https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v16i6.3821

elocation-id: e3821

Drouaillet-Mejía, Fernández-Echeverría, Silva-Martínez, Ortega-Gijón, Fernández-Lambert, and García-Santamaría: Water efficiency in polycultures for small-scale agriculture

Journal Metadata

Journal Identifier: remexca [journal-id-type=publisher-id]

Journal Title Group

Journal Title (Full): Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

Abbreviated Journal Title: Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc [abbrev-type=publisher]

ISSN: 2007-0934 [pub-type=ppub]

Publisher

Publisher’s Name: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias

Article Metadata

Article Identifier: 10.29312/remexca.v16i6.3821 [pub-id-type=doi]

Article Grouping Data

Subject Group [subj-group-type=heading]

Subject Grouping Name: Articles

Title Group

Article Title: Water efficiency in polycultures for small-scale agriculture

Contributor Group

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Drouaillet-Mejía

Given (First) Names: Zurisaddai

X (cross) Reference: 1 [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Fernández-Echeverría

Given (First) Names: Eduardo

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

Superscript: 2

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Silva-Martínez

Given (First) Names: Walter Ariel

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff3]

Superscript: 3

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Ortega-Gijón

Given (First) Names: Yoselyn Nohemí

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff4]

Superscript: 4

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Fernández-Lambert

Given (First) Names: Gregorio

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff5]

Superscript: 5

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: García-Santamaría

Given (First) Names: Luis Enrique

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff5]

Superscript: 5

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=corresp; rid=c1]

Superscript: §

Affiliation [id=aff1]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 1

Institution Name: in an Address: Maestría en Ingeniería Industrial-TecNM/ITS Misantla. Carretera a Loma del Cojolite km 1.8, Misantla, Veracruz, México. CP. 93850. (zuridrouaillet@gmail.com). [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Misantla [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Maestría en Ingeniería Industrial-TecNM [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: ITS Misantla [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

State or Province: Veracruz

Postal Code: 93850

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Email Address: zuridrouaillet@gmail.com

Affiliation [id=aff2]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 2

Institution Name: in an Address: TecNM/ITS-Zacapoaxtla. Zacapoaxtla, Puebla, México. CP. 73680. (eduardo.fe@zacapoaxtla.tecnm.mx). [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Zacapoaxtla [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: TecNM [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: ITS-Zacapoaxtla [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

State or Province: Puebla

Postal Code: 73680

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Email Address: eduardo.fe@zacapoaxtla.tecnm.mx

Affiliation [id=aff3]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 3

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Autónoma del Carmen. Av. 56 núm. 4, Esquina Avenida Concordia, Colonia Benito Juárez, Ciudad del Carmen, Campeche, México. CP. 24180. (wsilva@pampano.unacar.mx). [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Autónoma del Carmen [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Autónoma del Carmen [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

City: Ciudad del Carmen

State or Province: Campeche

Postal Code: 24180

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Email Address: wsilva@pampano.unacar.mx

Affiliation [id=aff4]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 4

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Tecnológica de Gutiérrez Zamora. Cuauhtémoc, Boca de Lima, Gutiérrez Zamora, Veracruz, México. CP. 93557. (yosdra230792@gmail.com). [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Zamora [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Tecnológica de Gutiérrez Zamora [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

State or Province: Veracruz

Postal Code: 93557

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Email Address: yosdra230792@gmail.com

Affiliation [id=aff5]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 5

Institution Name: in an Address: TecNM/ITS Misantla. Carretera a Loma del Cojolite km 1.8, Misantla, Veracruz, México. CP. 93850. (gfernandezl@itsm.edu.mx). [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Misantla [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: TecNM [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: ITS Misantla [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

State or Province: Veracruz

Postal Code: 93850

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Email Address: gfernandezl@itsm.edu.mx

Author Note Group

Correspondence Information: [§] Autor para correspondencia: legarcias@itsm.edu.mx. [id=c1]

Publication Date [date-type=pub; publication-format=electronic]

Day: 04

Month: 10

Year: 2025

Publication Date [date-type=collection; publication-format=electronic]

Season: Aug-Sep

Year: 2025

Volume Number: 16

Issue Number: 6

Electronic Location Identifier: e3821

History: Document History

Date [date-type=received]

Day: 01

Month: 06

Year: 2025

Date [date-type=accepted]

Day: 01

Month: 08

Year: 2025

Permissions

License Information [license-type=open-access; xlink:href=https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/; xml:lang=es]

Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons

Abstract

Title: Abstract

The adoption of irrigation technologies in small-scale crops faces economic barriers that hinder their implementation. This research developed, implemented and assessed an automated irrigation system for polyculture based on an open-source platform. In September 2023, the system was installed in the Orquiazul® greenhouse, Veracruz, Mexico, being applied to orchids of the Phalaenopsis, Dendrobium and Vanda species. Equipped with substrate moisture, temperature and relative humidity sensors and controlled with an Arduino-R1®, it automatically regulates the water supply according to the needs of each plant. Between September and December 2023, it reduced water consumption by 94%, going from 90 L biannually with manual irrigation to only 5 L with the automated system. In addition, it decreased weekly supervision from 10 to 2 h and achieved a 100% survival rate. Its modular design and low cost favor its adoption in rural communities without requiring advanced technical knowledge. Although the results are promising, it is recommended to evaluate its performance in different crops and climates to ensure its economic viability and long-term sustainability, reinforcing the potential of accessible technologies in small-scale agriculture.

Keyword Group [xml:lang=en]

Title: Keywords:

Keyword: agricultural sustainability

Keyword: automated irrigation

Keyword: backyard agriculture

Keyword: polycultures

Keyword: precision agriculture

Counts

Figure Count [count=4]

Table Count [count=3]

Equation Count [count=0]

Reference Count [count=21]

Page Count [count=0]

Abstract

The adoption of irrigation technologies in small-scale crops faces economic barriers that hinder their implementation. This research developed, implemented and assessed an automated irrigation system for polyculture based on an open-source platform. In September 2023, the system was installed in the Orquiazul® greenhouse, Veracruz, Mexico, being applied to orchids of the Phalaenopsis, Dendrobium and Vanda species. Equipped with substrate moisture, temperature and relative humidity sensors and controlled with an Arduino-R1®, it automatically regulates the water supply according to the needs of each plant. Between September and December 2023, it reduced water consumption by 94%, going from 90 L biannually with manual irrigation to only 5 L with the automated system. In addition, it decreased weekly supervision from 10 to 2 h and achieved a 100% survival rate. Its modular design and low cost favor its adoption in rural communities without requiring advanced technical knowledge. Although the results are promising, it is recommended to evaluate its performance in different crops and climates to ensure its economic viability and long-term sustainability, reinforcing the potential of accessible technologies in small-scale agriculture.

Keywords:

agricultural sustainability, automated irrigation, backyard agriculture, polycultures, precision agriculture.

Introduction

Mexican agriculture faces critical challenges in water management. Its availability is irregular: in abundance, it is wasted; and in scarcity, farmers depend on rain. In Mexico, 76% of fresh water is used in agriculture, with more than 50% being lost due to inefficiencies (CONAGUA, 2023), coupled with the decrease in groundwater sources of up to 30% in two decades (SIAP, 2024), compromising the country’s sustainability and food security.

In this context of water scarcity and climate unpredictability, agricultural practices supported by the Internet of Things (IoT) and artificial intelligence (AI) have been shown to improve agricultural productivity (Qazi et al., 2022) and make better use of water use (Al-Hazmi et al., 2023). This challenge of efficient water use in agricultural systems is today a constant in rural communities (Statista, 2024).

In Mexico, 21% of arable hectares have technified irrigation and less than 5% of small farmers use digital tools for water management (CONAGUA, 2023; FAO, 2023). Irrigation modernization faces economic, cultural, and technical barriers, limiting agricultural sustainability (Brahmanand and Singh, 2022). To reduce this gap, financing strategies, training and accessible technologies are included, optimizing the use of water and strengthening the resilience of the sector.

Small farmers combine crops with growth cycles subject to poor water management, which can reduce agricultural yields by up to 40% (Juárez and Agudelo, 2021). Researchers such as Lu et al. (2022) have developed sensors and the internet of things to optimize irrigation water use and improve crop management. However, their high cost excludes small producers and its design focuses mainly on monoculture systems.

Despite the impossibility and economic resistance of small farmers to adopt crop management technologies (Dahane et al., 2022), automated irrigation systems based on open-source platforms emerge as an economical and adaptable alternative (Carrera et al., 2021). Their flexibility to integrate with local networks and mobile devices makes them ideal solutions for small-scale and family agriculture (Lucín and Torres, 2023).

