Optimal associativity in rural areas of Ecuador using game theory
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v12i7.2890Keywords:
Losses, associativity, collective economy, agricultural planning, commercializationAbstract
Agriculture in Latin America and specifically in Ecuador seeks to solve self-consumption and sales needs. In Ecuador, thousands of households are currently engaged in agriculture, which represents 70 of the country’s agricultural production and 60% of the food that makes up the basic basket. The objective of this research is to propose a model so that producers can work in agroecological associations using cooperative game theory, achieving to improve their productivity, coming to compete in a dynamism of costs, supply, demand, distance and time. A study with a mixed approach was conducted, since in the quantitative part, semi-structured surveys, descriptive analysis, as well as secondary information for the numerical mathematical model of cooperative game theory were used. In the qualitative part, being a little studied phenomenon, the sample size was 76 agro-producers, and the sampling was for convenience. For its part, the research design was non-experimental, cross-sectional since the data were collected in a single moment (2019). The survey consisted of 13 items, among which were their geographical location, socioeconomic characteristics of the producer and agricultural production, collection-commercialization and sale of the product, among others. The information from the survey was analyzed using descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages and averages). Finally, using the results of the surveys and secondary databases, their location was georeferenced to simulate two comparative scenarios of working or not in association using the Matlab software. The findings suggest that it is important to work with a maximum of 20 producers per association, with the optimal number being less than 10 agro-producers, thus reducing productivity losses by 6.4% (14.4 kg) of production.
Downloads
References
Altier, M.; Nicholls, C. and Henao, A. Y. 2015. Agroecology and the design of climate change-resilient farming system. Agron. Sustainable Development. 35:869-890.
Altieri, M. A. 2002. Agroecology: the science of natural resource management for poor farmers in marginal environments. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. (Ed.). 1-24 pp.
Altieri, M. and Toledo, V. M. 2011. The agroecological revolution of latin America: rescuing nature, securing food sovereignity and empowering peasants. J. Peasant Studies. 587-612 pp.
Barkin, D. y Fuentes-Carrasco, M. Z. 2012. La significación de una economía ecológica radical. Rev. Iberoam. Econ. Ecol. 19:1-14.
Brown, F. 1984. La evolución de la teoría de la oferta en condiciones de competencia perfecta. Inv. Econ. 43(167):255-258. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42779424.
Cabrera, J.; Morales, D. and Medina, R. 2019. Reducing power losses in smart grids with cooperative game theory. In: Ustun, T. S. Advanced communication and control methods for future Smartgrids London, United Kingdom. Intechopen. 49-65 pp.
Gobierno Autónomo Descentralizado Municipal del Cantón Cuenca. 2019. Alcaldía de Cuenca. http://www.cuenca.gov.ec/.
Granot, D. 2010. The reactive bargaining set for cooperative games. Inter. J. Game Theory. 39(1):163-170.
Hair, J. B. 2004. Investigación de mercados. McGraw-Hill. México, DF.
Heifer. 2016. Plan de negocios feria agroecológica de la escuela agroecológica de mujeres Saraguras. http://www.heiferecuador.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/5.-plan-de-negocios feria-eams.pdf.
Hernández-Sampieri, R. y Mendoza-Torres, C. P. 2018. Metodología de la investigación. Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. Mc Graw Hill Education. México, DF.
Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos. 2018. Ecuador en cifras. https://www.ecuadorencifras. gob.ec/encuesta-de-superficie-y-produccion-agropecuaria-continua-2018/.
Intriago, R. Y. 2018. Agroecología en el ecuador. Proceso histórico, logros y desafíos. Agroecología. 11(2):95-113.
Jiménez-Losada, A. 2017. Models for cooperative games with fuzzy relations among the agents. Studies in Fuzziness Soft Computing. 355:1-36.
MAG. 2014. Ministerio de agricultura y ganadería la agroecología está presente: mapeo de productores agroecológicos y del estado de la agroecología en la sierra y costa ecuatoriana. Quito: Heifer-Ecuador.
Peleg, B. and Sudhölter, P. 2007. Introduction to the theory of cooperative games. Berlín: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Rivera, C. 2019. Desarrollo de estrategias para el incremento de consumo de productos agroecológicos en la provincia del Azuay-Ecuador. Buenos Aires.
Saal, M. Y. 2015. Agroecología y agroecología y soberanía alimentaria, el caso de la feria agroecológica de Córdoba. https://issuu.com/magdalenasaal/docs/merged?fbclid= iwar0x urguxz-bzskbmujloi-ho81-yljtkbsj7ol21lnk1wjhebejeszr4do.
Santacoloma, P. 2016. Hacia una definición de cadenas cortas agroalimentarias. Taller de intercambio de experiencias: cadenas cortas agroalimentarias. FAO. Ciudad de México. 593dp.com/index.php/593-digital-publisher/login/signIn. 5-7 pp.
SIN. 2019. Sistema Nacional de Información. 2019. Planes de desarrollo y ordenamiento territorial. Retrieved from https://multimedia.planificacion.gob.ec/pdot/descargas.html.
Toledo, V. M.; Boege, E. and Barrera-Bassol, N. 2010. The biocultural heritage of México: an overview. Landscape. (Ed.). 6-10 pp.
Young, H. 2005. Monotonic solutions of cooperative game. Inter. J. Game Theory. 14:65-72.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas accept the following conditions:
In accordance with copyright laws, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas recognizes and respects the authors’ moral right and ownership of property rights which will be transferred to the journal for dissemination in open access. Invariably, all the authors have to sign a letter of transfer of property rights and of originality of the article to Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP) [National Institute of Forestry, Agricultural and Livestock Research]. The author(s) must pay a fee for the reception of articles before proceeding to editorial review.
All the texts published by Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas —with no exception— are distributed under a Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which allows third parties to use the publication as long as the work’s authorship and its first publication in this journal are mentioned.
The author(s) can enter into independent and additional contractual agreements for the nonexclusive distribution of the version of the article published in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas (for example include it into an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it is clearly and explicitly indicated that the work was published for the first time in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas.
For all the above, the authors shall send the Letter-transfer of Property Rights for the first publication duly filled in and signed by the author(s). This form must be sent as a PDF file to: revista_atm@yahoo.com.mx; cienciasagricola@inifap.gob.mx; remexca2017@gmail.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International license.