https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v17i4.4037

elocation-id: elocation-id: e4037

Sánchez-Toledano, Borja-Bravo, García-Valladares, and Martínez-Morales: Intrinsic and extrinsic attributes influencing the selection of dehydrated fruits and vegetables in Mexico

Journal Metadata

Journal Identifier: remexca [journal-id-type=publisher-id]

Journal Title Group

Journal Title (Full): Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

Abbreviated Journal Title: Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc [abbrev-type=publisher]

ISSN: 2007-0934 [pub-type=ppub]

Publisher

Publisher’s Name: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias

Article Metadata

Article Identifier: 10.29312/remexca.v17i4.4037 [pub-id-type=doi]

Article Grouping Data

Subject Group [subj-group-type=heading]

Subject Grouping Name: Article

Title Group

Article Title: Intrinsic and extrinsic attributes influencing the selection of dehydrated fruits and vegetables in Mexico

Contributor Group

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Sánchez-Toledano

Given (First) Names: Blanca Isabel

X (cross) Reference: 1 [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Borja-Bravo

Given (First) Names: Mercede

X (cross) Reference: 2 [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

X (cross) Reference: § [ref-type=corresp; rid=c1]

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: García-Valladares

Given (First) Names: Octavio

X (cross) Reference: 3 [ref-type=aff; rid=aff3]

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Martínez-Morales

Given (First) Names: Elena Guadalupe

X (cross) Reference: 3 [ref-type=aff; rid=aff3]

Affiliation [id=aff1]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 1

Institution Name: in an Address: Campo Experimental Zacatecas-INIFAP. Carretera Zacatecas-Fresnillo km 24.5, Calera de Víctor Rosales, Zacatecas. CP. 98500. Tel. 55 38718700, ext. 82322. [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias [content-type=orgname]

Institution Name: in an Address: Campo Experimental Zacatecas [content-type=orgdiv1]

Address Line

City: Calera de Víctor Rosales

State or Province: Zacatecas

Postal Code: 98500

Country: in an Address: México [country=MX]

Affiliation [id=aff2]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 2

Institution Name: in an Address: Campo Experimental Pabellón-INIFAP. Carretera Aguascalientes-Zacatecas km 32.5, Pabellón de Arteaga, Aguascalientes. CP. 20670. Tel. 55 38718700, ext. 82520. [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias [content-type=orgname]

Institution Name: in an Address: Campo Experimental Pabellón [content-type=orgdiv1]

Address Line

City: Pabellón de Arteaga

State or Province: Aguascalientes

Postal Code: 20670

Country: in an Address: México [country=MX]

Affiliation [id=aff3]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 3

Institution Name: in an Address: Instituto de Energías Renovables-Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Xochicalco s/n, Azteca, Temixco, Morelos. CP. 62580. [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México [content-type=orgname]

Institution Name: in an Address: Instituto de Energías Renovables [content-type=orgdiv1]

Address Line

City: Temixco

State or Province: Morelos

Postal Code: 62580

Country: in an Address: México [country=MX]

Author Note Group

Correspondence Information: [§] Autora para correspondencia: borja.mercedes@inifap.gob.mx. [id=c1]

Publication Date [date-type=pub; publication-format=electronic]

Day: 19

Month: 06

Year: 2026

Publication Date [date-type=collection; publication-format=electronic]

Year: 2026

Volume Number: 17

Issue Number: 4

Electronic Location Identifier: e4037

History: Document History

Date [date-type=received]

Day: 01

Month: 03

Year: 2026

Date [date-type=accepted]

Day: 01

Month: 05

Year: 2026

Permissions

License Information [license-type=open-access; xlink:href=https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/; xml:lang=es]

Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons

Abstract

Title: Abstract

For dehydrated products to access new markets and for their production to generate economic development opportunities in rural production units, it is necessary to understand consumer demands. The objective was to analyze consumer behavior and identify the main attributes that lead consumers to make the decision to purchase dehydrated fruits and vegetables in Mexico in 2023. A survey was administered to 704 households nationwide and analyzed using Pearson correlation, cluster analysis and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). It was identified that the most valued attributes were flavor (46.28%), being a national product (40.13%), biodegradable packaging (38.04%), and supporting environmental conservation (35.42%). In addition, four groups of consumers were identified who differed in the attributes valued when purchasing dehydrated products; however, flavor was the most important across all groups. Companies that produce dehydrated fruit and vegetable products can create generic promotion strategies that highlight the attributes of health, environmental care, product quality and social responsibility.

