Methods of rearing and reproduction predatory mites of the order Mesostigmata

Authors

  • Blanca Alicia Esquivel-Ayala Laboratorio de Entomología ‘Biol. Sócrates Cisneros Paz’-Facultad de Biología-Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. Edificio B4, Ciudad Universitaria, Francisco J. Múgica S/N, Col. Felicitas del Río, Morelia, Michoacán. CP. 58030
  • Martha Patricia Chaires-Grijalva Unidad Académica Multidisciplinaria Mante-Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas. E. Cárdenas González No. 1201 Pte, Jardín, Ciudad Mante, Tamaulipas. CP. 89840
  • Silvano Montañez-Hernández Laboratorio de Entomología ‘Biol. Sócrates Cisneros Paz’-Facultad de Biología-Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. Edificio B4, Ciudad Universitaria, Francisco J. Múgica S/N, Col. Felicitas del Río, Morelia, Michoacán. CP. 58030
  • Blanca Nieves Lara-Chávez Laboratorio de Fitopatología-Facultad de Agrobiología-Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. Paseo Lázaro Cárdenas 2290, Emiliano Zapata, Melchor Ocampo, Uruapan, Michoacán. CP. 60170
  • Margarita Vargas-Sandoval Laboratorio de Entomología ‘Biol. Sócrates Cisneros Paz’-Facultad de Biología-Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. Edificio B4, Ciudad Universitaria, Francisco J. Múgica S/N, Col. Felicitas del Río, Morelia, Michoacán. CP. 58030

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v15i3.3676

Keywords:

agricultural pests, biological control, Blattisociidae, Laelapidae, Phytoseiidae, natural enemies

Abstract

Due to the irrational use of chemicals for pest control in intensive crops, the diversity of communities of beneficial organisms, such as the predatory mites of the order Mesostigmata, has been alarmingly diminished,. These arachnids have taken on agricultural relevance because most of their members have zoophagic feeding habits and naturally regulate harmful populations of insects, nematodes and other mites that inhabit plants. For more than 40 years, predatory mites have been introduced regularly for biocontrol work and it is estimated that more than 60% of programs use these organisms; however, the commercial products available are limited to a few species, which vary in effectiveness according to the conditions of the crop, availability of prey and competition for niches with other predatory organisms; in addition, their production is protected under trade secrecy in most cases. With this, the opportunity opens up to explore native or even already commercialized species in order to evaluate their predatory capacity at the research level or as usual tools for pest regulation; a first challenge for this purpose is propagation and culture methods. The methods for mite culture can be divided into two: maintenance on plants and in confinement; although each technique has been developed for a particular species or a certain purpose, knowing their basic design promises to bring us closer to a new line of study for their introduction and reintroduction into agricultural systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asgari, F.; Safavi, S. A. and Moayeri, H. R. S. 2022. Life table parameters of the predatory mite, Blattisocius mali Oudemans (Mesostigmata: blattisociidae), fed on eggs and larvae of the stored product mite, Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Schrank). Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control. 32(1):118-127. Doi.org/10.1186/s41938-022-00616-5.

Badii, M. H. y Abreu, J. L. 2006. Control biológico una forma sustentable de control de plagas. Daena. International Journal of Good Conscience. 1(1):82-89.

Ballal, C. R.; Gupta, S. K.; Gupta, T. and Varshney, R. 2021. A simple protocol for rearing a native predatory mite Neoseiulus indicus. Current Science. 120(12):1923-1926. Doi.org/10.18520/cs/v120/i12/1923-1926.

Barbosa, M. F. and Moraes, G. J. 2016. Potential of astigmatid mites (Acari: astigmatina) as prey for rearing edaphic predatory mites of the families Laelapidae and Rhodacaridae (Acari: mesostigmata). Experimental and Applied Acarology. 69(3):289-296. Doi: Doi.org/10.1007/s10493-016-0043-4.

Bulnes, D. R. y Orozco, J. 2020. Producción masiva del ácaro depredador Amblyseius swirskii (Athias-Henriot) (Acari, Phytoseiidae) y su aplicación en campo: revisión de literatura. Escuela Agrícola Panamericana, Zamorano Honduras. Tesis de Licenciatura. https://bdigital.zamorano.edu/items/ee85783f-94d3-4ff7-b0b0-66de84671989.

