Productive diversity and fruit quality of peach and nectarine cultivars

Authors

  • Armando García-Ávila Colegio de Postgraduados image/svg+xml , Campus Montecillo Author
  • Guillermo Calderón-Zavala Colegio de Postgraduados image/svg+xml , Campus Montecillo Author
  • María de la Cruz Espíndola-Barquera Fundación Salvador Sánchez Colín-CICTAMEX, SC Author
  • Alfredo López-Jiménez Colegio de Postgraduados image/svg+xml , Campus Montecillo Author
  • Amalio Santacruz-Varela Colegio de Postgraduados image/svg+xml , Campus Montecillo Author
  • Irán Alia-Tejacal Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos image/svg+xml , Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v17i5.4103

Keywords:

Prunus persica, genetic improvement, yield

Abstract

From 2022 to 2023, 15 cultivars with low cold requirements were evaluated in Coatepec Harinas, State of Mexico, in order to select the most outstanding materials for their productive potential and fruit quality. Four-year-old trees were evaluated under forced production management, and growth, productivity and fruit quality were determined. Productive behavior in yield ranged from 3 to 23 kg tree-1, the period from flowering to fruit maturity lasted between 105 and 134 days, and fruit production efficiency ranged from 0.18 to 0.91 kg cm-2. The total soluble solids, content ranged from 11.6 to 19.7 °Brix, titratable acidity, from 0.5 to 0.97% malic acid and the TSS/TA ratio from 15.8 to 36.12. Fruit size ranged from 68 to 168 g, shaped from 64 to 255 and firmness from 1.2 to 4.4 kgF mm-1. ‘Oro de San Juan’ and ‘Cardenal’ presented the highest yields; in terms of fruit quality, most cultivars showed excellent attributes in size, shape, firmness and sweeter, more aromatic fruity flavor in white-fleshed fruits. ‘Cardenal’ presented the earliest fruit ripening, 28 days before ‘Diamante’. The introduction and production of the peach cultivars Oro de San Juan, Cardenal, and Robín are real alternatives to increase per-hectare yields and the crop’s profitability, as well as to improve per capita consumption with better fruit characteristics in the market.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anthony, B. M. and Minas, I. S. 2021. Optimizing peach tree canopy architecture for efficient light use, increased productivity, and improved fruit quality. Agronomy. 11(10):120.

AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis. International Association of Official Agricultural Chemist 16th. Maryland, USA. Vol. 2. 1114 p.

Bussi, C.; Genard, M. M. 2016. Thinning and pruning to overcome alternate bearing in peach trees. Eur. J. Hort. Sci. 79(6):313-317.

Famiani, F.; Battistelli, A.; Moscatello, S.; Cruz-Castillo, J. G. and Walker, R. P. 2015. The organic acids that are accumulated in the flesh of fruits: occurrence, metabolism and factors affecting their contents -a review. Revista Chapingo, Serie Horticultura. 21(2):97-128.

Fanwoua, B. J.; Bairam, E.; Delaire, M. and Buck-Sorlin, G. 2014. The role of branch architecture in the production and partitioning of assimilates: the example of the apple tree (Malus domestica). Frontiers of Plant Science. 5(338):1-6.

FAO. 2025. FAOSTAT Agriculture. Agricultural data-production: crops. http://faostat.fao.org.

García, A. A.; Espíndola, B. Ma. de la C. y Calderón, Z. G. 2018. Guía técnica para la producción de durazno. Toluca, Estado de México. 103 p.

Kader, A. A. and Mitchell, G. F. 1989. Maturity and quality. In: peaches, plum and nectarines. growing and handling for fresh market. LaRue, J. H. and Johnson, R. S. (Eds.). University of California-Davis. Davis, CA, USA. 191-196 pp.

Li, X.; Gao, P.; Zhang, Ch.; Xiao, X.; Chen, C. and Song, F. 2023. Aroma of peach fruit: a review on aroma volatile compounds and underlying regulatory mechanisms. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 58(10):4965-4979.

Ortiz, C., A.; Lara, I.; Graell, J.; López, M. L. and Echeverría, G. 2008. Sensory acceptance of peaches stored in AC. Relationship with instrumental quality parameters. Acta Hortic. 796(30):225-230.

Osborne, J. L.; Robinson, T. L. and Parra, Q. R. 2005. Chemical blossom thinning agents reduce crop load of ‘Rising Star’ peach in New York. Acta Hort. 727(51):423-428.

Qian, J.; Zhao, Y.; Shi, Y. and Chen, K. 2022. Transcriptome analysis of peach fruit treated with 1-MCP: information on the peach softening regulatory network. Food Quality and Safety. 17(6):1-11.

Raseira, M. C. B. y Franzón, R. C. 2021. Situación general de la cría de melocotón. Agrociencia Uruguay. NE1(25):1-10.

Rawandoozi, Z. J.; Hartmann, T. P.; Byrne, D. H. and Carpenedo, S. 2020. Heritability, correlation and genotype-environment interaction of phenological and fruit quality traits in peaches. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 146(1):56-67.

SAGARPA-SIAP. 2025. Producción agrícola por cultivo. Durazno. http//www.siap.gob.mx.

Sanches, A. G; Silva, M. D; Moreira, E. G. and Cordeiro, C. A. 2017. Starch sources and storage temperature in maintaining the post-harvest quality of red-fleshed pitaya. Colloq. Agrar. 2(13):41-54.

Veerappan, K.; Natarajan S.; Chung H. and Park, J. 2021. Molecular insights of fruit quality trainst in peaches, Prunus persica. Plants (Basel). 10(10):1-14.

Published

2026-08-21

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

García-Ávila, Armando, Guillermo Calderón-Zavala, María de la Cruz Espíndola-Barquera, Alfredo López-Jiménez, Amalio Santacruz-Varela, and Irán Alia-Tejacal. 2026. “Productive Diversity and Fruit Quality of Peach and Nectarine Cultivars”. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas 17 (5): e4103. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v17i5.4103.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2