Nutrient composition and productivity of alternative autumn-winter forages in different sowing dates in northern Mexico

Authors

  • Anabel Guadalupe López-Jara Juarez University of the State of Durango-Faculty of Agriculture and Zootechnics. Highway Gómez Palacio-Tlahualilo km 32, ejido Venecia, Gómez Palacio, Durango. ZC. 35000
  • David Guadalupe Reta-Sánchez Experimental Field Delicias-INIFAP. Highway Delicias-Rosales km 2, Downtown, City Delicias, Chihuahua, Mexico. ZC. 33000
  • Arturo Reyes-González Experimental Field La Laguna-INIFAP. Blv. Jose Santos Valdez, num. 1200 Pte. Matamoros, Coahuila, Mexico. ZC. 27440
  • Omar Iván Santana Experimental Field Pavellón-INIFAP. Highway Aguascalientes-Zacatecas km 32.5, Pavellón of Arteaga, Aguascalientes, Mexico. ZC. 20660
  • Magali Jeaneth López-Calderón Juarez University of the State of Durango-Faculty of Agriculture and Zootechnics. Highway Gómez Palacio-Tlahualilo km 32, ejido Venecia, Gómez Palacio, Durango. ZC. 35000
  • Juan Isidro Sánchez-Duarte Experimental Field La Laguna-INIFAP. Blv. Jose Santos Valdez, num. 1200 Pte. Matamoros, Coahuila, Mexico. ZC. 27440

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v13i28.3268

Keywords:

canola (Brassica napus L.), nutrients, forage, safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the nutrient composition and productivity of alternative forages on different sowing dates. The alternative forages were canola and safflower, and the traditional ones were barley and triticale. The four sowing dates were: November 16, December 7, December 28 and January 18, for two years. When compared with barley and triticale, canola and safflower had lower neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and higher crude protein (CP), but similar net energy for lactation (NEL). The sowing date had little impact on the nutrient composition of these forages, but the nutrient yield was significantly affected. Dry matter (DM), CP and NEL yields decreased by delaying the sowing date in all species. Canola, safflower and barley had the highest nutrient yields on November 16 and December 7, while in triticale, they occurred between November 16 and December 28. Barley and triticale produced the highest yields of DM and NEL on all sowing dates; both species showed the highest NDF yield on the first three sowing dates during the two years. In conclusion, early sowing improves the nutrient composition and productivity in canola and safflower, therefore, these crops represent a good option as an alternative forage sown in late November or early December in northern Mexico.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Begna, S. H. and Angadi, S. V. 2016. Effects of planting date on winter canola growth and yield in the Southwestern USA. J. Plant Sci. 1(7):201-217. Doi: 10.4236/ajps.2016.71021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2016.71021

CONAGUA. 2019. Comisión Nacional del Agua. Estadísticas del agua en México. Gobierno de México. 17-55 pp. http://sina.conagua.gob.mx/sina/index.php?publicaciones.

Geoering, H. K. and Van Soest, P. J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications. Agric. Handbook 379.ARS. USDA. Washington DC. 8-9.

Gol, L.; Tomé, F. and Von, K. M. 2017. Floral transitions in wheat and barley: interactions between photoperiod, abiotic stresses, and nutrient status. J. Exp. Bot. 7(68):1399-1410. doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx055. Li, X. 2021. Plant cell wall chemistry: implications for ruminant’s utilisation. J. Appl. Anim. Nutr. 9(1):31-56. https://doi.org/10.3920/JAAN2020.0017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx055

Mirosavljević, M.; Momčilović, V.; Novo, P.; Maksimović, I. and Putnik-D, M. 2018. Dry matter accumulation of winter wheat and barley at different sowing dates. Rat. I Povrta. 2(55):87-94.

Munyon, J. W.; Bheemanahalli, R.; Hunt, W. C. and Raja, R. K. 2020. Developing functional relationships between temperature and cover crop species vegetative growth and development. Agron. J. 2(113):1333-1348. doi:10.1002/agj2.20537.

Nurunnaher, A. and Islam, M. R. 2017. Heat stress effects and management in wheat. A review. Agron. Sust. Dev. 5(37):1-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0443-9

Reta, S. D. G.; Quiroga, G. H. M. y Serrato, C. J. S. 2015. Patrones de cultivos forrajeros alternativos con mejor adaptación al cambio climático en la Comarca Lagunera. Desplegable para productores núm. 20. 2 p. INIFAP-CIRNOC-CELALA.

