DOI: https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v16i8.3912

elocation-id: e3912

Higuera-Rubio, Gaytán-Pinzón, Peraza-Magallanes, Sandoval-Castro, Lara-Ponce, and Calderón-Vázquez: Native corn in Sinaloa: agroclimatic and sociocultural factors that limit its productivity

Journal Metadata

Journal Identifier: remexca [journal-id-type=publisher-id]

Journal Title Group

Journal Title (Full): Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

Abbreviated Journal Title: Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc [abbrev-type=publisher]

ISSN: 2007-0934 [pub-type=ppub]

Publisher

Publisher’s Name: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias

Article Metadata

Article Identifier: 10.29312/remexca.v16i8.3912 [pub-id-type=doi]

Article Grouping Data

Subject Group [subj-group-type=heading]

Subject Grouping Name: Articles

Title Group

Article Title: Native corn in Sinaloa: agroclimatic and sociocultural factors that limit its productivity

Contributor Group

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Higuera-Rubio

Given (First) Names: Jesús Mireya

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Superscript: 1

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

Superscript: 2

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Gaytán-Pinzón

Given (First) Names: Grethel Priscila

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Superscript: 1

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

Superscript: 2

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Peraza-Magallanes

Given (First) Names: Ayesha Y.

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

Superscript: 2

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Sandoval-Castro

Given (First) Names: Eduardo

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

Superscript: 2

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Lara-Ponce

Given (First) Names: Estuardo

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff3]

Superscript: 3

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Calderón-Vázquez

Given (First) Names: Carlos L.

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

Superscript: 2

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=corresp; rid=c1]

Superscript: §

Affiliation [id=aff1]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 1

Institution Name: in an Address: Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación-Instituto Politécnico Nacional-CIIDIR Unidad Sinaloa. Guasave, Sinaloa, México. [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Secretaría de Ciencia, Humanidades, Tecnología e Innovación [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Instituto Politécnico Nacional [content-type=orgname]

Institution Name: in an Address: CIIDIR Unidad Sinaloa [content-type=orgdiv2]

Address Line

City: Guasave

State or Province: Sinaloa

Country: in an Address: México [country=MX]

Affiliation [id=aff2]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 2

Institution Name: in an Address: Instituto Politécnico Nacional-CIIDIR Unidad Sinaloa, Guasave, Sinaloa. México. [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Instituto Politécnico Nacional [content-type=orgname]

Institution Name: in an Address: CIIDIR Unidad Sinaloa [content-type=orgdiv1]

Address Line

City: Guasave

State or Province: Sinaloa

Country: in an Address: México [country=MX]

Affiliation [id=aff3]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 3

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Autónoma Indígena de México. Los Mochis, Sinaloa, México. [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Autónoma Indígena de México [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

City: Los Mochis

State or Province: Sinaloa

Country: in an Address: México [country=MX]

Author Note Group

Correspondence Information: [§] Autor para correspondencia: ccalderon@ipn.mx. [id=c1]

Publication Date [date-type=pub; publication-format=electronic]

Day: 29

Month: 11

Year: 2025

Publication Date [date-type=collection; publication-format=electronic]

Season: Nov-Dec

Year: 2025

Volume Number: 16

Issue Number: 8

Electronic Location Identifier: e3912

History: Document History

Date [date-type=received]

Day: 1

Month: 09

Year: 2025

Date [date-type=accepted]

Day: 1

Month: 11

Year: 2025

Permissions

License Information [license-type=open-access; xlink:href=https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/; xml:lang=es]

Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons

Abstract

Title: Abstract

The state of Sinaloa is internationally recognized for its high production of corn from commercial hybrids and technified systems. Nevertheless, native corn is also grown by small producers, mainly in the mountain region. This practice has experienced a sharp reduction in its sowing area as well as variability in its production. The objective was i) to identify the main agroclimatic and sociocultural factors that have influenced the reduction of the area allocated to the cultivation of native corn varieties; and ii) to analyze the variability in the production volumes of these types of corn in the northern regions of the state of Sinaloa. The data were categorized into quantitative and qualitative; the former were analyzed using one-way Anova and Pearson’s correlation, while the qualitative data were analyzed by content analysis. Analysis of historical data from 1980 to 2023 indicates a substantial 88.6% reduction in the planting area allocated to native corn cultivation, whereas production is highly variable between harvests. This is a result of the decrease in rainfall and the increase in temperatures. Likewise, the lack of public policies, insecurity, and the migration of young people to urban areas have led small producers to consider abandoning traditional corn practices, reducing the production of rainfed native corn, and putting at risk the genetic diversity of corn, compromising the food security of communities.

Keyword Group [xml:lang=en]

Title: Keywords:

Keyword: corn yield

Keyword: milpa

Keyword: precipitation

Counts

Figure Count [count=3]

Table Count [count=1]

Equation Count [count=0]

Reference Count [count=25]

Abstract

The state of Sinaloa is internationally recognized for its high production of corn from commercial hybrids and technified systems. Nevertheless, native corn is also grown by small producers, mainly in the mountain region. This practice has experienced a sharp reduction in its sowing area as well as variability in its production. The objective was i) to identify the main agroclimatic and sociocultural factors that have influenced the reduction of the area allocated to the cultivation of native corn varieties; and ii) to analyze the variability in the production volumes of these types of corn in the northern regions of the state of Sinaloa. The data were categorized into quantitative and qualitative; the former were analyzed using one-way Anova and Pearson’s correlation, while the qualitative data were analyzed by content analysis. Analysis of historical data from 1980 to 2023 indicates a substantial 88.6% reduction in the planting area allocated to native corn cultivation, whereas production is highly variable between harvests. This is a result of the decrease in rainfall and the increase in temperatures. Likewise, the lack of public policies, insecurity, and the migration of young people to urban areas have led small producers to consider abandoning traditional corn practices, reducing the production of rainfed native corn, and putting at risk the genetic diversity of corn, compromising the food security of communities.

Palabras clave

corn yield, milpa, rendimiento de maíz.

Introduction

The state of Sinaloa is characterized as the national leader in commercial corn production, with more than 6.6 million tons during 2023, which represented 24.2% of the national production (SIAP, 2023). By 2023, in Sinaloa, 97.5% of the hectares were destined for the planting of irrigated hybrid corn and only 2.5% was used for the planting of native seeds, which are sown in the rainy season in the mountain areas due to the climatic and geographical conditions of the region (Siacon, 2023).

According to historical data reported by Siacon (2023), in the 1980s, native rainfed corn was planted on more hectares (156 015 ha of corn, with 76.3%) under rainfed conditions and only 36 901 ha under irrigation conditions. From 1991 onwards, this trend began to change. Most of the planted area was changed to an irrigation system with commercial hybrids (Siacon, 2023), primarily due to the technification and construction of dams (Mancera-Gonzáles, 2022). Since then, these increases have resulted in a considerable reduction in the area allocated to the cultivation of native rainfed corn of up to 88%, while production has been variable (with values from 11 057 t to 110 428.8 t) over the years (Siacon, 2023).

The main municipalities where native rainfed corn is grown in Sinaloa are Mocorito (3 130 ha), San Ignacio (2 236 ha), Badiraguato (2 180 ha), Cosalá (1 816 ha), Rosario (1 355 ha) and the municipality of Sinaloa (851 ha). The latter with significant losses in planting area compared to 2022 (Siacon, 2023).

Various studies Ureta et al. (2020); Zhang et al. (2022); Simanjuntak et al. (2023); Cruz-González et al. (2024); Zhao et al. (2025) mention that climatic aspects and socioeconomic characteristics influence the productivity of native corn crops, planted under rainy and irrigation conditions in the Sinaloa region.

Climate change has caused changes in temperature and rainfall patterns, negatively influencing grain yield in different regions of Mexico (Cruz-González et al., 2024); temperature is the most influential factor in yield under drought (rainfed) conditions, while precipitation has been the main factor in irrigated crops (Ureta et al., 2020).

