Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas   volume 10  number 2   February 15 - March 31, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v10i2.392

Investigation note

Identification and distribution of Meloidogyne spp. in tomato
in Sinaloa Mexico

José Ángel Martínez-Gallardo1

Tomás Díaz-Valdés1

Raúl Allende-Molar2

Jesús Enrique Retes-Manjarrez3

José Armando Carrillo-Fasio

1Faculty of Agronomy-Autonomous University of Sinaloa. Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico. (jose-angel-13@hotmail.com; tdiaz10@hotmail.com). 2Universidad Veracruzana-Faculty of Biological and Agricultural Sciences. Tuxpan, Veracruz. (raallende@uv.mx). 3Vilmorin of Mexico. Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico. (enrique.retes@vilmorin.com). 4Center for Research in Food and Development AC-Culiacán Unit. El Diez Field, Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico. (acarrillo@ciad.mx).

§Corresponding author: acarrillo@ciad.mx.

Abstract

Worldwide, the most important phytoparasitic nematode genus is Meloidogyne, since it affects more than 3 000 plant species and its infection is characterized by the formation of galls in the root of the infected plant. In Sinaloa, the current distribution of Meloidogyne is unknown, because the most recent reports are from the year 2000 and 2001, identifying the species M. incognita, M. arenaria, M. hapla and M. javanica, distributed in the state. In the present work of investigation, the objectives were to identify morphologically and molecularly the species of the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.), as well as, to determine its distribution in the culture of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L), in Sinaloa, Mexico. Cultivated lots with tomato were sampled in the different horticultural zones of Sinaloa, Mexico, during the agricultural cycles 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2015-2016 and 2016-2017, in the open field, shade mesh and greenhouses, where samples of soil and roots, to perform morphological and molecular identification. The species identified in the samples collected were M. enterolobii, M. incognita and M. arenaria with 88, 10 and 2% incidence respectively. These results indicate that M. enterolobii, M. incognita and M. arenaria are distributed in the state of Sinaloa in the tomato crop, being M. enterolobii the predominant species.

Keywords: Solanum lycopersicum, horticulture, root-knot nematode.

Reception date: February 2019

Acceptance date: March 2019


Introduction

Tomato is the main export agro-food product in Mexico, its production in 2013 was 3.2 million tons (SIAP, 2017). In the 2013-2014 season, 47 136 ha of vegetables were grown in Sinaloa, producing around 1 million t of tomato, of which 313 914 t were exported with a value of 303.2 million dollars. (CIDH, 2014). Nematode species of the genus Meloidogyne are one of the most harmful phytopathogens in tomato cultivation worldwide, as they severely damage the root system of the crop. Meloidogyne is distinguished from other genera by having a wide range of hosts, this has made it classified as the genus of phytoparasitic nematodes of greatest economic importance in the world (Salazar-Antón and Guzmán-Hernández, 2013).

In Mexico, Meloidogyne spp., is the most important phytoparasitic nematode genus that attacks tomato cultivation, due to the percentage of losses it causes and in different producing states the presence of four species is reported: M. incognita, M. arenaria, M. javanica and M. hapla (Carrillo et al., 2000; Cid del Prado et al., 2001); however, in the 2012-2013 season, Martínez et al. (2015), made the first report of the presence of the species M. enterolobii attacking tomato plants carrying the Mi gene (highly resistant to M. incognita, M. javanica and M. arenaria) under shade culture conditions in Culiacán , Sinaloa. Among the reports of Carrillo et al. (2000); Cid del Prado et al. (2001); Martínez et al. (2015), used the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as a molecular biology tool, since it has provided an alternative and sensitive approach for the detection and identification of root-knot nematodes and many pathogenic organisms present in the soil that was previously difficult their identification (Hu et al., 2011).

The objectives of the present study were to identify Meloidogyne spp. morphologically and molecularly, as well as to know its distribution in the tomato crop, in Sinaloa, Mexico.

