Nutritional value of the forage from sorghums evaluated in the Bajío

Authors

  • Jaime Cruz Rodríguez-Gómez Posgrado en Recursos Genéticos y Productividad-Producción de Semillas-Colegio de Postgraduados. Carretera México-Texcoco km 36.5, Montecillo, Texcoco, Estado de México, México. CP. 56264
  • Miguel Hernández-Martínez Campo Experimental Bajío-INIFAP. Carretera Celaya-San Miguel de Allende km 6.5, Celaya, Guanajuato, México. CP. 38110

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v16i7.3854

Keywords:

Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench., acid detergent fiber, ethereal extract, neutral detergent fiber

Abstract

Sorghum forage generally provides yields similar to that of corn, its silage contains less starch, similar proteins, and more fiber than corn, and its water requirement is lower, which has made it an alternative to forage corn. In 2022, at the Animal Nutrition Laboratory of the Postgraduate Program in Genetic Resources and Productivity, Livestock Program of the College of Postgraduates, Montecillo Campus, we carried out the bromatological analysis of forage samples from sorghum cultivars grown during the autumn-winter agricultural cycle of 2021 at the Bajío Experimental Field of INIFAP, with the aim of evaluating their nutritional value. A completely randomized design with 3 replications was used. The statistical analysis was performed through a Tukey test at 5% for the comparison of means between cultivars, using the RStudio 4.3.3 statistical package. The Súper Sorgo 35 cultivar presented the highest values for neutral detergent fiber (76.19%) and total protein (13.52%). The cultivars Silage king (95.6%), Silo Máster (20.05%), ET-V1 (56.87%), and RB Cañero (1.84%) exhibited the highest values for dry matter, ash, acid detergent fiber and ethereal extract, respectively. Sorghum forage showed statistically significant differences between cultivars for all the variables studied, with Silage King and Súper Sorgo 35 standing out with a higher percentage of dry matter and protein, respectively, compared to the rest of the cultivars assessed. The nutritional value of the forage of the sorghums evaluated was outstanding, making this crop an alternative for animal feed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amelework, B.; Shimelis, H.; Tongtoona, P.; Mark-Laing, M. and Mengistu, F. 2015. Genetic variation in lowland sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) landraces assessed by simple sequence repeats. Plant Gener Resour. 13(2):131-141.

Bernard, J. K. 2015. Forage sorghum for dairy cattle. https://articles.extension.org/pages/71948/ forage-sorghum-for-dairy-cattle.

Borba, L. F. P.; Ferreira, M. D. A.; Guim, A. and Tabosa, J. N. 2012. Nutritive value of different silage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) cultivars. Acta Sci Anim Sci. 34(2):123-129.

Casler, M. D. 2001. Breeding forage crops for increased nutritional value. In Advances in Agronomy. 71:51-107 Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(01)71012-7.

Elferink, S. J.; Driehuis, F.; Gottschal, J. C. and Spoelstra, S. F. 2000. Silage fermentation processes and their manipulation. FAO. Plant Production and Protection Papers. 17-30 pp.

Fardin, F.; Sani, B.; Moaveni, P.; Afsharmanesh, G. and Mozafari, H. 2023. Nutritional value and agronomic traits of forage sorghum under drought stress. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology. 48:102624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2023.102624.

Ferreira, F. D. J.; Bonfá, C. S.; Oliveira, D. E. P. D.; Magalhães, M. A.; Parrella, R. A. D. C. and Dallago, G. M. 2023. Chemical-bromatological composition of silages from biomass sorghum genotypes. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical. 53:e76362. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-40632023v5376362.

Fonseca, L.; Mezzalira, J. C.; Bremm, C.; Filho, R. S. A.; Gonda, H. L. and Carvalho, P. C. F. 2012. Management targets for maximising the short-term herbage intake rate of cattle grazing in Sorghum bicolor. Livest Sci. 145(1-3):205-211.

Gois, G. C.; Silva-Matias, A. G.; Araújo, G. G. L. D.; Campos, F. S.; Simões, W. L.; Lista, F. N.; Machado Guimarães, M. J.; Silva, T. S.; Rodrigues-Magalhães, A. L. and Bevenuto-Silva, J. K. 2022. Nutritional and fermentative profile of forage sorghum irrigated with saline water. Biological Rhythm Research. 53(2):246-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2019.1629088.

