Biocultural and socioeconomic dimensions of sustainability in agroforestry systems diversified with cacao and vanilla
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v14i3.3093Keywords:
Theobroma cacao L., Vanilla planifolia A., Agroecological management, Enterprise development, MESMISAbstract
Agroforestry systems and productive diversification are sustainable alternatives that reverse the damages and risks of conventional agriculture. There are few sustainability studies that allow them to be incorporated into projects aimed at increasing profitability and improving the welfare of producers, restoring ecosystem services. The objective was to assess the sustainability of two traditional agroforestry systems, diversified with cacao and vanilla, in the states of Veracruz and Oaxaca. Agroecological techniques and business development strategies were promoted with the families of both producers. The research was carried out during the period: February 2012 to July 2020, the plots are located in the municipalities of San Pedro Ixcatlán, Oaxaca and Papantla, Veracruz. The methodology of the framework of assessment of natural resource management systems was used. The results showed that the initial states had a low intensive management, low use of inputs, high diversification and oriented to subsistence agriculture. After diversification, agroecological management and business development, transition states have improved in most sustainability indicators. In particular, profitability (benefit-cost index), which reached 1.2 for San Pedro and 2.6 for Papantla when added value is given to vanilla and cacao. The participation of women in emerging activities derived from diversification and the interest of young people to continue with activities of transformation of raw materials and the commercialization of value-added products are relevant.
Downloads
References
Adger, W. N. 2000. Social and ecological resilience: are they related? prog. Hum. Geogr. 24(3):347-364. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132007015404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/030913200701540465
Alcazar, P.; Espejel, I.; Reyes, O. M. and Arredond, G. M. C. 2019. Retrospective assessment as a tool for the management of sustainability in diversified farms. Agroecol. Sustain. Food Syst. 44:30-53. Doi: 10.1080/21683565.2019.1578722.
Altieri, M. A. y Nicholls, C. I. 2002. Un método agroecológico rápido para la evaluación de la sostenibilidad de cafetales. Manejo integrado de plagas y agroecología. 64:17-24.
Altieri, M. A. y Nicholls, C. I. 2012. Agroecología: única esperanza para la soberanía alimentaria y la resiliencia socioecológica. Agroecología, 7(2): 65-83. https://doi.org/10.6018/ agroecología.
Armengot, L.; Barbieri, P.; Andres, C.; Milz, J. and Schneider, M. 2016. Cacao agroforestry systems have higher return on labor compared to full-sun monocultures. Agron. Sustain Dev. 36(70):1-10. Doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0406-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0406-6
Astier, M.; Masera, O. R. y Galvan, M. Y. 2008. Evaluación de sustentabilidad. Un enfoque dinámico y multidimensional. Valencia, Immag Impressions, SL. España. 201 p.
Caso, B. L.; Barrera, L. C. and Aliphat, M. M. 2006. Cacao, vanilla and annatto: three production and exchange systems in the southern maya lowlands, centuries. J. Latin American Geogr. 5(2):29-52. https://doi.org/10.1353/LAG.2006.0015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lag.2006.0015
Cerda, B. R.; Orozco, A. L.; Carreño, R. G.; Ordóñez, J. C.; Amores, C. F. M.; Caicedo, A. W. J.; Oblitas, G. P. S. and Somarriba, C. E. 2019. Tropical agroforestry and ecosystem services: tradeoff analysis for better design strategies. In: Mosquera, L. M. R. and Prabhu, R. Ed. Agroforestry for sustainable agriculture. Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, Cambridge, UK. ISBN: 9781786762207. 218-262 pp.
Climate-data.org. 2018. Public database. Mexico climate: average temperature in Mexico, weather & Mexico weather by month climate data.org. https://en.climate-data.org/north-america/mexico-179/.
Cuevas, C. A.; Vera, C. Y. B. and Cuevas, S. J. A. 2019. Resilience and sustainability of traditional agroecosystems of Mexico: Totonacapan. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. 10(1):165-175. https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/remexca/v10n1/2007-0934-remexca-10-01-165-en.pdf.
