Analysis of the efficiency and returns to scale of sugar mills in Mexico
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v13i1.2639Keywords:
data envelopment analysis, economies of scale, stochastic frontier analysis, total factor productivityAbstract
In Mexico, the sugarcane agroindustry is important in the economy of 25 states and 267 municipalities. In the 1995-1996 harvest, 61 sugar mills operated and in the 2017-2018 harvest only 51 mills. In a 19-year period, 16.4% of the milling infrastructure of the Mexican sugarcane agroindustry closed. Technically, there are inefficiencies in their parameters that influenced their closure. The present research aims to analyze the efficiency and nature of the returns to scale with which sugar mills operated in Mexico in the 2010-2011 harvest. The methodology used was data envelopment analysis (DEA). The results indicate that 23 mills operated at their optimal scale, nine mills with total efficiency, but with pure inefficiency and scale inefficiency, and a third group operated with total inefficiency, pure inefficiency and scale inefficiency. As for the nature of the returns to scale, the DEA identified that 23 mills operated with constant returns to scale, 29 with increasing returns to scale and only two mills with diminishing returns to scale. The main conclusion indicates that the 29 mills with increasing returns to scale can improve their performance if they expand their size, production and factor productivity would increase more than proportionally. The mill Panuco is the only one that was identified with both scale inefficiency and diminishing returns to scale, so such performance could lead it to stop operating and close as a plant.
Downloads
References
Becerril, T. O. U.; Rodríguez, L. G y Ramírez, H. J. J. 2011. Eficiencia técnica del sector agropecuario de México: una perspectiva de análisis envolvente de datos. Economía. 34(31):85-110. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=195621325004.
Belmonte, U. L. J. y Plaza, Ú. J. A. 2008. Análisis de la eficiencia en las cooperativas de crédito en España. Una propuesta metodológica basada en el análisis envolvente de datos (DEA). Rev. Econ. Púb. Soc. Coop. 22(63):113-133. https://ojs.uv.es/index.php/ciriecespana/ index.
CEMA. 2017. Compañía Editora del Manual Azucarero Mexicano. Manual azucarero mexicano. (Ed.) Cía. Editora del Manual Azucarero, SA de CV Ciudad de México, México. 487 p.
Campos, O. F. y Oviedo, P. M. 2015. Extensión de los predios agrícolas y productividad. El caso del campo cañero en México. El Trimestre Económico. 80(325):147-181.
Charnes, A.; Cooper, W. W.; Lewin, A. Y. and Seiford, L. M. 1994. Data envelopment analysis. Theory, methodology, and application. Springer Science+Business Media LLC. New York, NY. 507 p.
Charnes, A.; Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes, E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2(6):429-444. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.
Coelli, T. 1996. A guide to DEAP. Version 2.1: a data envelopment analysis (computer) program. Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. University of New England, Australia. http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/~econ380/DEAP.PDF.
Coelli, T. J.; Prasada, R, D. S. P.; O’Donnell, C. J. and Battese, G. E. 2005. An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. 2th (Ed.). Springer: New York, NY, USA. 341 p.
Coelli, T. J.; Prasada, R. D. S. and Battese, G. E. 1998. An Introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Kluwer Academic Publisher. Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 341 p.
CONADESUCA. 2017. Comité Nacional para el Desarrollo sustentable de la caña de azúcar. Informe estadístico del sector agroindustrial de la caña de azúcar en México Zafras 2006-2007/2015-2016. Ciudad de México, México. https://www.gob.mx/conadesuca/articulos/ informe-estadistico-del-sector-agroindustrial-de-la-cana-de-azucar-en-mexico-zafras-2006-2007-2015-2016?idiom=es.
CONADESUCA. 2018. Comité Nacional para el Desarrollo Sustentable de la Caña de Azúcar. Quinto informe estadístico del sector agroindustrial de la caña de azúcar en México Zafras 2008-2009/2017-2018. Ciudad de México, México. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/ attachment/file/392732/Nacional-y-Entidad-Federativa.pdf.
CONADESUCA. 2019. Comité Nacional para el Desarrollo Sustentable de la Caña de Azúcar. 6° Informe estadístico del sector agroindustrial de la caña de azúcar en México. Zafras 2009-2010/2018-2019. Ciudad de México, México. https://www.gob.mx/conadesuca/es/ articulos/6-informe-estadistico-del-sector-agroindustrial-de-la-cana-de-azucar-en-mexico?idiom=es. Zafras 2009-2010 / 2018-2019.
