DOI: https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v17i1.3987

elocation-id: e3987

Martínez-Sánchez, Gutiérrez-Ibáñez, Saavedra-Guevara, Martínez-Bernal, Ramírez-Dávila, and Salgado-Siclán: Antifungal activity of native isolates of Trichoderma spp. against phytopathogens

Journal Metadata

Journal Identifier: remexca [journal-id-type=publisher-id]

Journal Title Group

Journal Title (Full): Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas

Abbreviated Journal Title: Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc [abbrev-type=publisher]

ISSN: 2007-0934 [pub-type=ppub]

ISSN: 2007-9934 [pub-type=epub]

Publisher

Publisher’s Name: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias

Article Metadata

Article Identifier: 10.29312/remexca.v17i1.3987 [pub-id-type=doi]

Article Grouping Data

Subject Group [subj-group-type=heading]

Subject Grouping Name: Article

Title Group

Article Title: Antifungal activity of native isolates of Trichoderma spp. against phytopathogens

Contributor Group

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Martínez-Sánchez

Given (First) Names: Carolina

X (cross) Reference: 1 [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Gutiérrez-Ibáñez

Given (First) Names: Ana Tarín

X (cross) Reference: 1 [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Saavedra-Guevara

Given (First) Names: Claudia

X (cross) Reference: 1 [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Martínez-Bernal

Given (First) Names: Luz Raquel

X (cross) Reference: 1 [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Ramírez-Dávila

Given (First) Names: Francisco

X (cross) Reference: 1 [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Salgado-Siclán

Given (First) Names: Martha Lidya

X (cross) Reference: 1 [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

X (cross) Reference: § [ref-type=corresp; rid=c1]

Affiliation [id=aff1]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 1

Institution Name: in an Address: Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas-Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. Campus El Cerrillo, Supermanzana Carretera km 15.5. Piedras Blancas, Toluca de Lerdo, México. CP. 50200. [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

City: Toluca de Lerdo

State or Province: Estado de México

Postal Code: 50200

Country: in an Address: México [country=MX]

Author Note Group

Correspondence Information: [§] Autor para correspondencia: mlsalgados@uaemex.mx. [id=c1]

Publication Date [date-type=pub; publication-format=electronic]

Day: 01

Month: 01

Year: 2026

Publication Date [date-type=collection; publication-format=electronic]

Season: Jan-Feb

Year: 2026

Volume Number: 17

Issue Number: 1

Electronic Location Identifier: e3987

History: Document History

Date [date-type=received]

Day: 01

Month: 12

Year: 2025

Date [date-type=accepted]

Day: 01

Month: 02

Year: 2026

Permissions

License Information [license-type=open-access; xlink:href=https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/; xml:lang=es]

Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons

Abstract

Title: Abstract

Diseases represent one of the primary causes of loss in agricultural production. Although chemicals are a common alternative for controlling them, they generate adverse effects on human health and the environment. Therefore, sustainable options are required, such as the use of soil microorganisms with biocontrol activity, such as Trichoderma, a fungus that has multiple mechanisms of action against phytopathogens, stimulates the soil microbiota, improves nutrient absorption, and activates plant defense mechanisms. This research aimed to evaluate the antagonism of eleven native Trichoderma species against Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum, Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum using the percentage of radial growth inhibition, the percentage of growth area, the degree of antagonism, and the presence of mycoparasitism. Dual confrontation was performed under in vitro conditions in the phytopathology laboratory of the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences of the Autonomous University of the State of Mexico. The isolates Trichoderma atroviride TH3 and T. asperellum Th11 stood out for their inhibition capacity, reduction of pathogenic growth, high degree of antagonism, and mycoparasitism. The degree of antagonism was assessed with coverage of up to two-thirds of the growth area over the pathogen. Rhizoctonia solani showed the lowest percentage of growth area and was the main target of mycoparasitism. The results suggest that Trichoderma species have potential for use in sustainable agricultural practices.

