Characterization of rural extension workers in Mexico a contribution from the correspondence analysis

Authors

  • Victor Manuel Santos Chávez Colegio de Postgraduados-Campus Montecillo. Carretera México-Texcoco km 36.5, Montecillo, Texcoco, Estado de México. CP. 56230 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4803-8756
  • María de Jesús Santiago Cruz Colegio de Postgraduados-Campus Montecillo. Carretera México-Texcoco km 36.5, Montecillo, Texcoco, Estado de México. CP. 56230 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3346-8094
  • Miguel Ángel Martínez Damián Colegio de Postgraduados-Campus Montecillo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1215-7406
  • Vinicio Horacio Santoyo Cortés Universidad Autónoma Chapingo-Centro de Investigaciones Económicas, Sociales y Tecnológicas de la Agroindustria y la Agricultura Mundial. Carretera México-Texcoco km 38.5, Chapingo, Texcoco, Estado de México. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0400-1724
  • Adolfo Guadalupe Álvarez Macías Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco-Departamento de Producción Agrícola y Animal. Calzada del Hueso núm. 1100, Col. Villa Quietud, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8650-0641

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v12i8.2893

Keywords:

agricultural training, rural development, rural education, rural typologies

Abstract

Rural innovation remains a crucial element to solve problems of low productivity in agriculture and rural poverty, rural extension constitutes an instrument of agricultural policy that promotes innovation through its extension workers. In order to characterize the profile of these actors, a typology was made based on their professional attributes and the problems they face. The survey of extension workers of the monitoring and evaluation system of the rural extension policy 2016-2017 was used, it collected information in ten states of the republic and its sample size was 609 questionnaires. The methodology used multivariate statistical procedures, at first, the correspondence analysis estimated principal dimensions, later clusters were constructed to define the typology. Three strata were detected, which grouped the predominant problem and area of the professional studies, this allows a better understanding of the characteristics of the extension workers and establish strategies for solving problems in the extension policy focused on the knowledge of the capacities and conditions of one of its main actors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdi, H. and Williams, L. 2010. Principal component analysis. Wires computational statistics. 2(4):433-459. Doi:10.1002/wics.101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wics.101

Aguilar-Gallegos, N.; Muñoz-Rodríguez, M.; Santoyo-Cortés, H.; Aguilar-Ávila, J. and Klerkx, L. 2015. Information networks that generate economic value: A study on clusters of adopters of new or improved technologies and practices among oil palm growers in Mexico. Agric. Systems. 135(2015):122-132. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.01.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.01.003

Ardila, J. 2010. Extensión rural para el desarrollo de la agricultura y la seguridad alimentaria: aspectos conceptuales, situación y visión de futuro. Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (IIICA). Costa Rica. 128 p.

Bartlett, A. 2010. An introduction to real-world extension. Rural Development News. 1:7-14.

Bouyer, F.; Hamadou, S.; Adakal, H.; Lancelot, R.; Stachurski, F.; Belem, A. and Bouyer, J. 2011. Restricted application of insecticides: a promising tsetse control technique, but what do the farmers think of it? Plos Negl. Trop. Dis. 5(8):e1276. Doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0001276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0001276

Christoplos, I. 2010. Cómo movilizar el potencial de la extensión agraria y rural. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación (FAO). Italia. 68 p.

Cook, B.; Satizábal, P. and Curnow, J. 2021. Humanizing agricultural extension: A Review. World Development. 140:1-19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105337.

Fantappiè, M.; Lorenzetti, R.; De Meo, I. and Constantini, E. 2020. How to improve the adoption of soil conservation practices? Suggestions from farmers ‘perception in western Sicily. J. Rural Studies. 73:186-202. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.00.

Greenacre, M. 2007. Correspondence analysis in practice. Chapman & Hall/CRC. Taylor & Francis groupo. Second (Ed.). United States of America. 274 p.

Lahai, B.; Goldey, P. and Jones, G. 1999. The gender of the extension agent and farmer’acces to and participation in agricultural extension in nigeria. The J. Agric. Ed. Ext. 6(4):223-233. Doi: 10.1080/13892240085300051. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13892240085300051

Lamontagne-Godwin, J.; Williams, F.; Bandara, W. and Appiah-Kubi, Z. 2017. Quality of extension advice: a gender case study from Ghana and Sri Lanka. The J. Agric. Ed. Ext. 23(1):7-22. Doi: 10.1080/1389224X.2016.1230069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2016.1230069

Landini, F. 2016. Problemas de la extensión rural en América Latina. Perfiles Latinoam. 24(47):47-68. Doi: 10.18504/pl2447-005-2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18504/pl2447-005-2016

Qamar, K. 2011. Introducing demand-driven extension approach in a traditional region: a case study fromm Pakistan. Office of knowledge exchange, research and extension. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy. 106 p.

Rogers, E. 2003. Diffusion of innovations. The free press. United States of America. 526 p.

Santos, V.; Álvarez, A. y Francisco, C. 2019. Problemas del extensionismo rural en México. Rev. Geog. Agríc. 62:139-168. doi:dx.doi.org/10.5154/r.rga.2018.62.07.

Santoyo-Cortés, H.; Muñoz-Rodríguez, M.; Aguilar-Ávila, J. y Martínez-González, G. 2016. Extensionismo para la innovación basado en evidencias. In: Martínez-Carrera, D. y Ramírez-Juárez, J. (Ed.). Ciencia tecnología e innovación en el sistema agroalimentario de México. Biblioteca básica de agricultura. Editorial del Colegio de Postgraduados. México, DF. 333-360 pp.

SAGARPA, FAO. 2018. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación y Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura (FAO). 100 p.

SAGARPA, FAO. 2018b. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación y Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura (FAO). 87 p.

Sewell, A.; Hartnett, M.; Gray, D.; Blair, H.; Kemp, P.; Kenyon, P.; Morris, T. and Wood, B. 2017. Using educational theory and research to refine agricultural extension: affordances and barriers for farmers ‘learning and practice change. The J. Agric. Ed. Educ. 23(4):313-333. Doi: 10.1080/1389224X.2017.1214861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2017.1314861

Solleiro, J.; Castañón, R. y Martínez, L. 2020. Buenas prácticas de extensionismo y transferencia de tecnología. Recomendaciones para el sistema de extensionismo agroalimentario mexicano. Rev. Mex. Agron. 24(46):508-522.

Urcola, H.; Sartre, X.; Veiga, I.; Elverdin, J. and Albaladejo, C. 2015. Land tenancy, soybean, actors and transformations in the pampas: a district balance. J. Rural Stud. 39(2015):32-40. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.03.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.03.001

Published

2021-12-07

How to Cite

Santos Chávez, Victor Manuel, María de Jesús Santiago Cruz, Miguel Ángel Martínez Damián, Vinicio Horacio Santoyo Cortés, and Adolfo Guadalupe Álvarez Macías. 2021. “Characterization of Rural Extension Workers in Mexico a Contribution from the Correspondence Analysis”. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas 12 (8). México, ME:1445-57. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v12i8.2893.

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>