Tomato production under protected conditions with foliar applications of metal nanoparticles

Authors

  • Juan Martín Olivarez-Rodríguez Maestría interinstitucional en agricultura protegida-Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. Prolongación de la calle Mariano Jiménez s/n, Col. El Varillero, Apatzingán, Michoacán, México. CP. 60670. Tel. 453 5341675
  • Patricio Apáez-Barrios Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias-Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. Prolongación de la calle Mariano Jiménez s/n, Col. El Varillero, Apatzingán, Michoacán, México. CP. 60670. Tel. 453 5341675
  • Yurixhi Atenea Raya-Montaño Facultad de Agrobiología “Presidente Juárez”-Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. Paseo Lázaro Cárdenas s/n, esq. Berlín, Colonia Viveros, Uruapan, Michoacán, México. CP. 60190. Tel. 452 5236474
  • Maricela Apáez-Barrios Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias-Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. Prolongación de la calle Mariano Jiménez s/n, Col. El Varillero, Apatzingán, Michoacán, México. CP. 60670. Tel. 453 5341675

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v15i3.3667

Keywords:

Solanum lycopersicum, nutritional content, lycopene content

Abstract

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum, L.) is the most important vegetable in the world in terms of production volumes, which will have to continue to increase to meet future consumption needs. In this regard, the use of nanotechnology could make the supply of nutrients to plants more efficient and improve and increase agricultural production. The objective of the study was to determine the effect of foliar application of Zn, Cu, and Fe nanoparticles on tomato production and quality. In 2021, a Roma-type tomato crop was established under protected agriculture. The treatments consisted of the individual and combined foliar application of nanoparticles of Zn, Fe, Cu, Zn+Fe, Zn+Cu, Fe+Cu, Zn+Fe+Cu, plus a control without application. It was found that the individual application of the nanoparticles did not improve tomato production, however, the combined supply increased the yield. The highest production was recorded with Zu+Fe+Cu, which was 66% higher than the control plants, with this treatment the lycopene content also doubled (2.23 mg g-1 dry matter). The nanoparticles increased the nutrient content within the maximum limit allowed for consumption. Therefore, the application of micronutrient nanoparticles supplied in combination is a viable alternative to improve tomato yield and quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, R.; Yusoff-Abd, S. M.; Uddin, M. K.; Quddus, M. A. and Hossain, M. A. M. 2021. Recent trends in the foliar spraying of zinc nutrient in tomato production. Agronomy. 11(10):1-15. Doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11102074.

AOAC. 2005. Oficial Methods of Analysis. 18th Ed. AOAC international, Gaithersburg, MD. Method 2006. 03:1-13 pp.

Chhipa, H. 2017. Nanofertilizers and nanopesticides for agriculture. Environ. Chem. Lett. 15(1):15-22. Doi.org/10.1007/s10311-016-0600-4.

El-Raie, A.; Hassan, H. E.; El-Rahman, A. A. and Arafat, A. A. 2015. Response of tomato plants to different rates of iron nanoparticles spraying as foliar fertilization. Misr J. Agric. Eng. 32(3):1295-1312. Doi.org/10.21608/mjae.2015.98629.

FAO. 2017. Food and Agriculture Organization of the Unites Nation. The future of food and agriculture Trends and challenges. Rome. 9-20 pp. https://www.fao.org/ 3/i6881s/i6881s.pdf.

Fernández, C.; Pitre, A.; Llobregat, M. J. y Rondón, Y. 2007. Evaluación del contenido de licopeno en pastas de tomate comerciales. Inf. Tecnol. 18(3):31-38. Doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07642007000300005.

García, E. A. 2004. Modificación al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). México, DF. 90 p.

Górecka, D.; Wawrzyniak, A.; Jędrusek-Golińska, A.; Dziedzic, K.; Hamułka, J.; Kowalczewski, P. L. and Walkowiak, J. 2020. Lycopene in tomatoes and tomato products. Open chem. 18(1):752-756. Doi.org/10.1515/chem-2020-0050.