The sampling was carried out during the reproductive stage of 160 lots cultivated with tomato, in open field conditions, shade mesh and greenhouse in four of the main production areas of Sinaloa: (Los Mochis, Culiacán, La Cruz de Elota and Escuinapa), During the agricultural cycles 2013-2014, 2014-2015, 2015-2016 and 2016-2017, each sampling point was georeferenced (Table 1).

Table 1. Location of samples in tomato culture, in Sinaloa.

Municipality

Latitude

Longitude

Altitude (m)

Los Mochis

25°43’51.56”

108°45’42.67”

19

Los Mochis

25°55’43.13”

108°50’11.68”

30

Los Mochis

25°51’16.28”

108°54’36.75”

22

Los Mochis

25°47’17.75”

108°44’32.27”

24

Los Mochis

25°39’55.11”

108°45’37.99”

12

Culiacán

24°53’22.86”

107°39’54.45”

26

Culiacán

24°52’27.97”

107°41’41.41”

18

Culiacán

24°48’53.58”

107°48’11.44”

7

Culiacán

24°43’31.98”

107°36’26.59”

14

Culiacán

24°39’07.41”

107°28’37.93”

15

Culiacán

24°38’45.56”

107°30’18.54”

15

Culiacán

24°36’19.72”

107°34’37.05”

7

Culiacán

24°45’54.16”

107°31’03.34”

27

Culiacán

24°56’41.70”

107°28’13.01”

109

Culiacán

24°55’59.57”

107°26’36.05”

72

Culiacán

24°32’49.77”

107°26’12.75”

17

Culiacán

24°32’19.36”

107°26’18.25”

15

Culiacán

24°31’18.36”

107°27’45.30”

10

Elota

24°01’55.38”

107°00’32.72”

7

Elota

24°00’23.13”

107°01’27.80”

10

Elota

24°00’20.38”

106°59’41.17”

7

Elota

23°57’24.13”

106°52’37.48”

54

Elota

23°57’17.58”

106°51’42.45”

67

Elota

23°54’04.78”

106°53’53.99”

10

Elota

23°54’10.31”

106°52’26.60”

15

Elota

23°53’40.45”

106°52’29.58”

20

Escuinapa

23°06’49.21”

106°01’54.69”

91

Escuinapa

23°01’21.33”

105°55’10.96”

31

Escuinapa

22°55’55.85”

106°06’31.24”

7

Escuinapa

24°44’25.53”

105°50’22.38”

5

Escuinapa

22°43’40.57”

105°50’16.49”

4

Escuinapa

22°40’49.13”

105°47’57.83”

5

The soil sample was taken between 5 and 30 cm deep, close to the root growth zone (rhizosphere) of the plants, because it is where the highest population density of phytoparasitic nematodes is found. Also included was the collection of gilled roots for their respective analysis. Each soil sample consisted of 2 kg (8 to 10 subsamples) and 5 roots of galls (taken completely at random), labeled and stored at 4 °C until nematode extraction.

The samples composed of soil and roots of each sample were analyzed in the nematology laboratory of CIAD, Culiacán. The identification of the specimens was made based on their morphological characteristics (cephalic region, type of stylet, type of basal nodules and the distance of the mouth of the dorsal esophageal gland [DGED]) and perineal patterns of the females, supported by keys taxonomic studies of Eisenback et al. (1981) and EPPO (2011).

To confirm the identity of Meloidogyne at the species level, the roots were then washed with distilled water to remove the soil, individual galls were selected, where 50 females were removed with a dissecting needle and placed in a microcentrifuge tube 1.5 mL, subsequently, an aliquot of 45 μL of lysis buffer (50 mM NaOH) was added, it was subjected to heat lysis at 95 °C for 10 min, an aliquot of 45 μL of Tris-HCl (pH 8) was added, and centrifuged for 3 min at 10 000 rpm (Hu et al., 2011), the supernatant was recovered, to proceed with PCR using the specific primers Me-F and Me-R (Meloidogyne enterolobii), F-jav and R -jav (Meloidogyne javanica), Ma-F and Ma-R (Meloidogyne arenaria), Mi-F and Mi-R (Meloidogyne incognita), Mha-F and Mha-R (Meloidogyne hapla), which code for the 28S rRNA region (Table 2) (Hu et al., 2011).