Keyword Group [xml:lang=en]

Title: Keywords:

Keyword: conservation

Keyword: demand

Keyword: analytic hierarchical process

Counts

Figure Count [count=1]

Table Count [count=3]

Equation Count [count=2]

Reference Count [count=36]

Abstract

For dehydrated products to access new markets and for their production to generate economic development opportunities in rural production units, it is necessary to understand consumer demands. The objective was to analyze consumer behavior and identify the main attributes that lead consumers to make the decision to purchase dehydrated fruits and vegetables in Mexico in 2023. A survey was administered to 704 households nationwide and analyzed using Pearson correlation, cluster analysis and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). It was identified that the most valued attributes were flavor (46.28%), being a national product (40.13%), biodegradable packaging (38.04%), and supporting environmental conservation (35.42%). In addition, four groups of consumers were identified who differed in the attributes valued when purchasing dehydrated products; however, flavor was the most important across all groups. Companies that produce dehydrated fruit and vegetable products can create generic promotion strategies that highlight the attributes of health, environmental care, product quality and social responsibility.

Keywords:

conservation, demand, analytic hierarchical process.

Introduction

The consumption of dehydrated fruits and vegetables has become popular among people seeking foods that are low in calories, high in fiber content, free of chemical additives, with nutritional and organoleptic properties, attractive in appearance and ready for immediate consumption (Anigstein, 2019; Moreno-Colom and Boràs-Català, 2021).

In addition to the above, the consumption of dehydrated foods is associated with the benefits that these products bring to human health, as they are foods with high nutritional value and are supplements in the diet (Vega et al., 2006). This is mainly because the consumption of fruits and vegetables influences the reduction of the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases, some types of cancer, diabetes mellitus, overweight, and obesity, which are the main causes of death worldwide (Mora et al., 2023).

Therefore, dehydrated foods are an alternative to expand the consumption of fruits and vegetables among a high percentage of the population (Tarancón et al., 2020). The preferences for, and the decision to purchase a food, depend on various factors that influence the quality perceived by consumers; among them are the intrinsic attributes, which are the physical, organoleptic, or nutritional factors of the products, such as variety, flavor, smell, color and nutrients, among others.

There are also extrinsic attributes, which are characteristics by which a product can be differentiated, without being physically part of them, such as price, brand, packaging, and environmental and sociocultural connotations, among others (Torres et al., 2025). In addition, Siró et al. (2008) mention other factors, such as consumers’ socioeconomic characteristics, opinions, attitudes, objectives, the sociocultural environment, and the level of information consumers possess.

According to Tabares and Lochmuller (2013), the factors that lead consumers to make choices that meet their nutritional, social, environmental and emotional needs must be analyzed. There is research that has determined the attributes of dehydrated products, such as tubers, fruits, and vegetables (López et al., 2019; Da Silva et al., 2019; Sánchez-Toledano et al., 2024, Monaco et al., 2024), where the authors point out that intrinsic and extrinsic attributes must be considered in business and commercial strategies.

From the above, the following questions arise: What attributes of dehydrated products are valued by consumers, and what should the cooperative consider making its products? What aspects should be considered in the design of commercial strategies? To respond, the objective was to analyze consumer behavior and identify the main attributes that lead consumers to make the decision to buy dehydrated fruits and vegetables in Mexico.

Materials and methods

Information collection

A questionnaire was administered to consumers of dehydrated products nationwide from July to September 2023. The questionnaire included 36 multiple-choice questions, organized into three sections: 1) sociodemographic characteristics and consumption habits; 2) product knowledge; and 3) important attributes when buying dehydrated foods.

The confidence level of the instrument was evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient, yielding a value of 0.944 (Al-Makhroumi et al., 2022). The survey was created on the Google Apps server via Drive® and pilot tests were conducted to ensure question clarity and minimize errors (n= 25). Once validated, the survey was distributed online.

Sample estimation

The sample size was estimated using finite population sampling. The formula was that used by Rodríguez (2003):

n = N * Z α / 2 2 * p * q d 2 ( N 1 ) + Z α / 2 2 * p * q

Where: N= 35 219 141 households in Mexico in 2022 (INEGI, 2023); Z= confidence level (99%) 2.57; p= probability of success 0.5; q= probability of failure 0.5; d= maximum error (5%). The sample size was 661; however, during the application of the survey, 704 valid surveys were recorded, which were considered for analysis.

