Yield and quality of seven varieties of sugarcane in El Mante, Tamaulipas

Authors

  • José Reyes-Hernández Multidisciplinary Academic Unit Mante-Autonomous University of Tamaulipas. Boulevard Enrique Cárdenas González num. 1201, Col. Jardin, El Mante City, Tamaulipas, Mexico. ZC. 89840. Tel. 831 2320544
  • Rodolfo Torres-de los Santos Multidisciplinary Academic Unit Mante-Autonomous University of Tamaulipas. Boulevard Enrique Cárdenas González num. 1201, Col. Jardin, El Mante City, Tamaulipas, Mexico. ZC. 89840. Tel. 831 2320544
  • Hermelindo Hernández-Torres Multidisciplinary Academic Unit Mante-Autonomous University of Tamaulipas. Boulevard Enrique Cárdenas González num. 1201, Col. Jardin, El Mante City, Tamaulipas, Mexico. ZC. 89840. Tel. 831 2320544
  • Verónica Hernández-Robledo Multidisciplinary Academic Unit Mante-Autonomous University of Tamaulipas. Boulevard Enrique Cárdenas González num. 1201, Col. Jardin, El Mante City, Tamaulipas, Mexico. ZC. 89840. Tel. 831 2320544
  • Edwin Alvarado-Ramírez Multidisciplinary Academic Unit Mante-Autonomous University of Tamaulipas. Boulevard Enrique Cárdenas González num. 1201, Col. Jardin, El Mante City, Tamaulipas, Mexico. ZC. 89840. Tel. 831 2320544
  • Santiago Joaquín-Cancino Faculty of Engineering and Sciences-Autonomous University of Tamaulipas. University Center Campus Victoria, Knowledge Management Center building, 4th Floor, Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, Mexico. ZC. 87120. Tel. 834 3181721

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v13i5.3232

Keywords:

Saccharum officinarum L., Brix, processable stalks, sucrose

Abstract

The agro-industrial yield and juice quality of seven varieties (IMMEX 91-589, XMEX 91-917, IMMEX 95-25, MEX 95-59, ATEMEX 96-40, MEX 96-60 and IMMEX 98-13) of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.), plus CP 72-2086 as a control, were evaluated at the beginning of maturity. The experiment was conducted in El Mante, Tamaulipas, Mexico, between 2019 and 2020, under a randomized complete block design, with four repetitions and considering the varieties as a treatment. The variables were the yield of processable stalks (PSY) and sugar (SY), degrees Brix (oBx), sucrose concentration (S), purity (P), reducing sugars (Rs), moisture (M) and fiber (F). It was obtained that all showed significant statistical differences (p≤ 0.05) between varieties, except M and F (p> 0.05). In PSY, they increased the yield between 2.8 and 20% with respect to the control, except for IMMEX 98-13, which decreased 9.5%, and in SY all were equal to the control, except MEX 95-59 and IMMEX 98-13, which decreased the yield by 25.3 and 18.8%, respectively. As for Brix, S, P and Rs, all varieties obtained values similar to CP 72-2086 and in some cases they differed from each other. The results indicated that the varieties XMEX 91-917 and IMMEX 95-25 surpassed the control variety in PSY, while in SY and juice quality, they matched it, so they can be an option to diversify the varieties in the region of the state.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Begum, M. K.; Alam, M. R.; Islam, M. S. and Arefin, M. S. 2012. Effect of water stress on physiological characters and juice quality of sugarcane. India. Sugar Technology. 14(2):161-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-012-0140-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-012-0140-6

Cardozo, N. P. and Sentelhas, P. C. 2013. Climatic effects on sugarcane ripening under the influence of cultivars and crop age. Brasil. Scientia Agricola. 70(6):449-456. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162013000600011. Coale, F. J.; Sanchez, C. A.; Izuno, F. T. and Bottcher, A. B. 1993. Nutrient accumulation and removal by sugarcane grown on Everglades Histosols. Estados Unidos de América. Agron. J. 85(2):310-315. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500020028x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500020028x

Córdova-Gamas, G.; Salgado-García, S.; Castelán-Estrada, M.; Palma-López, D. J.; García-Moya, E.; Lagunes-Espinoza, L. D. C. y Córdova-Sánchez, S. 2016. Opciones de fertilización para el cultivo de caña de azúcar (Saccharum spp.) en Tabasco, México. México. Agroproductividad. 9(3):27-34.