Keyword Group [xml:lang=en]

Title: Keywords:

Keyword: antagonism

Keyword: growth area

Keyword: inhibition

Keyword: mycoparasitism

Keyword: pathogens

Keyword

Italic: Trichoderma [toggle=yes]

Counts

Figure Count [count=1]

Table Count [count=2]

Equation Count [count=0]

Reference Count [count=31]

Abstract

Diseases represent one of the primary causes of loss in agricultural production. Although chemicals are a common alternative for controlling them, they generate adverse effects on human health and the environment. Therefore, sustainable options are required, such as the use of soil microorganisms with biocontrol activity, such as Trichoderma, a fungus that has multiple mechanisms of action against phytopathogens, stimulates the soil microbiota, improves nutrient absorption, and activates plant defense mechanisms. This research aimed to evaluate the antagonism of eleven native Trichoderma species against Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum, Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum using the percentage of radial growth inhibition, the percentage of growth area, the degree of antagonism, and the presence of mycoparasitism. Dual confrontation was performed under in vitro conditions in the phytopathology laboratory of the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences of the Autonomous University of the State of Mexico. The isolates Trichoderma atroviride TH3 and T. asperellum Th11 stood out for their inhibition capacity, reduction of pathogenic growth, high degree of antagonism, and mycoparasitism. The degree of antagonism was assessed with coverage of up to two-thirds of the growth area over the pathogen. Rhizoctonia solani showed the lowest percentage of growth area and was the main target of mycoparasitism. The results suggest that Trichoderma species have potential for use in sustainable agricultural practices.

Keywords:

antagonism, growth area, inhibition, mycoparasitism, pathogens, Trichoderma.

Introduction

There is a serious risk of economic losses in agricultural production, as well as a major challenge to food security, due to the significant impact of pests, which cause global losses of between 17.2% and 21.5% in crops such as wheat, rice, corn, potatoes, and soybeans (Savary et al., 2019; Skendžić et al., 2021). The massive use of phytosanitary products in pest control has generated negative consequences, such as biodiversity loss, the development of resistance in pest organisms, and damage to human health (Vinchira-Villarraga and Moreno-Sarmiento, 2019).

In response, more sustainable alternatives have been sought, including the use of antagonistic microorganisms, which are considered a viable option to ensure the production of healthy food (Gutiérrez-Ramírez et al., 2013; Companioni et al., 2019; Vinchira-Villarraga and Moreno-Sarmiento, 2019). Microorganisms with biocontrol activity are characterized by rapid growth, high reproductive capacity, competitive efficiency, and environmental adaptation (Viera-Arroyo et al., 2020).

Currently, there is a large number of microorganisms with profitable applications in agriculture as control agents, with Trichoderma spp. standing out, a cosmopolitan fungus highly competitive for space and nutrients and that produces bioactive metabolites (Amerio et al., 2020; Andrade-Hoyos et al., 2023; Cortés-Hernández et al., 2023). More than 200 species of the genus Trichoderma have been described as biological control agents (Garrido et al., 2019; Sood et al., 2020; Allende-Molar et al., 2022). In Mexico, 42 species have been reported, with T. asperellum and T. viride being the most common (Allende-Molar et al., 2022).

Species such as T. asperellum, T. atroviride, T. hamatum, T. harzianum, T. longibrachiatum, T. koningii, and T. viride, among others, have shown antagonistic and mycoparasitic effects against soil phytopathogens such as Phytophthora capsici, Fusarium oxysporum, Macrophomina phaseolina, Rhizoctonia solani, Sclerotium rolfsii, and Phymatotrichopsis omnivora (Andrade-Hoyos et al., 2019; Camacho-Luna et al., 2021; Allende-Molar et al., 2022). Other species act on pathogens due to the presence of various secondary metabolites (Montes-Vergara et al., 2022).

In the biotechnological area, Trichoderma species are of interest for the production of enzymes, generously used in the food industry (Allende-Molar et al., 2022); in addition, other species are reported as bioinducers of plant growth (Hernández-Melchor et al., 2019; Matas-Baca et al., 2023) and as responsible for activating the systemic response in plants through the expression of genes such as Epl1 and Sm1 (Martínez-Canto et al., 2021).

Although there are numerous studies on the biological control of pathogens by Trichoderma spp., it is necessary to implement studies on autochthonous strains, adapted to local environmental conditions (Amerio et al., 2020). This research aimed to evaluate the antagonistic activity of eleven native Trichoderma species against the phytopathogens Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum, Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum under in vitro conditions.

