New cocoa varieties selected in Colombia

Authors

  • Genaro Andrés Agudelo-Castañeda Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria-Agrosavia. Centro de Investigación La Suiza. Bucaramanga, Colombia. CP. 250047. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0469-1406
  • Eduar Yovany Antolinez-Sandoval Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria-Agrosavia. Centro de Investigación Tibaitatá, sede Cimpa, Barbosa, Colombia. CP. 250047 https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0145-6002
  • Eliana Yadira Báez-Daza Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria-Agrosavia. Centro de Investigación La Suiza. Bucaramanga, Colombia. CP. 250047. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1059-1604
  • Yeirme Yaneth Jaimes-Suárez Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria-Agrosavia. Centro de Investigación La Suiza. Bucaramanga, Colombia. CP. 250047. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7942-0598
  • Gladys Alejandra Romero-Guerrero Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria-Agrosavia. Centro de Investigación La Suiza. Bucaramanga, Colombia. CP. 250047

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v14i3.3057

Keywords:

compatibilidad sexual, componentes de rendimiento, madera fina tropical

Abstract

In recent years, the increasing cultivation of cocoa in Colombia has been consolidated into the country's agricultural economy, requiring further technological developments to improve productivity and profitability. Lack of genotypes and adapted and selected productive varieties is one of the causes for low yield. The aim of this study is the agronomic evaluation of eight cocoa genotypes TCS13, TCS19 (Theobroma Corpoica La Suiza), SCC53, SCC82, SCC83 (Selección Colombia Corpoica) and CCS 73, CCS77, CCS80 (Colección Corpoica La Suiza), compared to a commercial control ICS95 (Imperial Collage Selection), in four producing localities within the natural subregions of Montaña Santandereana and Magdalena Medio in northeastern Colombia, established in agroforestry systems with fine woods. The results identified two genotypes- TCS13 and TCS19- which were superior in yield (with production of 1.5 and 1.8 kg tree-1 year-1, respectively), low incidence of limiting diseases such as Frosty Pod Rot, and self-compatible. These results allowed the inclusion in the national registry of commercial cultivars in the Colombian Agricultural Institute (ICA) in 2017.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbott, P. C.; Benjamin, T. J.; Burniske, G. R.; Croft, M. M.; Fenton, M. C.; Kelly, C. R.; Lundy, M. M.; Rodríguez, C. F. and Wilcox, M. D. 2018. An analysis of the supply chain of cacao in Colombia. United states agency for international development (USAID). Washington, DC, USA. Cali. CO. 74-78 pp.

Agudelo, C. G. A.; Cadena, T. J.; Almanza, M. P. J. y Pinzón, S. E. H. 2018. Desempeño fisiológico de nueve genotipos de cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) bajo la sombra de tres especies forestales en Santander, Colombia. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hortíc. 12(1):223-232. https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2018v12i1.7341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2018v12i1.7341

Bostock, R. M.; Pye, M. F. and Roubtsova, T. V. 2014. Predisposition in plant disease: exploiting the nexus in abiotic and biotic stress perception and response. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 52(1):517-549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-172902

Core, T. R 2019. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.

Cubillos, G. 2017. Frosty pod rot, disease that affects the cocoa (Theobroma cacao) crops in Colombia. Crop Protec. 96(2017):77-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.01.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.01.011

Eskes, A. B.; Engels, J. M. M. and Lass, R. A. 2000. Working procedures for cocoa germplasm evaluation and selection. Proceedings of the CFC/ICCO/IPGRI Project Workshop. Montpellier, France. IPGRI, Rome, Italy. 95-99 pp.

García, C. R. G.; Perdomo, A. M.; Ortiz, R.; Beltrán, P. and López, K. 2014. Characterization of the supply and value chains of Colombian cocoa. Dyna. 81(187):30-40. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v81n187.39555. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v81n187.39555

García, G. A. G.; Gutiérrez, M. I.; Núñez, H. E. H.; Salazar, J. C. S. and Casanoves, F. 2020. Relevance of local knowledge in decision-making and rural innovation: a methodological proposal for leveraging participation of Colombian cocoa producers. J. Rural Studies. 75(2020):119-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.01.012. Golldack, D. B.; Li, C.; Mohan, H. and Probst, N. 2014. Tolerance to drought and salt stress in plants: unraveling the signaling networks. Front. Plant Sci. 5(2014):151-161.

