https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v16i30.4043

elocation-id: e4043

Medina-Mendoza, Mendoza-Toletino, and Pérez-Laínez: Determination of lead and cadmium in water of the Mezquital Valley

Journal Metadata

Journal Identifier: remexca [journal-id-type=publisher-id]

Journal Title Group

Journal Title (Full): Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

Abbreviated Journal Title: Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc [abbrev-type=publisher]

ISSN: 2007-0934 [pub-type=ppub]

Publisher

Publisher’s Name: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias

Article Metadata

Article Identifier: 10.29312/remexca.v16i30.4043 [pub-id-type=doi]

Article Identifier: 00006 [pub-id-type=other]

Article Grouping Data

Subject Group [subj-group-type=heading]

Subject Grouping Name: Articles

Title Group

Article Title: Determination of lead and cadmium in water of the Mezquital Valley

Contributor Group

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Medina-Mendoza

Given (First) Names: Carmen

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Superscript: 1

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=corresp; rid=c1]

Superscript: §

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Mendoza-Toletino

Given (First) Names: Yucundo

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

Superscript: 2

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Pérez-Laínez

Given (First) Names: María Dolores

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff3]

Superscript: 3

Affiliation [id=aff1]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 1

Institution Name: in an Address: Ingeniería en Alimentos-Universidad Tecnológica del Valle del Mezquital. Carretera Ixmiquilpan-Capula km 4, Nith, Ixmiquilpan, Hidalgo. CP. 42300. Tel. 759 7232789, ext. 9119. [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Tecnológica del Valle del Mezquital [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Ingeniería en Alimentos [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Tecnológica del Valle del Mezquital [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

City: Ixmiquilpan

State or Province: Hidalgo

Postal Code: 42300

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Affiliation [id=aff2]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 2

Institution Name: in an Address: Ingeniería en Energía y Desarrollo Sostenible-Universidad Tecnológica del Valle del Mezquital. Carretera Ixmiquilpan-Capula km 4, Nith, Ixmiquilpan, Hidalgo. CP. 42300. Tel. 759 7232789, ext. 9113. (ymendoza@utvm.edu.mx). [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Tecnológica del Valle del Mezquital [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Ingeniería en Energía y Desarrollo Sostenible [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Tecnológica del Valle del Mezquital [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

City: Ixmiquilpan

State or Province: Hidalgo

Postal Code: 42300

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Email Address: ymendoza@utvm.edu.mx

Affiliation [id=aff3]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 3

Institution Name: in an Address: Ingeniería en Agroindustrias-Universidad de la Costa. Carretera al Libramiento Paraje de las Pulgas S/N, Santiago, Pinotepa Nacional, Oaxaca. CP. 71600. Tel. 954 5434610. (dolores.lainez@uncos.edu.mx). [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Ingeniería en Agroindustrias [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad de la Costa [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

City: Pinotepa Nacional

State or Province: Oaxaca

Postal Code: 71600

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Email Address: dolores.lainez@uncos.edu.mx

Author Note Group

Correspondence Information: [§] Autora para correspondencia: cmedina@utvm.edu.mx. [id=c1]

Publication Date [date-type=pub; publication-format=electronic]

Day: 15

Month: 10

Year: 2025

Publication Date [date-type=collection; publication-format=electronic]

Season: Sep-Oct

Year: 2025

Volume Number: 16

Issue Number: esp30

Electronic Location Identifier: e4043

History: Document History

Date [date-type=received]

Day: 00

Month: 05

Year: 2025

Date [date-type=accepted]

Day: 00

Month: 07

Year: 2025

Permissions

License Information [license-type=open-access; xlink:href=https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/; xml:lang=es]

Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons

Abstract

Title: Abstract

The Mezquital Valley, in the state of Hidalgo, has historically used wastewater from Mexico City for agricultural irrigation, which has favored local production, but has also generated environmental and health risks due to the presence of heavy metals with bioaccumulation capacity. The purpose of this research was to determine the levels of lead and cadmium in samples of wastewater, natural water, and drinking water from seven municipalities in the region. The determinations were made by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry, following the NMX-AA-051-SCFI-2001 standard. The results showed that wastewater exceeded the permissible limits by 26% for Pb and 30% for cadmium. In natural water and drinking water, the excess was 70% and 100%, respectively, according to NOM-127-SSA1-2021 and NOM-001-SEMARNAT-2021. These findings highlight the need to establish continuous and specialized monitoring of heavy metals in water, in order to protect public health and promote safer use of water resources.

