https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v17i5.4175

elocation-id: elocation-id: e4175

Villamarín-Barreiro, Vásquez-Cortez, Cedeño-Loja, and Plua-Montiel:

Journal Metadata

Journal Identifier: remexca [journal-id-type=publisher-id]

Journal Title Group

Journal Title (Full): Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

Abbreviated Journal Title: Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc [abbrev-type=publisher]

ISSN: 2007-0934 [pub-type=ppub]

Publisher

Publisher’s Name: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias

Article Metadata

Article Identifier: 10.29312/remexca.v17i5.4175 [pub-id-type=doi]

Article Grouping Data

Subject Group [subj-group-type=heading]

Subject Grouping Name: Artículo

Title Group

Title Group

Article Title: Efficacy of botanical and biological insecticides against Spodoptera frugiperda in corn

Contributor Group

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Villamarín-Barreiro

Given (First) Names: Juan Andrés

X (cross) Reference: 1 [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Vásquez-Cortez

Given (First) Names: Luis Humberto

X (cross) Reference: 2 [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

X (cross) Reference: § [ref-type=corresp; rid=c1]

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Cedeño-Loja

Given (First) Names: Pedro Emilio

X (cross) Reference: 3 [ref-type=aff; rid=aff3]

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Plua-Montiel

Given (First) Names: Jhoan Alfredo

X (cross) Reference: 4 [ref-type=aff; rid=aff4]

Affiliation [id=aff1]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 1

Institution Name: in an Address: Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas - Universidad Técnica de Babahoyo, Los Ríos, Ecuador. [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Técnica de Babahoyo [content-type=orgname]

Address Line: Los Ríos

Country: in an Address: Ecuador [country=EC]

Email Address: jvillamarinb@utb.edu.ec

Affiliation [id=aff2]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 2

Institution Name: in an Address: Carrera de Agroindustria - Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias - Universidad Técnica de Babahoyo, Los Ríos, Ecuador. [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Carrera de Agroindustria [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias [content-type=orgdiv2]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Técnica de Babahoyo [content-type=orgname]

Address Line: Los Ríos

Country: in an Address: Ecuador [country=EC]

Affiliation [id=aff3]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 3

Institution Name: in an Address: Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas - Universidad Técnica de Babahoyo, Los Ríos, Ecuador. [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Técnica de Babahoyo [content-type=orgname]

Address Line: Los Ríos

Country: in an Address: Ecuador [country=EC]

Email Address: pcedenol@utb.edu.ec

Affiliation [id=aff4]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 4

Institution Name: in an Address: Facultad de Ciencias de la Industria, Producción y Agroindustria - Universidad Técnica Estatal de Quevedo, Ecuador. [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Facultad de Ciencias de la Industria, Producción y Agroindustria [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Técnica Estatal de Quevedo [content-type=orgname]

Address Line: Quevedo

Country: in an Address: Ecuador [country=EC]

Email Address: jpluam@uteq.edu.ec

Author Note Group

Correspondence Information: §Autor para correspondencia: lvazquezc@utb.edu.ec . [id=c1]

Publication Date [date-type=pub; publication-format=electronic]

Day: 01

Month: 08

Year: 2026

Volume Number: 17

Issue Number: 5

Electronic Location Identifier: e4175

History: Document History

Date [date-type=received]

Day: 01

Month: 04

Year: 2026

Date [date-type=accepted]

Day: 01

Month: 08

Year: 2026

Permissions

License Information [license-type=open-access; xlink:href=https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/; xml:lang=es]

Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons

Abstract

Title: Abstract

The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda , is one of the main pests of corn in Ecuador, causing significant yield losses. The intensive use of chemical insecticides for its control poses environmental and human health risks. As a sustainable alternative, this study evaluated the efficiency of biological and botanical insecticides under laboratory conditions. The research was conducted from May to July 2025 using a completely randomized design with four treatments [BotaniGard® ES ( Beauveria bassiana ), Dipel® WG ( Bacillus thuringiensis ), NeemAzal® T/S (neem oil), and Delegate® 250 WG (spinetoram, as a chemical control)], which were applied to third-instar larvae via the leaf immersion technique, with evaluations at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h. Results showed that B. thuringiensis achieved 100% mortality at 96 h, followed by neem oil and B. bassiana , both with 97.5%. Spinetoram produced immediate and sustained mortality of 100% from 24 h. In contrast, neem showed a low initial mortality rate (17.5%) that progressively increased over time. Overall, the biological and botanical insecticides evaluated are effective alternatives for managing S. frugiperda under laboratory conditions, helping reduce dependence on conventional chemical insecticides.

