Trophic behavior of insectivorous birds in agroforestry systems immersed in mesophilic forest

Authors

  • Claudio Romero-Día Maestría en Ciencias en Agroforestería para el Desarrollo Sostenible-Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Carretera Federal México-Texcoco km 38.5, Chapingo, Texcoco, México. CP. 56230. Tel. 595 9521500
  • Saúl Ugalde-Lezama Área de Recursos Naturales Renovables-Departamento de Suelos-Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Carretera Federal México-Texcoco km 38.5, Chapingo, Texcoco, México. CP. 56230
  • Rosa María García-Núñez Maestría en Ciencias en Agroforestería para el Desarrollo Sostenible-Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Carretera Federal México-Texcoco km 38.5, Chapingo, Texcoco, México. CP. 56230. Tel. 595 9521500
  • Uriel Marcos-Rivera Área de Recursos Naturales Renovables-Departamento de Suelos-Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Carretera Federal México-Texcoco km 38.5, Chapingo, Texcoco, México. CP. 56230
  • Yessenia Cruz-Miranda Área de Recursos Naturales Renovables-Departamento de Suelos-Universidad Autónoma Chapingo. Carretera Federal México-Texcoco km 38.5, Chapingo, Texcoco, México. CP. 56230

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v11i2.2298

Keywords:

birdlife, foraging, hunting, sympatric

Abstract

In order to know the hunting techniques that birds use in the capture of their prey, from August (2018) to January (2019), the bird monitoring was applied, using systematic sampling, point count with fixed radius and intensive search. Observation frequency (FO) and relative abundance index (IAR) were determined. To determine association between birds and hunting techniques, Poisson regression analysis (ARP) was applied. To learn more important hunting techniques, principal component analysis (ACP) was applied. To determine differences between hunting techniques and infer if what is recorded is present, Kruskal-wallis and X2 were applied. FO notes that the most frequent hunting techniques are collect (63.7%), inspect (15.32%) and boost (8.06%). The IAR suggests average values of 0.24; 0.25; 0.333; 0.142. The ARP suggests better fit models with an AIC= 49.506. The ACP explains 100% inertia. Kruskal-wallis shows differences in CT and CT-PT-BMM. The X2 evidence that what is recorded is expected. There is evidence of sympatric coexistence in registered bird species because there is no competition for the resource or the hunting technique used to capture their prey.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2020-03-23

How to Cite

Romero-Día, Claudio, Saúl Ugalde-Lezama, Rosa María García-Núñez, Uriel Marcos-Rivera, and Yessenia Cruz-Miranda. 2020. “Trophic Behavior of Insectivorous Birds in Agroforestry Systems Immersed in Mesophilic Forest”. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas 11 (2). México, ME:241-52. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v11i2.2298.

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.