Meadow degradation in a rural community of a protected natural area
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v13i7.2763Keywords:
biosphere reserve, grazing, livestock farming, recovery of degraded paddocksAbstract
In order to know the degree of degradation of meadows, as well as the social perception on how to avoid it, in the rural community Francisco Villa I, municipality of Jiquipilas, Chiapas, located in the area of influence of the protected natural area La Sepultura Biosphere Reserve. Since no similar studies in the region were found, it was considered a challenge to evaluate the degradation of the meadow from the local perspective and compare it with the technical evaluation to perceive that strategies to avoid and stop it can arise from the social initiative. The management characteristics of grazing areas and the strategies that producers would employ to mitigate the degradation of their paddocks were determined through 11 semi-structured interviews. To evaluate the degree of degradation, a probabilistic sample was selected, from 10 plots divided according to the botanical composition, in two systems of grazing areas: the naturalized one and the improved one, variables: vegetation cover [double sampling or botanal method of Tothill et al. (1992)], botanical composition [double sampling technique described by Haydock and Shaw (1975)] and tree inventory (Dallmeier, 1992). The analysis was descriptive, except for the variable of Vegetation cover, of Tukey’s mean comparison (p> 0.05). Vegetation cover was higher (58%) for the naturalized grass system and lower (51.6%) for the improved one; the botanical composition was 37% of the Cynodon plectostachyus grass for the former and 34% of cover with the Andropogun gayanus grass in the latter, with 12 and 9 tree species, respectively. The level of degradation of the paddocks evaluated of the grazing areas was rated as moderate by the producers, coinciding with the technical results made.
Downloads
References
Barrasa, G. S. y Reyes, F. D. J. 2011. Recuperación de saberes ambientales en comunidades campesinas en reservas de Biosfera de Chiapas. En saberes ambientales campesinos. Colección Jaguar-UNICACH. México, DF. 137-165 pp.
COTECOCA. 1980. Comisión técnico-consultiva de coeficientes de agostaderos. Manejo de coeficientes de agostaderos. Secretaría de Agricultura y Recursos Hidráulicos (SARH). 682 p.
Cruz, M.; Pereda, J. y Muñoz, D. 2015. Evaluación económica-productiva de un sistema de ceba semi estabulado con pastoreo de Brachiaria brizantha cv Marandú en la provincia de Camagüey. Ecosistema Ganadero. 2(1):17-25.
Dallmeier, F. 1992. Measuring and monitoring forest biodiversity: the SI/MAB model. In: Bachmann, P.; Köhl, M. and Päivinen, R. (eds.). Assessment of Biodiversity for Improved Forest Planning. Forestry Sciences. 51:15-21. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007 /978-94-015-9006-8-2.
FAOSTAT. 2017. Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics Division. Rome, Italy. Economic and Social Development Department. Rome, Italy. http://faostat3.fao.org/ home/E.
Flores, I. F.; Rivera, M. M.; Medina, M. S.; Ibarra, M. F. y Retes, L. R. 2018. Cambios de vegetación y costos asociados con el continuo sobrepastoreo del ganado en el pastizal mediano abierto de Cananea, Sonora, México. Rev. Mex. Agron. 42:855-856. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa? id=14156175004.
Geissdoerfer, M.; Savaget, P.; Bocken, N. M. P. and Hultink, E. J. 2017. The circular economy, a new sustainability paradigm? J. Cleaner Production. 143:757-768. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048.
González, R. L. 2019. Caracterización productiva de los sistemas ganaderos y el manejo del recurso pastizal en el Cantón Joya de los Sachas. Eur. Sci. J. 15(18):1857-1881. Doi: 10.19044/esj. 2019.v15n18p355.
Haydock, K. P. and Shaw, N. H. 1975. The comparative yield method for estimating dry matter yield of pasture. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 15(76):663-670. https://doi.org/10. 1071/EA9750663.
Hernández, K. J. 1995. Caracterización de especies arbóreas y arbustivas nativas con potencial para la alimentación de bovinos en El Petén. Tesis Lic. Zootecnia. Universidad de San Carlos-Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia. Guatemala. 66 p.
Hernández, K. J.; Ibrahim, M. A.; Detlefsen, G.; Harvey, C. A. y Prins K. 2002. Cuantificación y calificación de pasturas degradadas incorporando conocimiento local de ganaderos de la Calzada Mopán, Dolores, Petén, Guatemala. Agroforestería en las Américas. 9(35):62-68.
Hernández, R.; Fernández, C. y Baptista, M. P. 2014. Metodología de la investigación. 6ta. Ed. Mc Graw Hill. México. 600 p.
Hoyos, J. E.; Angulo, J.; Mahecha, L.; Houwers, H. W. y Cerón, M. F. 2021. Comparación productiva y de calidad en leche de vacas Holstein pastoreando en diferentes sistemas del trópico alto. Acta Agronómica. 70(1):35-41. https://doi.org/10.15446/acag.v70n1.80801.