Keyword Group [xml:lang=en]

Title: Keywords:

Keyword: bioinsecticides

Keyword: dosage

Keyword: entomopathogens

Keyword: mortality

Keyword: substitution

Counts

Figure Count [count=1]

Table Count [count=1]

Equation Count [count=0]

Reference Count [count=30]

Abstract

The fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda , is one of the main pests of corn in Ecuador, causing significant yield losses. The intensive use of chemical insecticides for its control poses environmental and human health risks. As a sustainable alternative, this study evaluated the efficiency of biological and botanical insecticides under laboratory conditions. The research was conducted from May to July 2025 using a completely randomized design with four treatments [BotaniGard® ES ( Beauveria bassiana ), Dipel® WG ( Bacillus thuringiensis ), NeemAzal® T/S (neem oil), and Delegate® 250 WG (spinetoram, as a chemical control)], which were applied to third-instar larvae via the leaf immersion technique, with evaluations at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h. Results showed that B. thuringiensis achieved 100% mortality at 96 h, followed by neem oil and B. bassiana , both with 97.5%. Spinetoram produced immediate and sustained mortality of 100% from 24 h. In contrast, neem showed a low initial mortality rate (17.5%) that progressively increased over time. Overall, the biological and botanical insecticides evaluated are effective alternatives for managing S. frugiperda under laboratory conditions, helping reduce dependence on conventional chemical insecticides.

Keywords:

bioinsecticides, dosage, entomopathogens, mortality, substitution.

Introduction

Corn ( Zea mays L.) originated and was domesticated in Mesoamerica from teosinte through processes of genetic mixing and introgression that favored its diversification and adaptation ( Yang et al ., 2023 ; Berube et al ., 2024 ). In addition to constituting a biocultural legacy of Mexico’s indigenous communities for more than 10 000 years ( Yasin et al ., 2024 ), this crop represents a strategic source of raw materials for agribusiness and human food. In Ecuador, its productive importance is significant; in 2016, 485 696 ha were cultivated, with a production of 1 667 704 t and an average yield of 3.17 ha-1( Analuisa et al ., 2023 ).

Corn yield can be significantly affected by factors such as weeds, diseases, and insect pests, which limit crop growth and development ( Loot et al ., 2023 ). Among these threats, the fall armyworm ( Spodoptera frugiperda ) is one of the most important corn pests worldwide, including in Ecuador, due to its high impact on productivity. Uncontrolled infestations have been reported to cause yield losses ranging from 21% to 53%, reaching up to 67% in specific regions of West Africa; even the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) reports reductions of up to 73% in severe scenarios. Although these data pertain to other regions, they demonstrate the pest’s high destructive potential and its importance in productive systems in Latin America.

Spodoptera frugiperda primarily affects corn during its early stages of development, damaging the foliage and whorl; however, it can persist throughout the crop cycle and increase its destructive potential ( Wan et al ., 2021 ). Its management includes physical, mechanical, cultural, biological and chemical methods ( Akeme et al ., 2021 ). Nonetheless, chemical control can generate environmental impacts and affect beneficial organisms ( Vásquez et al ., 2024 ; Zhou et al ., 2025 ); in contrast, biological control based on entomopathogens represents an alternative for integrated pest management ( Sala et al ., 2023 ; Kinyanjui et al ., 2025 ). Nevertheless, its effectiveness against S. frugiperda in Ecuador remains variable due to environmental and agronomic factors.

This research aimed to evaluate the efficacy of biological and botanical insecticides for controlling Spodoptera frugiperda larvae in corn ( Zea mays ) under laboratory conditions, as sustainable alternatives to reduce dependence on conventional chemical insecticides ( Mascarin et al ., 2016 ). It was hypothesized that these insecticides have an efficacy comparable to chemical products in terms of larval mortality, although with differences in the speed and dynamics of response. This study seeks to provide scientific evidence to strengthen integrated management strategies for one of the main pests that affect corn yield.