In terms of socioeconomic aspects, it has been found that the lack of access to technology, financing and technical assistance in the mountain areas and the Yoreme-Mayo indigenous region reduces the capacity to respond to climate challenges, leaving the rural population vulnerable to the decrease in their production for self-consumption (Lara-Ponce et al., 2017), which contrasts with medium and large producers in the Valley area of the state, where their production is large-scale and commercialized, and they enjoy benefits from public policies and government support (Ibarrola-Rivas et al., 2020).

In Sinaloa, the importance of corn production (Zúñiga-Espinoza, 2023), its socioeconomic impact (Gerardo-Montoya and Armenta-Bojórquez, 2010), and the environmental implications of its production have been analyzed with a focus on hybrid corn (Cruz and Leos, 2019). For native corn varieties, genetic diversity has been studied, and they have been phenotypically and agronomically characterized (Pineda-Hidalgo et al., 2013; Linares-Olguín et al., 2019); however, regarding the cultivation of native corn in Sinaloa, very little is known about the main factors that impact its productivity.

In this context, the present research aimed: i) to identify the main agroclimatic and sociocultural factors that have influenced the reduction of the area allocated to the cultivation of native corn; and ii) to analyze the variability in the production volumes of this type of corn in the northern regions of the state of Sinaloa. It is hypothesized that the production of native rainfed corn in rural areas of northern Sinaloa has been affected by agricultural, economic, climatic and social factors, which result in a decrease in planting areas and endanger the agrodiversity of native corn in Sinaloa. The findings of this work could help to make visible the risk situation of the genetic diversity of native corn and clarify the factors that weaken the food security of local communities.

Materials and methods

Historical records of native corn production (t), planting area (ha) and grain yield (t ha-1) in the state of Sinaloa for the period 1980-2023 were accessed and downloaded (SIACON, 2023). Historical records of annual precipitation during the same period were also analyzed on the platform of the National Water Commission and the National Meteorological Service. Likewise, the database of INEGI (2019) was consulted to identify native corn planting areas.

As an exploratory tool, a semi-structured survey was designed, divided into three sections: agroeconomic, agroclimatic, and sociocultural factors. Data were obtained on the cultivation system, production and plot size, production costs, planting periods and types, tools and inclusion of technology, presence of rodents and diseases, harvest treatments, production destination, whether they will continue planting, how the weather has affected their harvests, as well as whether or not they have benefited from government programs.

The survey was conducted from November 2023 to July 2024, utilizing the snowball sampling technique. Respondents were chosen based on the following criteria: a) being a family member; b) living in rural and indigenous areas of the northern region of the state of Sinaloa; and c) planting native corn.

The results of the surveys were analyzed together with the data in section VII: agriculture, subsegments: agricultural production, cultivated crops, planted area, harvested area, production, production destination, use of fertilizers and manures, technology in agriculture, and environmental factors that affect the harvest of the National Agricultural Survey, applied in 2012, 2014, 2017, and 2019 (https://www.inegi.org.mx/programas/ena/2019/) of the same areas. The data were categorized into quantitative and qualitative data; the former were analyzed using one-way Anova and Pearson’s correlation using the R statistical software (R Core Team, 2021), while the qualitative data were analyzed through content analysis (Vizcarra et al., 2015).

Results and discussion

Decrease in the planting area and variability of native rainfed corn production in Sinaloa.

In 1980, Sinaloa was barely listed as a corn-producing state, with just over 62 700 t in irrigated mode and 72 732 t in rainfed mode (SIACON, 2023). From 1991 onwards, most of the planting area transitioned to irrigation production due to increased infrastructure (dam construction), technological advances, adoption of improved varieties and economic incentives. By that year, more than 155 000 ha will already be planted under this modality, producing around 144 577 t, reaching more than 6 625 812 t in 2023 (SIACON, 2023).

The outlook for native corn was utterly different. Figure 1 shows production, area allocated to native rainfed corn, and grain yield from 1980 to 2023. A notable decrease in the sowing area can be observed (119 114 ha in 1980 to 13 547 ha in 2023). In other words, the area planted with native rainfed corn was reduced by more than 88%.