Da Silva, P. P.; Soares, L.; Da Costa, J. G.; Da Silva, L.; Farías, J. C.; Rebelo, E.; Messias, J.; De Souza, G. V.; Nascimentoe, V. X.; Todaroe, A. R.; Riffel, A.; Grossi-de-Saf, M. F.; Pereira, M. H.; Goulart, A. E. and Ramalho, C. E. 2012. Path analysis for selection of drought tolerant sugarcane genotypes through physiological components. Estados Unidos de América. Industrial Crops and Products. 37(1):11-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.11.015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.11.015

Figueiredo, R.; Araújo, P.; Llerena, J. P. P. and Mazzafera, P. 2019. Suberin and hemicellulose in sugarcane cell wall architecture and crop digestibility: a biotechnological perspective. China. Food and Energy Security. 8(3):1-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.163. García-Fernández, F. G.; Herrera, M. Á. y Muñoz, N. E. S. 2014. La agroindustria azucarera en El Mante, Tamaulipas. Estrategias para potenciar la cadena de valor. México. Rev. Mex. Agron. 35:922-933.

Gilbert, R. A.; Shine, J. M.; Miller, J. D.; Rice, R. W. and Rainbolt, C. R. 2006. The effect of genotype, environment and time of harvest on sugarcane yields in Florida, USA. China. Field Crops Res. 95(2-3):156-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.02.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.02.006

Glaz, B.; Shine, J. M.; Irey, M. S.; Perdomo, R.; Powell, G. and Comstock, J. C. 2011. Seasonal fiber content of three sugarcane cultivars in three crop cycles on sand and muck soils. USA. Agron. J. 103(1):211-220. https://doi.org/10.2134/ agronj2010.0353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2010.0353

Gómez-Merino, F. C.; Trejo-Téllez, I.; Morales-Ramos, V.; Salazar-Ortiz, J.; Velasco-Velasco, J.; Sentíes-Herrera, H. E. y Ladewig, P. 2014. Necesidades de innovación en la producción de caña de azúcar. Agroproductividad. 7(2):22-26.

Gravois, K. 2020. Sugarcane variety performance. Pub. 3752:12. www.lsuagcenter.com/ articles/page1588964225077

Gravois, K. A. and Milligan, S. B. 1992. Genetic relationship between fiber and sugarcane yield components. Estados Unidos de América. Crop Sci. 32(1):62-67. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183X003200010014x. Inman-Bamber, N. G. and Smith, D. M. 2005. Water relations in sugarcane and response to water deficits. China. Fields Crops Res. 92(2-3):185-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005. 01.023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.023

Islam, M. S.; Pan, Y. B.; Lomax, L. and Grisham, M. P. 2021. Identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) controlling fibre content of sugarcane (Saccharum hybrids spp.). Alemania. Plant Breed. 140(2):360-366. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbr.12912.

Jackson, P. A. 2005. Breeding for improved sugar content in sugarcane. China. Fields Crops Res. 92(2-3):277-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.024

Méndez-Adorno, J. M.; Salgado-García, S.; Lagunes-Espinoza, L. C.; Mendoza-Hernández, J. R. H.; Castelán-Estrada, M.; Córdova-Sánchez, S. e Hidalgo-Moreno, C. I. 2016. Relación entre parámetros fisiológicos en caña de azúcar (Saccharum spp.) bajo suspensión de riego previo a la cosecha. México. Agroproductividad. 9(3):15-21. Pérez, E. A.; López, I. G.; Salgado-Garcia, S.; Rivera, S. I. y Sánchez, S. C. 2019. Fertilization alternatives for sugarcane crop in Pujiltic Sugarcane Mill, Chiapas, México. India. Sugar Technology. 21(5):756-764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-018-0692-1.

Salgado, S.; Núñez, R.; Peña, J. J.; Etchevers, J. D.; Palma, D. J. y Soto, R. M. 2003. Manejo de la fertilización en el rendimiento, calidad del jugo y actividad de invertasas en caña de azúcar. Venezuela. Interciencia. 28(10):576-580.