The selection of respondents was carried out with convenience sampling, justified by the participants’ willingness to answer.

Analysis of information

The degree of correlation between the variables was calculated using Pearson correlation (Hernández et al., 2018). Consumption habits were assessed with a five-point Likert scale: not at all (1); rarely (2); occasionally (3); almost always (4); and always (5). The descriptive statistical analysis was carried out using the methodology of Gould (1988). The scores of the statements were calculated, evaluating for each individual i, a total score (Pi), adding the scores assigned to each of the items j (Pi,j):

P i = j = 1 10 P i , j

Then, the mean, standard deviation, and variance were calculated.

A cluster analysis was performed using the K-means method as the clustering technique and Euclidean square distance as a measure of similarity. Finally, through the analytic hierarchical process (AHP) consumer preferences were identified and the relative importance of the attributes they consider when purchasing dehydrated products was estimated. The information obtained from the survey was concentrated in Excel 2016 spreadsheets, and the statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, version 27.

Results and discussion

Sociodemographic characteristics and consumption habits

Age and income showed a positive relationship (Table 1), indicating that the older people are, the greater the economic possibility to purchase food that satisfies specific preferences and needs. The level of education and income had a positive relationship, indicating that when schooling and income are high, consumption preferences may differ from those of people with lower levels of education and income.

Table 1

Table 1. Pearson correlation between significant variables.

Income level1 Sex2 Age3 Education level4 Household members5 Consume dehydrated products6
1 Pearson correlation 1 0.094* 0.483** 0.47** -0.209** -0.079*
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.013 0 0 0 0.037
2 Pearson correlation 0.094* 1 0.053 -0.008 0.141** 0.124**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.013 0.16 0.836 0 0.001
3 Pearson correlation 0.483** 0.53 1 0.205** -0.13** -0.135**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0 0.16 0 0.001 0
4 Pearson correlation 0.47** -0.008 0.205** 1 -0.125** -0.104**
Sig. (2-tailed) 0 0.836 0 0.001 0.006
5 Pearson correlation -0.209** 0.141** 0.13** 0.125** 1 -0.019
Sig. (2-tailed) 0 0 0.001 0.001 0.62
6 Pearson correlation -0.079* 0.124** -0.135** 0.134** -0.019 1
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.037 0.001 0 0.006 0.62

[i] Asterisks indicate significance (*= p ≤ 0.05, **= p ≤ 0.01).

The relationship between sociodemographic variables in purchasing decisions is consistent with studies conducted in Italy (Massaglia et al., 2019); Bulgaria and Moldova (Pocol et al., 2020) and Romania (Barbu et al., 2023), where per capita income was a relevant variable when deciding what to buy.

The relationship between the consumption of dehydrated products and income and education was negative, indicating a lower probability of purchasing these products when the consumer has a higher level of schooling and income. Miramontes-Escobar et al. (2020) highlighted that consumers with higher incomes follow a low-carbohydrate, high-protein diet and consume more fresh fruits and vegetables. In addition, an educated consumer is a more rational and freer being when making purchases (Castillejo et al., 2011), which makes them prefer fresh fruits and vegetables over dehydrated ones.

In this regard, Yuting and Liang (2020) noted that consumers with a strong health motivation prefer to eat dried fruits occasionally as a snack rather than change their eating routine in the long term. Additionally, Monaco et al. (2024) pointed out that intrinsic attributes, such as color and texture, affect the preference of dehydrated products over consumer perceptions, which is based on the value associated with the product and the preservation of its nutrients, giving greater preference to fresh fruits and vegetables.

In a study conducted in Mexico (Sánchez-Toledano et al., 2024) on consumers’ perceptions of dehydrated fruits and vegetables, the authors mentioned that the country has a wide variety of fruits and vegetables at affordable prices year-round, and that the trend is to consume them fresh. In turn, dehydrated foods are considered as ‘snacks’ or ingredients for preparing dishes, so their acquisition is occasional. Mexicans prefer to buy these products in large and open-air markets, in supermarkets, traditional stores, and online, since this depends on the prices of the products, the convenience of the location, and the consumer’s familiarity with the use of technology.