ICCO. 2021. International cocoa organization. Quarterly bulletin of cocoa statistics. London, UK. 47(3):11-7. Jaimes, Y. Y.; Ribeyre, F.; Gonzalez, C.; Rojas, J.; Furtado, E. L. and Cilas, C. 2019. Factors affecting the dynamics of frosty pod rot in the main cocoa areas of Santander state, Colombia. Plant Dis. 103(7):1665-1673. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-10-18-1761-RE.

Leandro, M. M. E.; Tixier, P.; Germon, A.; Rakotobe, V.; Phillips, M. W.; Maximova, S. and Avelino, J. 2017. Effects of microclimatic variables on the symptoms and signs onset of Moniliophthora roreri, causal agent of Moniliophthora pod rot in cacao. PLoS One. 12(10):e0184-638. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184638. López, M. E.; Ramírez, O. A.; Dubón, A.; Ribeiro, T. H. C.; Díaz, F. J. and Chalfun, J. A. 2021. Sexual compatibility in cacao clones drives arrangements in the field leading to high yield. Sci. Hortic. 287(16):110-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110276.

Osorio, G. J. A.; Berdugo, C. J.; Coronado, R. A.; Zapata, Y. P.; Quintero, C.; Gallego, S. G. and Yockteng, R. 2017. Colombia a source of cacao genetic diversity as revealed by the population structure analysis of germplasm bank of Theobroma cacao L. Front. Plant Sci. 8(1994):1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01994

Quintana, F. L. F.; García, J. A. y Moreno, M. E. 2018. Perfil sensorial de cuatro modelos de siembra de cacao en Colombia. Entramado. 14(2):256-268.

Royaert, S.; Phillips, M. W.; Arciniegas, L. A. M.; Cariaga, K.; Brown, J. S.; Kuhn, D. N. and Motamayor, J. C. 2011. Identification of marker-trait associations for self-compatibility in a segregating mapping population of Theobroma cacao L. Tree Genet. Genomes. 7(6):1159-1168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-011-0403-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-011-0403-5

Sarmiento, A. I. P.; Caicedo, D. A. Z.; Peláez, J. J. Z. and Garzón, S. L. C. 2019. Seedling emergency and biometry of fruits and seeds of Cariniana pyriformis from the middle Magdalena Valley, Colombia. Cerne. 25(2):221-229. https://doi.org/10.1590/010477 60201925022596. Schroth, G.; Läderach, P. R.; Martinez, V. A. I.; Bunn, C. and Jassogne, L. T. P. 2016. Vulnerability to climate change of cocoa in West Africa: patterns, opportunities and limits to adaptation. Sci. Total Environ. 556(2016):231-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2016.03.024. Somarriba, E. J. and López, S. A. 2018. Coffee and cocoa agroforestry systems: pathways to deforestation, reforestation, and tree cover change. International Bank for Reconstruction and development/The World Bank, Washington, DC. USA. 50 p. Thomas, E.; Van, Z. M.; Loo, J.; Hodgkin, T.; Galluzzi, G. and Van, E. J. 2012. Present spatial diversity patterns of Theobroma cacao L. in the neotropics reflect genetic differentiation in Pleistocene refugia followed by human-influenced dispersal. PLoS One. 7(10):e47-676. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047676. Vaast, P. and Somarriba, E. J. 2014. Trade-offs between crop intensification and ecosystem services: the role of agroforestry in cocoa cultivation. Agrofor. Syst. 88(6):947-956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9762-x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9762-x

Published

2023-05-04

How to Cite

Agudelo-Castañeda , Genaro Andrés, Eduar Yovany Antolinez-Sandoval, Eliana Yadira Báez-Daza, Yeirme Yaneth Jaimes-Suárez, and Gladys Alejandra Romero-Guerrero. 2023. “New Cocoa Varieties Selected in Colombia”. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Agrícolas 14 (3). México, ME:315-26. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v14i3.3057.

Issue

Section

Articles