Food self-sufficiency in Mexico: support prices versus direct payments to the producer

Authors

  • Karen Lucero Cruz Herrera División de Ciencias Económico Administrativas-Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Carretera Federal México-Texcoco km 38.5, Texcoco, Estado de México, México. CP. 56230. Tel. 595 9215
  • Ramón Valdivia Alcalá División de Ciencias Económico Administrativas-Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Carretera Federal México-Texcoco km 38.5, Texcoco, Estado de México, México. CP. 56230. Tel. 595 9215
  • Miguel Ángel Martínez Damián División de Ciencias Económico Administrativas-Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Carretera Federal México-Texcoco km 38.5, Texcoco, Estado de México, México. CP. 56230. Tel. 595 921500.
  • José María Contreras Castillo División de Ciencias Económico Administrativas-Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Carretera Federal México-Texcoco km 38.5, Texcoco, Estado de México, México. CP. 56230. Tel. 595 921500.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v12i6.2533

Keywords:

bread wheat production, direct payments, food self-sufficiency, rice production, support prices

Abstract

Domestic production of basic products has failed to meet the demand of the population. In addition to this, imports of bread wheat and rice have been increasing since the trade liberalization in Mexico. This research analyzes the performance of the support price policy and PROCAMPO through the methodology that consists of the calculation of the food dependence index, where production, population, imports, exports and product yield are considered to quantify it, this with the aim of observing in what magnitude each policy contributes to achieving the objective set by the Federal Government of achieving food self-sufficiency in the country. The analysis period includes 2011-2020 to observe more broadly the behavior of the national production of the selected products (bread wheat and rice), the results obtained in the analysis indicate that the direct payment policy (PROCAMPO) is more effective in increasing the productivity of the Mexican countryside than the support price policy; however, despite the efforts the main objective is still not achieved, there are still major efforts to improve the conditions of the Mexican countryside, because there is no reduction in imports of the products studied, they continue to oscillate in more than 50% of national consumption and have not shown significant reductions that indicate an improvement in the results of the implementation of the program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Appendini, K. 1991. Los campesinos frente a la política de abasto: una contradicción permanente. Revista Comercio Exterior. 41 (10): 976-984. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnib pcajpcglclefindmkaj/viewer.html?pdfurl=http%3A%2F%2Frevistas.bancomext.gob.mx%2Frce%2Fmagazines%2F275%2F7%2FRCE7.pdf

Appendini, K 1985. Reflexiones sobre la política de precios de garantía , Problemas del Desarrollo. Revista Latinoamericana de Economía. 16 (61): 120-136. https://doi.org/10.22201/iiec. 20078951e.1985.61.35745CEDRSSA. 2019. Centro de Estudios para el Desarrollo Sustentable y la Soberanía Alimentaria. http://www.cedrssa.gob.mx/post-el--n-sector-agropecuario-en-el-pib-n---segundo-trimestre-de-2019--htm. CEPAL. 2014. Comisión Económica para América Latina. Seguridad alimentaria y nutricional. https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/36773-seguridad-alimentaria-nutricional-cuatro-paises-andinos-propuesta-seguimiento.

Clapp, J. 2016. Food self-sufficiency: making sense of it, and when it makes sense. Food Policy. 66(3)88-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.12.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.12.001

DOF. 1994. Diario Oficial de la Federación. Obtenido en el decreto que regula el programa de apoyos directos al campo denominado procampo:https://www.inforural.com.mx// wpcontent/uploads/2007/02/decreto-creacion-procampo.pdf.

DOF. 2019. Diario Oficial de la Federación. https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota-detalle.php? codigo=5565599&fecha=12/07/2019.

DOF. 2019. Diario Oficial de la Federación. Lineamientos de operacion del programa de precios de garantia.: https://dof.gob.mx/nota-detalle.php?codigo=5551718&fecha=01/03/2019.

