Narrow- and broadleaf weed control in wheat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v15i6.3105Keywords:
Triticum aestivum L., herbicides, resistanceAbstract
Long-term use of herbicides leads to resistance problems; therefore, the biological effectiveness of new treatments needs to be determined. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of herbicides applied postemergence on weeds [Avena fatua L., Phalaris spp., Brassica nigra (L.) W. D. J. Koch and Chenopodium album L.]; for this, a trial was established in the autumn-winter 2019-2020 cycle, using the experimental design of randomized complete blocks with four replications. Five herbicide treatments (T2: mesosulfuron-methyl 1%/iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium 0.2%; T3: iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium 0.9%/mesosulfuron-methyl 4.5%/thiencarbazone-methyl 2.25%/mefenpyr-diethyl 13.5% + methylated vegetable oil; T4: flucarbazone sodium 70% + clodinafop-propargil 0.8%; T5: tralkoxydim 25%; T6: pinoxaden 0.5% + rapeseed oil 45%) and a control without application (T1) were evaluated. The variables evaluated were phytotoxicity to the crop, population and weed control. At harvest, the following were determined: plant height, spike length, yield, the weight of 1 000 grains, and the hectoliter weight of wheat. The T2 and T3 treatments controlled A. fatua and Phalaris spp. to a lesser extent and B. nigra and C. album to a greater extent in addition to causing a higher degree of phytotoxicity; T6 and T4 better controlled the populations of A. fatua and Phalaris spp., with an intermediate performance for broadleaf weeds; T5 showed poor control for both narrow- and broadleaf weeds. The herbicides that controlled weed populations and increased yield were T2 and T3, controlling broadleaf species, and T4 and T6, controlling narrow- and broadleaf weeds.
Downloads
References
Abouziena, H. F.; Shararafaida, A. A. and El-Desoki, E. R. 2008. Efficacy of cultivar selectivity and weed control treatments on wheat yield and associated weeds in sandy soils. World J. Agric. Sci. 4(3):384-389.
Balassone, F. y Puricelli, E. 2020. Sensibilidad de biotipos de Conyza sumatrensis a glifosato y a inhibidores de ALS en dos estados de desarrollo. Agriscientia. 37(2):11-20. Doi.org/10.31047/1668.298x.v37.n2.25404.
Buendía-Ayala, B.; Martínez-Cruz, E.; Villaseñor, M. H.; Hortelano, S. R.; Espitia-Rangel E. y Buendía-González, M. 2019. La incidencia de roya amarilla y la calidad industrial del grano y la masa en trigo harinero. 10(1):143-154. Doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v10i1.1333.
Delgado, R. J. 2006. Rotación de cultivos en sistemas de labranza de conservación: Experiencias en el CIMMYT. In: memoria del primer foro de producción y comercialización de trigo en Guanajuato. Ed. INIFAP. Campo Experimental Bajío. Celaya, Guanajuato, México. 138-147 pp.
Martínez, C. E.; Espitia, R. E.; Villaseñor, M. H.; Hortelano, S. R.; Muñiz, R. E. y Zamudio, C. A. 2017. Calidad industrial del trigo harinero en función del número de riegos. Revista Méxicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. 8(7):1497-1508.
Medina, C. T. y Rosales, R. E. 2014. Capítulo 3. Manejo integrado de maleza. In: tecnología para la producción sustentable de trigo de riego en El Bajío. Libro técnico núm. 6. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y pecuarias (INIFAP). 58-66 pp.
Palmieri, V. E.; Alvarez, C. E.; Permingeat, H. R.; and Perotti, V. E. 2022. A122S, A205V, D376E, W574L and S653N substitutions in acetolactate synthase (ALS) from Amaranthus palmeri show different functional impacts on herbicide resistance. Pest Manag. Sci. 78(2):749-757.
SAS Institute Inc. 2014. Base SAS® 9.3 Procedures guide. Cary, NC, USA.
SE. 1996. Secretaría de Economía. Norma Mexicana NMX-FF-036-1996. Productos alimenticios no industrializados. Cereales. Trigo (Triticum aestivum L. y Trticum durum Desf.). Dirección General de Normas Especificaciones y Métodos de Prueba.
SE. 2008. Secretaría de Economía. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-247-SSA1-2008. Productos y servicios. Cereales y sus productos. Cereales, harinas de cereales, sémolas o semolinas. Alimentos a base de: cereales, semillas comestibles, de harinas, sémolas o semolinas o sus mezclas. Productos de panificación. Dirección General de Normas Especificaciones y Métodos de Prueba.
Shoeran, S.; Punia, S. S.; Yadav, A. and Singh, S. 2013. Bioefficacy of pinoxaden in combination with other herbicides against complex weed flora in wheat. Indian J. Weed Sci. 45(2):90-92.
SIAP. 2022. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. Avance de siembras y cosechas. https://nube.siap.gob.mx/avance-agricola/.
Solís, M. E.; Huerta, E. J.; Pérez, H. P.; Villaseñor, M. H.; Ramírez, R. A. y Ledesma, R. L. 2017. Cisne F2016: nueva variedad de trigo harinero de gluten fuerte para El Bajío, México. Revista Mexicana de ciencias Agrícolas 8(8):1911-1917.
Torres-García, J.; Segura-León, O.; Uscanga-Mortera, E.; Trejo, C.; Conde-Martínez, V.; Kohashi-Shibata, J. and Martínez-Moreno, D. 2018b. Evolution, growth and phenology of Phalaris minor L. biotypes resistant to ACCase inhibiting herbicides in Mexico. Bot. Sci. 96(1):95-102.
Torres-García, J.; Tafoya-Razo, J.; Velázquez-Márquez, S. and Tiessen, A. 2018a. Double herbicide-resistant biotypes of wild oat (Avena fatua L.) display characteristic metabolic fingerprints before and after applying ACCase and ALS-inhibitors. Acta Physiol. Plant. 40(119):1-12.
Urzúa, S. F. 2001. Estudios de efectividad biológica con herbicidas. In: bases para realizar estudios de efectividad biológica de plaguicidas. Ed. Colegio de Postgraduados. Montecillo, Estado de México. 85-94. pp.
USDA. 2021. United States Department of Agriculture. Grain and feed annual. https://apps.fas.usda.gov/newgainapi/api/Report/.
Yanniccari, M. E.; Larsen, A. O. y Istilart, C. M. 2017. Evaluación de herbicidas post-emergentes en variedades de trigo Candeal. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. Actualización técnica en cultivos de cosecha fina 2016/17. http://hdl.handl.net/11336/80114.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas accept the following conditions:
In accordance with copyright laws, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas recognizes and respects the authors’ moral right and ownership of property rights which will be transferred to the journal for dissemination in open access. Invariably, all the authors have to sign a letter of transfer of property rights and of originality of the article to Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP) [National Institute of Forestry, Agricultural and Livestock Research]. The author(s) must pay a fee for the reception of articles before proceeding to editorial review.
All the texts published by Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas —with no exception— are distributed under a Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which allows third parties to use the publication as long as the work’s authorship and its first publication in this journal are mentioned.
The author(s) can enter into independent and additional contractual agreements for the nonexclusive distribution of the version of the article published in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas (for example include it into an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it is clearly and explicitly indicated that the work was published for the first time in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas.
For all the above, the authors shall send the Letter-transfer of Property Rights for the first publication duly filled in and signed by the author(s). This form must be sent as a PDF file to: revista_atm@yahoo.com.mx; cienciasagricola@inifap.gob.mx; remexca2017@gmail.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International license.