Figure 1

Figure 1. a) Production vs planted area (1980-2023); b) grain yield vs planted area (1980-2023). Production (t), planting area (ha), and yield (t ha-1) of rainfed corn in Sinaloa during the period 1980-2023 (SIACON, 2023).

2007-0934-remexca-16-08-e3912-gf1.png

Interestingly, although the planted area had a constant reduction, production was variable (Figure 1a), with maximum production values in 2007 (110 428.8 t) and minimum values of 11 057 t in 1982. From 2020 onwards, production decreased to 30 518 t by 2023. As for the grain yield under rainfed conditions in 1980, a value of 0.72 t ha-1 was recorded, while for 2023, it increased to 2.46 t ha-1, which contrasts with the large decrease in the sowing area (Figure 1b).

This gradual increase in yield reported in SIACON (2023) contrasts with what was declared by producers in the surveys carried out in 2024 (0.876 t ha-1). The productive analysis of rainfed corn in Sinaloa highlights a considerable reduction in the planted area, prompting us to question what will happen to the conservation of native varieties, which are valuable to the local culture, in the following years. Discouraging scenarios are expected.

Various studies have reported fourteen corn breeds in Sinaloa, including Bofo, Blando de Sonora, Chapalote, Dulcillo del Noroeste, Elotero de Sinaloa, Jala, Onaveño, Reventador, Tabloncillo, Tabloncillo Perla, and Vandeño (Pineda-Hidalgo et al., 2013; Linares-Olguín et al., 2019), which represent 23% of the national racial genetic variation (Linares-Olguín et al., 2019).

Year after year, producers save their seeds in an artisanal way for the following season. If the reduction of the sowing area for these materials continues, it would result in a very significant loss. The primary source of food and livelihood for small producers is also at risk.

Only 22% of respondents record production costs, which range from $5 000.00 to $7 000.00 ha-1. Rainfed corn producers who plant in the milpa system in Oaxaca, Puebla, and Veracruz reported production costs of $6 748.00 to $7 340.00 ha-1 (Sosa-Cabrera and González-Amaro, 2022). Regarding yield, producers responded that the average value was 876 kg ha-1, very similar to what was obtained by Sosa-Cabrera and González-Amaro (2022), but in contrast to Lara-Ponce et al. (2017); Linares-Olguín et al. (2019); SIACON (2023), which report a production of 328 kg ha-1, 2.3 t ha-1 and 2.46 t ha-1, respectively for Sinaloa.

Among the corn varieties most commonly used in the study area are the following: Eight Carreras, Olote Colorado, Blando, Yellow Pinto, Breve San Juan, Cuarenteño, Yellow Corn, Black Corn, Chapalote and Surutato (Figure 2). The destination of their production is mainly for self-consumption and fodder (86.7%), while only 13.3% is destined for commercialization or used as an exchange with residents of nearby communities in community fairs, thus promoting a flow of plant material.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Varieties most commonly used for planting in rural regions of the state of Sinaloa.

2007-0934-remexca-16-08-e3912-gf2.png

Agroclimatic factors that limit production and planting area

Rainfall is key in rainfed corn production. For Sinaloa, from 1980 to 2024 (Figure 3), rainfall in the state fluctuated from 430 to 1 200 mm year-1; however, since 2019 the reduction has been evident, coupled with the increase in temperatures that brings with it natural phenomena that occur in northwestern Mexico, such as ‘El Niño’ and anticyclonic events (CONAGUA, 2024).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Average annual rainfall in the state of Sinaloa from 1980 to 2024.

2007-0934-remexca-16-08-e3912-gf3.png

On the other hand, rainfall decreased from a cumulative total of 630 mm to 487 mm between 2021 and 2024. That is, 39% less than the average of the last 60 years (CONAGUA, 2024), which exacerbates conditions, particularly in these areas that depend 100% on rainfall. The aforementioned has also led to a reduction in seed conservation, causing partial to total crop losses.