Materials and methods

Experiment location

This study was conducted from May to July 2025 in the Entomology Laboratory of the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences of the Technical University of Babahoyo. The research was carried out at the ‘San Pablo’ Experimental Farm, located at km 7.5 of the Babahoyo-Montalvo highway. The geographical coordinates are 79° 32’ west longitude and 01° 49’ south latitude, with an altitude of 8 m.

Insecticides used in this experiment

The present research evaluated four insecticides for commercial use: a botanical insecticide based on neem ( Azadirachta indica ), two biological insecticides formulated with entomopathogenic microorganisms and a synthetic insecticide serving as a positive control.

The botanical insecticide was the commercial product NeemAzal® T/S (Trifolio-M GmbH, Germany), whose active ingredient is azadirachtin (10 g L-1), and was applied at a concentration of 1.95 ml per 0.39 L of water, according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (batch: NA-2024-EC01).

The biological insecticides used were Dipel® WG (Valent BioSciences, USA), based on Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki (HD-1 strain; 16 000 IU mg-1), and BotaniGard® ES (Laverlam International Corp., USA), formulated with Beauveria bassiana (GHA strain; 1×107ml-1conidia). Both products were purchased from authorized distributors in Ecuador and applied at the recommended doses to control lepidopteran larvae (batches: BT-EC2024-07 and BB-EC2024-05, respectively).

The synthetic insecticide used as a positive control was Delegate® 250 WG (Corteva Agriscience, USA), whose active ingredient is spinetoram (250 g kg-1), belonging to the spinosyn group (IRAC group 5), applied at a dose of 0.39 cc per 0.78 L of water (batch: SP-EC2024-03).

The strains of Bacillus thuringiensis (HD-1) and Beauveria bassiana (GHA) were commercial isolates widely used in the biological control of insects, ensuring stability, viability, and standardized concentration of colony-forming units (CFUs) and conidia, respectively. All products were used to control third-instar larvae of Spodoptera frugiperda , ensuring reproducible and comparable experimental conditions.

Description of the biological material used

The material used was the corn ( Zea mays L.) variety INIAP H-550, grown under controlled conditions at the ‘San Pablo’ Experimental Farm of the Technical University of Babahoyo. Leaves for the bioassays were collected from plants 30-35 days after planting, corresponding to phenological stages V6-V8. Fully expanded, tender leaves from the middle part of the plant, free of damage or infestations, were selected. A total of 160 homogeneous leaf fragments measuring approximately 5×5 cm were used.

Each treatment consisted of four replications, with 10 leaf fragments, distributed under a completely randomized design. The fragments were immersed in insecticide solutions for 10 s to ensure uniform coverage, then dried on absorbent paper at room temperature for 20-30 min to remove excess moisture. Finally, they were fed to third-instar Spodoptera frugiperda larvae under controlled laboratory conditions (25 ±2 °C, 70 ±5% relative humidity and a 12:12 h light/dark photoperiod), ensuring standardized conditions for evaluating larval mortality.

Insecticide application

The treatments were applied via the foliar immersion technique using 2×3 cm fragments of corn leaves, immersed for 10 s in 250 ml of insecticide solution to ensure uniform coverage. The fragments were then dried at room temperature for 20-30 min and fed to 10 third-instar larvae of Spodoptera frugiperda per experimental unit. The bioassays were conducted under controlled laboratory conditions (25 ±2 °C, 70 ±5% relative humidity, and a 12:12 h light/dark photoperiod), using independent containers to prevent cross-contamination. The treated plant material was renewed every 24 h during the experimental period ( Real and Paiba, 2023 ).

Insecticide efficacy

The efficacy of each product and dose was evaluated in the percentage of relative and cumulative mortality of each treatment.

Evaluation of insecticide efficacy and dosage

Insecticide efficacy was determined by the mortality percentage of Spodoptera frugiperda larvae evaluated at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h after application. Dead larvae were defined as those that did not move when mechanically stimulated. The observed mortality was adjusted for the natural mortality recorded in the control in order to avoid overestimating the effects of the treatments.

Relative mortality was the percentage of mortality at each evaluation time, whereas cumulative mortality was calculated as the progressive total during the experimental period. The most efficient treatment was considered to be the one that achieved the highest mortality percentage in the shortest time, and the most effective dose was the one that produced the highest cumulative mortality. Since the response variable consisted of proportional data, a binomial distribution was assumed for statistical analysis.

