Agronomic behavior of chickpea crop in the sector of El Limoncito, Ecuador
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v12i6.2775Keywords:
adaptability, edaphoclimatology, chickpeaAbstract
In the present study, the agronomic behavior of the Peruvian tropicalized chickpea at different sowing distances was evaluated, under the edaphoclimatic conditions of the area of El Limoncito, province of Santa Elena, Ecuador. The experimental design applied was the completely randomized block design (DBCA), where five treatments with different sowing distances were studied, which were T1 (0.1 x 0.5 m), T2 (0.2 x 0.5 m), T3 (0.3 x 0.5 m), T4 (0.4 x 0.5 m) and T5 (0.5 x 0.5 m). In each treatment, the variables of plant height, number of flowers, number of branches, number of pods and yield were analyzed. The results obtained show that T2 with distance of 0.2 x 0.5 m gives optimal results in terms of plant height, number of flowers, number of branches, number of pods and yield.
Downloads
References
Abi-Ghanem, R.; Carpenter-Boggs, L.; Smith, J.; Vandemark, G. 2012. Nitrogen fixation by US and middle eastern chickpeas with commercial and wild middle eastern inocula. ISRN Soil Science.1-5 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/981842
Anderson, J. T.; Willis, J. H. and Mitchell-Olds, T. 2011. Evolutionary genetics of plant adaptation. Trends in genetics: TIG. 27(7):258-266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2011.04.001
Apáez, B. M.; Escalante, E. J. A. S.; Rodríguez, G. M. T.; Sosa, M. E. y Apáez, B. P. 2016. Distancia entre hileras, nitrógeno y producción de garbanzo en humedad residual. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. 7(2):223-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v7i2.339
Carranca, C. de V. A. and Rolston, D. 1999. Biological nitrogen fixation by fababean, pea and chickpea, under field conditions, estimated by the isotope dilution technique. European Journal of Agronomy. 10(1):49-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(98)00049-5
Chipana, C. 2015. Ensayo de treinta variedades de garbanzo (Cicer arietinum L.) sembrado en invierno para condiciones de costa central (Tesis de grado). UNA La Molina Lima, Perú.
Coirini, A. y Nolasco, M. 2016. El cultivo de garbanzo en Córdoba: análisis con imágenes satelitales. CAI, 8º Congreso de AgroInformática. 67-80 pp.
FAO. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura. 1997. The state of the world’s plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. FAO: Roma. Obtenido de: http://www.fao.org/3/a-w7324e.pdf)%D8%9B.
FAO. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura. 2020. FAOSTAT. Obtenido de: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC.
Fierros, G.; Ortega, P.; Acosta, J.; Padilla, I.; Valenzuela, V.; Jiménez, Y. y López, J. 2011. Respuesta del rendimiento de genotipos de garbanzo blanco a la sequía terminal. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. 8(5):1143-1154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v8i5.114
Heidarvand, L. and Maali-Amiri, R. 2013. Physio-biochemical and proteome analysis of chickpea in early phases of cold stress. J. PlantPhysiol. 170:459-469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2012.11.021
Kazydub, N.; Kuzmina, S. and Chernenko, S. 2017. Adaptability of chickpea collection samples in the southern forest-steppe of western Siberia. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science. 23(5):743-749.
Kirnak, H.; Varol, I.; Irik, H. and Ozaktan, H. 2017. Effects of Irrigation Applied at Different Growth Stages on Chickpea Yield. Agronomy Research. 15(5):1928-1933.
Moral, J.; Mejias, A. y López, M. 1994. El cultivo del garbanzo: diseño para una agricultura sostenible. Madrid Ministerio de Agricultura Pesca y Alimentación, Secretaria General Técnica. Hojas divulgadoras. España. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación. 12-94 pp.
Nisa, Z.; Arif, A. and Waheed, M. Q. et al. 2020. A comparative metabolomic study on desi and kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes under rainfed and irrigated field conditions. Sci. Rep. 10:13919.
Pérez, N.; Díaz, S.; Garnier, E.; Lavorel, S.; Poorter, H.; Jaureguiberry, P.; Bret-Harte, M.; Cornwell, W.; Craine, J.; Gurvich, D.; Urcelay, C.; Veneklaas, E.; Reich, P.; Poorter, L.; Wright, I.; Ray, P.; Enrico, L.; Pausas, J.; de Vos, A.; Buchmann, N.; Funes, G.; Quétier, F.; Hodgson, J.; Thompson, K.; Morgan, H. D.; Ter Steege, H.; Van der Heijden, M.; Sack, L.; Blonder, B.; Poschlod, P.; Vaieretti, M.; Conti, G.; Staver, A.; Aquino, S. and Cornelissen, J. 2013. New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Australian Journal of Botany. 61:167-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/BT12225
Saluzzo, A. 2010. Adaptación del cultivo de garbanzo en función de la variabilidad ambiental. 3ª Jornada Nacional de Garbanzo, INTA EEA Salta.
Shagarodsky, T.; Chiang, M. y López, Y. 2001. Evaluación de cultivares de garbanzo (Cicer arietinum l.) en Cuba. Agronomía Mesoamericana. 12(1):95-98.
Sharma, R. and Johnson, P. 2017. Genotype x environment interaction and stability analysis for yield traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 8(3):865-869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-928X.2017.00137.5
Sharma, R.; Abraham, S.; Bhagat, R.; Mishra, T. and Prakash, O. 2018. Evaluation of chickpea varieties treated with bio inoculants for yield performance, disease resistance and adaptability to climatic conditions of Gariyaband district in Chhattisgarh. Legume Research. 41(1):57-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18805/lr.v0iOF.9110
Vizgarra, O.; Espeche, C.; Silvana, Y.; Mamaní, G. y Daniel, P. L. 2017. TUC 403 y TUC 464, dos nuevas variedades de garbanzo tipo Kabuli para el noroeste argentino. Rev. Ind. y Agríc. de Tucumán. 94(1):41-47.
Wood, J. and Grusak, M. 2007. Nutritional Value of Chickpea. In Chickpea Breeding and Management. CAB International. 101-142 pp. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845932138.005
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The authors who publish in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas accept the following conditions:
In accordance with copyright laws, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas recognizes and respects the authors’ moral right and ownership of property rights which will be transferred to the journal for dissemination in open access. Invariably, all the authors have to sign a letter of transfer of property rights and of originality of the article to Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP) [National Institute of Forestry, Agricultural and Livestock Research]. The author(s) must pay a fee for the reception of articles before proceeding to editorial review.
All the texts published by Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas —with no exception— are distributed under a Creative Commons License Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which allows third parties to use the publication as long as the work’s authorship and its first publication in this journal are mentioned.
The author(s) can enter into independent and additional contractual agreements for the nonexclusive distribution of the version of the article published in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas (for example include it into an institutional repository or publish it in a book) as long as it is clearly and explicitly indicated that the work was published for the first time in Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas.
For all the above, the authors shall send the Letter-transfer of Property Rights for the first publication duly filled in and signed by the author(s). This form must be sent as a PDF file to: revista_atm@yahoo.com.mx; cienciasagricola@inifap.gob.mx; remexca2017@gmail.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 International license.