Ninety percent of producers surveyed agree that precipitation has been one of the most influential factors in the decrease in yield and corn planting area. Nevertheless, precipitation and yield are discretely correlated (R= 0.225), which may indicate that there are other relevant factors associated with rainfed corn yield. The study by Ureta et al. (2020) projected a discouraging scenario for Mexico by 2050, foreseeing drastic decreases in rainfall due to climate change, where the cultivation of corn under both rainfed and irrigated conditions will be severely affected. Rainfall is becoming less predictable, in terms of time and quantity, implying a great challenge for agriculture in general (Simanjuntak et al., 2023). Small-scale producers in the rainfed system of food production are the most vulnerable.

Sociocultural factors that limit production and planting area

Table 1 describes the producers surveyed as well as their agricultural practices. The average age of the respondents is 57 years, coinciding with what was reported by Uzcanga et al. (2017), who conducted an analysis of the milpa system in rural areas of the state of Yucatán. The areas surveyed in Sinaloa are characterized by the presence of the Yoreme-Mayo indigenous group, mainly concentrated in the municipalities of El Fuerte and Sinaloa de Leyva. Fifty-seven percent of the respondents identified with this group, while 10% with the Tarahumara group. Thirty-three percent did not define themselves by any ethnicity.

Table 1

Table 1. Producers of native rainfed corn and agricultural practices implemented in rural mountain areas of the north of the state of Sinaloa.

Characteristics of native corn producers
No. of producers interviewed 161
Percentage of male interviewees 62
Percentage of female interviewees 38
Average age of producers 57
Percentage of producers who speak an Indigenous language 67
Average planting area (ha) 4.95 ±0.73
Average years of planting and producing corn 20.3
Average corn production (t ha-1) 0.876 ±0.49
Native corn seed characteristics and exchange dynamics
Percentage of producers using only one native corn variety 25.12
Percentage of producers alternating native corn varieties 74.88
Percentage of seed exchange practices with other communities 13.33
Percentage of producers who save their seed for the next planting cycle 86.3
Percentage of corn used for self-sustaining and fodder 86.67
Agricultural practices
Percentage of corn planted in polyculture or “milpa” systems 87.3
Percentage of corn planted under monoculture systems 12.7
Percentage of producers using tractors for sowing 1.8
Percentage of producers who apply agrochemicals 3

These areas are characterized as low-resource areas (INEGI, 2019), where the primary activity is agriculture. One hundred percent of the respondents have an ejido land (4.95 ha on average) that they have inherited, of which they only plant 1 to 1.5 ha of corn. Most producers in the rainfed system in other rural areas of Mexico own plots of land no larger than 5 ha, which are also inherited, and only a part is allocated to planting corn in the milpa system (Cano-González and Cadena-Iñiguez, 2021).

On the other hand, cultivation of native corn in these areas is practiced for self-sustenance, which is governed by customs that are transmitted from generation to generation. Ninety-seven percent mention not using fertilizer and pesticide inputs, mainly because their use is closely related to the purchasing power of each producer head of household. The use of these inputs results in an increase in the cost of production of at least 27% (González-Cruz et al., 2024).

Corn that is mainly grown in the milpa system is accompanied by beans and squash (Fonteyne et al., 2023). In contrast, in the surveyed area, 87.3% of producers mentioned combining native corn with beans, squash, peanuts, watermelons, or cucumbers, alternating combinations depending on their food needs and seed availability.

Finally, surveys indicate that the rural mountain areas of the state have experienced a 55% migration of their young inhabitants to the cities of the state in search of employment alternatives. This causes an erosion in the traditional knowledge and conservation of native corn. In addition, 70% of the producers surveyed mentioned that the lack of government support for inputs and fair prices has discouraged them, encouraging them to renounce their traditions and migrate in search of improving their quality of life.

One of the recurring requests (59.3%) in the surveys was for support in technification, since planting is carried out using rudimentary tools, which limits the planting area to be larger. Ibarrola-Rivas et al. (2020) noted that, after 2008, national government policies focused on supporting small rainfed corn producers in central and southern Mexico, leaving aside other regions with the same shortcomings and needs.