Hafeez, B. M. K. Y.; Khanif, Y. M. and Saleem, M. 2013. Role of zinc in plant nutritiona review. Am. J. Exp. Agric. 3(2):374-391.

Hortalizas A. 2017. Tomato primus. 1 p. http://www.semillasmexico.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/PRIMUS-LF.pdf.

Karuppanapandian, T.; Moon, J. C.; Kim, C.; Manoharan, K. and Kim, W. 2011. Reactive oxygen species in plants: their gerenation, signal traduction, and scavenging mechanics. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 5(6):709-725.

Liu, R. and Lal, R. 2015. Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing agronomic productions. Sci. Total environ. 514(1):131-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.scitotenv.2015.01.104.

Morales-Díaz, A. B.; Ortega-Ortíz, H.; Juárez-Maldonado, A.; Cadenas-Pliego, G.; González-Morales, S. and Benavides-Mendoza, A. 2017. Application of nanoelements in plant nutrition and its impact in ecosystems. Adv. Nat. Sci. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 8(1):013001.

NIH. 2022. National Institutes of Health. Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI). Tolerable upper intake levels, elements. food and nutrition board, national. Academies. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK545442/table/appJ-tab9/?report=objec tonly.

Perveen, R.; Suleria, H. A. R.; Anjum, F. M.; Butt, M. S.; Pasha, I. and Ahmad, S. 2015. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) carotenoids and lycopenes chemistry; metabolism, absorption, nutrition, and allied health claims a comprehensive review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 55(7):919-929. Doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.657809.

Rai, M.; Ingle, A. P.; Pandit, R.; Paralikar, P.; Shende, S.; Gupta, I. and Silva, S. S. 2018. Copper and copper nanoparticles: role in management of insect pests and pathogenic microbes. Nanotechnol. Rev. 7(4):303-315. Doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2018-0031.

Raliya, R.; Nair, R.; Chavalmane, S.; Wang, W. N. and Biswas, P. 2015. Mechanistic evaluation of translocation and physiological impact of titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles on the tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plant. Metallomics. 7(12):1584-1594. Doi.org/10.1039/c5mt00168d.

SAS. 2017. Statistical Analysis Systems. SAS/STAT User’s guide, version 9.4. SAS Institute Inc. North Caroline, USA.

Seleiman, M. F.; Almutairi, K. F.; Alotaibi, M.; Shami, A.; Alhammad, B. A. and Battaglia, M. L. 2020. Nano fertilization as an emerging fertilization technique: why can modern agriculture benefit from its use. Plants. 10(2):1-27.

Skowroñska, M. and Filipek, T. 2014. Life cycle assessment of fertilizers: a review. Int agrophys. 28(1):101-110.

Van-Nguyen, D.; Mai-Nguyen, H.; Thanh-Le, N.; Huu-Nguyen, K.; Thi-Nguyen, H.; Mai-Le, H.; Trung-Nguyen, A.; Thu-Dinhm, N. H.; Anh-Hoang, S. and Van-Ha, C. 2022. Copper nanoparticle enhances plant growth and grain yield in maize under drought stress conditions. J. Plant Growth Reg. 41(1):364-375. Doi.org/10.1007/s00344-021-10301-w.

Zulfiqar, F.; Navarro, M.; Ashraf, M.; Akram, N. A. and Munné-Bosch, S. 2019. Nanofertilizer use for sustainable agriculture: advantages and limitations. Plant Sci. 289(1):1-11. Doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110270.

Published

2024-05-03

How to Cite

Olivarez-Rodríguez, Juan Martín, Patricio Apáez-Barrios, Yurixhi Atenea Raya-Montaño, and Maricela Apáez-Barrios. 2024. “Tomato Production under Protected Conditions With Foliar Applications of Metal Nanoparticles”. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas 15 (3). México, ME:e3667. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v15i3.3667.

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)