Experimental design and treatments evaluated

The experiment was established under a completely randomized design with an A×B factorial arrangement and an additional control. Factor A included four insecticides (neem oil, Beauveria bassiana , Bacillus thuringiensis and spinetoram) and factor B comprised three dose levels (high, medium and low), with ten replications per treatment (10 larvae per experimental unit), totaling 130 experimental units.

Mortality was recorded at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h. Binomial data were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model (Glimmix, Sas), with insecticide, dose, time and their interactions as fixed effects, replications as a random effect. Means were compared using Tukey’s test (p≤ 0.05).

Results and discussion

Comparison of insecticide efficacy as a function of evaluation time

The temporal evaluation showed significant differences among treatments ( Figure 1 ). Spinetoram achieved rapid and sustained 100% mortality from the first hours. In contrast, neem showed a progressive response, whereas Bacillus thuringiensis and Beauveria bassiana presented a delayed effect, with low initial mortalities that increased toward 96 h. These differences reflect their mechanisms of action. The low mortality rates of the control confirm that the effects are due to the treatments.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Average mortality percentage of Spodoptera frugiperda larvae after the application of various insecticides and doses at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h.

2007-0934-remexca-17-5-e4175-gf1-en.png

Evaluation of insecticide efficacy

Insecticide efficacy varied over time. Spinetoram stood out for presenting immediate and sustained 100% mortality. Neem showed low initial efficacy (10.83%), which progressively increased until reaching 67.5% mortality at 96 h. By contrast, Beauveria bassiana and Bacillus thuringiensis showed a delayed effect, with mortalities exceeding 98% by the end of the evaluation period.

Identification of the best insecticide for fall armyworm control in corn

Spinetoram was the most effective insecticide for controlling Spodoptera frugiperda under laboratory conditions, as it obtained mortalities of 100% at 24 h and showed highly significant differences compared with the rest of the treatment alternatives (p< 0.0001), so it can be considered a useful option for rapid control in the early stages of the crop.

Identification of the dose with the highest mortality percentage

Dose analysis determined that high doses did not significantly improve efficacy compared with the medium dose, whereas low doses significantly reduced the level of control at 48 and 96 h. These results highlight the importance of adequate dosing to optimize treatment efficacy.

Evaluation of the mortality percentage in treatments

The tests showed significant differences between the evaluated treatments and the control group (p≤ 0.05), as observed in Table 1 . The control recorded minimal mortality (between 5% and 7.5%), attributed to natural factors or handling stress. In contrast, insecticide treatments showed progressive increases in larval mortality over time.

Table 1

Table 1. Comparative summary of efficacy in controlling S. frugiperda .

Comparison 24 h 48 h 72 h 96 h
Neem 17.5 ±3.32ᵃ 36.67 ±4.44ᵃ 67.5 ±4.44ᵃ 97.5 ±5.38ᵃ
Spinetoram 100 ±0ᵇ 100 ±0ᵇ 100 ±0ᵇ 100 ±0ᵇ
B. bassiana 0 ±0ᵇ 0 ±0ᵇ 58.33 ±4.99ᵇ 96.67 ±1.58ᵇ
B. thuringiensis 0 ±0ᵇ 60 ±6.95ᵇ 84.17 ±4.56ᵇ 98.33 ±1.16ᵇ
High 29.38 ±6.81ᵃ 38.13 ±6.52ᵃ 67.5 ±5.31ᵃ 88.13 ±3.47ᵃ
Medium 28.13 ±6.89ᵃ 46.25 ±6.73ᵃᵇ 67.5 ±5.46ᵃ 85.63 ±4.09ᵃ
Low 25.63 ±6.9ᵃ 63.13 ±6.58ᵇ 74.38 ±4.78ᵃ 98.13 ±1.05ᵇ
Control 5 ±3.33ᶜ 7.5 ±3.8ᶜ 7.5 ±3.82ᶜ 7.5 ±3.82ᶜ
Interaction 0.018 0.012 0.006 0.003

[i] Values expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences according to statistical tests (p< 0.05).

Spinetoram exhibited the highest efficacy, achieving 100% mortality from 24 h and remaining constant until 96 h. On the other hand, Bacillus thuringiensis and Beauveria bassiana showed delayed effects, with mortalities below 10% in the first 24 h, but increasing significantly to values close to or above 95% at 96 h.

