https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v17i5.4103

elocation-id: elocation-id: e4103

García-Ávila, Calderón-Zavala, Espíndola-Barquera, López-Jiménez, Santacruz-Varela, and Alia-Tejacal: Productive diversity and fruit quality of peach and nectarine cultivars

Journal Metadata

Journal Identifier: remexca [journal-id-type=publisher-id]

Journal Title Group

Journal Title (Full): Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

Abbreviated Journal Title: Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc [abbrev-type=publisher]

ISSN: 2007-0934 [pub-type=ppub]

Publisher

Publisher’s Name: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias

Article Metadata

Article Identifier: 10.29312/remexca.v17i5.4103 [pub-id-type=doi]

Article Grouping Data

Subject Group [subj-group-type=heading]

Subject Grouping Name: Article

Title Group

Article Title: Productive diversity and fruit quality of peach and nectarine cultivars

Contributor Group

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: García-Ávila

Given (First) Names: Armando

X (cross) Reference: 1 [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Calderón-Zavala

Given (First) Names: Guillermo

X (cross) Reference: 1 [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

X (cross) Reference: § [ref-type=corresp; rid=c1]

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Espíndola-Barquera

Given (First) Names: María de la Cruz

X (cross) Reference: 2 [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: López-Jiménez

Given (First) Names: Alfredo

X (cross) Reference: 1 [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Santacruz-Varela

Given (First) Names: Amalio

X (cross) Reference: 1 [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Alia-Tejacal

Given (First) Names: Irán

X (cross) Reference: 3 [ref-type=aff; rid=aff3]

Affiliation [id=aff1]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 1

Institution Name: in an Address: Colegio de Postgraduados - Campus Montecillo. Carretera México-Texcoco km 36.5, Montecillos, Texcoco, Estado de México, México. [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Colegio de Postgraduados [content-type=orgname]

Institution Name: in an Address: Campus Montecillo [content-type=orgdiv1]

Address Line: Carretera México-Texcoco km 36.5, Montecillos, Texcoco, Estado de México

Country: in an Address: México [country=MX]

Postal Code: 56230

Phone Number: in an Address: 595 9520257

Email Address: garciaa.armando@colpos.mx

Email Address: lopezja@colpos.mx

Email Address: asvarela@colpos.mx

Affiliation [id=aff2]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 2

Institution Name: in an Address: Fundación Salvador Sánchez Colín-CICTAMEX, SC. Coatepec Harinas, Estado de México, México. [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Fundación Salvador Sánchez Colín-CICTAMEX, SC [content-type=orgname]

Address Line: Coatepec Harinas, Estado de México

Country: in an Address: México [country=MX]

Postal Code: 51700

Phone Number: in an Address: 723 1450160

Email Address: mespindolab@gmail.com

Affiliation [id=aff3]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 3

Institution Name: in an Address: Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias - Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos. Av. Universidad Núm. 1001, Chamilpa, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México. [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos [content-type=orgname]

Address Line: Av. Universidad Núm. 1001, Chamilpa, Cuernavaca, Morelos

Country: in an Address: México [country=MX]

Postal Code: 62210

Phone Number: in an Address: 777 3297900

Email Address: iran.alia@uaem.mx

Author Note Group

Correspondence Information: §Autor para correspondencia: cazagu@colpos.mx . [id=c1]

Publication Date [date-type=pub; publication-format=electronic]

Day: 01

Month: 08

Year: 2026

Volume Number: 17

Issue Number: 5

Electronic Location Identifier: e4109

History: Document History

Date [date-type=received]

Day: 01

Month: 03

Year: 2026

Date [date-type=accepted]

Day: 01

Month: 06

Year: 2026

Permissions

License Information [license-type=open-access; xlink:href=https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/; xml:lang=es]

Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons

Abstract

Title: Abstract

From 2022 to 2023, 15 cultivars with low cold requirements were evaluated in Coatepec Harinas, State of Mexico, in order to select the most outstanding materials for their productive potential and fruit quality. Four-year-old trees were evaluated under forced production management, and growth, productivity and fruit quality were determined. Productive behavior in yield ranged from 3 to 23 kg tree-1, the period from flowering to fruit maturity lasted between 105 and 134 days, and fruit production efficiency ranged from 0.18 to 0.91 kg cm-2. The total soluble solids, content ranged from 11.6 to 19.7 °Brix, titratable acidity, from 0.5 to 0.97% malic acid and the TSS/TA ratio from 15.8 to 36.12. Fruit size ranged from 68 to 168 g, shaped from 64 to 255 and firmness from 1.2 to 4.4 kgF mm-1. ‘Oro de San Juan’ and ‘Cardenal’ presented the highest yields; in terms of fruit quality, most cultivars showed excellent attributes in size, shape, firmness and sweeter, more aromatic fruity flavor in white-fleshed fruits. ‘Cardenal’ presented the earliest fruit ripening, 28 days before ‘Diamante’. The introduction and production of the peach cultivars Oro de San Juan, Cardenal, and Robín are real alternatives to increase per-hectare yields and the crop’s profitability, as well as to improve per capita consumption with better fruit characteristics in the market.

Keyword Group [xml:lang=en]

Title: Keywords:

Keyword

Italic: Prunus persica [toggle=yes]

Keyword: genetic improvement

Keyword: yield

Counts

Figure Count [count=0]

Table Count [count=5]

Equation Count [count=2]

Reference Count [count=23]

Abstract

From 2022 to 2023, 15 cultivars with low cold requirements were evaluated in Coatepec Harinas, State of Mexico, in order to select the most outstanding materials for their productive potential and fruit quality. Four-year-old trees were evaluated under forced production management, and growth, productivity and fruit quality were determined. Productive behavior in yield ranged from 3 to 23 kg tree-1, the period from flowering to fruit maturity lasted between 105 and 134 days, and fruit production efficiency ranged from 0.18 to 0.91 kg cm-2. The total soluble solids, content ranged from 11.6 to 19.7 °Brix, titratable acidity, from 0.5 to 0.97% malic acid and the TSS/TA ratio from 15.8 to 36.12. Fruit size ranged from 68 to 168 g, shaped from 64 to 255 and firmness from 1.2 to 4.4 kgF mm-1. ‘Oro de San Juan’ and ‘Cardenal’ presented the highest yields; in terms of fruit quality, most cultivars showed excellent attributes in size, shape, firmness and sweeter, more aromatic fruity flavor in white-fleshed fruits. ‘Cardenal’ presented the earliest fruit ripening, 28 days before ‘Diamante’. The introduction and production of the peach cultivars Oro de San Juan, Cardenal, and Robín are real alternatives to increase per-hectare yields and the crop’s profitability, as well as to improve per capita consumption with better fruit characteristics in the market.

Keywords:

Prunus persica, genetic improvement, yield.

Introduction

Peaches and nectarines are the most preferred drupe and stone fruits worldwide due to their attractive colors, aroma and a combination of sugar and acidity that generate a unique and popular flavor among consumers ( Veerappan et al ., 2021 ).

In 2023, they were grown in 81 countries, with an area of 2.4 million hectares, with a production of 44 million tons and a yield of 10.8 t ha-1. China, with 36% of the area and 38% of the total production, is the main producer ( FAOSTAT, 2025 ).

In Mexico, peaches are among the sweet seasonal fruits with high consumption and economic value. In 2024, the productive behavior of this fruit was 34 000 ha, 265 000 t and a yield of 8 t ha-1. The main producing states are Zacatecas, Chihuahua, Michoacán, and Mexico with values of 92 000, 37 000, 31 000 and 26 000 t, respectively ( SAGARPA-SIAP, 2025 ).

Peach production in regions of Morelos, Michoacán, and the southern part of the State of Mexico, which have a subtropical climate, is recognized as an important real alternative due to the potential and comparative advantages it presents compared to the temperate zones of Puebla, Tlaxcala, and Zacatecas. Early harvest aligns with a market window, resulting in attractive prices for producers.

This has brought back relevance and interest in continuing to incorporate areas for peach and nectarine cultivation and production. However, the lack of well-adapted cultivars with fruit quality and yield superior to those of traditional varieties has limited their production. As a result, producers have turned to foreign cultivars, including ‘Diamante’.

This particular lack of new cultivars has been one of the main factors driving peach producers and consumers away in Mexico. Raseira and Franzón (2021) note that the introduction of new cultivars with superior productive and commercial attributes could improve yield and that superior-quality fruit can attract end consumers.