Bustos-Rodríguez, H. A. 2013. Desarrollo de un modelo de simulación de una cría masiva del ácaro depredador Phytoseiulus persimilis (Parasitiformes: phytoseiidae). Universidad Militar Nueva Granada. 9-20.http://hdl.handle.net/10654/12444.

Castilho, R. C.; Venancio, R. and Narita J. P. Z. 2015. Mesostigmata as biological control agents, with emphasis on Rhodacaroidea and Parasitoidea. Ed. Prospects for biological control of plant feeding mites and other harmful organisms. 19(1):1-31. Doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15042-0-1.

Castro-López, M. A. 2018. Ácaros Mesostigmata como potenciales controladores de Thrips tabaci Lindeman en el cultivo de cebolla Allium cepa L. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Agronomía. Tesis de maestría. 35-67 pp. https://repositorio.unal.edu.co/handle/unal/63820.

Chaires-Grijalva, M. P. 2012. Gamásidos (Acari: Mesostigmata). Ed. Ácaros de importancia en el suelo. Colegio de Postgraduados. Montecillo, Estado de México. 110-126 pp. ISBN: 978-607-715-059-6.

Chaires-Grijalva, M. P.; Estrada-Venegas, E. G.; Equihua-Martínez, A.; Moser, J. C. and Blomquist, S. R. 2016. Trophic habits of Mesostigmatid mites associated with bark beetles in Mexico. Journal of the Acarological Society of Japan. 25(1):161-S167. Doi.org/10.2300/acari.25.Suppl-161.

Demite, P. R.; Moraes, G. J.; McMurtry, J. A.; Denmark, H. A. and Castilho, R. C. 2023. Phytoseiidae Database. www.lea.esalq.usp.br/phytoseiidae.

García-Ortiz, N.; Marcelino, L. A.; Gives, P. M.; Arellano, M. E. L.; Garfias, C. R. B. y Garduño, R. G. 2015. Actividad depredadora in vitro de Lasioseius penicilliger (Arachnida: Mesostigmata) contra tres especies de nemátodos: Teladorsagia circumcincta, Meloidogyne sp. y Caenorhabditis elegans. Veterinaria México. 2(1):1-9. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S244867602015000100003 &script=sci-abstract.

Gavara, J.; Cabello, T.; Gallego, J. R.; Hernández-Suarez, E. and Piedra-Buena, D. A. 2022. Evaluation of the egg predator Blattisocius tarsalis (Mesostigmata: Blattisociidae) for the biological control of the potato tuber moth Tecia solanivora under storage conditions. Agriculture. 12(7):1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ agriculture12070920.

Knapp, M.; Van-Houten, Y.; Hoogerbrugge, H. and Bolckmans, K. 2013. Amblydromalus limonicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) as a biocontrol agent: literature review and new findings. Acarologia. 53(2):191-202. https://doi.org/10.1051/acarologia/20132088.

Knapp, M.; Van-Houten, Y.; Van-Baal, E. and Groot, T. 2018. Use of predatory mites in commercial biocontrol: current status and future prospects. Acarology. 58(1):72-82. https://doi.org/10.24349/acarologia/20184275.

Kumar, V.; Xiao, Y.; McKenzie, C. L. and Osborne L. S. 2015. Early establishment of the Phytoseiid mite Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on pepper seedlings in a predator-in-first approach. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 65(4):465-481 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10493-015-9895-2.

Lam, W.; Paynter, Q. and Zhang, Z. Q. 2019. Predation, prey preference and reproduction of predatory mites Amblydromalus limonicus (Garman), Amblyseius herbicolus (Chant) and Neoseiulus cucumeris (Oudemans) (Mesostigmata: phytoseiidae) on immature Scricothrips staphylinus Haliday (Thysanoptera: thripidae), a biocontrol agent of gorse. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 24(3):508-519. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.24.3.14.

Lindquist, E. E.; Krantz, G. W. and Walter, D. E. 2009. Order Mesostigmata. Ed. A manual of acarology, third edition. Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock. 124-232 pp.

McMurtry, J. A. and Croft, B. A. 1997. Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annual Review of Entomology. 42(1):291-321.