Materials and methods

Biological material

The fungal strains used in this study belong to the collection of the Phytopathology Laboratory of the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences of the Autonomous University of the State of Mexico. The pathogens used were: Botrytis cinerea (strawberry), Fusarium oxysporum (avocado), Rhizoctonia solani (potato), and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (sunflower). The antagonist strains of Trichoderma spp. were collected in different regions of the State of Mexico in 2023, from rhizosphere samples of various agricultural crops, and molecularly identified in 2024 (in the process of publication).

Growth inhibition tests

The pathogen and antagonist strains were activated in PDA BD Difco™ medium (potato dextrose agar) for seven days at 25 °C, using the same medium for dual seeding. The confrontation assays consisted of antagonist-pathogen dual seeding, following the methodology of Dennis and Webster (1971). To do this, a 7 mm mycelial disc of the pathogen was placed on the inner margin of the Petri dish containing the culture medium, and the antagonist was seeded at the opposite end.

The control consisted of seeding the pathogen alone at the margin of the Petri dish. Petri dishes were incubated at 25 °C in darkness for 10 days, until the mycelia made contact and the control fully colonized the Petri dish. The mean values of the percentage of radial growth inhibition (PRGI) of the mycelium were calculated according to the formula: PRGI= [(R1 - R2) / R1] × 100 (Ezziyyani et al., 2004). Where: PRGI= percentage of radial growth inhibition of mycelium (mm); R1= mycelial growth of the pathogen (control); R2= mycelial growth of the pathogen in confrontation with the antagonist.

The experiment was conducted under a completely randomized design with three replications per pathogen in dual seeding with eleven Trichoderma species.

Growth area percentage (GAP)

The percentage of the pathogen’s growth area due to the antagonist’s effect in dual seeding was estimated using the AutoCAD® technological application, for use in engineering and architecture (Khoroshko, 2020). This software allows areas to be estimated, using dynamic commands, which is helpful with circular or irregular shapes, as in the case of fungal growth.

Degree of antagonism (DA)

The degree of Trichoderma antagonism was determined using the scale by Bell et al. (1982), which describes the antagonist’s colonization capacity on the surface of the culture medium in dual seeding with the pathogen, with five levels ranging from the antagonist’s supremacy to its absence.

Mycoparasitism activity

Semipermanent preparations stained with lactophenol blue (Corrales et al., 2020) were used from dual cultures of 10 days of age. These samples were observed under the optical microscope at 40X and 100X magnifications. Ten fields from each sample were examined to determine the presence of mycoparasitism, following the methodology described by Andrade-Hoyos et al. (2019), with modifications. Mycoparasitism was considered when coiling of the antagonist’s hyphae and deformation or fragmentation of the pathogen’s mycelium were observed.

Statistical analysis

The results of PRGI and GAP were transformed using the arcsine function, followed by an analysis of variance (Anova) and a multiple comparison of means with Tukey’s test (p ≤ 0.05), under a completely randomized design with three replications. The statistical analysis was performed using InfoStat version 2020.

Results and discussion

Percentage of radial growth inhibition (PRGI)

The percentage of radial growth inhibition (PRGI) evaluated in dual seeding with the eleven native species of Trichoderma and the phytopathogens Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum, Rhizoctonia solani, and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum showed inhibition of mycelial growth with significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) relative to the control (Table 1).

Table 1

Table 1. Percentage of inhibition of radial mycelial growth (PRGI) of Trichoderma spp. against phytopathogens in dual growth.

Species Botrytis cinerea Fusarium oxysporum Rhizoctonia solani Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
T. atroviride Th1 63.25A 60.62A 56.07A 48.95A
T. atroviride Th2 64.98A 58.06AB 54.2A 49.35A
T. atroviride Th3 64.66A 58.73AB 57.51A 48.96A
T. viridarium Th4 49.37C 50.94CD 40.61B 41.66BC
T. viride Th5 48.67AB 48.21D 41.77B 37.32C
T. hamatum Th6 58.22AB 56.2ABC 52.47A 51.45A
T. atroviride Th7 58.45AB 59.3AB 55.23A 46.13AB
T. atroviride Th8 61.91AB 53.5BCD 55.41A 49.01A
T. scalesiae Th9 65.02A 58.39AB 55.88A 49.96A
T. atroviride Th10 63.08AB 57.89AB 54.56A 51.19A
T. asperellum Th11 54.95BC 52.91BCD 55.70A 47.53A

[i] Means with different letters in the same column are statistically different.