In this context, the College of Postgraduates’ genetic improvement program has a collection of genotypes with unique characteristics that are currently of interest to reveal. Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate the yield and fruit quality of 15 peach and nectarine cultivars to assess their potential qualities.

Materials and methods

The study was conducted over two years -2022 and 2023- at the Salvador Sánchez Colín CICTAMEX SC Foundation, ‘La Cruz’ Experimental Center, located in Coatepec Harinas, State of Mexico. The site is located at 18° 48’ north latitude, 99° 42’ west longitude, and an altitude of 2 200 m.

The soil is a Cambisol; the climate is temperate subhumid, with a maximum temperature of 26.1 °C, a minimum temperature of 4.3 °C and an average temperature of 15.8 °C. Rainfall occurs mainly in summer, with the rainiest months being from June to September, with an annual average of 1 162 mm ( PDM, 2025).

Fifteen peach and nectarine cultivars were evaluated; 14 of which were obtained from the genetic improvement program of the College of Postgraduates ( Table 1 ). The Diamante cultivar was used as a control; it is from EMBRAPA-Brazil’s genetic improvement program and is found on most plantations in the subtropical areas of the states of Michoacán, Morelos and the south of the State of Mexico.

Table 1

Characteristics of 15 peach/nectarine cultivars with low cold requirements, evaluated in Coatepec Harinas, State of Mexico, cycles 2022 and 2023.

Cultivar Origin Type Cold requirement (CU) Pulp color
Diamante (control) Embrapa-Brazil Peach 200 Yellow
Cardenal CP Peach 250 Yellow
Colegio 2005 CP Peach 200 Yellow
Oro de San Juan CP Peach 275 Yellow
Oro Azteca Mejorado CP Peach 225 Yellow
Diamante Mejorado CP Peach 250 Yellow
Miel Azteca CP Peach 250 Yellow
Nuevo Azteca CP Peach 250 Yellow
Sol Azteca CP Peach 300 Yellow
Granizo CP Peach 250 White
Robín CP Peach 275 White
Perla Azteca CP Peach 200 White
Encanto Azteca CP Peach 200 White
Esplendor Azteca CP Peach 250 White
Blanquiña CP Nectarine 300 White

[i] CP= College of Postgraduates; CU= cold units ( García et al ., 2018 ).

The trees were four years old at the start of the study, were growing on a regional ‘Criollo’ rootstock at a planting distance of 5 m between rows and 2 m between trees and had been pruned into a narrow vase shape.

In the ‘Los Postes’ orchard, three trees per cultivar were selected for their respective study. For quality evaluation, during the harvest season from February to June, 10 fruits at maturity for consumption were used for each material and each year (2022 and 2023). Fruit selection was based on discarding fruits that were physiologically immature, malformed or damaged by physical injury, pests or diseases.

Subsequently, the fresh weight of 10 fruits was obtained using an Explorer Pro® gravimetric balance, calibrated to ±0.01 g (Mod. EP114C, Switzerland); the shape was estimated by dividing the value of the polar diameter of the fruit by its equatorial dimeter (cm), measured with a CD-6 ‘CSSX’ vernier (Mitutoyo Corp.), where higher values indicated elongated fruits or fruits with apical protuberance, and lower values indicated a round fruit shape. Firmness was recorded in 10 fruits using a Mc Cormick texture analyzer (F-327) with an 11 mm diameter probe. The probe was inserted into the equatorial section of the fruit, where the peel (exocarp) had previously been removed, following the method of Kader and Mitchel (1989) .

The total soluble solids (TSS in °Brix) content was determined in 10 fruits using a digital refractometer (PR-100 Atago, Tokyo, Japan); the titratable acidity (% malic acid) was determined using the method proposed by the AOAC (1990) ; likewise, the TSS/TA ratio was evaluated and its value was obtained by dividing the amount of total soluble solids by the titratable acidity of each of the 10 samples. To evaluate productive behavior, the trees were subjected to a forced production program ( Table 2 ).

Table 2

Agronomic management for forced peach production in Coatepec Harinas, State of Mexico, cycles 2022 and 2023.