Reta, S. D. G.; Sánchez, D. J. I.; Torres, H. D.; Reyes, G. A. y Ochoa, M. E. 2017a. El cártamo forrajero como alternativa para siembras tardías en otoño-invierno. Desplegable para productores núm. 26. 2 p. INIFAP-CIRNOC-CELALA.

Reta, S. D. G.; Serrato, C. J. S.; Figueroa, V. R.; Cueto, W. J. A.; Berumen, P. S. y Santamaría, C. J. 2008. Cultivos alternativos con potencial de uso forrajero en la Comarca Lagunera. Libro técnico núm. 3. 268 p. INIFAP-CIRNOC-CELALA.

Reta, S. D. G.; Serrato, C. J. S.; Quiroga, G. H. M.; Gaytán, M. G. y Figueroa, V. U. 2017b. Secuencia de cultivo alternativas para incrementar el potencial forrajero y productividad del agua. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Pec. 4(8):397-406. https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v8i4.4645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v8i4.4645

Reta, S. D. G.; Serrato, C. J. S.; Quiroga, G. H. M.; Figueroa, V. U. y Gaytán, M. A. 2017. Potencial forrajero de cultivares de canola primaverales e invernales en la Comarca Lagunera, México. Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 2(40):227-233. https://doi.org/10.35196/rfm.2017.2.227-233.

Robertson, M. J.; Asseng, S.; Kirkegaard, J. A.; Wratten, N.; Holland, J. F.; Watkinson, A. R; Potter, T. D.; Burton, W. A.; Walton, G. H. and Moot, D. J. I. 2002. Environmental and genotypic control of time to flowering in canola and Indian mustard. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 53(7):793-809. doi.org/10.1071/AR01182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/AR01182

Roohi, E.; Tahmasebi, S. Z.; Modarres, S. S. A. M. and Siosemardeh, A. 2013. Comparative study on the effect of soil water stress on photosynthetic function of triticale, bread wheat, and barley. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2(15):215-228.

Sánchez, M. H.; Reta, S. D. G.; Serrato, C. J. S.; Figueroa, V. U.; Cueto, W. J. A. y Castellanos, P. E. 2018. Efecto de la fecha de siembra sobre el potencial forrajero de cultivares primaverales de canola en la comarca lagunera, México. ITEA. 3(114):223-242.

Santamaría, J. C.; Reta, S. D. G.; Chávez, G. J. F.; Cueto, W. J. A. y Romero, P. R. J. I. 2006. Caracterización del medio físico con relación a cultivos forrajeros alternativos para la comarca lagunera. Libro técnico núm. 2. 240 p. INIFAP-CIRNOC-CELALA.

Santiago, R. B.; Costa, A. V.; Lemaire, G.; Borges, R. de M.; Saibro, J. C.; Nabinger, C.; Villamil, F. B. and Justin, I. C. 2012. Forage yield and nitrogen nutrition dynamics of warm-season native forage genotypes under two shading levels and in full sunlight. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 7(41):1589-1597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000700006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000700006

Schwarte, A. J.; Gibson, L. R.; Karlen, D. L.; Liebman, M. and Jannink, J. L. 2005. Planting date effects on winter triticale dry matter and nitrogen accumulation. Agron. J. 5(97):1333-1341. Doi:10.2134/agronj2005.0010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0010

Talji, D. T. 2015. Effect of planting date on yield performance and some agronomical traits in safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.) under rainfed and irrigation conditions in Jordan. Adv. Environ. Biol. 9(24):367-370.

Torabi, B.; Adibnya, M.; Rahimi, A. and Azari, A. 2020. Modeling flowering response to temperature and photoperiod in safflower. Ind. Crops Prod. 1(151):112474. Doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112474.

Wiedenhoeft, M. H. and Barton, B. A. 1994. Management and environment effects on brassica forage quality. Agron. J. 2(86):227-232. doi:10.2134/agronj1994.0002196200860002 0003x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600020003x

Published

2022-09-22

How to Cite

López-Jara, Anabel Guadalupe, David Guadalupe Reta-Sánchez, Arturo Reyes-González, Omar Iván Santana, Magali Jeaneth López-Calderón, and Juan Isidro Sánchez-Duarte. 2022. “Nutrient Composition and Productivity of Alternative Autumn-Winter Forages in Different Sowing Dates in Northern Mexico”. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas 13 (28). México, ME:125-35. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v13i28.3268.

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)