Network flow optimization in the formulation of an investment project in Tecamachalco, Puebla

Authors

  • Gonzalo Medel Chavéz Postgraduate in Socioeconomics, Statistics and Informatics-Economics-Postgraduate College. Mexico-Texcoco Federal Highway km 36.5, Montecillo, Texcoco, State of Mexico. ZC. 56230.
  • Oscar Antonio Arana-Coronado Postgraduate in Socioeconomics, Statistics and Informatics-Economics-Postgraduate College. Mexico-Texcoco Federal Highway km 36.5, Montecillo, Texcoco, State of Mexico. ZC. 56230. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5720-7561
  • Roberto Calos García-Sanchez Postgraduate in Socioeconomics, Statistics and Informatics-Economics-Postgraduate College. Mexico-Texcoco Federal Highway km 36.5, Montecillo, Texcoco, State of Mexico. ZC. 56230.
  • Ramón Valdivia Alcalá Division of Economic-Administrative Sciences-Chapingo Autonomous University. Mexico-Texcoco Federal Highway km 38.5, Chapingo, State of Mexico, Mexico. ZC. 56230.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v13i6.2914

Keywords:

linear programming, network flow, optimization, projects, vegetables

Abstract

Using linear programming, a network flow model was formulated to optimize the use of the land of small producers in the area of the Tecamachalco Valley, Puebla, Mexico. The optimal crop pattern was estimated in order to increase net profits over a production horizon and obtain financial indicators such as NPV, IRR and B/C R. These values were compared with the traditional methodology of project evaluation. The production horizon was five years for five horticultural crops: onion, tomato, bell pepper, cucumber and zucchini. The results indicated that the optimal crop pattern was to produce tomato in spring-summer (s-s) and bell pepper in autumn-winter (a-w). A NPV of $295 229.84 pesos, an IRR of 68.64% and a B/C ratio of 1.52 were obtained. The net profit of the production plan was $7 422 367.00 pesos, being between 15 and 45% higher with respect to the individual production of each crop. For the selected crops, profits of $6 254 668.49 and $6 339 146.18 pesos were calculated for tomatoes and bell peppers, respectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alvarado, B. J. 2009. La programación lineal aplicación de las pequeñas y medianas empresas. Reflexiones. 88(1):89-105. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=72912559007.

Bazaraa, M. S.; Jarvis, J. J. and Sherali, H. D. 2010. Linear Programming and Network Flows. 4th (Ed). Editorial Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley y Sons, Inc. 748 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780471703778

CONASAMI, 2020. Secretaria del Trabajo y Previsión social. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/ attachment/file/525061/Tabla-de-salarios-m-nmos-vigentes-apartir-del-01-de-enero-de-2020.pdf.

CONEVAL, 2018. Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2013-2018. Ciudad de México: Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social.

CONUEE, 2011. Estudio de Sistemas de Bombeo Agropecuarios en México, México DF.

CRETEALC-México, 2011. Manejo del acuífero del valle de Tecamachalco, Puebla, México.

Detlefsen, N. K. and Leck, A. L. 2004. Modelling optimal crop sequences using network flows. Tjele, Denmark: University of Aarhus, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Agroecology and Environment. 94(2):566-572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2007.02.002

Forrester, R. J. and Rodríguez, M. S. 2018. An integrer programming approach to crop rotation planning at an organic farm. The UMAP Journal. 38(4):5-25.

Fundar, 2014. Centro de Análisis e Investigación. Infografía: ¿Por qué es importante la pequeña agricultura? Subsidios al Campo en México. https://fundar.org.mx/porque-es-importante-la-pequena-agricultura/.

Gittinger, J. P. 1982. Análisis económico de proyectos agrícolas. Banco Mundial. Madrid, España. 323-442 pp.

Kaiser, H. M. and Messer, K. D. 2011. Mathematical Programming for Agricultural, Environmental, and Resource Economics. United States of America: John Wiley y Sons Inc. 151-155 pp.

Jebelli, J.; Paterson, B. and Abdelwahab, A. 2016. A linear programming model to optimize cropping pattern in small-scale irrigation schemes: an application to Mekabo Scheme in Tigray, Ethiopia. International Journal of Environmental and Agriculture Research. 2(8):24-34.

INEGI, 2018. Encuesta Nacional Agropecuaria 2017, CDMX: https://www.inegi.org.mx/ contenidos/programas/ena/2017/doc/mini-ena17.pdf.

INEGI, 2019. Marco Geoestadístico. Available at: https://www.inegi.org.mx/temas/mg/.

Mohamad, N. H. and Said, F. K. 2011. A mathematical programming approach to crop mix problem. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 6(1):191-197.

Pérez, M. D. 2000. Formulación y evaluación de proyectos de inversión. 1ra. Ed. DICEA. Chapingo, Estado de México: 150 p.

Prisenk, J. and Turk, J. 2015. A multi-goal mathematical approach for the optimization of crop lanning on organic farms: a Slovenian case study. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 52(4):971-979.

Render, B. C.; Stair, R. M. y Hanna, M. E. 2012. Métodos cuantitativos para los negocios. 11va. Ed. México. Pearson Education. 429-457 pp.

Reyes, O. S. y Reyes, R. E. 2018. La historia del crédito agrícola en México. México, DF. Cámara de Diputados LXIII Legislatura. 341-344 pp.

SEDESOL, 2011. Secretaría de Desarrollo Social. Pobreza, migración y capacidades básicas en la población jornalera agrícola en México. Resultados de la Encuesta Nacional de Jornaleros Agrícolas 2009, México, DF.

SIAP, 2019. Sistema de Información Agroalimentaria de Consulta. Ciudad de México: SADER. https://nube.siap.gob.mx/gobmx-publicaciones-siap/pag/2019/Atlas-Agroalimentario-2019.

Published

2022-10-24

How to Cite

Medel Chavéz, Gonzalo, Oscar Antonio Arana-Coronado, Roberto Calos García-Sanchez, and Ramón Valdivia Alcalá. 2022. “Network Flow Optimization in the Formulation of an Investment Project in Tecamachalco, Puebla”. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas 13 (6). México, ME:1015-26. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v13i6.2914.

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2