Season Stage Task
September Full flower Defoliation with urea (3%; equivalent to 3 kg in 100 L of water) and zinc sulfate (2%); Fruiting pruning; Application of Revent® of 200 g active ingredient per liter (1.25 ml L-1of water) plus oil (citrolina) at 2%
October Dormant tree Control of peach leaf curl and shothole blight; First fertilization: ½ nitrogen plus all phosphorus and potassium
November-December Petal drop Control of brown rot; Control of thrips and red spider mites; Second fertilization: ½ nitrogen; Irrigation; *Weed control
January-February Fruit thinning and development Fruit thinning; Control of powdery mildew; Foliar fertilization: zinc, manganese, calcium, boron, and other minor elements (2-3 applications); Control of thrips, red spider mites and fruit flies; Irrigation and weed control
March-April Harvest Control of brown rot and fruit flies and *anti-bird netting

[i] += necessary activities; *= tasks that depend on weather conditions or the presence of the problem.

Based on the agronomic management, the following was determined: fruit development period (FDP), the time elapsed from anthesis to harvest of the fruit at consumption maturity was recorded (the change of color from green to the predominant color of each cultivar was taken as a maturity criterion); yield in kg tree-1(YT), the total fresh weight was immediately recorded at each of the three cuts during the harvest stage, and the fruit production efficiency per tree (FPE) was calculated by dividing the yield (kg) by the cross-sectional area of the trunk (cm2) of the same tree (kg cm-2).

To calculate the cross-sectional area, the trunk’s perimeter was measured at a height of 20 cm from the ground, and the following equality was applied:

A T T = 1 4 π d

The diameter (d) was calculated using the following function:

d = P π

Where: P= trunk perimeter; π= 3.1416.

The experimental design was completely randomized, with three replications per cultivar, with one peach tree as the experimental unit. The data for the variables described above were subjected to an analysis of variance and tests of means using Tukey’s test, with a significance level of ≤0.05. For the variable fruit shape, a non-parametric test was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. All these procedures were performed using SAS®, v. 8.0 (SAS Institute, 1999).

Results and discussion

Physical and chemical properties of fruit quality

Fruit weight varied between 88 g and 168 g for the yellow peaches ‘Oro Azteca Mejorado’, ‘Diamante Mejorado’, ‘Miel Azteca’, ‘Sol Azteca’, ‘Cardenal’, ‘Diamante’, ‘Nuevo Azteca’, ‘Colegio 2005’ and ‘Oro de San Juan’. In white-fleshed peaches and nectarines, it ranged from 68 g to 149 g, for ‘Blanquiña’, ‘Granizo’, ‘Esplendor Azteca’, ‘Perla Azteca’, ‘Encanto Azteca’ and ‘Robín’. The potential of ‘Robín’ and ‘Oro de San Juan’, white and yellow peaches, respectively, stood out, as they showed higher fruit weight over the two years of evaluation (149 g and 168 g).

Outstanding cultivars could generate preference, acceptance and higher marketing prices. For cultivars weighing less than 90 g to 100 g, thinning can keep weight stable or even increase it due to increased carbohydrate availability for each fruit that remains on the tree ( Fanwoua et al ., 2014 ). This thinning task has been suggested to begin at fruiting pruning, during full flowering and before pit hardening; however, the optimal time is at full flowering or immediately after it ( Osborne et al ., 2005 ).

Nonetheless, fruit weight will depend largely on harvest time, genotype, number of fruits, and prevailing climatic and agricultural management conditions ( Rawandoozi et al ., 2020 ).

For fruit shape, the yellow peaches ‘Diamante’, ‘Sol Azteca’, ‘Diamante Mejorado’, ‘Oro de San Juan’ and ‘Nuevo Azteca’, according to analysis and adjustment of means by non-parametric analysis of Kruskal-Wallis, presented the highest values (indicating less roundness), between 183 and 255, which indicate a notable apical protuberance (tip) in their fruits. This is an undesirable trait that makes them prone to bruise during post-harvest handling and shipping and that decreases their commercial quality.

Conversely, some white-fleshed cultivars, such as Encanto Azteca, Perla Azteca and Esplendor Azteca, were statistically different from ‘Diamante’ in fruit shape, with lower values between 77 and 117, indicating a round fruit profile ( Table 3 ). This genetic improvement in the fruit’s round shape favors post-harvest handling and increases consumer preference for the fruit.