Del Amo, R. S.; Ramos, P. J. M. and Vergara, T. M. C. 2010. Ethnoecological restoration of deforested and agrocultural tropical lands for Mesoamerica. Ed. environmental and human health: risk management in development countries. Conservation of land, air, water and cultural assets. 141-156. pp.
Gómez-Pompa, A.; Flores, J. S. and Fernández, M. A. 1990. The sacred cacao groves of the Maya. Latin American antiquity. 1(3):247-257. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/972163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/972163
González-Jácome, A. 2019. Los vaivenes históricos de dos recursos bioculturales: el cacao y la vainilla. Ed. La restauración ecológica productiva: el camino para recuperar el patrimonio biocultural de los pueblos mesoamericanos. Universidad Veracruzana. Veracruz, México. ISBN: 978-607-502-761-6. 125-151 pp.
Hipólito, R. E. and Ramos, P. J. M. 2020. Bioculturality and transdisciplinarity: two paths for reaching Sustainability through community capacity building: chapter 4. Ed. Community capacity and resilience in Latin America. Routledge, New York. 52-73 pp.
Hipólito, R. E.; Amo, S. R. y Ramos-Prado, J. M. 2010. Los procesos ecológicos del trópico como modelo para el desarrollo empresarial rural. Aleph Zero. 55(1):1-9.
Hipólito, R. E.; Carcaño, M. M. G.; Ramos, P. J. M.; Vázquez, C. E. A.; López, R. L. y Ricaño, R. J. 2017. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 49(4): 356-365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2017.04.003
IPES/FAO. 2010. Biopreparados para el manejo sostenible de plagas y enfermedades en la agricultura urbana y periurbana. Santiago de Chile, Chile. 96 p.
López, A. P. 2014. Paquete tecnológico cacao (Theobroma cacao L.). Producción de planta. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP). México. 10 p.
Priego, G. A.; Galmiche, A. T.; Castelán, M. E.; Ruiz, O. R. y Ortiz, A. C. 2009. Evaluación de la sustentabilidad de dos sistemas de producción de cacao: estudios de caso en unidades de producción rural en Comalcalco, Tabasco. Universidad y Ciencia. 25(1):39-57. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=15416335003.
Resilience, A.. 2007. Assessing and managing resilience in social-ecological systems: Workbook for practitioners. Resilience Alliance. USA. 54 p.
Rojas, F. J. y Rodríguez, M. F. D. 2019. Experiencias del plan cacao Nestlé, en México. Creación de valor compartido en sistemas agroforestales de cacao, café y vainilla. Una propuesta empresarial. La restauración ecológica productiva: el camino para recuperar el patrimonio biocultural de los pueblos mesoamericanos. Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz, México. 357-370 pp.
Somarriba, E. J.; Orozco, A. L.; Cerda, B. R.; López, S. A. and Cook, J. 2018. Analysis and design of the shade canopy of cocoa-based agroforestry systems. In: Umaharan, P. Ed. Achieving sustainable cultivation of cocoa. Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, Cambridge, UK. 1-31 pp.
Speelman, E. N.; López, R. S.; Colomer, N. A.; Astier, M. and Masera, O. R. 2007. Ten years of sustainability evaluation using the MESMIS framework: lessons learned from its application in 28 latin american case studies. Inter. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 14(4):345-361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500709469735
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas accept the following conditions:
In accordance with copyright laws, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas recognizes and respects the authors’ moral right and ownership of property rights which will be transferred to the journal for dissemination in open access. Invariably, all the authors have to sign a letter of transfer of property rights and of originality of the article to Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP) [National Institute of Forestry, Agricultural and Livestock Research]. The author(s) must pay a fee for the reception of articles before proceeding to editorial review.
All the texts published by Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas —with no exception— are distributed under a Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which allows third parties to use the publication as long as the work’s authorship and its first publication in this journal are mentioned.
The author(s) can enter into independent and additional contractual agreements for the nonexclusive distribution of the version of the article published in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas (for example include it into an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it is clearly and explicitly indicated that the work was published for the first time in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas.
For all the above, the authors shall send the Letter-transfer of Property Rights for the first publication duly filled in and signed by the author(s). This form must be sent as a PDF file to: revista_atm@yahoo.com.mx; cienciasagricola@inifap.gob.mx; remexca2017@gmail.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International license.