Keyword Group [xml:lang=en]

Title: Keywords

Keyword: heavy metals

Keyword: organic matter

Keyword: public health

Counts

Figure Count [count=5]

Table Count [count=2]

Equation Count [count=0]

Reference Count [count=26]

Abstract

The Mezquital Valley, in the state of Hidalgo, has historically used wastewater from Mexico City for agricultural irrigation, which has favored local production, but has also generated environmental and health risks due to the presence of heavy metals with bioaccumulation capacity. The purpose of this research was to determine the levels of lead and cadmium in samples of wastewater, natural water, and drinking water from seven municipalities in the region. The determinations were made by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry, following the NMX-AA-051-SCFI-2001 standard. The results showed that wastewater exceeded the permissible limits by 26% for Pb and 30% for cadmium. In natural water and drinking water, the excess was 70% and 100%, respectively, according to NOM-127-SSA1-2021 and NOM-001-SEMARNAT-2021. These findings highlight the need to establish continuous and specialized monitoring of heavy metals in water, in order to protect public health and promote safer use of water resources.

Keywords:

heavy metals, organic matter, public health.

Introduction

The use of wastewater in the Mezquital Valley region of the state of Hidalgo has boosted agricultural development by providing wastewater to the following irrigation districts: 003-Tula, 100-Alfajayucan, and 112-Ajacuba, since the construction of the large drainage canal in 1856, thus allowing crop production (García, 2019; Rosas and García, 2024).

This practice has enriched soils with organic matter, favoring crop growth (Guédron et al., 2014); nevertheless, it has generated contamination of water sources, soil degradation, and exposure to toxic substances (González et al., 2015; Hernández et al., 2016; Leeser et al., 2018; Luneberg et al., 2018; Chamizo et al., 2020), leading to environmental and public health problems.

Among the most dangerous pollutants are heavy metals, due to their high mobility in the environment and their capacity for bioaccumulation (Garduño et al., 2023). Prolonged exposure to lead (Pb) and cadmium (Cd) represents a serious health risk, with permissible limits of 0.2 mg L-1 for Pb and Cd in wastewater and 0.01 mg L-1 and 0.005 mg L-1 for Pb and Cd, respectively, for human use and consumption, according to (NOM-001-SEMARNAT-2021; NOM-127-SSA1-2021; SCFI, 2022 a, b).

Heavy metals generate metal-specific free radicals that cause oxidative stress in cells, which causes DNA damage, inactivation of enzymatic proteins, protein aggregation, conformational changes that affect their structure, function, and cause cell damage (Wu et al., 2016), which is reflected in chronic systemic effects and increased incidence of cancer when found in high concentrations in drinking water (Contreras et al., 2017; Izquierdo et al., 2022).

Despite the environmental and public health impact, heavy metal pollution in the Mezquital Valley has been little analyzed, being one of the most environmentally affected regions in Mexico. This study aimed to measure the levels of lead and cadmium in different water sources in the Mezquital Valley, Hidalgo, to determine if they exceed the permissible limits established by Mexican regulations.

Specifically, it was sought to quantify the concentrations of these metals in wastewater, natural water, and drinking water in the region, as well as to statistically compare the levels between the different types of water sources to identify risk areas. The hypothesis stated that these concentrations exceeded the normative values, which represented a potential risk to public health and the environment, derived from the prolonged use of wastewater in agricultural activities.

Materials and methods

The water analysis was carried out at the Technological University of the Mezquital Valley. A total of 29 samples of wastewater were collected from irrigation canals, dams and rivers; in the case of purified and drinking water, six samples were obtained from springs, four from wells and 16 from drinking sources; in total, there were 54 samples from the state of Hidalgo and one from the State of Mexico as a control (Table 1).

Table 1

Table 1. Samples of wastewater, natural water, and drinking water collected in the state of Hidalgo.

