Rescue of traditional agricultural knowledge in the ñätho hñähñu

Authors

  • Manuel Osornio Aguiar Master of Science in Rural Sociology-Chapingo Autonomous University. Mexico-Texcoco highway km 38.5, Chapingo, State of Mexico. CP. 56230

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v13i4.3201

Keywords:

agricultural, biocultural, knowledge, Otomi

Abstract

The ñätho hñähñu are an ancient people and legitimate owners of the territories that today comprise the center and north of the State of Mexico, over the centuries they forge a way of life reciprocal and complementary with their environment, creating a worldview integrated into their territory and a complex system of symbols that give rise to their language, an essential element of their biocultural heritage and their knowledge that make it possible to structure the system of agricultural knowledge and develop the milpa and the backyard -Huähi ne Nxutahngu- and integrate them into their environment as an irreplaceable agroecological unit, in harmony with their worldview and consistent supplier of foods, medicines and raw materials, the study was conducted in March and September 2017 and 2018. The agricultural praxis of the Otomi is based on the rescue and reappraisal of their technical knowledge, built and validated based on accumulated experiences as means to overcome climatological and geographical conditions, guarantee their survival and reproduce as a society in a territory. That is, the system of symbols allows them to be collectivized in individual action by transferring the knowledge not only from the old man -Xhita- to children and grandchildren, but between families and localities of the same ethnicity, validating and collectivizing its social function.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldana, R. 2000. Castells, la era de la información. realidades y reflexiones sobre la globalización. Espiral. México, DF.

Bartra, V. A. 2010. Campesindios. Aproximaciones a los campesinos de un continente colonizado. La Nación. México, DF.

Boege, E. 2010. El Patrimonio biocultural de los pueblos indígenas de México. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia (INAH). México, DF.

Cornejo, M.; Besoaín, C. y Mendoza, F. 2011. Desafíos en la generación de conocimiento en la investigación social cualitativa contemporánea. Forum. Qualitative Social Research. 12 p.

Dussel, E. 1998. Ética de la liberación en la edad de la globalización y de la exclusión. Trota. España. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/401177ar

Garrido, V. L. 2011. Habermas y la teoría de la acción comunicativa. razón y palabra. México, DF.

Geertz, C. 2003. La interpretación de las culturas. Gedisa (Ed.). España.

Habermas, J. 2003. Acción comunicativa y razón sin trascendencia. Paidós. España.

Kobialka, A. 2014. El proyecto de Habermas en ciencia y técnica como ideología y sus legados en la búsqueda de una sociedad más justa. Ensenada, Argentina.

Mélich, J. C. 1998. Antropología simbólica y acción educativa. Paidós. Barcelona, España.

Torres, C. G. 2017. Sustentabilidad y compatibilidad. Universidad Autónoma Chapingo (UACH). Texcoco, Estado de México.

Published

2022-06-21

How to Cite

Osornio Aguiar, Manuel. 2022. “Rescue of Traditional Agricultural Knowledge in the ñätho hñähñu”. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas 13 (4). México, ME:727-33. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v13i4.3201.

Issue

Section

Investigation notes