The isolates that showed the highest inhibitory activity against pathogens were: T. atroviride Th3 (57.46%), T. scalesiae Th9 (57.31%), and T. atroviride Th1 (57.22%). As for the pathogens most affected in their mycelial development by the effect of the antagonist, they were B. cinerea (59.32%), F. oxysporum (55.88%), and R. solani (52.67%); in contrast, the lowest level of control was observed in S. sclerotiorum (47.41%).

According to Matas-Baca et al. (2023), the use of native species with natural antagonistic activity is highly efficient in controlling various phytopathogens, and their use is recognized in sustainable agriculture plans (Companioni et al., 2019; Cortés-Hernández et al., 2023). The Trichoderma species considered in this study showed biocontrol activity against soil phytopathogens, as indicated by Yao et al. (2023), with T. viride and T. harzianum limiting the growth of 29 species of phytopathogenic fungi, among which Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum, Rhizoctonia solani, and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum stand out.

The inhibition of pathogens by Trichoderma isolates varies with the native strain and the phytopathogen species used. In this study, the response of the PRGI of T. atroviride Th3 on the pathogen Rhizoctonia solani was 57.51%, exceeding that reported by Pérez et al. (2020) for this same species. Similarly, Geng et al. (2022) report a significant inhibition of 68% and a rapid development of T. harzianum on B. cinerea in dual culture in vitro, a percentage comparable to those of the autochthonous isolates T. scalesiae Th9 (65.02%) and T. atroviride Th2 (64.98%) (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Figure 1. View of the confrontation of pathogens with Trichoderma and types of mycoparasitism.

A) B. cinerea in confrontation with T. scalesiae; B) F. oxysporum in confrontation with T. atroviride; C) R. solani in confrontation with T. asperellum; D) S. sclerotiorum in confrontation with T. scalesiae. E) Trichoderma atroviride coiling around Rhizoctonia solani; F) Trichoderma atroviride invades the mycelium of Rhizoctonia solani.

2007-0934-remexca-17-1-3987-gf1.png

On the other hand, Silva et al. (2022) report a 12.2% inhibition of S. sclerotiorum growth when using T. lentiforme; in contrast, T. hamatum Th6 and T. atroviride Th10 quadrupled this percentage, reaching PRGI values of 51.45% and 51.19%, respectively. As for F. oxysporum, Sallam et al. (2019) report high PRGI using T. atroviride as an antagonist, a result that agrees with the findings of this study. The analysis of variance indicated a significant effect of treatments with different native Trichoderma species on the PRGI of the different pathogens, with a coefficient of determination R2= 0.98. Likewise, Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (p ≤ 0.05) identified significant differences among the isolates, grouping them into different levels of antifungal effectiveness.

Growth area percentage (GAP)

Using AutoCAD® software for the percentage of growth area (GAP) of phytopathogenic fungi and their respective antagonists allowed us to measure colony area (cm2) more efficiently than with manual methods (Khoroshko, 2020). The pathogen with the lowest GAP was Rhizoctonia solani (9.54%), and the highest was Fusarium oxysporum (16.95%), showing significant differences between isolates (Tukey, p ≤ 0.05), as described in (Table 2).

Table 2

Table 2. Percentage of growth area (GAP) of pathogens in dual growth with Trichoderma spp.

Species Botrytis cinerea Fusarium oxysporum Rhizoctonia solani Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
T. atroviride Th1 11.26ABC 18.09B 8.22C 11.26ABC
T. atroviride Th2 11.07ABC 20.74A 54.2A 49.35A
T. atroviride Th3 12.04AB 19.65AB 7.55C 12.04AB
T. viridarium Th4 13.61A 8.58D 14.04A 13.61A
T. viride Th5 9.41C 11.06C 13.95A 9.41C
T. hamatum Th6 11.94BC 20.28AB 9.12C 10.13BC
T. atroviride Th7 11.94ABC 19.83AB 8.02C 11.94ABC
T. atroviride Th8 10.67BC 19.75AB 8.13A 10.67ABC
T. scalesiae Th9 10.83BC 20.09AB 8C 10.83BC
T. atroviride Th10 9.97C 19.54AB 8.2C 9.97C
T. asperellum Th11 12.02AB 8.84CD 11.72B 12.02AB

[i] Means with different letters in the same column are statistically different.