The neem-based botanical insecticide showed a progressive response, with initial mortality rates near 17.5% that gradually increased to approximately 97.5% by the end of the evaluation period. The analysis of the statistical model showed a significant interaction among the factors insecticide, dose and time (p≤ 0.05), indicating that the larval mortality response is conditioned by the combination of the type of insecticide, the dose applied and the exposure time.

Discussion

The efficacy of the neem-formulated insecticide observed in this study, with mortality rates approaching 97.5% at 96 h, confirms its potential as a tool for controlling Spodoptera frugiperda under laboratory conditions. This behavior responds to the progressive action of azadirachtin, which acts as a growth regulator, feeding inhibitor and disruptor of the molting process ( Mordue and Nisbet, 2000 ).

Recent studies also report the toxicity of Azadirachta indica extracts against this pest, although differences in mortality can be attributed to formulation, concentration, and experimental conditions ( Saleem et al ., 2024 ). Azadirachtin also interferes with the endocrine system of insects by altering the regulation of the ecdysone hormone and juvenile hormone, affecting molting and developmental processes and acts as an antifeedant that reduces foliar consumption and causes a progressive weakening of larvae ( Wen et al ., 2013 ).

Likewise, neem extracts exhibit significant insecticidal activity against lepidopterans, with effects dependent on dose and exposure time ( Martínez et al ., 2016 ); they also have a short residual effect that induces alterations in molting, growth inhibition and progressive death ( Isman, 2020 ).

These results are higher than those reported by González et al . (2015) , who obtained mortality rates of 86.66% and by Rodríguez et al . (2018) , who reported values close to 50%, which can be explained by differences in formulation and experimental conditions. Similarly, Martinez and Emden (2001) noted that neem can affect the juvenile stages for several days, ultimately causing larval death.

Treatment with Bacillus thuringiensis achieved 100% mortality at 96 h, attributable to the action of δ-endotoxins that cause intestinal damage in larvae ( Bravo et al ., 2011 ). This behavior coincides with that described by Butt et al . (2016) regarding its efficacy after prolonged periods of exposure, as also indicated by Palma et al . (2024) on the wide biocidal activity.

The insecticidal effect of Bacillus thuringiensis is due to the production of crystalline (Cry) proteins, which damage the intestinal epithelium of larvae after ingestion, causing the death of the insect ( Palma et al ., 2024 ).

By comparison, González et al . (2015) reported mortalities of 70.66%, whereas Amezcua et al . (2023) reported an LC50of 189.53 μg ml-1, indicating that its efficacy may vary with concentration, strain, and experimental conditions.

The Beauveria bassiana formulation showed a mortality close to 97.5% at 96 h, attributed to its ability to penetrate the cuticle and cause progressive systemic infections ( Zimmermann, 2007 ). This behavior is consistent with what Idrees et al . (2022) describe, who highlight its cumulative effect over time.

However, studies such as that by Amezcua et al . (2023) report lower mortalities (49.33%), suggesting that factors such as strain virulence and formulation significantly influence its efficacy ( Iwanicki et al ., 2023 ).

The mechanism of action of Beauveria bassiana involves the adhesion of conidia to the insect cuticle, followed by their germination and penetration by hydrolytic enzymes such as chitinases and proteases. The fungus then colonizes the hemolymph and produces toxic metabolites that alter essential physiological functions, causing host death.

Spinetoram exhibited the highest efficacy in terms of speed, reaching 100% mortality from the first 24 h, in contrast to neem (17.5%) and biological insecticides, which showed no initial effect. This behavior aligns with what was reported by Kulye et al . (2021) , who highlight its high efficacy in the first 24-48 h, demonstrating its immediate action compared with biological and botanical insecticides.

Conclusions

The neem-based botanical insecticide demonstrated high efficacy in controlling Spodoptera frugiperda larvae under laboratory conditions, reaching mortalities close to 97.5% at 96 h of evaluation, evidencing a progressive effect over time. The biological insecticides Bacillus thuringiensis and Beauveria bassiana also showed high levels of larval mortality, especially in late evaluations, confirming their efficacy as sustainable alternatives, albeit with slower action than the synthetic insecticide.

Spinetoram presented rapid and sustained action, achieving 100% mortality from the first 24 h, standing out as the treatment with the greatest immediate efficacy. Regarding dosage, the results suggest that medium and low doses of the evaluated insecticides can achieve control levels comparable to higher doses under controlled conditions, highlighting the potential for optimization in the use of these products within integrated pest management programs.