Code Origin Location Altitude (masl) Code Origin Location Altitude (masl)
CPT1 Canal Tecozautla 1 733 PMI1 Dam El Maye, Ixmiquilpan 1 720
CPN1 Canal Pueblo Nuevo, Ixmiquilpan 1 781 MTA Spring Arbolado, Tasquillo 1 704
CLJI Canal La Joya, Ixmiquilpan 1 772 MFI Spring El Fitzi, Ixmiquilpan 1 798
CSM1 Canal San Miguel, Ixmiquilpan 1 714 MPA Spring Panales, Ixmiquilpan 1 780
CLSS Canal Lagunilla, San Salvador 1 979 MLR Spring Remedios, Ixmiquilpan 1 767
CPT2 Canal Pañhe, Tecozautla 1 733 MAN1 Spring Remedios, Ixmiquilpan 1 757
CPN2 Canal Pueblo Nuevo, Ixmiquilpan 1 781 MAN2 Spring Remedios, Ixmiquilpan 1 762
CBI1 Canal Bangandho, Ixmiquilpan 1 795 PLRI Well Reforma, Ixmiquilpan 1 738
CNI1 Canal El Nith, Ixmiquilpan 1 751 PXZ Well Xindho, Zimapan 1 779
CMLI Canal Media Luna, Ixmiquilpan 1 738 PJEM* Well Santa Ana, Jilotzingo 2 739
CSM2 Canal San Miguel, Ixmiquilpan 1 714 CNI2 Well Panales, Ixmiquilpan 1 751
COBI Canal La Otra Banda, Ixmiquilpan 1 738 RSNI Drinking Sn Nicolás, Ixmiquilpan 1 719
CTA1 Canal Tasquillo 1 704 PBAI Drinking Bangando, Ixmiquilpan 1 795
CXA1 Canal San Nicolás, Atotonilco 2 012 PEC Drinking El Carrizal, Ixmiquilpan 1 774
CPN3 Canal Pueblo Nuevo, Ixmiquilpan 1 781 PLJI Drinking La Joya, Ixmiquilpan 1 772
CPI1 Canal Portezuelo, Ixmiquilpan 1 784 PUTV Drinking UTVM, Ixmiquilpan 1 772
CDI1 Canal El Deca, Ixmiquilpan 1 762 PVII Drinking Villagrán, Santiago de A. 1 941
CXA2 Canal Xathé, Atotonilco el Grande 2 049 PLEC Drinking La Vega, Alfajayucan 1 848
CLOI Canal Loma del Oro, Ixmiquilpan 1 738 PEVI Drinking El Valante, Ixmiquilpan 1 731
CLRI Canal La Reforma, Ixmiquilpan 1 738 PMBI Drinking Maguey B., Ixmiquilpan 1 798
CVSA Canal Villagrán, Santiago de A. 1 941 PBSS Drinking Bóxtha, San Salvador 1 979
CMBI Canal Maguey Blanco, Ixmiquilpan 1 798 PENI Drinking El Nith, Ixmiquilpan 1 751
CSM3 Canal San Miguel, Ixmiquilpan 1 714 PRPA Drinking Panales, Ixmiquilpan 1 780
CCAI Canal Capula, Ixmiquilpan 1 757 PRMA Drinking El Maye, Ixmiquilpan 1 720
RTI1 River Tula 1 773 PLRE Drinking La Reforma, Ixmiquilpan 1 738
RMJ River Moctezuma, Jacala 1 360 PRPO Drinking Portezuelo, Ixmiquilpan 1 784
CPAI Canal Panales, Ixmiquilpan 1 780 PRAL Drinking Alfajayucan 1 871
PHZ Dam Hidroeléctrica, Zimapan 1 779

[i] *= sample collected in the State of Mexico.

Sampling was carried out following NMX-AA-003-1980 (SCFI, 1980). A volume of 500 ml of each sample was collected in polyethylene containers. They were preserved by adding nitric acid up to a pH of 2 and refrigerated at 4 °C for no more than six months.

Total metals were determined by the flame method with an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (model Buck Scientific AAS VGP 216, UAS.), in triplicate, according to NMX-AA-051-SCFI-2001 (SCFI, 2001). Digestion was carried out on a heating plate, and homogenization was performed to verify that there were no solids adhering to the bottom; then, a 50 ml aliquot was taken and transferred to a beaker.

Three milliliters of concentrated nitric acid were added, and it was heated on an evaporation dish, avoiding boiling, until 2 to 5 ml were obtained, and then left to cool. Five milliliters of concentrated nitric acid were added, and it was covered with a watch glass and placed on the plate, raising the temperature until the reflux of vapors; once digestion was completed, it was removed and left to cool.