The need to estimate the percentage of fungal growth area in inhibition studies is confirmed by Camacho-Luna et al. (2021), who evaluated the action of Trichoderma sp. on the percentage of growth area of Fusarium oxysporum and F. proliferatum, reaching values of 20.4% and 33.3%, respectively. In contrast, the results obtained in this study showed GAPs ranging from 10.9% to 12.9%. These results highlight the use of computational tools to estimate areas in biological phenomena, allowing precise and quantifiable data to be obtained.

Degree of antagonism (DA)

The Trichoderma attributes recognized in antagonist success include its ability to compete for space and nutrients, rapid development, and mycoparasite ability (Martínez-Martínez, 2020). In general, the results showed that the native species of Trichoderma reached degree 2 on the pathogens evaluated, which represents the colonization of two-thirds of the culture medium, thereby limiting the growth of phytopathogens. This behavior was particularly evident against Botrytis cinerea and Fusarium oxysporum.

In contrast, the strains Trichoderma viridarium TH4 and Trichoderma viride TH5 showed low antagonistic activity against Rhizoctonia solani, presenting a degree 3, which indicated competition between both organisms; on the other hand, for Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, degrees 3 and 4 were observed, respectively, reflecting a limited effectiveness of the antagonist. However, Rodríguez and Flores (2018) reported values of 1 to 3 using T. harzianum against Rhizoctonia solani.

Mycoparasitism

The genus Trichoderma has been recognized with mycoparasitism activity, defined as the ability to act on the host cell wall (Matas-Baca et al., 2023). In this study, it was possible to document the type of mycoparasitism carried out by autochthonous strains of Trichoderma on the pathogen Rhizoctonia solani, because it presents a thick mycelium and dark coloration that contrasted with the antagonist. The Trichoderma species that showed mycelium coiled around the pathogen were Trichoderma atroviride Th2 and Trichoderma viride Th5; those with mycelium invading the pathogen internally were T. atroviride Th3, Trichoderma scalesiae Th9, and Trichoderma asperellum Th11; and the strains that fragmented the mycelium of the pathogen were T. atroviride Th7 and T. atroviride Th10 (Figure 1).

It has been documented that, after successful penetration, Trichoderma is able to degrade the cell wall of its host by producing enzymes on different pathogen species; it can even be located in the lumen of the fungus once it has penetrated its interior (Sood et al., 2020). Tyskiewicz et al. (2022) recognize the action of Trichoderma spp. by degrading the cell wall of fungi. In this sense, Fernández (2022) reports parasitic initiation with the activation of recognition genes, followed by coiling and, finally, the disintegration of hyphae.

Conclusions

The potential of native species of Trichoderma spp. as biocontrol agents against the phytopathogens Botrytis cinerea, Fusarium oxysporum, Rhizoctonia solani, and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is confirmed, given their PRGI, GAP, DA, and mycoparasitism characteristics, with the isolates Trichoderma atroviride Th3 and Trichoderma asperellum Th11 standing out. The mycoparasitic activity of Trichoderma was outstanding with Rhizoctonia solani, including mycelium coiling, penetration into the pathogen, and degradation of its cell wall.

Finally, this study contributed to the knowledge about the use of native Trichoderma spp. in the control of pathogens in in vitro cultures, providing valuable information for their future applications in disease management programs.

Acknowledgements

The research received support from the Comecyt Fund, Edomex-Ficdtem-2022-01: funding for research by women scientists. Project: FICDTEM-2023-115.

Bibliography

1 

Allende-Molar, R.; Báez-Parra, K.; Salazar-Villa, E. and Rojo-Báez, I. 2022. Biodiversity of Trichoderma spp. in Mexico and its potential use in agriculture. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems. 25(3):e4297. https://doi.org/10.56369/tsaes.4297.

2 

Amerio, N. S.; Castrillo, M. L.; Bich, G. A.; Zapata, P. D. y Villalba, L. L. 2020. Trichoderma en la Argentina: estado del arte. Ecología Austral. 30(1):113-124. https://doi.org/10.25260/EA.20.30.1.0.945.

3 

Andrade-Hoyos, P.; Luna-Cruz, A.; Osorio-Hernández, E.; Molina-Gayosso, E.; Landeros-Valenzuela, N. y Barrales-Cureño, H. J. 2019. Antagonismo de Trichoderma spp. vs hongos asociados a la marchitez de chile. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. 10(6):1259-1272. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v10i6.1326.