FIRA. 2016. Fideicomisos Instituidos en Relación a la Agricultura. Panorama agroalimentario. Azúcar 2015. Morelia, Michoacán, México. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/ file/61947/Panorama-Agroalimentario-Az-car-2015.pdf.
Fontalvo, H. T. J. y De la Hoz, H. G. 2016. Eficiencia de los hospitales de Bolívar, Colombia, por medio análisis envolvente de datos. Dimensión Empresarial. 14(1):95-108.
Huguenin, J. M. 2012. Data envelopment analysis (DEA). A pedagogical guide for decision makers in the public sector. Institut de Hautes Études en Administration Publique (IHEAP). Laussane, Swiis. https://serval.unil.ch/en/notice/serval:BIB-0FC432348A97.
Jaforullah, M. and Whiteman, J. 1999. Scale efficiency in the New Zealand dairy industry: a non-parametric approach. The Australian J. Agric. Res. Econ. 43(4):523-541. Doi:10.1111/ 1467-8489.00093.
Molina, E. I. 2019. Iniciativa que reforma diversas disposiciones de la ley de desarrollo sustentable de la caña de azúcar. Sistema de Información Legislativa. Secretaría de Gobernación. http://si1.gobernacion.gob.mx/portal.
Perdomo, J. A. y Mendieta, J. C. 2007. Factores que afectan la eficiencia técnica y asignativa en el sector cafetero colombiano: una aplicación con análisis envolvente de datos. Desarrollo y Sociedad. 2(60):1-46.
Pérez, Z. A. 2007. Tenencia de la tierra e industria azucarera. (Ed.) Porrúa. México, DF. 226 p.
Quintanilha, da S. J.; Baptista, J. C. C. y Angulo, M. L. 2012. Evaluación de la eficiencia de las compañías aéreas brasileñas a través de un modelo híbrido de análisis envolvente de datos (DEA) y programación lineal multiobjetivo. Ingeniare. Rev. Chilena de Ingeniería. 20(3):331-342.
SAGARPA. 2005. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural Pesca y alimentación. Ley de desarrollo sustentable de la caña de azúcar. Diario Oficial de la Federación (DOF) del 22 de agosto de 2005. DF, México.
SAGARPA-CONADESUCA. 2014. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación-Comité Nacional para el Desarrollo Sustentable de la Caña de Azúcar. Programa Nacional de la Agroindustria de la Caña de Azúcar (PRONAC). Diario Oficial de la Federación (DOF) del 2 de mayo de 2014. DF, México.
Sen, A. K. 1962. An aspect of Indian agriculture. Economic & Political Weekly. 14(4-6):243-245.
SIAP. 2019. Servicio de Información Agroindustrial y Pesquera. Anuario estadístico de la producción agrícola. Producción agrícola. Año 2019. Ciudad de México, México. https://nube.siap.gob.mx/cierreagricola/.
Tetteh, A. B.; Backman, S. and Rezitis, A. 2016. Does farm size matter? Investigating scale efficiency of peasant rice farmers in northern Ghana. Economics Bulletin. 36(4):2275-2290.
UNC-CNPR. 2017. Unión Nacional de Cañeros-Confederación Nacional de Propietarios Rurales. Estadisticas de la Agroindustria de Caña de Azúcar. 2005-2006/2015-2016. DF, Méxo.
Zhu, J. 2013. Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking. Data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets. Springer. New York. 420 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas accept the following conditions:
In accordance with copyright laws, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas recognizes and respects the authors’ moral right and ownership of property rights which will be transferred to the journal for dissemination in open access. Invariably, all the authors have to sign a letter of transfer of property rights and of originality of the article to Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP) [National Institute of Forestry, Agricultural and Livestock Research]. The author(s) must pay a fee for the reception of articles before proceeding to editorial review.
All the texts published by Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas —with no exception— are distributed under a Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which allows third parties to use the publication as long as the work’s authorship and its first publication in this journal are mentioned.
The author(s) can enter into independent and additional contractual agreements for the nonexclusive distribution of the version of the article published in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas (for example include it into an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it is clearly and explicitly indicated that the work was published for the first time in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas.
For all the above, the authors shall send the Letter-transfer of Property Rights for the first publication duly filled in and signed by the author(s). This form must be sent as a PDF file to: revista_atm@yahoo.com.mx; cienciasagricola@inifap.gob.mx; remexca2017@gmail.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International license.