For every 100 ml of final solution volume, 10 ml of hydrochloric acid (1:1) and 15 ml of water were added. Subsequently, the sample was heated for 15 min without reaching the boiling point and brought up to 100 ml. To take readings, the spectrophotometer was calibrated in accordance with paragraph 9.3 of the NMX-AA-051-SCFI-2001 standard; finally, the calculations were carried out according to equation 1 of the line, and the coefficient of determination, R2, had values of 0.985 for Pb and 0.973 for Cd.

Equation 1. y= mX+b. Where: y= absorbance of the processed sample; m= slope (absorptivity coefficient) and b= ordered to the origin.

Statistical analysis

The values of Pb and Cd concentrations of the sampling sites were used to perform an analysis of variance (Anova) and a post-hoc analysis to make multiple comparisons between means; Scheffe’s multiple range test was used, with α= 0.05, to indicate statistical significance due to the homogeneity of variances; the above was performed with SPSS Statistics, Version 25.

Results and discussion

Calibration curves. Standard solutions were prepared with known concentrations of Pb: 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.5 mg ml-1 and Cd: 0.005, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.3 mg ml-1, including a blank as a reference. The measurements were made by atomic absorption spectroscopy, at wavelengths of 283.3 nm for Pb and 326.1 nm for Cd, with a bandwidth of 0.1 nm. Acetylene was used as fuel and nitrous oxide as a carrier gas, optimizing the atomization of the analytes (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Calibration curve for Pb.

2007-0934-remexca-16-esp30-e4043-gf6.png

Concentrations of Pb and Cd in wastewater. Analysis of wastewater samples revealed that 26% of them exceeded the permissible Pb limits, which are set at 0.2 mg L-1, with concentrations ranging from 0.017 mg L-1 to 0.466 mg L-1 (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Calibration curve for Cd.

2007-0934-remexca-16-esp30-e4043-gf7.png

In the case of Cd, 30% of the samples exceeded this limit, registering concentrations between 0.009 mg L-1 and 0.774 mg L-1. The values obtained for both metals showed statistically significant differences (p= 0) in all the analyses of variance performed, under homogeneous conditions (Table 2). Similar results were reported by Oloruntoba et al. (2022), who identified high concentrations of Pb and Cd in wastewater.

Table 2

Table 2. Pb and Cd concentrations in wastewater, natural water, and drinking water.