4 

Andrade-Hoyos, P.; Rivera-Jiménez, M. N.; Landeros-Valenzuela, N.; Silva-Rojas, H. V.; Martínez-Salgado, S. J. y Romero-Arenas, O. 2023. Beneficios ecológicos y biológicos del hongo cosmopolita Trichoderma spp. en la agricultura: una perspectiva en el campo mexicano. Revista Argentina de Microbiología. 55(4):366-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2023.06.005.

5 

Bell, D. K.; Wells, H. D. and Markham, C. R. 1982. In vitro antagonism of Trichoderma species against six fungal plant pathogens. Phytopathology. 72(4):379-382.

6 

Camacho-Luna, V.; Flores-Moctezuma, H. E.; Rodríguez-Monroy, M.; Montes-Belmont, R. y Sepúlveda-Jiménez, G. 2021. Inducción de la respuesta de defensa de plantas de cebolla en la interacción con Trichoderma asperellum y Alternaria porri. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. 12(4):685-698.

7 

Companioni, G. B.; Domínguez, A. G. y García, V. R. 2019. Trichoderma: su potencial en el desarrollo sostenible de la agricultura. Biotecnología Vegetal. 19(4):237-248.

8 

Corrales, R. L. C. y Caycedo, L. L. 2020. Principios fisicoquímicos de los colorantes en microbiología. Nova. 18(33):73-100. https://doi.org/10.22490/24629448.3701.

9 

Cortés-Hernández, F. C.; Alvarado-Castillo, G. y Sánchez-Viveros, G. 2023. Trichoderma spp., una alternativa para la agricultura sostenible: una revisión. Revista Colombiana de Biotecnología. 25(2):73-87. https://doi.org/10.15446/rev.colomb.biote.v25n2.111384.

10 

Dennis, C. and Webster, J. 1971. Antagonistic properties of species-groups of Trichoderma. I. Production of non-volatile antibiotics. Transactions of the British Mycological Society. 57(1):25-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/s00071536(71)80077-3.

11 

Di Rienzo, J. A.; Casanoves, F.; Balzarini, M. G.; González, L.; Tablada, M. y Robledo, C. W. 2020. InfoStat versión 2020. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. (Software). http://www.infostat.com.ar.

12 

Ezziyyani, M.; Pérez-Sánchez, C.; Requena, M. E.; Rubio, L. y Candela, M. E. 2004. Biocontrol por Streptomyces rochei-ziyani, de la podredumbre del pimiento (Capsicum annuum L.) causada por Phytophthora capsici. Anales de Biología. 26:69-78. https://revistas.um.es/analesbio/article/view/30471.

13 

Fernández, M. B.; Almenares, C. M.; Aguado, M. E.; Díaz, O. A. y Hernández-Rodríguez, A. 2022. Actividad micoparasítica en la interacción Trichoderma spp. - Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris. Revista Cubana de Ciencia Biológicas. 10(2):1-7.

14 

Geng, L.; Fu, Y.; Peng, X.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, M.; Song, Z.; Guo, N.; Chen, S.; Chen, J.; Bai, B.; Liu, A. and Ahammed, G. J. 2022. Biocontrol potential of Trichoderma harzianum against Botrytis cinerea in tomato plants. Biological Control. 174:105019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2022.105019.

15 

Gutiérrez-Ramírez, A.; Robles-Bermúdez, A.; Santillán-Ortega, C.; Ortiz-Catón, M. y Cambero-Campos, O. J. 2013. Control biológico como herramienta sustentable en el manejo de plagas y su uso en el estado de Nayarit, México. Revista Bio Ciencias. 2(3):102-112.

16 

Hernández-Melchor, D. J.; Ferrera-Cerrato, R. y Alarcón, A. 2019. Trichoderma: Importancia agrícola, biotecnología y sistemas de fermentación para producir biomasa y enzimas de interés industrial. Chilean Journal of Agricultural & Animal Sciences. 35(1):98-112. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0719-38902019005000205.

17 

Khroshko, A. 2020. The research of possibilities and application of the AutoCAD software package for creating electronic versions of textbooks for ‘engineering and computer graphics’ course. TEM Journal. 9(3):1141-1149. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM93-40.

