Yield and response of soybean varieties to whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) in three planting dates

Authors

  • Edgardo Cortez Mondaca Campo Experimental Valle del Fuerte- INIFAP. Carretera Internacional km 1609, C. P. 81110. Juan José Ríos, Guasave, Sinaloa
  • Jesús Pérez Márquez EVACU- INIFAP- Carretera Culiacán- Eldorado km 17.5, C. P. 80000.Culiacán, Sinaloa
  • Franklin Gerardo Rodríguez Cota Campo Experimental Valle del Fuerte- INIFAP. Carretera Internacional km 1609, C. P. 81110. Juan José Ríos, Guasave, Sinaloa
  • José Luis Martínez Carrillo Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora. 5 de febrero 818 sur. C. P. 85000, Cd. Obregón, Sonora
  • Libnih Cervantes Cárdenas Campo Experimental Valle del Fuerte- INIFAP. Carretera Internacional km 1609, C. P. 81110. Juan José Ríos, Guasave, Sinaloa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v4i7.1146

Keywords:

phenology, genotypes, whitefly, preference, resistance

Abstract

Planting date studies are important to help understand adaptation, behavior and plasticity of new plant materials in a given environment, under different management conditions and pressure of abiotic and biotic factors. During the spring-summer 2009-2009 was evaluated the agronomic behavior, phenology and response to whitefly of 12 soybean genotypes on three sowing dates in northern Sinaloa, Mexico. Treatments included six soybean varieties not evaluated in the region: AG 5605, AG 5903, AG 5905, AG 6301, AG 6702 and DB 6451; three commercial varieties Cajeme, Hector (Nainari) and Balbuena S-94; the variety Hutcheson highly preferred by white fly and two advanced lines from the National Research Institute for Forestry, Agriculture and Livestock candidates to new soybean varieties for the Northwest of Mexico: Cu04-139 and Cu04-238. The best genotype combinations by planting date in relation to grain yield were: CU04-139 with 2 496.1 and 2 442.9 kg ha-1  in the first and second planting date, Balbuena S-94; AG 6702 and AG 6301 with 2 360.8; 2 261.3 and 2 247.5 kg ha-1 in the first, third and second planting date respectively. The most preferred genotypes by adults and pupa of whitef ly are Hutcheson, DB 6451, AG 5905 and AG 6301. In contrast the less preferred varieties and less infested were Hector, CU04-238, S-94, Cajeme and AG 5903. The third planting date showed the greatest abundance of whitef lies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2018-04-25

How to Cite

Cortez Mondaca, Edgardo, Pérez Márquez Jesús, Rodríguez Cota Franklin Gerardo, Martínez Carrillo José Luis, and Cervantes Cárdenas Libnih. 2018. “Yield and Response of Soybean Varieties to Whitefly Bemisia Tabaci (Genn.) in Three Planting Dates”. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas 4 (7). México, ME:1067-80. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v4i7.1146.

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.