Table 3

Physical properties of fruit quality in 15 peach/nectarine cultivars evaluated in Coatepec Harinas, State of Mexico, during 2022 and 2023.

Cultivar Weight (g) Shape Firmness (kgF)
Oro de San Juan 168.05 ay 182.4 ad 1.54 ef
Robínx 149.8 ab 168.65 be 2.2 bf
Colegio 2005 134.65 bc 140 ch 1.62 df
Nuevo Azteca 128.8 cd 189.75 ac 2.55 be
Diamante 114.7 ce 255.4 a 2.33 be
Cardenal 110.1 df 74.38 hi 2.68 bd
Sol Azteca 105.75 eg 244.35 a 2.61 be
Encanto Aztecax 102.25 eg 76.75 gi 1.68 cf
Miel Azteca 92.6 fg 63.83 i 1.81 cf
Perla Aztecax 91.3 fg 80.43 fi 2.72 bc
Diamante Mejorado 91 fg 232.48 ab 1.8 cf
Oro Azteca Mejorado 88.36 gh 109.08 ei 2.9 b
Esplendor Aztecax 88.1 gh 116.85 di 1.94 bf
Granizox 86.5 gh 167.75 bf 4.42 a
Blanquiñaxw 68.35 h 155.42 cg 1.2 f
Media 108.02 150.5 2.26
CV (%) 17.8 41.7 42.43

[i] Polar diameter/equatorial diameter ratio with adjustment of means using Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric analysis; y= values with a common letter are not significantly different according to Tukey’s test (p≤ 0.05); x= white-fleshed varieties; w= nectarine.

Research such as that by Li et al. (2016) reports that the degree of ellipticity and tip prominence tends to increase in subtropical cultivars, mainly due to a lack of cold hours and to high temperatures after flowering.

In firmness, a significantly lower value (1.2 kgF) was obtained for ‘Blanquiña’. This can negatively affect quality attributes, increase susceptibility to diseases and lead to greater postharvest fruit deterioration due to lower cell wall resistance (Qiant et al., 2021). The highest value was for ‘Granizoʼ, with 4.42 kgF. This peach has a high degree of pulp adherence to the seed, which can classify it as a prospect for the industry.

The yellow peaches ‘Oro de San Juan’, ‘Colegio 2005’, ‘Diamante Mejorado’, ‘Miel Azteca’, ‘Diamante’, ‘Nuevo Azteca’, ‘Sol Azteca’, ‘Cardenal’, and ‘Oro Azteca Mejorado’ showed firmness values between 1.54 and 2.9 kgF. For the white-fleshed peaches ‘Encanto Azteca’, ‘Esplendor Azteca’, ‘Robín’ and ‘Perla Azteca’, the corresponding values varied between 1.68 and 2.72 kgF, respectively.

In general, the yellow cultivars ‘Nuevo Azteca’, ‘Cardenal’, ‘Sol Azteca’, and ‘Oro Azteca Mejorado’ showed values that were similar to and higher than those of ‘Diamond’ (control) and those of white peaches at the time of harvest; this can give them greater resistance during handling, transport and storage.

The total soluble solids (TSS) content for the yellow peaches ‘Oro de San Juan’, ‘Miel Azteca’, ‘Diamante Mejorado’, ‘Nuevo Azteca’, ‘Cardenal’, ‘Diamante’, ‘Oro Azteca Mejorado’, ‘Colegio 2005’ and ‘Sol Azteca’ showed an average of 13.47 and a range from 11.66 to 14.9 °Brix. For the white-fleshed peaches and nectarines ‘Robín’, ‘Perla Azteca’, ‘Esplendor Azteca’, ‘Encanto Azteca’, ‘Granizo’ and ‘Blanquiña’, the average value was 15.83 and varied from 13.57 to 19.75 °Brix. The concentration of TSS in white-fleshed cultivars was higher ( Table 4 ).

Table 4

Chemical properties of fruit quality in 15 peach/nectarine cultivars evaluated in Coatepec Harinas, State of Mexico, during 2022 and 2023.