Table 2. Sequence of specific Meloidogyne primers.

Primer

Sequence of primer (5’-3’)

Species specific

F: Me

AACTTTTGTGAAAGTGCCGCTG

M. enterolobii

R: Me

TCAGTTCAGGCAGGATCAACC

F: Jav

GGTGCGCGATTGAACTGAGC

M. javanica

R: Jav

CAGGCCCTTCAGTGGAACTATAC

F: Ma

TCGAGGGCATCTAATAAAGG

M. arenaria

R: Ma

GGGCTGAATATTCAAAGGAA

F: Mi

GTGAGGATTCAGCTCCCCAG

M. incognita

R: Mi

ACGAGGAACATACTTCTCCGTCC

F: Mha

TCGAGGGCATCTAATAAAGG

M. hapla

R: Mha

GGGCTGAATATTCAAAGGAA

PCR reactions were performed using the core Systems 1 PCR system (Promega). The total volume of the reaction mixture was 25 μL for all reactions. The content of the reaction mixture was: 10 ng of genomic DNA, 5 μL of 10x PCR buffer, 3 μL of MgCl2 (25 mM), 0.5 μL of each dNTP (10 μM), 1 μL of each primer, 0.2 μL of Taq polymerase (5u μL-1) and the rest of sterile nanopure water. The amplification of the DNA was carried out in a thermal cycler (BIO-RAD T100), under the following amplification conditions: 94 °C for 2 min, 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 64 °C for 30 s, 68 °C for 1 min, followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min.

An aliquot of the PCR product was visualized, in a 1% agarose gel, stained with 1 μL of ethidium bromide (10 mg mL-1), in a transilluminator (Benchtop UV). A visible band of ±250 bp was considered as a positive response. (M. enterolobii), ±750 bp. (M. javanica), ±950 bp. (M. arenaria), ±1 000 bp. (M. incognita) and ±1 500 bp. (M. hapla).

Of all the populations obtained, when analyzing their morphological, morphometric and molecular characterization, a frequency of 88% was recorded for M. enterolobii, 10% for M. incognita and 2% for M. arenaria (Figure 1).

According to reported by EPPO (2011) and Ramírez-Suárez et al. (2014; 2016), taking into consideration the perineal patterns of the females collected in the present investigation, the characteristics of the cephalic region, type of stylet, type of basal nodes and the distance of the DGED samples were identified as M. enterolobii: ringed females with white lateral fields and of piriform shape, of variable size, the relationship between the distance from the head to the short excretory pore, located at the level of the metacorpus.

Figure 1. Population percentage of Meloidogyne species in the tomato crop in Sinaloa.

Sturdy stylet and perineal patterns were ovoid to rounded, with moderately high and rounded arch. M. incognita presented two rings in the ring-shaped cephalic region and the anterior part of the stylet in the form of 'rowing' with blunt tip, rounded basal nodules and the distance from the base of the nodules to the very short DGED (1.8-3.3 μm), in addition, in the perineal sections they presented the high dorsal arch formed by grooves that varied from smooth to wavy, without clearly visible lateral lines. M. arenaria had the characteristic of three rings in the cephalic region and the long DGED (3.2-4.9 μm); in addition, in the perineal models, it showed the presence of the dorsal arch with 'shoulder pads', formed by pronounced undulations of the dorsal striae (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Perineal patterns of: A) M. incognita, B) M. arenaria and C) M. enterolobii, obtained from females of roots of tomato crop of Sinaloa.

The PCR amplified fragments of ±250 bp. (M. enterolobii), ±950 bp. (M. arenaria) and ±1 000 bp. (M. incognita) respectively, which confirms the results obtained by morphology and molecular biology.

The species M. enterolobii was identified in the four production zones of Sinaloa, while M. arenaria was presented in Los Mochis, La Cruz de Elota and Escuinapa, and M. incognita was only found in the areas of Culiacan and La Cruz de Elota (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Distribution of Meloidogyne species in tomato crops in Sinaloa.

In five sampling lots (3% of the samples) mixed species were found, one presented M. enterolobii and M. incognita and in four the population mixture of M. arenaria and M. enterolobii was found.