Conclusions

A significant trend of a more than 88% reduction in the planting area of rainfed corn in Sinaloa was found, contrasting with variable production and an increase in grain yield. The results position Sinaloa as a state where native corn is produced, grown in the mountain areas of the state for self-sustenance, mainly using the milpa system.

It is home to at least fourteen breeds, which are adapted to arid-dry climates, conserved and selected by small producers in the rainfed system of the rural mountain areas of the state, supporting a logic of language typical of the anthropology and culture of the region. The main factors that have triggered this scenario are the effects of climate change, mainly due to rainfall scarcity, the lack of government support, public policies, and access to technology that supports small producers, as well as the high rate of emigration of their inhabitants to urban areas.

Funding: Basic and Frontier Science Project 2023-24: CBF2023-2024-3902 ‘Genomic diversity and molecular modulators of interaction of corn grown under the milpa system’. SECIHTI.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank MC. Ricardo Rendón de Anda, Dr. Daniela Heredia, Eng. Carlos Machado and Eng. Oscar for their support in the fieldwork.

Bibliografía

1 

Cano-González, A. y Cadena-Iñiguez, P. 2021. Strategy to strengthen the traditional milpa family production systems. Agroproductividad. 14(4):119-125. Doi.org/10.32854/agrop.v14i4.1840.

2 

CONAGUA- SEMARNAT. 2024. Comisión Nacional del Agua, Estadísticas del Agua en México- Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales. Ciudad de México, México. www.gob.mx/conagua/acciones-y-programas/publicaciones-estadisticas-y-geograficas-60692.

3 

Cruz, D. D. y Leos, R. J. A. 2019. La producción de maíz en Sinaloa, México, y sus implicaciones para el medio ambiente. Letras verdes. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Socioambientales. 25(1):100-118. Doi.org/10.17141/letrasverdes.25.2019.3705.

4 

Cruz-González, A.; Arteaga-Ramírez, R.; Sánchez-Cohen, I.; Soria-Ruiz, J. y Monterroso-Rivas, A. 2024. Impactos del cambio climático en la producción de maíz en México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. 15(1):e3327. Doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v15i1.3327.

5 

Fonteyne, S.; Castillo-Caamal, J. B.; Lopez-Ridaura, S.; Van-Loon, J.; Espidio-Balbuena, J.; Osorio-Alcalá, L. and Verhulst, N. 2023. Review of agronomic research on the milpa, the traditional polyculture system of Mesoamerica. Frontiers in Agronomy. 5(1115490) 1-16. Doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2023.1115490.

6 

Gerardo-Montoya, L. y Armenta-Bojórquez, A. D. 2010. Reflexiones sobre el impacto socioeconómico del cultivo de maíz en Sinaloa. Ra Ximhai. 6(1):69-72. Doi.org/10.35197/rx.06.01.2010.10.lg.

7 

González-Cruz, J. L. and Torres-Rojo, J. M. 2024. Regional differences in rainfed white corn production in Mexico. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. 15(1):e3170. Doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v15i1.3170.

8 

Ibarrola-Rivas, M. J.; Castillo, G. and González, J. 2020. Social, economic and production aspects of maize systems in Mexico. Investigaciones geográficas. 102:e60009. Doi.org/10.14350/rig.60009.

9 

INEGI. 2019. La Encuesta Nacional Agropecuaria. www.inegi.org.mx/programas/ena/2019/.

10 

Lara-Ponce, E.; Valdés-Vega, J. L.; Medina-Torres, S. M. y Martínez-Ruíz, R. 2017. Situación de la agricultura de mayos y mestizos del Norte de Sinaloa, México. Agricultura, Sociedad y Desarrollo. 14(4):577-597. https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S1870-54722017000400577&script=sci-arttext.