Cultivar TSS (%) TA (% malic acid) TSS/TA ratio
Blanquiña 19.75 az 0.95 a 21.72 bc
Granizo 16.59 b 0.97 a 18.05 c
Encanto Azteca 15.46 bc 0.8 ad 20.92 bc
Esplendor Azteca 15.09 bd 0.53 d 36.12 a
Sol Azteca 14.9 bd 0.62 bd 29.89 ab
Perla Azteca 14.54 bd 0.83 ac 18.71 c
Colegio 2005 14.53 bd 0.86 ab 17.95 c
Oro Azteca Mejorado 14.36 bd 0.75 ad 22.99 bc
Diamante 14.31 bd 0.73 ad 20.61 bc
Robín 13.57 ce 0.66 bd 24.67 bc
Cardenal 13.56 ce 0.93 a 15.84 c
Nuevo Azteca 13.2 ce 0.85 ab 17.95 c
Diamante Mejorado 13.06 de 0.74 ad 18.94 c
Miel Azteca 11.66 e 0.57 cd 21.23 bc
Oro de San Juan 11.66 e 0.75 ad 16.67 c
Media 14.41 0.77 21.48
CV (%) 14.74 32.72 42.09

[i] z= Values with a common letter are not significantly different according to Tukey’s test (p≤ 0.05).

The TSS content will depend on genotype, environmental conditions, yield, fruit position in the canopy, ripeness, water available during fruit development, nutrition, thinning and their interactions ( Rawandoozi et al ., 2020 ).

The cultivars Cardenal and Miel Azteca, with shorter periods from flower to ripe fruit (105 and 118 days), showed lower TSS values, with 11.66 and 13.56 °Brix, respectively. In yellow cultivars such as Oro de San Juan, Cardenal, and Nuevo Azteca, high fruit production may have affected the total TSS content. Controlling fruit load could reduce competition among fruits for carbohydrates (glucose, fructose and sucrose) and increase TSS levels ( Anthony and Minas, 2021 ).

For titratable acidity (TA), which represents a key quality parameter and an important factor in determining fruit flavor, it generally ranges between 0.07 and 0.14% for low-acid cultivars and between 1.1 and 1.45% for acidic cultivars (Mrázová et al., 2021). For the yellow peaches ‘Miel Azteca’, ‘Sol Azteca’, ‘Diamante’, ‘Diamante Mejorado’, ‘Oro de San Juan’, ‘Oro Azteca Mejorado’, ‘Nuevo Azteca’, ‘Colegio 2005’ and ‘Cardenal’, TA ranged from 0.57 to 0.93% malic acid, respectively.

In the white peaches ‘Esplendor Azteca’, ‘Robín’, ‘Encanto Azteca’, ‘Perla Azteca’, ‘Blanquiña’ and ‘Granizo’, it ranged from 0.53 to 0.97% malic acid.

In the Mexican market, as in most countries, sweet fruits with low acidity have been preferred, which are liked for their flavor balance and are commonly found in most of the available cultivars ( Table 4 ). Peach may contain important organic acids, such as oxalic acid, quinic acid, shikimic acid, citric acid, fumaric acid and malic acid, the latter being predominant ( Famiani et al ., 2015 ).

The ratio of total soluble solids to titratable acidity (TSS/TA) is the best indicator to evaluate fruit ripeness and palatability. A high ratio indicates a higher degree of ripeness and a more pleasant taste, due to an ideal balance between sugars and organic acids ( Sanches et al ., 2017 ).

‘Esplendor Azteca’, with white flesh, stood out with a higher TSS/TA ratio value, 36.12. This characteristic indicates high sweetness (15.09 °Brix) and low acidity (0.53% malic acid), reflected in an optimal balance between sweet and acid, desirable for the consumption of fresh fruit.

In the yellow peaches ‘Cardenal’, ‘Oro de San Juan’, ‘Nuevo Azteca’, ‘Colegio 2005’, ‘Diamante Mejorado’, ‘Diamante’, ‘Miel Azteca’, ‘Oro Azteca Mejorado’ and ‘Sol Azteca’, this ratio varied between 15.84 and 29.89. For the white peaches ‘Granizo’, ‘Perla Azteca’, ‘Encanto Azteca’, ‘Blanquiña’, ‘Robín’ and ‘Esplendor Azteca’, the TSS/TA ratio was between 18.05 and 36.12.