Consumption habits

In consumption habits, there is concern for health and food, evidenced by scores in the consumption of fruits and vegetables (Table 2). According to Mora et al. (2023), consuming fruits and vegetables is synonymous with good eating habits, better health, and disease prevention.

Table 2

Table 2. Scale of consumption habits.

Habits Mean Standard deviation Variance
Eating and health habits
Fruit and vegetable consumption 4.25 0.87 0.75
I care about my diet and my health 4.22 0.75 0.56
I moderate consumption of high fats and sugars 3.63 0.92 0.84
Social and leisure habits
In my free time, I usually go to bars and restaurants 3.23 1.17 1.37
I usually read, listen to, or watch the news daily 3.92 0.95 0.9
I usually go to cultural events (concerts and theater) 3.45 0.98 0.96
I usually eat away from home 3.32 1.01 1.03
I usually smoke or drink an alcoholic beverage 3.47 1.21 1.46
Sustainability and the environment
I care about the environment 4.44 0.73 0.54
I recycle garbage in suitable containers 3.98 0.96 0.93
I like to have contact with nature 4.4 0.74 0.55
Interest in physical activity
I like to do outdoor activities 4.28 0.83 0.69
I do physical exercise 3.62 0.96 0.93
Interest in food product innovation
Interest in learning about and trying beneficial health products 4.37 0.75 0.56
Interest in buying products that help rural people and indigenous communities 4.33 0.77 0.6
Interest in trying new products 3.9 0.88 0.78

[i] Not at all= 1; rarely= 2; occasionally= 3; almost always= 4; always= 5.

The results indicate concern for sustainability and the environment (Table 2), associated with the benefits perceived by consumers when purchasing products whose production and composition involve elements that help the planet, such as saving natural resources and raw materials (Arroyave-Ramírez and Arrubla-Zapata, 2018).

There was also interest in food innovation that benefits health, rural people and indigenous communities. These attributes in dehydrated foods can trigger product quality and market acceptance, where consumers prioritize quality over quantity and seek products with a clear history and origin (Gutiérrez and Martín, 1998; Matiz, 2025).

Consumers segments for dehydrated products

Four groups of consumers were identified: group one (31.68% of the sample), consisting of men aged 20 and 24, with a monthly income of less than $5 000.00 and between $5 001.00 and $10 000.00, with a university education and households of four to six members. The consumption of dehydrated foods consisted of aromatic herbs, seeds, chilis and teas.

Group two (16.62%), made up mostly of women, with a monthly income of more than $30 000.00, aged between 35 and 39, with postgraduate degrees, and households of one to three people. The consumption of dehydrated foods consisted of aromatic herbs and flour.

Group three (14.77%), made up of men with incomes between $10 001.00 and $15 000.00, aged 25 to 29, with a university education and households made up of one to three people. They consume dehydrated seeds, chilis, aromatic herbs and flours.

Group four (36.93%), mainly made up of men with incomes between $15 001.00 and $20 000.00 and between $20 001.00 and $30 000.00, aged 35 to 39 years, with postgraduate degrees, and households of one to three people. They consume dehydrated foods such as aromatic herbs, fruits, seeds, and flour.

Attributes valued by consumers when buying dehydrated foods

Sensory attributes were the most important, followed by origin, brand and social goals (Figure 1). Consumers had a greater preference for flavor (46.28%) and it is an attribute that determines the acceptance of dehydrated foods in the market. The origin had a significant influence, and this is due to the reliability of national products.

The preference for the national over the regional could be due to the limited availability of local brands. To take advantage of these attributes, companies that produce dehydrated foods must create brands with an emotional connection, which stimulates consumer engagement and loyalty (Carroll and Ahuvia, 2006; Anggraeni and Rachmanita, 2015; Ríos et al., 2025).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Hierarchical structure of the attributes valued by consumers of dehydrated foods.

2007-0934-remexca-17-4-e4037-gf2.png

Consumers of dehydrated foods preferred biodegradable packaging, highlighting a commitment to sustainability, as it is made of materials designed to decompose naturally by the action of microorganisms (Rivera et al., 2019). This result is similar to that of Estrada-Domínguez et al. (2020), who found that brand and ecolabeling are factors that positively influence the purchase of products, as they do not represent damage to the environment.