Fader, M.; Gerten, D.; Krause, M.; Lucht, W. and Cramer, W. 2013. Spatial decoupling of agricultural production and consumption: quantifying dependences of countries on food imports due to domestic land and water constraints environ. Revista Environ. Res. Lett. 8(46):15-30. https://stacks.iop.org/ERL/8/014046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014046

FAO. 2004. Política de Desarrollo Agrícola: conceptos y principios. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación. Política de Desarrollo Agrícola. http://www.fao.org/publications/card/es/c/fce83011-6556-50df-9c1d-c035432eb868/# :~:text=Pol%C3%ADtica%20de%20Desarrollo%20Agr%C3%ADcola%20%E2%80%93%20Conceptos,mediante%20estrategias%20y%20pol%C3%ADticas%20adecuadas.

Gonzalo-Rodríguez, B. V. 1994. Articulación sector agropecuario-resto de la economía en el proceso de desarrollo: antecedentes comparativos y el caso de México. Rev. Econ. Mex. 6(12):12-20.

Grammont, C. D. 2010. La desigualdad del campo mexicano. Revista Convergencia. (50):13-55. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S1405-14352009000200002&script=sci-abstract.

Hernández-Ortiz, J. y Martinez-Damián, M. A. 2009. Efectos del cambio de precios de garantía a procampo en precios al producto, sin incluir efecto de importaciones. Rev. Fitotec. 32 (2):153-159. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci-abstract&pid=S0187-73802 009000200011&lng=es&nrm=iso.

Hayami, Y. and Barker, R. 1976. Price support versus input subsidy for food self-suffiency in developing countries. Revista Agricultural Economics. 58(4):617-630. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/1238804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1238804

Info rural. 2019. Obtenido de https://www.inforural.com.mx.

Jiménez-García, E.; Martínez-Damián, M. A. y Kido-Cruz, A. 2008. Política de precios de garantía contra apoyos directos: análisis del bienestar del productor. Rev. Fitotec. 31(4):383-389. https://docplayer.es/21685509-Politica-de-precios-de-garantia-contra-apoyos-directos-analisis-del-bienestar-del-productor.html.

Pradhan, P. 2014. Food self-sufficiency across scales: how local can we go? Rev. Environ. Scien. Technol. 48(16):9463-9470. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es5005939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es5005939

Van-Oort, P. A. J.; Saito, K.; Tanaka, A.; Amovin-Assagba, E.; Van-Bussel, L. G. J.; Van-Wart, J.; de Groot, H.; Van-Ittersum, M. K.; Cassman, K. G. and Wopereis, M. C. S. 2015. Assessment of rice self-sufficiency in 2025 in eight African countries. Rev. Global Food Security. 5(12):39-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2015.01.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2015.01.002

Sánchez-Cano, J. E. 2014. La política agrícola en México, impactos y retos. Rev. Mex. Agron. 35(5)946-956. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/viewer.html? pdfurl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.redalyc.org%2Fpdf%2F141%2F14131676004.pdf&clen=4272401.

SIAP. 2019. Servicio de Informacion Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. https://www.gob.mx/siap.

Valdivia-Alcala, R.; Matus, G. J. A.; Martínez-Damián, M. A. y Santiago, C. M. D. 2000. Analisis comparativo de la distribucion de la tierra y apoyos directos al productor en México. Estudio de caso. Rev. Pol. Agric. 5(8):93-127.

Warr, P. 2011. Food security vs Food self-sufficiency: the indonesian case. Working Papers in Trade and Development Working Paper Australian University No. 2011/04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1910356

Published

2021-09-20

How to Cite

Cruz Herrera, Karen Lucero, Ramón Valdivia Alcalá, Miguel Ángel Martínez Damián, and José María Contreras Castillo. 2021. “Food Self-Sufficiency in Mexico: Support Prices Versus Direct Payments to the Producer”. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas 12 (6). México, ME:981-90. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v12i6.2533.

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.