18 

Martínez-Canto, O. J.; Cristóbal-Alejo, J.; Tun-Suárez, J. M. y Reyes-Ramírez, A. 2021. Detección de genes Epl1 y Sm1 en Trichoderma spp. antagonistas contra hongos fitopatógenos. Ecosistemas y Recursos Agropecuarios. 8(2):e2791.

19 

Martínez-Martínez, T. O.; Guerrero-Aguilar, B. Z.; Pecina-Quintero, V.; Rivas-Valencia, P.; González-Pérez, E. y Ángeles-Núñez, J. G. 2020. Antagonismo de Trichoderma harzianum contra la fusariosis del garbanzo y su efecto biofertilizante. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. 11(5):1135-1147.

20 

Matas-Baca, M. A.; Flores-Córdova, M. A.; Pérez-Álvarez, S.; Rodríguez-Roque, M. J.; Salas-Salazar, N. A.; Soto-Caballero, M. C. and Sánchez-Chávez, E. 2023. Trichoderma fungi as an agricultural biological control in México. Revista Chapingo. Serie Horticultura. 29(3):79-114. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchsh.2022.11.015.

21 

Montes-Vergara, D.; Barboza-García, A. and Pérez-Cordero, A. 2022. Antifungal and growth activity of strains of Trichoderma spp. against the avocado tristeza disease, Phytophthora cinnamomi. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control. 32:115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-022-00613-8.

22 

Pérez, A. A.; Pérez, M. A.; Martínez-Coca, B.; Rollhaiser, I. N. and Blengini, M. C. 2020. Selection of Trichoderma spp. isolates in vitro as potential biofungicides for the control of Rhizoctonia solani Kühn on potato. Agroscientia. 37(2):21-33.

23 

Rodríguez, I. C. and Flores, J. 2018. Capacidad antagónica in vitro de Trichoderma spp. frente a Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn y Fusarium verticillioides Neirenberg. Bioagro, 30(1):49-58.

24 

Sallam, N. M. A.; Eraky, A. M. I. and Sallam, A. 2019. Effect of Trichoderma spp. on Fusarium wilt disease of tomato. Molecular Biology Reports. 46(4):4463-4470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-019-04901-9.

25 

Savary, S.; Willocquet, L.; Pethybridge, S. J.; Esker, P.; McRoberts, N. and Nelson, A. 2019. The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 3(3):430-439. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y.

26 

Silva, L. G.; Camargo, R. C.; Mascarin, G. M.; Oliveira-Nunes, P. S. O.; Dunlap, C. and Bettiol, W. 2022. Dual functionality of Trichoderma: biocontrol of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and biostimulant of cotton plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 13:983127. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.983127.

27 

Skendžić, S.; Zovko, M.; Živković, I. P.; Lešić, V. and Lemić, D. 2021. The impact of climate change on agricultural insect pests. Insects. 12(5):440. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12050440.

28 

Sood, M.; Kapoor, D.; Kumar, V.; Sheteiwy, M. S.; Ramakrishnan, M.; Landi, M.; Araniti, F. and Sharma, A. 2020. Trichoderma: the ‘secrets’ of a multitalented biocontrol agent. Plants. 9(6):762. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9060762.

29 

Tyśkiewicz, R.; Nowak, A.; Ozimek, E. and Jaroszuk-Ściseł, J. 2022. Trichoderma: the current status of its application in agriculture for the biocontrol of fungal phytopathogens and stimulation of plant growth. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 23(4):2329. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23042329.

30 

Viera-Arroyo, W. F.; Tello-Torres, C. M.; Martínez-Salinas, A. A.; Navia-Santillán, D. F.; Medina-Rivera, L. A.; Delgado-Párraga, A. G.; Perdomo-Quispe, C. E.; Pincay-Verdezoto, A. K.; Báez-Cevallos, F. J.; Vásquez-Castillo, W. A. y Jackson, T. 2020. Control biológico: una herramienta para una agricultura sustentable, un punto de vista de sus beneficios en Ecuador. Journal of the Selva Andina Biosphere. 8(2):128-149. https://doi.org/10.36610/j.jsab.2020.080200128.

31 

Vinchira-Villarraga, D. M. y Moreno-Sarmiento, N. 2019. Control biológico: camino a la agricultura moderna. Revista Colombiana de Biotecnología. 21(1):2-5. https://doi.org/10.15446/rev.colomb.biote.v21n1.80860.