Physical characterization and water performance of organic, inorganic substrates and their combinations

Authors

  • Yunier Sosa-Sánchez Colegio de Postgraduados image/svg+xml , Campus Montecillo Author
  • Juan Enrique Rubiños-Panta Colegio de Postgraduados image/svg+xml , Campus Montecillo Author
  • Cándido Mendoza-Pérez Colegio de Postgraduados image/svg+xml , Campus Montecillo Author
  • Roberto Ascencio-Hernández Colegio de Postgraduados image/svg+xml , Campus Montecillo Author
  • Julián Delgadillo-Martínez Colegio de Postgraduados image/svg+xml , Campus Montecillo Author
  • Abdul Khalil-Gardezi Colegio de Postgraduados image/svg+xml , Campus Montecillo Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v17i4.4117

Keywords:

coconut fiber, compost, granulometry, tezontle, total available water, total porosity

Abstract

The use of a suitable substrate is decisive for the success of protected agriculture. This study aimed to evaluate the physical properties of various substrates and determine which offer greater water efficiency for application in protected agricultural systems. The research was conducted in 2025 at the Soil Physics Laboratory of the College of Postgraduates, Montecillo Campus. Seven substrates were analyzed: tezontle, coconut fiber, bovine compost and their mixtures. Total porosity, aeration porosity, water retention porosity, bulk density, granulometry and water retention capacity were determined. Likewise, readily available water, reserve water and total available water were quantified. The results indicated that coconut fiber and its combinations exhibited the most favorable values for total porosity, water retention porosity and total available water, consistent with reports in the specialized literature. Tezontle showed the lowest water retention porosity (17.5%), whereas coconut fiber stood out for its high water retention capacity (58.7%) and low bulk density (0.06 Mg m-3). The mixtures presented a balanced granulometry, unlike the pure substrates, which showed an excess of fine particles. Total available water showed positive correlations with water retention porosity (r²= 0.91) and the fine fraction (r²= 0.75), and negative correlations with coarse particles (r²= -0.76) and aeration porosity (r²= -0.6). In general, the combinations with coconut fiber offered adequate physical conditions that promote efficient water management in soilless cultivation systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abad, M.; Fornes, F.; Carrión, C.; Noguera, V.; Noguera, P.; Maquieira, Á. and Puchades, R. 2005. Physical properties of various coconut coir dusts compared to peat. HortScience. 40(7):2138-2144. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.40.7.2138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.40.7.2138

Abad, M.; Martínez-Herrero, M. D.; Martínez-García, P. F. y Martínez-Corts, J. 1993. Evaluación agronómica de los sustratos de cultivo. Acta Horticulturae. 11:141-154. https://redivia.gva.es/handle/20.500.11939/8211.

Boudreault, S.; Caron, J.; Lamhamedi, M. S. and Pepin, S. 2023. Comparison of hydraulic and aeration properties of peat substrates used to produce containerized white spruce seedlings (1+0) in forest nurseries. Forests. 14(4):858. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f14040858

Bunt, A. C. 1988. Media and mixes for container-grown plants: a manual on the preparation and use of growing media for pot plants 2nd (Ed.). Unwin Hyman. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7904-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-7904-1

Cabrera, R. I. 1995. Fundamentals of container media management: Part I. Physical properties. Rutgers cooperative extension. Fact sheet No. FS812. New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA. 8 p. https://njaes.rutgers.edu/pubs/publication.php?pid=FS812.

Caron, J. and Michel, J. 2021. Understanding and optimizing the physical properties of growing media for soilless cultivation. In: Gruda, N. S. (Ed.), Advances in horticultural soilless culture. 107-137 pp. Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003048206-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003048206-6

De Boodt, M.; Verdonck, O. y Cappaert, I. 1974. Método para la medición de la curva de liberación de agua de sustratos orgánicos. Acta Horticulturae. 37:2054-2063. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1974.37.20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1974.37.20

De Jong van Lier, Q.; Abreu de Melo, M. L. and Alves, R. P. E. 2024. Stochastic analysis of plant available water estimates and soil hydraulic characteristics. Vadose Zone Journal. 23(3):e20306. https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20306

Durand, S.; Boivin, P. y Michel, J. 2025. Organización en fase sólida y propiedades de contracción de algunos componentes de medios de cultivo según el tamaño de partícula. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 89(6):e70159. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70159

Durand, S.; Jackson, B. E.; Fonteno, W. C. and Michel, J. C. 2023. Advances in substrate particle characterization using dynamic image analysis compared to sieving procedure for predicting water retention properties. Acta Horticulturae. 1377:537-544. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2023.1377.66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2023.1377.66

Feng, X.; Zou, P.; Wang, Q.; Wang, H.; Li, X. and Wang, J. 2026. Modeling moisture content and analyzing water infiltration in coconut coir substrate using RGB image recognition and machine learning. MDPI. 16(2):219. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16020219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16020219