Instituto de Ciencia Animal. 1998. Analest versión 2.0® Sistema automatizado para el análisis estadístico. La Habana, Cuba.
Martínez, J.; Cajas, Y. S; León, J. D and Osorio, N. W. 2014. Silvopastoral systems enhance soil quality in grasslands of Colombia. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/ 2014/359736.
Merchant, I. y Solano, J. J. 2016. Las praderas, sus asociaciones y características: una revisión. Acta Agrícola y Pecuaria. 2(1):1-11.
Montes, M. A. 2015. Entrevista productiva. Una adaptación de entrevista focalizada orientada a abordar los procesos interpretativos. Rev. Lat. de Metodología de la Investigación Social. 9(5):35-49. http://relmis.com.ar/ojs/index.php/relmis/article/view/94.
Owen, O. S. 1977. Conservación de recursos naturales. México: Pax-México/Librería Carlos Césarman. 2da. Ed. 609-615 pp.
Padilla, C.; Crespo, G. y Sardiñas, Y. 2009. Degradación y recuperación de pastizales. Rev. Cub. Cienc. Agríc. 43(4):351-354.
Pezo, D. 2017. Tecnologías forrajeras para la intensificación de la ganadería en el contexto del cambio climático. Revista UTN Informa. 78:18-25.
Pezo, D. 2018. Intensificación sostenible de los sistemas ganaderos frente al cambio climático en América Latina y el Caribe: estado del arte / Monografía del bid; 685. Fondo para el medio ambiente mundial (FONTAGRO). Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID). 84 p.
Roca, A. J.; Lascano, P. J.; Arcos, C. N.; Cueva, N. M.; Molina, E. J.; Curbelo, L. M.; Guevara, R.; Guevara, G.; Chancusig, F. H.; Torres, C.; Nieto, P. E. y Serpa, G. 2018. Balance forrajero, de energía y nitrógeno en pastizales arborizados con Algarrobo (Prosopis juliflora (S. W.) DC.) bajo pastoreo de vacas lecheras. Rev. Prod. Anim. 30(1):38-46.
Solorio, S. F.; Wright, J.; Franco, M. J.; Basu, S. K.; Sarabia, S. L.; Ramírez, L.; Ayala, B. A.; Aguilar, P. C. and Ku, V. J. 2017. Silvopastoral systems: best agroecological practice for resilient production systems under dryland and drought conditions. In: Ahmed, M. and Stockle C. O. (Ed.). Quantification of Climate Variability, Adaptation and Mitigation for Agricultural Sustainability. Springer. 233-250 pp.
Sotelo, M. E.; Suárez, S. J. C; Álvarez, C. F.; Castro, N. A.; Calderón, S. V. H.; Arango, J. 2017. Sistemas sostenibles de producción ganadera en el contexto amazónico sistemas silvopastoriles: ¿una opción viable? Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT). Cali, Colombia. 24 p.
Tothill, J. C.; Hargreaves, J. N. G.; Jones, R. M. and McDonald, C. 1992. Botanal- acomprehensive sampling and computing procedure for estimating pasture yield and composition. 1. Field sampling. Trop. Agron. Tech. Memorandum 78. CSIRO Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures. Australia. 24 p.
United Nations Climate Change. 2020. Global warming potentials (IPCC). Second assessment report. https://unfccc.int/process/transparency-and-reporting/greenhouse-gas-data/green house-gas-data-unfccc/global-warming-potentials.
Zepeda, R. M.; Velasco, M. E.; Toral, J. N.; Hernández, A. y Martínez, J. J. 2016. Adopción de sistemas silvopastoriles y contexto sociocultural de los productores: apoyos y limitantes. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Pec. 7(4):471-488. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=26564820 7006.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas accept the following conditions:
In accordance with copyright laws, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas recognizes and respects the authors’ moral right and ownership of property rights which will be transferred to the journal for dissemination in open access. Invariably, all the authors have to sign a letter of transfer of property rights and of originality of the article to Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP) [National Institute of Forestry, Agricultural and Livestock Research]. The author(s) must pay a fee for the reception of articles before proceeding to editorial review.
All the texts published by Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas —with no exception— are distributed under a Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which allows third parties to use the publication as long as the work’s authorship and its first publication in this journal are mentioned.
The author(s) can enter into independent and additional contractual agreements for the nonexclusive distribution of the version of the article published in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas (for example include it into an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it is clearly and explicitly indicated that the work was published for the first time in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas.
For all the above, the authors shall send the Letter-transfer of Property Rights for the first publication duly filled in and signed by the author(s). This form must be sent as a PDF file to: revista_atm@yahoo.com.mx; cienciasagricola@inifap.gob.mx; remexca2017@gmail.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International license.