In fruits, this maturity index (MI) ratio is used to classify them as acidic (MI: 5-7), bittersweet (MI: 17-24) and sweet (MI: 31-98) ( Ortiz et al ., 2008 ). Therefore, it can be concluded that most cultivars can be classified as bittersweet and ‘Aztec splendor’ can be classified as sweet ( Table 4 ).

Fruit growth period and production

For the fruit growth period (FGP), ‘Cardenal’ excelled with only 105 days from flower to ripe fruit, 28 days faster than ‘Diamante’, which requires 133 days from flower to ripe fruit. Most cultivars exhibited a shorter time to fruit harvest compared to ‘Diamante’ ( Table 5 ). Nevertheless, this implies that the fruits have less time to accumulate carbohydrates, which often results in smaller sizes.

Table 5

Average fruit growth period and production of 15 peach/nectarine cultivars evaluated in Coatepec Harinas, State of Mexico, during 2022 and 2023.

Cultivar FGP (days) YT (kg) FPE (kg cm-2)
Perla Azteca 133.5 az 14.46 ac 0.28 ac
Diamante 133.17 a 14.4 ac 0.21 af
Granizo 131.67 ab 3.65 c 0.07 f
Oro de San Juan 129.37 ab 23.18 a 0.36 a
Colegio 2005 129.19 ab 9.22 bc 0.11 fe
Diamante Mejorado 128.17 ab 12.33 abc 0.11 fe
Robín 126 ab 14.87 abc 0.24 ae
Sol Azteca 125.67 ab 4.68 c 0.15 cf
Oro Azteca Mejorado 123.25 ab 11.07 bc 0.11 df
Encanto Azteca 122.6 ab 16.32 ab 0.31 ab
Nuevo Azteca 122.25 ab 14.22 abc 0.27 ad
Esplendor Azteca 120.47 ab 10.16 bc 0.2 af
Blanquiña 121.13 ab 11.19 bc 0.2 bf
Miel Azteca 118 bc 8.03 bc 0.09 ef
Cardenal 105.07 c 17.56 ab 0.2 bf
Media 124.55 12.45 0.2
CV (%) 5.67 43.57 37.54

[i] z= values with a common letter are not significantly different according to Tukey’s test (p≤ 0.05).

Short FGP materials could take advantage of this quality of early fruit ripening to achieve better selling prices. In addition, production costs would be reduced by achieving a faster fruit harvest. ‘Perla Azteca’, which matures late (133.5 days), could benefit producers and consumers by prolonging the supply of fresh fruit and increasing economic income from a seasonal offer.

This diversification has been an important breeding trend for extending the harvest season among early- and very late-maturing cultivars in some producing areas (Baccichet et al., 2025). It could also guarantee a fruit harvest from January to June in subtropical areas and help reduce fresh fruit imports to the Mexican market at the beginning of the year, which is the season of low supply. This would be a response to consumer demand for peaches to be available almost all year round.

In yield, the yellow peaches ʻOro de San Juanʼ and ʻCardenalʼ were superior, with 23 and 17 kg tree-1, respectively. They did not present alternation in their production during the two years of evaluation, considering that there is often an impact on the source-demand balance of nutrients and carbohydrates, and there is a competition between the vegetative and reproductive parts, which generates a drop in yield in the subsequent season ( Bussi et al ., 2016 ).

The lower yields of cultivars such as Granizo, Colegio 2005, Sol Azteca and Miel Azteca were influenced by factors such as adaptation, susceptibility to diseases ( Monilinia fructicola ), and low percentage of fruit set, to name a few. Outstanding cultivars could increase orchard productivity and improve the profitability of peach production per hectare.

In fruit production efficiency, for the yellow peaches ‘Miel Azteca’, ‘Colegio 2005’, ‘Diamante Mejorado’, ‘Oro Azteca Mejorado’, ‘Sol Azteca’, ‘Cardenal’, ‘Diamante’, ‘Nuevo Azteca’ and ‘Oro de San Juan’, it varied between 0.09 and 0.36. In the white peaches ‘Granizo’, ‘Blanquiña’, ‘Esplendor Azteca’, ‘Robín’, ‘Perla Azteca’ and ‘Encanto Azteca’, it ranged from 0.18 to 0.78 kg cm-2, respectively.

Oro de San Juan was superior in fruit production efficiency with 0.36 kg cm-2. However, it was observed that, numerically, white cultivars were more stable in total fruit yield than yellow peaches ( Table 5 ).