Granados-Niño, J. A.; Reta-Sanchez, D. G.; Santana, O. I.; Reyes-González, A.; Ochoa-Martínez, E.; Diaz, F. y Sánchez-Duarte, J. I. 2021. Efecto de la altura de corte de sorgo a la cosecha sobre el rendimiento de forraje y el valor nutritivo del ensilaje. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 12(3):958-968. https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v12i3.5724.

Mcdonald, P.; Henderson, A. R. and Heron, S. J. E. 1991. The biochemistry of silage 2nd. Ed. Marlow. Chalcombe. 180-197 pp.

Mejía-Kerguelén, S.; Tapia-Coronado, J. J.; Atencio-Solano, L. M. y Cadena-Torres, J. 2019. Producción y calidad nutricional del forraje del sorgo dulce en monocultivo e intercalado con maíz y frijol. Pastos y Forrajes. 42(2):133-142.

Meyer, D. W. and Brosz, J. D. 1979. Evaluation of sweet sorghum in North Dakota. Final report on purchase order S-2975. Battelle, Columbus, OH. 5-9 pp.

Moraes, S. D. D.; Jobim, C. C.; Silva, M. S. D. and Marquardt, F. I. 2013. Production and chemical composition of hybrid sorghum and corn for silage. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal. 14(4):624-634.

Mutalik-Desai, S. G.; Vaidya, P. S. and Pardo, P. A. 2020. Commercial sector breeding of sorghum: current status and future prospects. Sorghum in the 21st century: Food-fodder-feed-fuel for a rapidly changing world. 333-354 pp.

Pereira, E. S.; Mizubuti, I. Y.; Pinheiro, S. M.; Villarroel, A. B. S. and Clementino, R. H. 2007. Avaliação da qualidade nutricional de silagens de milho (Zea mays, L). Revista Caatinga. 20(3):8-12.

Pinho, R. M. A.; Santos, E. M.; Rodrigues, J. A. S.; Macedo, C. H. O.; Campos, F. S.; Ramos, J. P. D. F. and Perazzo, A. F. 2013. Avaliação de genótipos de milheto para silagem no semiárido. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal. 14(3):426-436.

Sánchez, A. C.; Subudhi, P. K.; Rosenow, D. T. and Nguyen, H. T. 2002. Mapping QTLs associated with drought resistance (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Plant. Mol. Biol. 48:713-726.

SIAP. 2023. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. Anuario estadístico de la producción agrícola. Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural. Ciudad de México. https://nube.siap.gob.mx/cierreagricola/.

Singh, S; Bhat, B. V.; Shukla, G. P.; Singh, K. K. and Gehrana, D. 2018. Variation in carbohydrate and protein fractions, energy, digestibility and mineral concentrations in stover of sorghum cultivars. Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales. 6(1):42-52. https://doi.org/10.17138/TGFT(6)42-52.

Skonieski, F. R.; Nornberg, J. L.; Azevedo, E. B.; David, D. B.; Kessler, J. D. and Menegaz, A. L. 2010. Produção, caracterização nutricional e fermentativa de silagens de sorgo forrageiro e sorgo duplo propósito. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences. 32(1):27-32.

Van Soest, P. J. 1972. Foraje fiber analyses (apparatus, reagentes, procedures and some applications). Agricultural Research Service. United States Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Hanbook Nº. 379. 20 p.

Van Soest, P. J. 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. 2nd Ed. Ithaca. Cornell University. 320-354 pp.

Van-Soest, P. J.; Robertson, J. B. and Lewis, B. A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science. 74(10):3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S00220302(91)78551-2.

Vasconcelos, R. C. D.; Von-Pinho, R. G.; Rezende, A. V.; Pereira, M. N. y Brito, A. H. D. 2005. Efeito da altura de corte das plantas na produtividade de matéria seca e em características bromatológicas da forragem de milho. Ciência e Agrotecnologia. 29(6):1139-1145. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542005000600006.

Published

2025-11-14

How to Cite

Rodríguez-Gómez, Jaime Cruz, and Migue Hernández-Martínez. 2025. “Nutritional Value of the Forage from Sorghums Evaluated in the Bajío”. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas 16 (7). México, ME:e3854. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v16i7.3854.

Issue

Section

Articles