11 

Linares-Holguín, O.; Rocandio-Rodríguez, M.; Santacruz-Varela, A.; López-Valenzuela, J. A.; Córdova-Téllez, L.; Parra-Terraza, S.; Leal-Sandoval, A.; Maldonado-Mendoza, I. y Sánchez-Peña, P. 2019. Caracterización fenotípica y agronómica de maíces (Zea mays ssp. mays L.) nativos de Sinaloa, México. Interciencia. 44(7):421-428. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/339/33960285008/html/.

12 

Mancera-Gonzáles, O. 2022. Las presas en Sinaloa, México: asimetrías regionales e inexperiencias necesarias. O Público e o Privado. 20(42):61-95. uece.br/index.php/opublicoeoprivado/article/view/8175.

13 

Pineda-Hidalgo, K.; Méndez-Marroquín, K. P.; Vega-Álvarez, E.; Chávez-Ontiveros, J.; Sánchez-Peña, P.; Garzón-Tiznado, J. A.; Vega-García, M. O. and López-Valenzuela, J. A. 2013. Microsatellite-based genetic diversity among accessions of maize landraces from Sinaloa in Mexico. Hereditas. 150(4):53-59. 10.1111/j.1601-5223.2013.00019.x.

14 

R Core Team. 2021. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. www.R-project.org/.

15 

SIACON. 2023. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria de Consulta. www.gob.mx/siap/documentos/siacon-ng-161430.

16 

SIAP. 2023. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. www.gob.mx/siap.

17 

Simanjuntak, C.; Gaiser, T.; Ahrends, H. E.; Ceglar, A.; Singh, M.; Ewert, F. and Srivastava, A. K. 2023. Impact of climate extreme events and their causality on maize yield in South Africa. Sci. Rep. 13(12462):1-16. Doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38921-0.

18 

Sosa-Cabrera, E. and González-Amaro, R. M. 2022. Profitability of corn (Zea mays L.) grown in milpa production systems in Oaxaca, Puebla, and Veracruz, México. Agro Productividad. 15(10):51-59. Doi.org/10.32854/agrop.v15i10.2212.

19 

Ureta, C.; González, E. J.; Espinosa, A.; Trueba, A.; Piñeyro-Nelson A. and Álvarez-Buylla, A. 2020. Maize yield in Mexico under climate change. Agricultural Systems. 177(102697):1-11. Doi.org/1 0.1016/j.agsy.2019.102697.

20 

Uzcanga, P. N. G.; Larqué, S. B.; Del Ángel, P. A. L.; Rangel, F. M. A. y Cano, G. A. J. 2017. Preferencias de los agricultores por semillas mejoradas y nativas de maíz en la Península de Yucatán, México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. 8(5):1021-1033. Doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v8i5.105.

21 

Uzcanga-Pérez, N; Cano-González, A. y Cadena-Iñiguez, P. 2021. Strategy to strengthen the traditional milpa family production systems. Agroproductividad. 14(4):119-125. Doi.org/10.32854/agrop.v14i4.1840.

22 

Vizcarra, B. I.; Thomé-Ortíz, H. y Hernández, L. C. D. 2015. Miradas al futuro: el relevo generacional en el desarrollo de la conciencia social como estrategia de conservación de los maíces nativos. Carta Económica Regional. 1(115):55-73. n2t.net/ark:/13683/ptuO/hSz.

23 

Zhang, Z.; Wei, J.; Li, J.; Jia, Y.; Wang, W.; Li, J.; Lei, Z. and Gao, M 2022. The impact of climate change on maize production: empirical findings and implications for sustainable agricultural development. Front. Environ. Sci. 10(954940):1-10. Doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.954940.

24 

Zhao, Z. W.; Leng, P.; Han, X. J. and Shang, G. F. 2025. Global maize yield responses to essential climate variables: assessment using atmospheric reanalysis and future climate scenarios. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 232(110140):1-12. Doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2025.110140.

25 

Zúñiga-Espinoza, N. G. 2023. Producción de maíz: evidencia de Sinaloa, México. International Journal of Professional Business Review. 8(9):e03558. Doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i9.3558.