Bibliography

1 

Akeme, C.; Ngosong, C.; Sumbele, S.; Aslan, A.; Tening, A.; Krah, C.; Kamanga, B.; Denih, A. and Nambangia, O. 2021. Different controlling methods of fall armyworm ( Spodoptera frugiperda ) in maize farms of small- scale producers in Cameroon. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 911(1):1-21. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/911/1/012053.

2 

Amezcua, L. G.; Fuentes, L. T.; Gutiérrez, J. M.; Sánchez, J. C.; Hernández, H. A. and Castrejón, J. E. 2023. Eficacia insecticida de spinetoram, Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner y clorpirifos contra Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith, 1797) en maíz. Avances en Investigación Agropecuaria. 27(1):208-2018. https://doi.org/10.53897/RevAIA.23.27.71.

3 

Analuisa, I. A.; Jimber, J. A.; Fernández, J. A. and Vergara, A. 2023. The value chain of Ecuadorian hard yellow corn. Challenges and opportunities. Lecturas de Economía. 1(98):231-262. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.le.n98a347315.

4 

Berube, B.; Ernst, E.; Cahn, J.; Roche, B.; de Santis Alves, C.; Lynn, J.; Scheben, A.; Grimanelli, D.; Siepel, A.; Ross-Ibarra, J.; Kermicle, J. and Martienssen, R. A. 2024. Teosinte pollen drives maize diversification and domestication by RNAi. Nature. 633(1):380-388. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07788-0.

5 

Bravo, A.; Likitvivatanavong, S.; Gill, S. S. and Soberón, M. 2011. Bacillus thuringiensis : A story of a successful bioinsecticide. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 41(7):423-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2011.02.006.

6 

Butt, T. M.; Coates, C. J.; Dubovskiy, I. M. and Ratcliffe, N. A. 2016. Entomopathogenic Fungi. In: Advances in Genetics. 94(1):307-364. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adgen.2016.01.006.

7 

González, M. B.; Gurrola, N. J. and Chaírez, I. 2015. Biological products for the control of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Revista Colombiana de Entomología. 41(2):200-204. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci-arttext&pid=S0120-04882015000200009.

8 

Idrees, A.; Afzal, A.; Qadir, Z. A. and Li, J. 2022. Bioassays of Beauveria bassiana Isolates against the Fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda . Journal of Fungi. 8(7):1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8070717.

9 

Isman, M. B. 2020. Botanical insecticides in the twenty-first century-fulfilling their promise? Annual Review of Entomology. 65(1):233-249. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011019-025010.

10 

Iwanicki, N. S.; Lopes, E. C.; De Lira, A. C.; Poletto, T. B.; Fonseca, L. Z. and Delalibera, J, I. 2023. Comparative analysis of Beauveria bassiana submerged conidia with blastospores: yield, growth kinetics and virulence. Biological Control. 185(1):1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2023.105314.

11 

Kinyanjui, G.; Tadesse Mawcha, K. and Ndolo, D. 2025. Advancing entomopathogenic fungi for improved management of Phthorimaea (Tuta) absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Journal of Integrated Pest Management. 16(1):1-19. https://doi.org/10.1093/jipm/pmaf034.

12 

Kulye, M.; Mehlhorn, S.; Boaventura, D.; Godley, N.; Venkatesh, S.; Rudrappa, T., Charan, T.; Rathi, D. and Nauen, R. 2021. Baseline susceptibility of Spodoptera frugiperda populations collected in India towards different chemical classes of insecticides. Insects. 12(8):1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12080758.

13 

Lin, S.; Li, S.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Wu, H.; Cheng, D. and Zhang, Z. 2021. Using azadirachtin to transform Spodoptera frugiperda from pest to natural enemy. Toxins. 13(8):1-12. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13080541.

14 

Martínez, A.; Ortega, J. S.; Hernández, S. I.; Olivas, E. H. and Alba, J. J. 2016. Applications of neem ( Azadirachta indica ) in agriculture: a review. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 13(2):191-198. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajtcam.v13i2.23.

15 

Martinez, S. S. and Emden, H. F. 2001. Growth disruption, abnormalities and mortality of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) caused by Azadirachtin. Neotropical Entomology. 30(1):113-125. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2001000100017.