Fields, J. S.; Owen, J. S. and Altland, J. E. 2020. Optimizing substrate available water and coir amendment rate n pine bark substrates. Water. 12(2):362. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020362

Flores-Sánchez, I. D.; Sandoval-Villa, M. and Trejo-Téllez, L. I. 2025. Basic proposal for evaluation of plant genetic resources to generate new crops. Frontiers in Plant Science. 16:1507521. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1507521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1507521

Gayosso‑Rodríguez, S.; Gutiérrez-Castorena, M. C.; Estrada-Botello, M. A. y Sánchez-Hernández, R. 2021. Características micromorfológicas de sustratos orgánicos y su relación con retención de agua y crecimiento radical. Agrociencia. 55(3):195-208. https://doi.org/10.47163/agrociencia.v55i3.2413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47163/agrociencia.v55i3.2413

Gomes, F. S.; Motta, M. F. B.; Bernardes, G. de P. and Soares, P. V. 2023. Influence of coconut fiber on the microstructural, mechanical and hydraulic behavior of unsaturated compacted soil. Soils and Rocks. 46(2):e2023013322. https://doi.org/10.28927/SR.2023.013322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28927/SR.2023.013322

Landis, T. D. 1990. Containers: types and functions. In: The container tree nursery manual. Landis, T. D.; Tinus, R. W.; McDonald, S. E. y Barnett, J. P. (eds.). Volume 2. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Washington, DC, USA. 41-85 pp. https://es.scribd.com/document/594534513/container-tree-nursery-manual-chap-2?utm.

Lazcano-Bello, M. I.; Sandoval-Castro, E.; Tornero-Campante, M. A.; Hernández Hernández, B. N.; Ocampo-Fletes, I. y Díaz-Ruíz, R. 2021. Evaluación de sustratos, solución nutritiva y enraizador en producción de plántulas de jitomate. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. 12(1):101-113. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v12i1.2450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v12i1.2450

Mixquititla-Casbis, G.; Villegas-Torres, O. G.; Andrade-Rodríguez, M. y Sotelo-Nava, H. 2022. Propiedades físicas y químicas de sustratos en función de su granulometría y componente orgánico-mineral. Acta Agrícola y Pecuaria. 8:e0081007. https://doi.org/10.30973/aap/2022.8.0081007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30973/aap/2022.8.0081007

Montoya-Jasso, V. M.; Ordaz-Chaparro, V. M.; Benedicto-Valdés, G. S.; Ruiz-Bello, A. y Arreola-Tostado, J. M. 2021. Caracterización química y física de sustratos enriquecidos con minerales y composta. Terra Latinoamericana. 39(1):15-27. https://doi.org/10.28940/terra.v39i1.1109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28940/terra.v39i0.601

Schafer, G. and Lerner, B. L. 2022. Physical and chemical characteristics and analysis of plant substrate. Ornamental Horticulture. 28(2):1-15. https://doi.org/10.1590/2447-536X.v28i2.2496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/2447-536x.v28i2.2496

Soto-Bravo, F. y Betancourt-Flores, A. 2022. Evaluación de metodologías para determinar las características físicas de un sustrato de fibra de coco. Agronomía Costarricense. 46(2):29-45. https://doi.org/10.15517/rac.v46i2.52044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/rac.v46i2.52044

Thiessen, M. E.; Fields, J. S. and Abdi, D. E. 2024. Physical properties and crop performance of four substrate fibers in greenhouse Petunia production. Horticulturae. 510(3):279. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10030279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae10030279

Velázquez-González, R. S.; García-García, A. L.; Ventura-Zapata, E.; Barceinas- Sánchez, J. D. O. y Sosa-Saavedra, J. C. 2022. Una revisión sobre la hidroponía y las tecnologías asociadas para operaciones de mediana y pequeña escala. Agriculture. 12(5):646. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12050646

Wright, H. C.; Wilkinson, S. W.; Morgan, C. W.; Rolfe, S. A.; Cameron, D. D. and Ryan, A. J. 2025. Polyurethane foam as a soilless growing media: demonstrating the importance of physical property optimization. Frontiers in Horticulture. 4:1646783. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhort.2025.1646783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fhort.2025.1646783

Zhao, R.; Sofkova- Bobcheva, S.; Cartmill, D. L.; Hardy, D. y Zernack, A. 2024. Evaluación comparativa de la piedra pómez como sustrato sin suelo para el cultivo en interiores de Rubus idaeus L. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science. 52(3):280-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2024.2358885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2024.2358885

Published

2026-07-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Sosa-Sánchez, Yunier, Juan Enrique Rubiños-Panta, Cándido Mendoza-Pérez, Roberto Ascencio-Hernández, Julián Delgadillo-Martínez, and Abdul Khalil-Gardezi. 2026. “Physical Characterization and Water Performance of Organic, Inorganic Substrates and Their Combinations”. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas 17 (4): e4117. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v17i4.4117.

Most read articles by the same author(s)