Crop alternaves for forage producon in southern Sonora

Authors

  • Gilberto Rodríguez-Perez Tecnológico Nacional de México-Valle del Yaqui. Av. Tecnológico, Block 611, Valle del Yaqui, Sonora. CP. 85276. Tel. 644 4082476
  • Miguel Angel Avila-Perches Campo Experimental Bajío-INIFAP. Carretera Celaya-San Miguel de Allende km 6.5, Celaya, Guanajuato. CP. 38110
  • María Isela Flores-Reyes Tecnológico Nacional de México-Roque. Carretera Juventino Rosas-Celaya km 8, Celaya, Guanajuato. CP. 38110
  • Netzahualcóyotl Mayek-Pérez Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas. Matamoros S/N, Zona Centro, Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas. CP. 87000
  • Martín Quintana-Camargo Centro Nacional de Recursos Genéticos-INIFAP. Blvd. de la Biodiversidad # 400, Rancho las Cruces, Tepatitlán de Morelos, Jalisco. CP. 47610
  • Alfredo Josué Gámez-Vázquez Campo Experimental Bajío-INIFAP. Carretera Celaya-San Miguel de Allende km 6.5, Celaya, Guanajuato. CP. 38110

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v16i8.3886

Keywords:

corn, oats, triticale

Abstract

In southern Sonora, Mexico, the nutritional value of forage for herbivores has not been established for a long time, whereas technological options have diversified; therefore, there is a need to evaluate annual crops as an option for forage production in order to integrate them into the agrifood chain. This research aimed to evaluate the forage production and chemical properties of different annual species in the semiarid conditions of southern Sonora. Nine elite spring-habit triticale lines, five varieties of oats, and two varieties of colored corn -yellow and purple- were evaluated in the field and laboratory in the autumn-winter cycle of 2023-2024. The agronomic variables were green forage (GF), dry forage (DF), and plant height (PH), as well as their chemical properties. The results showed statistical differences between species for forage variables, where corn showed higher production of green (GF) and dry (DF) forage, whereas the triticale lines TCL3, TCL7, and TCL9 clustered as a second option in GF and DF production; for their part, the TCL5, TCL2 and TCL4 lines provided better chemical properties, followed by the corn varieties, experimental oats 3, and the Turquesa oat variety.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Billman, E. D.; Souza, I. A.; Smith, R. G.; Soder, K. J.; Warren, N.; Teixeira F. A. and Brito A. F. 2021. Winter annual forage mass-nutritive value trade-offs are affected by harvest timing. Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management. 7(e20113):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20113.

Fraś, A.; Gołębiewska, K.; Gołębiewski, D.; Mańkowski, D. R.; Boros, D. and Szecówka, P. 2016. Variability in the chemical composition of triticale grain, flour and bread. Journal of Cereal Sience. 71:66-72.

French, K. E. 2017. Species composition determines forage quality and medicinal value of high diversity grasslands in lowland England. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment. 241:193-204. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.03.012.

García, E. 2004. Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). 97 p.

Hanoglu, O. H. 2024. Forage yields and nutritive values of oat and triticale pastures for grazing sheep in early spring. Peer Journal. 12:e17840. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.17840.

Lauzon, J.; Tremblay, G. F.; Bélanger, G.; Seguin, P.; Lajeunesse, J. and Gervais, R. 2019. Alfalfa and timothy nutritive value in contrasting agroclimatic regions. Agronomy Journal. 111(3):1371-1380.

Lee, M. A.; Davis, A. P.; Chagunda, M. G. G. and Manning, P. 2017. Forage quality declines with rising temperatures, with implications for livestock production and methane emissions. Biogeosciences. 14:1403-1417. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1403-2017.

Lemaire, G.; Sinclair, T.; Sadras, V. and Bélanger, G. 2019. Allometric approach to crop nutrition and implications for crop diagnosis and phenotyping. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 39:27-43.

López-Jara, A. G.; Reta-Sánchez, D. G.; Santana, O. I.; Reyes-González, A.; Rodríguez-Hernández, K.; Granados-Niño, J. A.; López-Calderón, M. J. y Sánchez-Duarte, J. I. 2025. Rendimiento de forraje y valor nutritivo del ensilado de forrajes alternativos y tradicionales de otoño-invierno. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 16(1):208-223.

Mancipe, M. E. A.; Vásquez, V. J. E.; Castillo, S. J.; Ortiz, C. R. E.; Avellaneda, A. Y. y Vargas, M. J. D. J. 2021. Productividad y valor nutricional de forraje de cebada y trigo del trópico alto colombiano. Agronomía Mesoamericana. 32(1):271-292.

Reta, S. D. G.; Sánchez, D. J. I.; Ochoa, M. E.; González, C. A. I.; Reyes, A. G. y Rodríguez, H. K. 2023. Rendimiento y valor nutritivo de brásicas forrajeras en comparación con forrajes tradicionales. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 14(1):237-247.

Riasat, M.; Kiaani, S.; Saed-Mouchehsi, A. and Pessarakli, M. 2019. Oxidant related biochemical traits are significant indices in triticale grain yield under drought stress condition. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 42(2):111-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2018.1549675.

SAS Institute. 2016. User’s Guide of SAS. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, North Carolina, USA. 550 p.

Shenk, J. S. and Westerhaus, M. O. 1995. The application of near Infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) to forage analysis. In: forage quality, evaluation, and utilization. Ed. Fahey, G. C. Madison, USA. 406-449 pp.

SIAP. 2023. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. Anuario estadístico de la producción agrícola. Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. Ciudad de México. https://nube.siap.gob.mx/cierreagricola/.

Soest, V. P. J. 1970. The chemical basis for nutritive evaluation of forages. Proc. Nat. Conf. On forage quality evaluation and utilization. Lincoln, Nebraska, USA. 78 p.

Thapa, R.; Poffenbarger, H.; Tully, K. L.; Ackroyd, V. J.; Kramer, M. and Mirsky, S. B. 2018. Biomass production and nitrogen accumulation by hairy vetch cereal rye mixtures: a meta-analysis. Agronomy Journal. 110(4):1197-1208. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2017.09.0544.

Velasco, L. J. L.; Soto, O. R.; Ail, C. C. E.; Grimaldo, J. O.; Avilés, M. S. M. y Lozano-Río, A. J. 2020. Rendimiento de biomasa y grano en variedades de triticale en el Valle de Mexicali. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. 11(5):1097-1109.

Wood, S.; Seguin, P.; Tremblay, G. F.; Bélanger, G.; Lajeunesse, J.; Martel, H.; Berthiaume, R. and Claessens, A. 2018. Validation of predictive equations of pre-harvest forage nutritive value for alfalfa grass mixtures. Agronomy Journal. 110(3):950-960.

Zhu, F. 2018. Triticale: nutritional composition and food uses. Food Chemistry. 241:468-479.

Published

2025-12-07

How to Cite

Rodríguez-Perez, Gilberto, Miguel Angel Avila-Perches, María Isela Flores-Reyes, Netzahualcóyotl Mayek-Pérez, Martín Quintana-Camargo, and Alfredo Josué Gámez-Vázquez. 2025. “Crop alternaves for Forage producon in Southern Sonora”. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas 16 (8). México, ME:e3886. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v16i8.3886.

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)