In their study, Acosta-Medina et al. (2023) point out that, in the long term, biopackaging can have more economical results by reducing waste disposal costs and complying with environmental standards, in addition to consumers being willing to pay more for products with biodegradable packaging.

Mohd-Suki (2016) mentions that if consumers know about the environmental impact caused by products, they tend to increase their purchases towards those that cause less harm. Currently, there is a concern for the care of the environment, which is why there is a growth in the use of biodegradable and eco-friendly packaging that supports the conservation of the environment, as it is made of recycled materials, reducing the emission of pollutants and using limited resources and energy (Acosta-Medina et al., 2023; Salinas y Vílchez, 2024).

In the social sphere, the three attributes showed similar importance (Figure 1), and a growing awareness of social responsibility was observed; therefore, products must demonstrate a solid commitment in this area, as it is an element that affects consumer acceptance (Barragán-Hernández et al., 2021). One of the factors that determines responsible purchasing is information about social responsibility issues and the image that the company projects on the subject (Leyva-Hernández et al., 2024).

In the assessment of attributes by consumer segments (Table 3), it was observed that group one prioritized the social aspect, whereas the other groups prioritized environmental care. Groups one and three exhibited equal preferences between national and regional origin. Group four balanced their preferences between support for the environment and indigenous peoples.

Table 3

Table 3. Attributes valued by consumers based on group segmentation.

Attribute Percentage (%)
Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Group 4
Sensory
Smell 27.62c 31.16a 30.6a 29.63b
Color 23.65c 23.6c 24.94b 25.01a
Flavor 48.74a 45.25a 44.46a 45.35a
Origin
International 24.57a 28.71a 25.12a 25.54a
National 39.16b 39.06c 38.7b 41.89a
Regional 36.26a 32.12b 36.19a 32.47b
Packaging
Biodegradable 37.9b 41.04a 37.97b 36.82c
Recyclable 29.16a 27.96a 27.49a 28a
Reusable 32.94b 31b 34.54a 35.17a
Social goals
Maintaining and creating jobs 30.4c 31.37c 34.95a 33.75b
Supporting indigenous peoples 32.57b 32.55b 30.32c 32.23a
Supporting the environment 37.03a 36.08a 33.72b 34.01a

Se destacó la necesidad de estrategias diferenciadas en cada grupo de consumidores, esta acción abre la puerta para explorar el potencial de influir en la creación de nuevos alimentos deshidratados que generen un impacto económico en pequeños productores.

Conclusiones

Los resultados de este estudio muestran que una variable sociodemográfica decisiva en la adquisición de productos deshidratados de frutas y verduras es el ingreso. Se distinguen cuatro segmentos de consumidores en frutas y verduras deshidratadas, los cuales están diferenciados por rangos de edad, nivel de ingreso, nivel educativo, tamaño de hogar y el tipo de productos deshidratados que adquieren.

Los atributos mejor valorados son el sabor, que sea un producto nacional, con empaque biodegradable. Los cuatro segmentos de consumidores de productos deshidratados tienen preferencias diferentes en lo ambiental, social, económico y sensorial. Por lo tanto, las estrategias de promoción deben estar diferenciadas para cada tipo de consumidor y destacar los atributos de salud, cuidado ambiental, calidad del producto y responsabilidad social.

Una de las limitaciones del estudio fue que contempló un sondeo general para productos deshidratados de frutas y verduras, por lo que la información obtenida solo da nociones generales sobre las características sociodemográficas de los consumidores y los atributos intrínsecos y extrínsecos asociados a ellos.

En futuras investigaciones se recomienda realizar estudios sobre productos específicos de frutas y verduras deshidratadas, que considere segmentos de consumidores y aspectos particulares del producto. Se sugiere hacer análisis comparativos entre regiones del país, para ello se puede aplicar el instrumento de medición considerando consumidores diferenciados por poder adquisitivo, nivel de estudios, edad, entre otras.

Bibliography

1 

Acosta-Medina, J. K; Contreras-Pacheco, O. E. y Pedraza-Avella, A. C. 2023. Empaques vs bioempaques para alimentos: una comparación a nivel técnica, comercial y normativa. Ingeniería y competitividad. 25(3):1-19. https://doi.org/10.25100/iyc.v25i3.13066.

2 

Al-Makhroumi, N.; Al-Khusaibi, M.; Al-Subhi, L.; Al-Bulushi, I. and Al-Ruzeiqi, M. 2022. Development and validation of a food safety knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported practices (KAP) questionnaire in Omani consumers. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 21(7):485-492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2022.02.001.