Code Lead (mg L⁻¹) Cadmium (mg L⁻¹) Code Lead (mg L⁻¹) Cadmium (mg L⁻¹)
CPT1¹ 0.046 ±0.006ᵃ⁻ᵇ 0.184 ±0.006ᶠ PMI1¹ 0.111 ±0.003ᶜ⁻ᶠ 0.077 ±0.002ᵃ⁻ᵈ
CPN1¹ 0.029 ±0.002ᵃ⁻ᵇ 0.077 ±0.007ᵃ⁻ᵈ MTA² 0.022 ±0.021ᵃ⁻ᵇ 0.009 ±0.002ᵃ
CLJI¹ 0.056 ±0.008ᵃ⁻ᶜ 0.023 ±0.023ᵃ⁻ᵇ MFI² 0.007 ±0.017ᵃ 0.023 ±0.001ᵃ
CSM1¹ 0.226 ±0.031ᵍ 0.64 ±0.012ʲ MPA² 0.015±0.006ᵃ⁻ᵇ 0.036 ±0.006ᵃ⁻ᵇ
CLSS¹ 0.329 ±0.017ʰ 0.6 ±0.011ʲ MLR² 0.005 ±0.003ᵃ 0.05 ±0.003ᵃ⁻ᵇ
CPT2¹ 0.048 ±0.008ᵃ⁻ᵇ 0.077 ±0.004ᵃ⁻ᵈ MAN1² 0.031 ±0.005ᵃ⁻ᵇ 0.009 ±0.001ᵃ
CPN2¹ 0.303 ±0.009ʰ 0.05 ±0.005ᵃ⁻ᶜ MAN2² 0.147 ±0.007ᶜ⁻ᵈ 0.023 ±0.005ᵃ
CBI1¹ 0.128 ±0.007ᵉ⁻ᶠ 0.063 ±0.005ᵃ⁻ᶜ PLRI² 0.029 ±0.006ᵃ⁻ᵇ 0.009 ±0.001ᵃ
CNI1¹ 0.048 ±0.003ᵃ⁻ᵇ 0.09 ±0.003ᵇ⁻ᵉ PXZ² 0.113 ±0.002ᶜ 0.506 ±0.024ᵉ⁻ᶠ
CMLI¹ 0.152 ±0.009ᶠ 0.009 ±0.001ᵃ PJEM² 0.178 ±0.007ᵈ 0.372 ±0.021ᶜ⁻ᵈ
CSM2¹ 0.113 ±0.002ᶜ⁻ᶠ 0.506 ±0.02ⁱ CNI2² 0.012 ±0.002ᵃ 0.063 ±0.009ᵃ⁻ᵇ
COBI¹ 0.466 ±0.03ⁱ 0.774 ±0.024ᵏ RSNI² 0.329 ±0.03ᵉ 0.466 ±0.015ᵉ⁻ᶠ
CTA1¹ 0.329 ±0.01ʰ 0.466 ±0.047ⁱ PBAI² 0.005 ±0.001ᵃ 0.533 ±0.008ᶠ⁻ᵍ
CXA1¹ 0.063 ±0.002ᵃ⁻ᵈ 0.023 ±0.004ᵃ⁻ᵇ PEC² 0.149 ±0.009ᶜ⁻ᵈ 0.452 ±0.036ᵈ⁻ᶠ
CPN3¹ 0.082 ±0.003ᵇ⁻ᵉ 0.009 ±0.003ᵃ PLJI² 0.017 ±0.003ᵃ⁻ᵇ 0.6 ±0.049ᵍ
CPI1¹ 0.111 ±0.002ᶜ⁻ᶠ 0.05 ±0.009ᵃ⁻ᶜ PUTV² 0.015 ±0.002ᵃ⁻ᵇ 0.426 ±0.009ᶜ⁻ᵈ
CDI1¹ 0.029 ±0.004ᵃ⁻ᵇ 0.023 ±0.004ᵃ⁻ᵇ PVII² 0.022 ±0.008ᵃᵇ 0.493 ±0.008ᵉ⁻ᶠ
CXA2¹ 0.017 ±0.006ᵃ 0.009 ±0.003ᵃ PLEC² 0.056 ±0.007ᵇ 0.479 ±0.011ᵉ⁻ᶠ
CLOI¹ 0.034 ±0.005ᵃ⁻ᵇ 0.036 ±0.005ᵃ⁻ᶜ PEVI² 0.015 ±0.004ᵃ⁻ᵇ 0.452 ±0.003ᵈ⁻ᶠ
CLRI¹ 0.07 ±0.01ᵃ⁻ᵈ 0.103 ±0.004ᶜ⁻ᵉ PMBI² 0.022 ±0.013ᵃ⁻ᵇ 0.09 ±0.001ᵃ⁻ᵇ
CVSA¹ 0.039 ±0.003ᵃ⁻ᵇ 0.157 ±0.014ᵉ⁻ᶠ PBSS² 0.012 ±0.001ᵃ 0.077 ±0.003ᵃ⁻ᵇ
CMBI¹ 0.08 ±0.003ᵇ⁻ᵉ 0.077 ±0.008ᵃ⁻ᵈ PENI² 0.015 ±0.003ᵃ⁻ᵇ 0.023 ±0.001ᵃ
CSM3¹ 0.13 ±0.002ᵉ⁻ᶠ 0.063 ±0.003ᵃ⁻ᶜ PRPA² 0.005 ±0.002ᵃ 0.332 ±0.002ᶜ
CCAI¹ 0.274 ±0.01ᵍ⁻ʰ 0.278 ±0.01ᵍ PRMA² 0.007 ±0.002ᵃ 0.533 ±0.017ᶠ⁻ᵍ
RTI1¹ 0.118 ±0.011ᵈ⁻ᶠ 0.358±0.017ʰ PLRE² 0.024 ±0.007ᵃ⁻ᵇ 0.009 ±0.004ᵃ
RMJ¹ 0.082 ±0.004ᵇ⁻ᵉ 0.144 ±0.014ᵈ⁻ᶠ PRPO² 0.027 ±0.005ᵃ⁻ᵇ 0.117 ±0.002ᵃ
CPAI¹ 0.303 ±0.003ʰ 0.144 ±0.02ᵈᵉᶠ PRAL² 0.017 ±0.001ᵃ⁻ᵇ 0.774 ±0.029ʰ
PHZ¹ 0.113 ±0.002ᶜ⁻ᶠ 0.506 ±0.025ⁱ
x̅ ±SD 0.135 ±0.004 0.194 ±0.008 x̅ ±SD 0.049 ±0.003 0.268 ±0.009
CV (%) 2.92 3.9 CV (%) 5.75 3.46