Messelink, G. and Holstein-saj, R. 2008. Improving thrips control by the soil dwelling predatory mite Macrocheles robustulus (Berlese). IOBC/WPRS Bull. 32(1):135-138.

Moreira, G. F. and de Moraes, G. J. 2015. The potential of free living laelapid mites (Mesostigmata: Laelapidae) as biological control agents. Ed. Prospects for biological control of plant feeding mites and other harmful organisms. 19(1):77-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15042-0-3.

Moreno, I. P. y Mancebón, V. S. M. 2011. Importancia y uso de los ácaros fitoseidos (Acari, Phytoseiidae) en el manejo agroecológico de plagas. Manejo agroecológico de sistemas. Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (BUAP). México. 69-92 pp. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299657957-Importancia-y-uso-de-los-acaros-fitoseidos-Acari-Phytoseiidae-en-el-Manejo-Agroecologico-de-Plagas.

Navarro-Campos, C.; Pekas, A.; Moraza, M. L.; Aguilar, A. and García-Marí, F. 2012. Soil-dwelling predatory mites in citrus: Their potential as natural enemies of thrips with special reference to Pezothrips kellyanus (Thysanoptera: thripidae). Biological Control. 63(2):201-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.07.007.

Ortiz, N. G.; Marcelino, L. A.; Gives, P. M.; Arellano, M. E. L.; Garfias, C. R. B. y Garduño R. G. 2015. Actividad depredadora in vitro de Lasioseius penicilliger (Arachnida: Mesostigmata) contra tres especies de nemátodos: Teladorsagia circumcincta, Meloidogyne sp. y Caenorhabditis elegans. Veterinaria México. 2(1):1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.21753/vmoa.2.1.340.

Pirayeshfar, F.; Moayeri, H. R. S.; Silva, G. L. and Ueckermann, E. A. 2022. Comparison of biological characteristics of the predatory mite Blattisocius mali (Acari: Blattisocidae) reared on frozen eggs of Tyrophagus putrescentiae (Acari: Acaridae) alone and in combination with cattail and olive pollens. Systematic and applied acarology. 27(3):399-409. Doi.org/10.1186/s41938-022-00616-5.

Riahi, E.; Fathipour, Y.; Talebi, A. A. and Mehrabadi M. 2017. Natural diets versus factitious prey: comparative effects on development, fecundity and life table of Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: phytoseiidae). Systematic and Applied Acarology. 22(5):711-723. https://doi.org/10.11158/saa.22.5.10.

Rodríguez-Aragón, S. M.; Vargas, Y. A. M.; Sabogal, A. E. y Rodríguez, M. L. 2018. Investigación, desarrollo y registro de enemigos naturales para control biológico. Caso: Phytoseiulus persimilis. 2(1):716-741. http://hdl.handle.net/ 20.500.12324/34079.

Rodríguez, H.; Montoya, A. Y.; Pérez, M. y Ramos, M. 2013. Reproducción masiva de ácaros depredadores Phytoseiidae: retos y perspectivas para Cuba. Revista de Protección Vegetal. 28(1):12-22. http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci-arttext&pid=S1010-27522013000100002.

Schoeller, E. N.; McKenzie, C. L. and Osborne, L.S. 2020. Comparison of the Phytoseiid mites Amblyseius swirskii and Amblydromalus limonicus for biological control chilli thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 82(3):309-318.

Vangansbeke, D.; Nguyen, D. T.; Audenaert, J.; Verhoeven, R.; Deforce, K.; Gobin, B.; Tirry, L. and Clercq, P. 2014. Diet-dependent cannibalism in the omnivorous Phytoseiid mite Amblydromalus limonicus. Biological control. 74(1):30-35. ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.03.015.

Walter, D. E. and Proctor, H. C. 2013b. Mites in soil and litter systems. In: mites: ecology, evolution and Behaviour. Springer, Dordrecht. 161-212 pp. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-94-007-7164-2-8.

Published

2024-05-21

How to Cite

Esquivel-Ayala, Blanca Alicia, Martha Patricia Chaires-Grijalva, Silvano Montañez-Hernández, Blanca Nieves Lara-Chávez, and Margarita Vargas-Sandoval. 2024. “Methods of Rearing and Reproduction Predatory Mites of the Order Mesostigmata”. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas 15 (3). México, ME:e3676. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v15i3.3676.

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)