Influence of humic and fulvic substances on soil attributes

Authors

  • Marco Aurélio da Silva Universidad Estatal del Norte de Paraná-Campus Luiz Meneghel. Laboratorio de Microbiología de Suelos. BR 369, km 54. CP. 86360-000.
  • Natália Maria Maciel Guerra-Silva Universidad Estatal del Norte de Paraná-Campus Luiz Meneghel. Sector Enfermería, BR 369, km 54, CP. 86360-000
  • Itacir Eloi-Sandini Universidad Estatal del Centro-Oeste. Guarapuava-PR.
  • Leopoldo Sussumu-Matsumoto Universidad Estatal del Norte de Paraná-Campus Luiz Meneghel. Laboratorio de Microbiología de Suelos. BR 369, km 54. CP. 86360-000.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v16i4.3644

Keywords:

Glycine max, bioinputs, rhizobacteria, soil quality bioindicators

Abstract

Humic and fulvic substances are organic compounds originating from the decomposition of plant and animal residues in the environment, which can be used as alternative inputs for the management of various crops. The objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of humic and fulvic substances on the chemical and microbiological attributes of the soil in soybean crops. Soil samples were collected at a depth of 0-10 cm before planting and at the flowering stage (R2), and chemical attributes were evaluated, such as macronutrient content, pH and organic matter, and microbiological attributes such as Microbial Biomass Carbon (MBC), Basal Respiration (BR), microbial and metabolic quotient to determine microbial activity. In agronomic parameters, plant development and productivity were evaluated. In the results of chemical attributes, little change was observed between treatments in the concentration of macronutrients; however, an improvement was observed in the concentration of organic matter in areas that received humic and fulvic substances at a dose of 4 L ha-1, a fact also observed in microbiological attributes, with an increase in the microbial community and significant improvement in biological activity of the soil. Data reflected the increase in productivity, with an increase of 10 to 14 bags per hectare, without and with association with Bacillus sp. respectively. It is concluded that humic and fulvic acids at a dose of 4 L ha-1 with or without association with the bacteria Bacillus sp. promoted improvements in the microbiological attributes of the soil and consequently in the development of soybean cultivation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ampong, K.; Thilakaranthna, M. S. and Gorim, L. Y. 2022. Understanding the role of humic acids on crop performance and soil health. Frontier in Agronomy. (4):1-14. Doi: 10.3389/fagro.2022.848621.

Anderson, T. H. and Domsch, K. H. 1993. The metabolic quotient for CO2 (qCO2) as a specific activity parameter to assess the effects of environmental conditions, such as pH, on the microbial biomass of forest soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 3(25):393-395.

Bertolin, D. C.; Sá, M. E.; Arf, O.; Furlani-Junior, E.; Colombo, A. S. and Carvalho, F. L. B. M. 2010. Aumento da produtividade de soja com a aplicação de bioestimulantes. Bragantia Campinas. 2(69):339-347. Doi:10.1590/S0006-87052010000200011.

Carmello, Q. A. C. and Oliveira, F. A. 2006. Nutrição de lavouras de soja: situação atual e perspectivas. Visão Agrícola. 5(1):8-11.

Caron, V. C.; Graças, J. P. and Castro, P. R. C. 2015. Condicionadores do solo: ácidos húmicos e fúlvicos. Piracicaba: ESALQ-USP. 13-27 pp.

CONAB. 2024. Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. Evolução de produção de soja no Brasil. Brasília. Conab. 111 p.

CONAB. 2016. Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. Evolução dos custos de produção de soja no Brasil. Brasília. Conab. 156 p.

Embrapa. 2009. empresa brasileira de pesquisa agropecuária. Manual de análises químicas de solos, plantas e fertilizantes. Silva, F. C. Ed. 2 Ed. Rev. Ampl. Embrapa Informação tecnológica. 627 p.

Ferreira, D. F. 2019. Sisvar: a computer analysis system to fixed effects split plot type designs. Revista Brasileira de Biometria. 4(37):529-535.

Galambos, N.; Compant, S.; Moretto, M.; Sicher, C.; Puopolo, G. and Wäckers, F. 2020. Humic acid enhances the growth of tomato promoted by endophytic bacterial strains through the activation of hormone growth and transcription related processes. Frontier in Plant Science. 11:1-14. Doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.582267.

Halpern, M.; Bar-Tal, A.; Ofek, M.; Minz, D.; Muller, T. and Yermiyahu, U. 2015. Chapter two is the use of biostimulants for enhancing nutrient uptake. Advances in Agronomy. 130:141-174. Doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2014.10.001.

Hita, D.; Fuentes, M.; Zamarreño, A. M.; Ruiz, Y. and García-Mina, J. M. 2020. Culturable bacterial endophytes from sedimentary humic acid-treated plants. Frontier in Plant Science. 11:1-12. Doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00837.

Li, Y.; Fang, F.; Wei, J.; Wu, X.; Cui, R.; Li, G.; Zheng, F. and Tan, D. 2019. Humic acid fertilizer improved soil properties and soil microbial diversity of continuous cropping peanut: a three year experiment. Scientific reports. 1(9):1-9. Doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48620-4

Lopes, J. A. M.; Pelúzio, J. M. and Martins, G. S. 2016. Teor de proteína e óleo em grãos de soja, em diferentes épocas de plantio para fins industriais. Tecnologia & Ciência Agropecuária, João Pessoa. 3(10):49-53.

Morzelle, M. C.; Peters, L. P.; Geraldi, A. B.; Castro, P. R. C. and Mendes, A. C. C. M. 2017. Agroquímicos estimulantes, extratos vegetais e metabólicos microbianos na agricultura. Série produtor rural núm. 63. 1. Ed. Piracicaba. ESALQ divisão de biblioteca. 96 p.

Oliveira, F. A.; Sfredo, G. J.; Klepker, D. and Castro, C. 2019. Exigências minerais e adubação. Embrapa. https://www.agencia.cnptia.embrapa.br/gestor/soja/arvore/contag01-38-271020069132.html. 1-8 pp.

Silva, E. E.; Azevedo, P. H. S. and Polli, H. 2007. Determinação do carbono da biomassa microbiana do solo. Seropédica. Embrapa Agrobiológica. 6 p.

Silva, R. R. D.; Silva, M. L. N.; Cardoso, E. L.; Moreira, F. M. D. S.; Curi, N. and Alivisi, A. M. T. 2010. Biomassa e atividade microbiana em solos sob diferentes sistemas de manejo na região fisiográfica campos das vertentes MG. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Viçosa, MG. 5(34):1585-1592. Doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832010000500011.

Soares, L. H. 2013. Manejo fisiológico com base em tratamento de sementes e aplicação de organominerais via foliar para sistemas de alto potencial produtivo de soja. Dissertação (mestrado) - curso de agronomia, escola superior de agricultura Luiz de Queiroz. Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba. 130 p. Doi.org/10.11606/D.11.2014.tde-04022014-152437.

Tedesco, M. J.; Gianello, C.; Bissani, C. A.; Bohnem, H. and Vlkweiss, S. J. 1995. Análise de solo, plantas e outros materiais, 2 Ed. Porto alegre. UFRGS-Departamento de Solos. 174 p.

Published

2025-06-03

How to Cite

da Silva, Marco Aurélio, Natália Maria Maciel Guerra Silva, Itacir Eloi-Sandini, and Leopoldo Sussumu-Matsumoto. 2025. “Influence of Humic and Fulvic Substances on Soil Attributes”. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas 16 (4). México, ME:e3644. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v16i4.3644.

Issue

Section

Articles