[i] Results expressed as mean ± standard deviation; different letters in the same column indicate significant differences with p= 0.05. x̅= mean; SD= standard deviation; CV= coefficient of variation; 1= wastewater; 2= natural and drinking waters.

Likewise, Kinuthia et al. (2020) documented that Pb levels in wastewater used for agricultural irrigation exceeded the limits set by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the US. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In more than 30% of the studies reviewed, concentrations of heavy metals, such as chromium (Cr), cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), and zinc (Zn), have been identified above the permissible limits established by current environmental regulations.

This situation highlights the urgent need to adequately treat wastewater tributaries before they are discharged into surface water bodies, in order to prevent contamination of groundwater aquifers (Arti and Mehra, 2023). In the Mezquital Valley region, the use of wastewater for agricultural irrigation is a common practice. Various studies have shown that the heavy metals present in these waters can be absorbed by plants.

In this sense, Lara et al. (2015) reported the presence of Cd and Pb in corn, alfalfa, and sunflower crops, with concentrations ranging from 0.001 to 0.096 mg kg-1 for Cd and from 0.05 to 0.613 mg kg-1 for Pb. The concentrations of Pb and Cd recorded in samples of natural and drinking water exceeded the permissible limits in 70% and 100% of cases, respectively. In addition, statistical differences were observed between the values obtained (Table 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Graph of Pb and Cd concentrations in wastewater.

2007-0934-remexca-16-esp30-e4043-gf8.png

Figure 4

Figure 4. Graph of Pb and Cd concentrations in natural and drinking water.

2007-0934-remexca-16-esp30-e4043-gf9.png

These findings coincide with what was reported by Balli and Leghouch (2018); Oloruntoba et al. (2022), who documented elevated concentrations of Pb and Cd in drinking water from wells and springs. In both studies, the levels detected exceed the values established by the World Health Organization (WHO) for water suitable for human consumption, which represents a potential risk to public health.

In this regard, Sansom et al. (2019) reported that 30.8% of the households analyzed had Pb concentrations in drinking water between 0.6 and 2.4 g L-1, exceeding the permissible limits and evidencing the need to protect public health. Groundwater contamination by heavy metals, whether due to geogenic or anthropogenic causes, poses a significant risk to human health, primarily through the intake of contaminated water (Oloruntoba et al., 2022).

Improving their quality before consumption is essential; however, treatment plants do not generate immediate effects due to the accumulation of organic matter, microorganisms, and heavy metals. In the Mezquital Valley, wastewater used for irrigation also recharges aquifers, contaminating drinking water sources. Globally, more than 20% of available freshwater no longer meets demand, and it is estimated that half of the population will face severe scarcity (Mancosu et al., 2015).

This highlights the urgency of comprehensive management and continuous monitoring of tributaries (Chamizo et al., 2020), given the cumulative toxicity in living organisms and its relationship with diseases, such as cancer (Arti and Mehra, 2023). Water is the main route of human exposure to heavy metals. Cd generates oxidative stress and damage to lungs, kidneys, and bones, and is considered carcinogenic (Bernhoft, 2013; Rinaldi et al., 2017). Pb, on the other hand, affects the nervous system, blood pressure and cognitive development, especially in children (Gidlow, 2004).

In the Mezquital Valley, water pollution is the result of the historical use of untreated wastewater for agricultural irrigation, the dumping of urban and industrial waste, as well as the runoff of agrochemicals from cultivated soils. This contaminated recharge of aquifers compromises the sources of supply.

The results obtained in this study open the door to the development of complementary research that includes physicochemical and microbiological parameters, which are fundamental for decision-making in the design of public policies and intervention strategies. The use of wastewater should be subject to strict surveillance, always prioritizing human safety (Vázquez et al., 2020).