3 

Anggraeni, A. and Rachmanita. R. E. 2015. Effects of brand love, personality and image on word of mouth; the case of local fashion brands among young consumers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 211:442-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.058.

4 

Anigstein, M. S. 2019. Estrategias familiares de provisión de alimentos en hogares de mujeres-madres trabajadoras de la ciudad de Santiago de Chile. Revista Chilena de Nutrición. 46(2):129-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0717-75182019000200129.

5 

Arroyave-Ramírez, C. A. y Arrubla-Zapata, J. P. 2018. Tendencias de producción y consumo ecológico. Revista Espacios. 39(7):1-14.

6 

Barbu, A.; Ion, V. A.; Frîncu, M.; Defta, N.; Lagunovschi-Luchian, V. and Bădulescu, L. A. 2023. Organic vegetable chips: exploring romanian consumers’ preferences in relation to socio-demographic factors. Foods. 12(18):1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12183374.

7 

Barragán-Hernández, W.; Mahecha-Ledesma, L.; Olivera-Ángel, M. y Angulo-Arizala, J. 2021. ¿Cómo los consumidores valoran atributos de calidad de carne bovina y su disposición a pago? Biotecnología en el sector agropecuario y agroindustrial. 19(1):167-179. https://doi.org/10.18684/bsaa.

8 

Carroll, B. A; y Ahuvia, A. C. 2006. Algunos antecedentes y resultados del amor a la marca. Marketing Letters. 17(2):79-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-006-4219-2.

9 

Castillejo, J. L.; Colom, A. J.; Pérez-Geta, P. M. A.; Neira, T. R.; Sarramona, J.; Touriñán, J. M. y Vázquez, G. 2011. Educación para el consumo. Educación XX1. 14(1):35-58.

10 

Da Silva, R. D.; Harrar, D. A. y Paz, G. A. 2019. Selección de atributos de frutas deshidratadas: análisis conjunto de elección. Anales. 19(1):57-76.

11 

Estrada-Domínguez, J. E.; Cantú-Mata, J. L.; Torres-Castillo, F. y Barajas-Ávila, E. 2020. Factores que influyen en el consumidor para la adquisición de productos sustentables. Interciencia. 45(1):36-41.

12 

Gould, S. J. 1988. Consumer attitudes toward health and health care: a differential perspective. Journal of Consumer Affair. 22(1):96-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1988.tb00215.x.

13 

Gutiérrez, C. J. y Martín, G. M. 1998. Atributos extrínsecos del producto: las señales de la calidad. In anales de estudios económicos y empresariales. Secretariado de Publicaciones. 13:81-116.

14 

Hernández, J. G.; Espinosa, C. F.; Rodríguez, J. E.; Chacín, R. J. G.; Toloza, S. C. A.; Arenas, T M. K.; Carrillo, S. S. M. y Bermúdez. P. V. J. 2018. Sobre el uso adecuado del coeficiente de correlación de Pearson: definición, propiedades y suposiciones. Archivos Venezolanos de Farmacología y Terapéutica. 37(5):587-601.

15 

INEGI. 2023. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. México en cifras. https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/areasgeograficas/#collapse-Resumen.

16 

Leyva-Hernández, S. N.; Terán-Bustamante, A. y Arango-Ramírez, P. M. 2024. Patrones de consume alimentario con enfoque socialmente responsable. Revista de Ciencias Sociales. 30(2):80-95.

17 

López, G.; León, L. L. P. y Espejel, B. J. E. 2019. El camote deshidratado como una nueva alternativa de consumo saludable para los sonorenses. Revista Inclusiones. 6(esp):50-65.

18 

Massaglia, S.; Borra, D.; Peano, C.; Sottile, F. and Merlino, V. M. 2019. Consumer preference heterogeneity evaluation in fruit and vegetable purchasing decisions using the best-worst approach. Foods. 8(7):1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8070266.

19 

Matiz, J. D. Á. 2025. Marketing 4.0: la clave de la transformación comercial para pequeños productores agrícolas en Colombia. In: los agronegocios y sus transiciones hacia la sostenibilidad. Correa, A. G. y Regino, V. J. (Eds.). Primera edición. Ediciones Unisalle. Bogotá, Colombia. 151-176 pp. https://doi.org/0000-0001-9090-3411.