Conclusions

‘Oro de San Juan’ and ‘Cardenal’ excelled in yield; in fruit quality, most cultivars showed excellent attributes in size, shape, firmness and sweeter, more aromatic fruity flavor in white-fleshed fruits.

‘Cardenal’ presented a fruit harvest 28 days faster than ‘Diamante’ an advantage to increase supply and profitability.

The introduction and production of the peach cultivars Oro de San Juan, Cardenal and Robín are real alternatives to increase per-hectare yields and the crop’s profitability, and to improve per capita consumption with better fruit characteristics in the market.

Bibliography

1 

Anthony, B. M. and Minas, I. S. 2021. Optimizing peach tree canopy architecture for efficient light use, increased productivity, and improved fruit quality. Agronomy. 11(10):120.

2 

AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis. International Association of Official Agricultural Chemist 16th. Maryland, USA. Vol. 2. 1114 p.

3 

Bussi, C.; Genard, M. M. 2016. Thinning and pruning to overcome alternate bearing in peach trees. Eur. J. Hort. Sci. 79(6):313-317.

4 

Famiani, F.; Battistelli, A.; Moscatello, S.; Cruz-Castillo, J. G. and Walker, R. P. 2015. The organic acids that are accumulated in the flesh of fruits: occurrence, metabolism and factors affecting their contents -a review. Revista Chapingo, Serie Horticultura. 21(2):97-128.

5 

Fanwoua, B. J.; Bairam, E.; Delaire, M. and Buck-Sorlin, G. 2014. The role of branch architecture in the production and partitioning of assimilates: the example of the apple tree (Malus domestica). Frontiers of Plant Science. 5(338):1-6.

6 

FAO. 2025. FAOSTAT Agriculture. Agricultural data-production: crops. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/.

7 

García, A. A.; Espíndola, B. Ma. de la C. y Calderón, Z. G. 2018. Guía técnica para la producción de durazno. Toluca, Estado de México. 103 p.

8 

Kader, A. A. and Mitchell, G. F. 1989. Maturity and quality. In: peaches, plum and nectarines. growing and handling for fresh market. LaRue, J. H. and Johnson, R. S. (Eds.). University of California-Davis. Davis, CA, USA. 191-196 pp.

9 

Li, X.; Gao, P.; Zhang, Ch.; Xiao, X.; Chen, C. and Song, F. 2023. Aroma of peach fruit: a review on aroma volatile compounds and underlying regulatory mechanisms. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 58(10):4965-4979.

10 

Ortiz, C., A.; Lara, I.; Graell, J.; López, M. L. and Echeverría, G. 2008. Sensory acceptance of peaches stored in AC. Relationship with instrumental quality parameters. Acta Hortic. 796(30):225-230.

11 

Osborne, J. L.; Robinson, T. L. and Parra, Q. R. 2005. Chemical blossom thinning agents reduce crop load of ‘Rising Star’ peach in New York. Acta Hort. 727(51):423-428.

12 

Qian, J.; Zhao, Y.; Shi, Y. and Chen, K. 2022. Transcriptome analysis of peach fruit treated with 1-MCP: information on the peach softening regulatory network. Food Quality and Safety. 17(6):1-11.

13 

Raseira, M. C. B. y Franzón, R. C. 2021. Situación general de la cría de melocotón. Agrociencia Uruguay. NE1(25):1-10.

14 

Rawandoozi, Z. J.; Hartmann, T. P.; Byrne, D. H. and Carpenedo, S. 2020. Heritability, correlation and genotype-environment interaction of phenological and fruit quality traits in peaches. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 146(1):56-67.

15 

SAGARPA-SIAP. 2025. Producción agrícola por cultivo. Durazno. https://www.gob.mx/agricultura/dgsiap.

16 

Sanches, A. G; Silva, M. D; Moreira, E. G. and Cordeiro, C. A. 2017. Starch sources and storage temperature in maintaining the post-harvest quality of red-fleshed pitaya. Colloq. Agrar. 2(13):41-54.

17 

Veerappan, K.; Natarajan S.; Chung H. and Park, J. 2021. Molecular insights of fruit quality trainst in peaches, Prunus persica. Plants (Basel). 10(10):1-14.