According to the sampling area (Figure 5), no direct relationship was observed between the concentration of Pb and Cd and the proximity to the discharge points. Although a decrease was expected in more remote areas, the results do not reflect this trend, suggesting a more complex dispersion of pollutants.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Map of sampling sites for wastewater, drinking water, and purified water.

2007-0934-remexca-16-esp30-e4043-gf10.png

Conclusions

The water analysis carried out in the Mezquital Valley region, in the state of Hidalgo, showed that the concentrations of Pb and Cd exceed the permissible limits established by current Mexican regulations. In wastewater, the levels of Pb and Cd exceed these limits by 26% and 30%, respectively. In the case of natural and drinking water, concentrations exceed the normative values by 70% for Pb and up to 100% for Cd. These results reflect the consequences of more than a century of continuous wastewater use for agricultural irrigation in the region.

Given this situation, it is essential to strengthen and give continuity to scientific studies aimed at the periodic and specific evaluation of pollutants in bodies of water. It is also essential to implement comprehensive strategies for the proper management of waste and the efficient treatment of water, with a view to its safe reuse in agriculture. To achieve this, it is crucial to foster collaboration between the different sectors: academic, governmental, industrial, and social, promoting an interdisciplinary approach that guarantees the protection of public health, food security, and environmental sustainability in the region.

Bibliography

1 

Arti, M. R. 2023. Analysis of heavy metals and toxicity level in the tannery effluent and the environs. Environ Monit Assess. 195(554):1-13 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-11154-4.

2 

Balli, N. and Leghouchi, E. 2018. Assessment of lead and cadmium in groundwater sources used for drinking purposes in Jijel (Northeastern Algeria). Global Nest Journal. 20(2):417-423.

3 

Bernhoft, R. A. 2013. Cadmium toxicity and treatment. The Scientific World Journal. 3:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/394652.

4 

Chamizo, C. S.; Otazo, S. S.; Gordillo, M. E.; Suárez S. A.; González, R. C. J. and Muñoz, N. H. 2020. Megacity wastewater poured into a nearby basin: looking for sustainable scenarios in a case study. Water. 12(3):824-844. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030824.

5 

Contreras, J. D.; Meza, R.; Siebe, C.; Rodríguez, D. S.; López, V. Y. A.; Castillo, R. G.; Amieva, R. I.; Solano, G. S. G.; Mazari, H. M. and Silva, M. M. A. 2017. Health risks from exposure to untreated wastewater used for irrigation in the Mezquital Valley, Mexico: A 25-year update. Water Res. 15(123):834-850.

6 

García, S. E. M. 2019. El agua residual como generadora del espacio de la actividad agrícola en el Valle del Mezquital, Hidalgo, México. Estudios Sociales. Revista de Alimentación Contemporánea y Desarrollo Regional. 29(54):1-34. https://doi.org/10.24836/es.v29i54.741.

7 

Garduño, J. A. L.; Durán, Á. J. C.; Ortori, C. A.; Adelrazig, S.; Barrett, D. A. and Gomes, R. L. 2023. Delivering on sustainable development goals in wastewater reuse for agriculture: Initial prioritization of emerging pollutants in the Tula Valley, Mexico, Water Research. 238:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.119903.

8 

Gidlow, D. A. 2004. Lead toxicity. Occupational Medicine. 54(2):76-81.

9 

González, M. B.; Webster, R.; Fiedler, S.; Loza, R. E.; Hernández, J. M.; Ruíz, S. L.G. and Siebe, C. 2015. Short-term emissions of CO2 and N2O in response to periodic flood irrigation with wastewater in the Mezquital Valley of Mexico. Atmospheric Environment. 101:116-124.

10 

Guédron, S.; Duwig, C.; Prado, B. L.; Point D.; Flores, M. G. and Siebe, C. 2014. (Methyl) Mercury, arsenic, and lead contamination of the world’s largest wastewater irrigation system: the Mezquital Valley Hidalgo Mexico. Water Air Soil Pollut. 225(2045):1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2045-3.

11 

Hernández, E. A.; Arango, G. C.; Reyes, P. A.; Martínez, S. P.; Pita de la, P. C.; Macías, M. S.; Arias, P. A. and Breña, N. J. 2016. Water supply source evaluation in unmanaged aquifer recharge zones: The Mezquital Valley (México) case study. Water. 9(4):1-25.