20 

Miramontes-Escobar, H. A.; Prado-Guzmán, G. A.; Toledo-Palomera, M. J.; Báez-García, J. E. y Sáyago-Ayerdi, S. G. 2020. Perfil nutricional según niveles socioeconómicos y menús proporcionados en un comedor social de México. Universidad y Salud. 22(3):203-212. https://doi.org/10.22267/rus.202203.192.

21 

Mohd-Suki, N. 2016. Green product purchase intention: impact of green brands, attitude, and knowledge. British Food Journal. 118(12):2893-2910. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-06-2016-0295.

22 

Mónaco, F.; De Marinis, P. and Sali, G. 2024. Consumers’ attitudes towards whole dried figs attributes: a preliminary study in Italy. Agriculture. 14(12):1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14122163.

23 

Mora, V. A. P.; Díaz, R. M.; Lora, D. O. L. y Pérez, O. 2023. Validación por juicio de expertos de un cuestionario sobre conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas del consumo de frutas y verduras. Interciencia. 48(1):46-50.

24 

Moreno-Colom, S. y Boràs-Català, V. 2021. Menos tiempo de cocina, más tiempo de consumo: ¿más igualdad de género? Revista de Economía Crítica. 31:121-138.

25 

Pocol, C. B.; Marinescu, V.; Amuza, A.; Cadar, R. L. and Rodideal, A. A. 2020. Sustainable vs unsustainable food consumption behaviour: a study among students from Romania, Bulgaria and Moldova. Sustainability. 12(11):1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114699.

26 

Ríos, E. I. R.; Romero, A. E. M. y Aguilar, G. W. S. 2025. Amor de marca como mediador entre estímulos emocionales y lealtad en consumidores jóvenes de Machala, Ecuador. Sciencevolution. 4(2):72-80. https://doi.org/10.61325/ser.v4i2.182.

27 

Rivera, C.; Contreras, F.; Ariza, W.; Bonilla, S. y Cruz, A. 2019. Los empaques biodegradables, una respuesta a la consciencia ambiental de los consumidores. Realidad Empresarial. 7:2-8. https://doi.org/10.5377/reuca.v0i7.7830.

28 

Rodríguez, M. N. 2003. La bioestadística y su papel en la investigación en salud. Revista Colombiana de Estadística. 26(1):77-87.

29 

Salinas, C. M. A. y Vílchez, S. E. P. 2024. Los empaques eco amigables de productos tecnológicos: una alternativa para reducir la contaminación. Revista Científica Cuidado y Salud Pública. 4(2):61-69. https://doi.org/10.53684/csp.v4i2.104.

30 

Sánchez-Toledano, B. I.; Borja-Bravo, M.; Zegbe, J. A. and Quintero, S. X. A. 2024. Perception of dehydrated products by Mexican consumers. Future Foods. 10:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2024.100491.

31 

Siró, I.; Kápolna, E.; Kápolna, B. and Lugasi, A. 2008. Functional food. Product development, marketing and consumer acceptance-a review. Appetite. 51(3):456-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. appet.2008.05.06.

32 

Tabares, M. S. y Lochmuller, C. 2013. Propuesta de un espacio multidimensional para la gestión por procesos. Un estudio de caso. Estudios Gerenciales. 29(127):22-230.

33 

Tarancón, P.; Fernández-Serrano, P. y Besada, C. 2020. ¿Qué fruta elegir en cada momento? La percepción del consumidor relativa a la fruta fresca, cortada y deshidratada. Agrícola Vergel. 429:257-266.

34 

Torres, L. L. E.; Barrantes, A. L. E.; Gómez, C. D. y Brenes, G. A. C. 2025. Preferencias de consumidores comerciales respecto a atributos extrínsecos de productos agrícolas. E-Agronegocios. 11(1):43-65. https://doi.org/10.18845/ea.v11i1.7081.

35 

Vega, A.; Chacana, M. y Lemus, R. 2006. La Industria de los alimentos deshidratados y la importancia del control de procesos. Revista Chilena para la Industria de Alimentos. Indualimentos. 9(42):50-67.

36 

Yuting, S. and Liang, C. 2020. Factors determining consumers´ purchase intentions towards dried fruit. International Journal of Fruit Science. 20(2):1072-1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2020.1774477.