The results of the identification of Meloidogyne species and their relationship with georeferencing coincide with the reports of other researchers (Castro et al., 1990; Cid del Prado et al., 1998; Carrillo et al., 2000; Cid del Prado et al., 2001; Martínez et al., 2015), since they report that the distribution intervals are based on the ranges of variation of each of the species.

The present study contributes to the knowledge of the current distribution of Meloidogyne spp. in Sinaloa and is considered a basis for future control tools.

Conclusions

The root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne), is distributed in all areas of tomato production in Sinaloa analyzed in the present study, being the species M. enterolobii which was found with greater frequency and distribution in the four areas sampled, M. incognita it was found only in two, whereas M. arenaria was found in three of the four sampled areas.

Cited literature

Carrillo, F. J. A.; García, E. R. S.; Allende, M. R.; Márquez, Z. I. y Cruz, O. J. E. 2000. Identificación y distribución de especies del nematodo nodulador (Meloidogyne spp.) en hortalizas en Sinaloa, México. Rev. Mex. Fitopatol. 18(2):115-119.

Castro, A. A. E.; Zavaleta-Mejía, E.; Cid del Prado, V. I. y Zamudio, G. V. 1990. Rotación e incorporación de Tagetes erecta L. para el manejo de Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & white) Chitwood en el cultivo de tomate (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) en Tecamachalco, Puebla. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología. 8:173-180.

Cid del Prado, V. I.; Hernández, J. A.; Espinoza, V.; Tovar, S. A. y Torres, R. 1998. Distribución geográfica y frecuencia de especies de Meloidogyne en la República Mexicana. En avances en la investigación. Instituto de Fitosanidad. Colegio de Posgraduados, Montecillo Estado de México. 114-115 pp.

Cid del Prado, V. I.; Hernández, J. A. y Tovar, S. A. 2001. Distribución de especies y razas de Meloidogyne en México. Rev. Mex. Fitopatol. 19(01):32-39.

CIDH. 2014. Comisión para la investigación y defensa de las hortalizas. Cierre de ciclo de hortalizas temporada 2013-2014. Culiacán, Sinaloa. 113 p.

Eisenback, J. D.; Hirschmann, H.; Sasser, J. N. and Triantaphyllou, A. C. 1981. A guide to four most common species of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) with a pictorial key. A cooperative publication of the Departments of Plant Pathology and Genetics. North Carolina State University and the United States Agency for International Development. Raleigh, North Carolina. 48 p.

EPPO. 2011. EPPO Standard PM 7/103 Meloidogyne enterolobii. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 41:329-339.

Hu, M.; Zhuo, K. and Liao, J. 2011. Multiplex PCR for the simultaneous identification and detection of Meloidogyne incognita, M. enterolobii and M. javanica using DNA extracted directly from individual Galls. Phytopathology. 101:1270-1277.

Martínez, G. J.A.; Díaz, V. T.; Allende, M. R.; García, E. R.S. y Carrillo, F. J.A. 2015. Primer reporte de Meloidogyne enterolobii parasitando tomate en Culiacán, Sinaloa México. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. Pub. Esp. 11:2165-2168.

Ramírez-Suárez, A.; Alcasio-Rangel, S.; Rosas-Hernández, L. and López-Buenfil, J. A. 2016. First report of Meloidogyne enterolobii infecting columnar cacti Stenocereus queretaroensis in Jalisco, Mexico. Plant Dis. 100(7):1506-1511.

Ramírez-Suárez, A.; Rosas-Hernández, L.; Alcasio-Rangel, S. and Powers, T. O. 2014. First report of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne enterolobii parasitizing watermelon from Veracruz, Mexico. Plant Dis. 98:428-434.

Salazar-Antón, W. y Guzmán-Hernández, T. 2013. Efecto de las poblaciones de Meloidogyne sp. en el desarrollo y rendimiento del tomate. Agron. Mesoam. 24(2):419-426.

SIAP. 2017. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. http://www.siap.gob.mx
/agricultura-produccion-anual/.