16 

Mascarin, G. M. and Jaronski, S. T. 2016. The production and uses of Beauveria bassiana as a microbial insecticide. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 32(177):1-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2131-3.

17 

Mordue, A. J. and Nisbet, A. J. 2000. Azadirachtin from the neem tree Azadirachta indica : Its action against insects. Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil. 29(4):615-632. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0301-80592000000400001.

18 

Palma, L.; Sauka, D. H. and Ibarra, J. E. 2024. Bacillus thuringiensis : a broader view of its biocidal activity. Toxins. 16(3):1-3. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins16030162.

19 

Real, C. I. and Paiba, K. O. 2023. Reactivation of the nuclear polyhedrosis virus strain VPNHz1991 for the management of the corn earworm ( Helicoverpa zea ). Revista Iberoamericana de Bioeconomia y Cambio Climático. 9(18):2193-2201. https://doi.org/10.5377/ribcc.v9i18.17547.

20 

Rodríguez, J. C.; Salazar, M. L. and Contreras, M. 2018. Effect of different surfactants on larvae III of Spodoptera frugiperda Smith under laboratory and field conditions. Arnaldoa. 25 (3):1041-1052. http://dx.doi.org/10.22497/arnaldoa.253.25315.

21 

Sala, A.; Barrena, R.; Meyling, N. V. and Artola, A. 2023. Conidia production of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana using packed-bed bioreactor: Effect of substrate biodegradability on conidia virulence. Journal of Environmental Management. 341(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118059.

22 

Saleem, U.; Asrar, M.; Jabeen, F.; Makhdoom Hussain, S. and Hussain, D. 2024. Determination of insecticidal potential of selected plant extracts against fall armyworm ( Spodoptera frugiperda ) larvae. Heliyon. 10(20):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39593.

23 

Saquee, F. S.; Norman, P. E.; Saffa, M. D.; Kavhiza, N. J.; Pakina, E.; Zargar, M.; Diakite, S.; Stybayev, G.; Baitelenova, A. and Kipshakbayeva, G. 2023. Impact of diffent types of green manure on pest and disease incidence and severity as well as growth and yield parameters of maize. Heliyon. 9(6):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17294.

24 

Vásquez, L. H.; Alvarado, K. A.; Intriago, F. G.; Raju, N. M. and Prasad, R. 2024. Banana and apple extracts with efficient microorganisms and their effect on cadmium reduction in cocoa beans ( Theobroma cacao L.). Discover Food. 4(163):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44187-024-00205-5.

25 

Wan, J.; Huang, C.; Li, C.; Zhou, H.; Li, Z.; Xing, L.; Zhang, B.; Qiao, X.; Liu, B.; Liu, C.; Liu, W.; Wang, W.; Qian, W.; Makrdy, S. and Wan, F. 2021. Biology, invasion and management of the agricultural invader: Fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae). Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 20(3):646-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63367-6.

26 

Wen, H.; Zhang, Q.; Cheng, D.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, H. and Xiangning, C. 2013. Cassia oil as a substitute solvent for xylene for rotenone EC and its synergistic activities. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 105(3):189-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2013.02.002.

27 

Yang, N.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.; Jin, M.; Vallebueno-Estrada, M.; Calfee, E.; Chen, L.; Dilkes, B. P.; Gui, S.; Fan, X.; Harper, T. K.; Kennett, D. J.; Li, W.; Lu, Y.; Ding, J.; Chen, Z.; Luo, J.; Mambakkam, S.; Menon, M. and Ross-Ibarra, J. 2023. Two teosintes made modern maize. Science. 382(6674):1-40. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adg8940.

28 

Yasin, S.; Zavala, F.; Niño, G.; Rodríguez, P.; Gutiérrez, A.; Sinagawa, S. and Lugo, E. 2024. Morphological and physiological response of maize ( Zea mays L.) to drought stress during reproductive stage. Agronomy. 14(8):1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14081718.

29 

Zhou, W.; Li, M. and Achal, V. 2025. A comprehensive review on environmental and human health impacts of chemical pesticide usage. Emerging Contaminants; 11(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emcon.2024.100410.

30 

Zimmermann, G. 2007. Review on safety of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana and Beauveria brongniartii . Biocontrol Science and Technology. 17(6):553-596. https://doi.org/10.1080/09583150701309006.