Interest rate and default risk in Mexican rural financing

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v17i5.4141

Keywords:

borrower segmentation, credit exclusion, institutional filters, marginal effects, predicted probability

Abstract

The study aimed to analyze the structural factors that limit access to rural credit in Mexico to show how interest rates, climate risks, document formalization, and territorial location operate as institutional filters of financial exclusion. To this end, a binary logistic model was applied to a national database of 250 observations, compiled from administrative records and secondary data from 2023, including variables that identify exclusion patterns not attributable to the borrower’s productive performance. The model was statistically significant and had robust explanatory power for default on rural loans. The quantitative results show that the interest rate is the factor with the greatest impact: for each additional percentage point in the rate, the probability of default increases by 21.5 percentage points. A change in climate risk category, such as going from frost to pest raises this probability by 2.23%. In addition, each additional month in the term reduces risk by 2.01%, suggesting a differentiated allocation based on the solvency profile. These findings allow us to conclude that the interest rate does not reflect the producer’s productivity but rather the system’s structural fragility, acting as the main driver of exclusion and that, in the rural financing system, there is a rigid architecture that penalizes structural risk without offering adaptation mechanisms for vulnerable producers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amanullah, L. G. and Channa, S. 2020. Credit constraints and rural farmers’ welfare in an agrarian economy. Heliyon. 6(10):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05252.

Armendáriz, B. and Morduch, J. 2010. The economics of microfinance. 2nd. Edition. MIT Press. 67-1356 pp.

Assairh, L.; Kaicer, M. and Jerry, M. 2021. Credit risk assessment in microfinance institutions through scoring: Moroccan case. International Journal of Accounting, Finance, Auditing, Management and Economics. 2(5):667-679. https://www.ijafame.org/index.php/home/article/view/191.

Beck, T.; Demirgüç, K., A. and Martínez, P. M. S. 2009. Banking services for everyone? Barriers to bank access and use around the world. The World Bank Economic Review. 22(3):397-430. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhn020.

Cassimon, D.; Engelen, P. J.; Reyntjens, S. and Van Campenhout, B. 2022. Determinants of and barriers to people’s financial inclusion in Mexico. OECD Economics Department Working Papers. OECD Publishing, Paris. No. 1728. 5-30 pp. https://doi.org/10.1787/73e9341b-en.

CNBV. 2025. Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores. Portafolio de información. Gobierno de México. https://portafolioinfo.cnbv.gob.mx/Paginas/Inicio.aspx.

De la Vega-Mena, M.; Santoyo-Cortés, V. H.; Muñoz-Rodríguez, M. y Altamirano-Cárdenas, J. R. 2014. Cobertura financiera de la banca de desarrollo para el sector rural de México. FIRA-Financiera Rural. Estudios Sociales. 22(44):137-164. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/estsoc/v22n44/v22n44a9.pdf.

Del Ángel-Mobarak, G. 2003. El Estado y los servicios financieros al medio rural. Análisis a través del caso Fideicomisos Instituidos en Relación con la Agricultura. Revista Estudios Agrarios. 17(46):75-109. https://biblat.unam.mx/es/revista/estudios-agrarios/6.

De-Olloqui, F. y Fernández-Díez, M. C. 2017. Financiamiento del sector agroalimentario y desarrollo rural. Documento para discusión No. IDB-DP-512. Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/spanish/document/Financiamiento-del-sector-agroalimentario-y-desarrollo-rural.pdf.

FAO. 2020. Food and Agriculture Organization. Mejores prácticas del financiamiento agrícola. Rural finance and investment learning centre. https://www.rfilc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/1126195018429-better-practices-in-agricultural-lending--es.pd.

FIRA. 2025a. Fideicomisos instituidos en relación con la agricultura. FIRA en cifras. https://www.fira.gob.mx/nd/firaencifras.jsp.

FIRA. 2025b. Fideicomisos instituidos en relación con la agricultura buscador de riesgos mínimos. https://www.fira.gob.mx/Nd/BuscadorRiesgoMinimo.jsp.

Franjo, L.; Pouokam, N. and Turino, F. 2022. Financial frictions and firm informality: A general equilibrium perspective. The Economic Journal 132(645):1790-1823. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueac010.

IMF. 2022. International Monetary Fund Mexico: financial sector assessment program- financial system stability assessment. IMF Country Report No. 2022/335. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400223686.002.

Khan, F. U.; Nouman, M.; Negrut, L.; Abban, J.; Cismas, L. M. and Siddiqi, M. F. 2024. Constraints to agricultural finance in underdeveloped and developing countries: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability. 22(1):1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2024.2329388.

Korkulu, A. and Akan, Y. 2024. Determining factors affecting agricultural credit demand: A research in Erzurum province, Türkiye. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 30(4):712-724. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1439139.

Ledgerwood, J.; Earne, J. and Nelson, C. 2013. The new micro-finance handbook: A financial market system perspective. Washington, DC. World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-9750-5.

Madero-Salmerón, B. L. y Núñez-Mora, J. A. 2025. Estimación de la tasa objetivo a través de un modelo econométrico empírico y su aplicación para estimar la curva de la tasa de interés. Panorama Económico. 17(35):45-68. https://doi.org/10.29201/peipn.v17i35.92.

Meki, M. and Quinn, S. 2024. Microfinance: an overview. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 40(1):1-35. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grad030.

Menard, S. 2000. Coefficients of determination for multiple logistic regression analysis. The American Statistician, 54(1):17-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2000.10474502.

Muñoz-Rodríguez, R. M.; Santoyo-Cortés, V. H. y Altamirano-Cárdenas, J. R. 2002. Mercados e instituciones financieras rurales: una nueva arquitectura financiera rural para México. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo (UACH). CIESTAAM. https://repositorio.chapingo.edu.mx/bitstreams/99ec5360-1331-4f89-9104-677687725df7/download.

Nyebar, A.; Obalade, A. A. and Muzindutsi, P. F. 2023. Effectiveness of credit risks management policies used by Ghanaian commercial banks in agricultural financing. In financial sector development in Ghana: exploring bank stability, financing models, and development challenges for sustainable financial markets Cham. Springer International Publishing. 231-264 pp.

WB. 2021. World Bank. Expanding financial access for Mexico’s poor and supporting economic sustainability. Results Brief. https://www.worldbank.org/en/results/2021/04/09/expanding-financial-access-for-mexico-s-poor-and-supporting-economic-sustainability.

Yin, Z.; Meng, L. and Sha, Y. 2020. Determinants of agriculture-related loan default: Evidence from China. Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, 23(0):5-27. https://doi.org/10.21098/bemp.v23i0.1160.

Yu, L.; Song, Y.; Wu, H. and Shi, H. 2023. Credit constraint, interlinked insurance and credit contract and farmers’ adoption of innovative seeds-field experiment of the loess plateau. Land MDPI. 12(2):1-28. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020357.

Published

2026-09-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ponce-Gutiérrez, Blanca Estela, Roberto Ruiz-Pérez, Araceli González-Juárez, and Rodolfo Valenzuela-Reynaga. 2026. “Interest Rate and Default Risk in Mexican Rural Financing”. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas 17 (5): e4141. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v17i5.4141.

Most read articles by the same author(s)