Salgado-García, S.; Castelán-Estrada, M.; Aranda-Ibañez, E. M.; Ortiz-Laurel, H.; Lagunes-Espinoza, L. C. y Córdoba-Sánchez, S. 2016. Calidad de jugos de caña de azúcar (Saccharum spp.) según el ciclo de cultivo en Chiapas, México. México. Agroproductividad. 9(7):23-28.

Sentíes-Herrera, H. E. y Gómez-Merino, F. C. 2014. Nuevas directrices en mejoramiento genético de caña de azúcar (Saccharum spp.). México. Agroproductividad. 7(2):9-15.

Singels, A.; Donaldson, R. A. and Smit, M. A. 2005. Improving biomass production and partitioning in sugarcane: theory and practice. China. Field Crops Res. 92(2):291-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.022. Singels, A.; Van Den Berg, M.; Smit, M. A.; Jones, M. R. and Van Antwerpen, R. 2010. Modelling water uptake, growth and sucrose accumulation of sugarcane subjected to water stress. China. Field Crops Research. 117(1):59-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010. 02.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.02.003

SAS. 2002. Statistical Analysis System. SAS User‘s Guide: Statistics (version 9.0). Cary, NC, USA: SAS Inst. Inc.

Suárez, J. H.; Menéndez, S. A.; González, M. A.; Delgado, M. I. y Gómez, P. J. R. 2018. Evaluación de genotipos de caña de azúcar en diferentes ambientes en el ingenio Ofelina, República de Panamá. Cuba. Centro Agrícola. 45(1):24-33.

Vargas, V.; Hernández, M. E.; Gutiérrez, L. J.; Plácido, J. M. y Jiménez, C. A. 2007. Clasificación climática del estado de Tamaulipas, México. México. Ciencia UAT. 2(2):15-19.

Vera-Espinosa, J. J.; Carrillo-Ávila, E.; Flores-Cáceres, S.; Arreola-Enríquez, J.; Osnaya-González, M. y Castillo-Aguilar, C. D. C. 2016. Evaluación agroindustrial de diez variedades de caña de azúcar (Saccharum spp.). México. Agroproductividad. 9(3):21-27. Waclawovsky, A. J.; Sato, P. M.; Lembke, C. G.; Moore, P. H. and Souza, G. M. 2010. Sugarcane for bioenergy production: an assessment of yield and regulation of sucrose content. Reino Unido. Plant Biotechnol. J. 8(3):263-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009. 00491.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00491.x

Downloads

Published

2022-08-02

How to Cite

Reyes-Hernández, José, Rodolfo Torres-de los Santos, Hermelindo Hernández-Torres, Verónica Hernández-Robledo, Edwin Alvarado-Ramírez, and Santiago Joaquín-Cancino. 2022. “Yield and Quality of Seven Varieties of Sugarcane in El Mante, Tamaulipas”. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas 13 (5). México, ME:883-92. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v13i5.3232.

Issue

Vol. 13 No. 5 (2022)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The authors who publish in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas accept the following conditions:

In accordance with copyright laws, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas recognizes and respects the authors’ moral right and ownership of property rights which will be transferred to the journal for dissemination in open access. Invariably, all the authors have to sign a letter of transfer of property rights and of originality of the article to Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP) [National Institute of Forestry, Agricultural and Livestock Research]. The author(s) must pay a fee for the reception of articles before proceeding to editorial review.      

All the texts published by Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas —with no exception— are distributed under a Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which allows third parties to use the publication as long as the work’s authorship and its first publication in this journal are mentioned.

The author(s) can enter into independent and additional contractual agreements for the nonexclusive distribution of the version of the article published in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas (for example include it into an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it is clearly and explicitly indicated that the work was published for the first time in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas.

For all the above, the authors shall send the Letter-transfer of Property Rights for the first publication duly filled in and signed by the author(s). This form must be sent as a PDF file to: revista_atm@yahoo.com.mx; cienciasagricola@inifap.gob.mx; remexca2017@gmail.

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International license.

Most read articles by the same author(s)