12 

Izquierdo, V. J. A.; Sánchez, G. M.; Peña, L. C. S.; Martínez, A. M. and Razo, L. M. 2022. Arsenic and fluoride in the drinking water in Tula City, México: challenges and lessons learned. Water Air Soil Pollut . 233(200):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-022-05674-x.

13 

Kinuthia, G. K.; Ngure, V.; Beti, D.; Lugalia, R.; Wangila, A. and Kamau, L. 2020. Levels of heavy metals in wastewater and soil samples from open drainage channels in Nairobi, Kenya: community health implication. Scientific Reports. 10(8434):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65359-5.

14 

Lara, V. F. M.; Ventura, M. A.; Ehsan, M.; Rodríguez, O. A.; Vargas, M. J. y Landero, V. N. 2015. Contenido de Cd y Pb en suelo y plantas de diferentes cultivos irrigados con aguas residuales en el Valle del Mezquital, Hidalgo, México. Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental. 31(2):127-132.

15 

Lesser, L. E.; Mora, A.; Moreau, C.; Mahlknecht, J.; Hernández, A. A.; Ramírez, A. I. and Barrios, P. H. 2018. Survey of 218 organic contaminants in groundwater derived from the world’s largest untreated wastewater irrigation system. Mezquital Valley, Mexico. Chemosphere. 198:510-521.

16 

Luneberg, K.; Schneider, D.; Siebe, C. and Daniel, R. 2018. Drylands soil bacterial community is affected by land-use change and different irrigation practices in the Mezquital Valley, Mexico. Scientific Reports . 8(1413):1-15.

17 

Mancosu, N.; Snyder, R. L.; Kyriakakis, G. and Spano, D. 2015. Water scarcity and future challenges for food production. Water. 7(3):975-992. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7030975.

18 

Oloruntoba, E. O.; Wada, O. Z. and Adejumo, M. 2022. Heavy metal analysis of drinking water supply, wastewater management, and human health risk assessment across secondary schools in Badagry coastal community, Lagos State, Nigeria. International Journal of Environmental Health Research. 32(9):1897-1914. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2021.1926438.

19 

Rinaldi, M.; Micali, A.; Marini, H.; Adamo, E. B.; Puzzolo, D.; Pisani, A.; Trichilo, V.; Altavilla, D.; Squadrito, F. and Minutoli, L. 2017. Cadmium, organ toxicity and therapeutic approaches: a review on brain, kidney and testis damage. Current Medical Chemistry. 24(35):3879-3893.

20 

Rosas, B. M. and García, S. E. M. 2024. Wastewater and agriculture in Mezquital Valley (Mexico): analyzing alternatives from circular economy and ecological economy using bibliometric review. Discover Water. 4(61):1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43832-024-00111-y.

21 

Sansom G.; Cizmas, L.; Aarvig, K.; Dixon, B.; Kirsch, K. R.; Katare, A. and Sansom, L. 2019. Vulnerable populations exposed to lead-contaminated drinking water within Houston ship channel communities. International Journal Environmental Research and Public Health. 15(1-16):2745. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16152745.

22 

SCFI. 1980. Norma mexicana NMX-AA-003-1980. Aguas residuales-muestreo. Secretaria de Comercio y Fomento Industrial. Diario Oficial de la Federación.

23 

SCFI. 2001. Norma oficial mexicana. NMX-AA-051-SCFI-2001. 2001. Análisis de agua-determinación de metales por absorción atómica en aguas naturales, potables, residuales y residuales tratadas-método de prueba.

24 

SCFI. 2022a. Norma oficial mexicana. NOM-001-SEMARNAT-2021. Que establece los límites permisibles de contaminantes en las descargas de aguas residuales en cuerpos receptores de la nación. Diario Oficial de la Federación .

25 

SCFI. 2022b. Norma oficial mexicana. NOM-127-SSA1-2021. Agua para uso y consumo humano. Límites permisibles de la calidad del agua. Diario Oficial de la Federación .

26 

Wu, X.; Cobbina, S. J.; Mao, G.; Xu, H.; Zhang, Z. and Yang L. 2016. Una revisión de la toxicidad y los mecanismos de metales pesados individuales y en mezclas en el medio ambiente. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 23(9):8244-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6333-x.