In addition to the economic resistance of the small producer to adopt crop management technologies (Barnes et al., 2019), their implementation requires investment in learning for installation and operation, creating a gap between technology, purchase and use (Klerkx and Rose, 2020). To reduce this barrier, Kamienski et al. (2019) have developed accessible, simple and efficient technological solutions, allowing their adoption by small producers without compromising functionality.

To this end, the research that precedes this article had the main objective of designing, implementing and evaluating an open-source automated polyculture irrigation system (APIS) to improve water efficiency in small-scale agriculture. This article contributed to the design of irrigation systems that allow real-time monitoring of soil moisture and ambient temperature.

It is ideal for small rural producers and polycultures with independent irrigation lines adjusted to the needs of crops in greenhouses, tunnels and backyard orchards, improving efficiency in the use of water and reducing its consumption. The usefulness of the APIS is evaluated in the Orquiazul® orchid greenhouse, located in a community in Mexico.

Materials and methods

Traditional management and problems in Orquiazul®

The research was established at the Orquiazul® greenhouse in San Rafael, Veracruz in Mexico (20° 10’ 07.0” north latitude, 96° 54’ 48.4” west longitude), which grows Phalaenopsis, Dendrobium and Vanda orchids. The plants arranged in five production lines with 15 specimens of the same species per line are managed by two workers under constant supervision in morning and afternoon shifts, they carry out the irrigation, causing fungal problems and root rot, with 13% to 20% mortality per line, affecting the economic viability of the greenhouse. In response to these limitations, an automated polyculture irrigation system (APIS) was implemented, designed to fine-tune the water supply to the specific needs of each orchid species through the use of programmable sensors and controllers.

Method

The APIS, programmed in Arduino-R1® (Indautor-Mexico registration number: 03-2023-071911280500-01), operates with independent irrigation lines for each orchid species. It reduces manual monitoring with visual and audible alerts: a green light indicates irrigation in progress, whereas a red light and flashing alert indicate a lack of water after five minutes, with pauses of 30 seconds. It monitors the moisture of the substrate and activates irrigation when it falls below the established threshold. In addition, it stores temperature, relative humidity and substrate moisture data on an SD card, with the option of export to Excel® or Minitab®.

Materials: irrigation system architecture

The APIS, based on Arduino-R1®, uses anti-corrosion capacitive sensors to measure soil moisture and automatically activates each irrigation line according to specific parameters for each species. Its components include soil moisture sensors, ambient temperature (AT), relative humidity (RH), flowmeters, valves, visual (LED) and audible (buzzer) alerts, relays, a Wi-Fi module (ESP32) for remote monitoring, and an SD card for data storage (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Infrastructure of the polyculture irrigation system (APIS).

2007-0934-remexca-16-06-e3821-gf5.png

Irrigation is adjusted according to pre-established parameters, optimizing water use and avoiding excesses, while allowing real-time monitoring through Wi-Fi with visual and audible alerts, reducing the need for on-site supervision (Figure 2).

Prior to installation, moisture sensors were calibrated with dry and wet substrates to determine specific limits for each species, and flowmeters were adjusted to deliver the precise flow of water according to the needs of the plants. The system was validated for three months, demonstrating its ability to maintain the moisture of the substrate in optimal ranges and operate autonomously, without direct intervention from the farmer.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Operation of the polyculture irrigation system (APIS).

2007-0934-remexca-16-06-e3821-gf6.png

Automated system validation

The optimal ranges of moisture were calibrated by orchid and hourly data were recorded. Then, a Student’s t-test was applied (Molina, 2022) and normality was verified with Shapiro-Wilk (Tapia and Ceballos, 2021). In addition, weekly inspections recorded survival and signs of stress. At 16 weeks, moisture, thermal stability, and irrigation efficiency were evaluated and the volume of water was compared between automated and manual irrigation. Finally, the data was analyzed in Minitab®.

Results

Figure 3 shows the irrigation system in operation. Between September and December 2023, hourly data on ambient temperature (AT), relative humidity (RH), and substrate moisture (SM) were recorded and analyzed in Minitab® to generate graphs of system behavior. Figure 4 presents values by production line (L1 to L5), highlighting irrigation (I) moments and upper (UL) and lower (LL) limits for Phalaenopsis (L1, L2), Dendrobium (L3) and Vanda (L4, L5).

Figure 3

Figure 3. Irrigation system in operation. Original photos Orquiazul®.

2007-0934-remexca-16-06-e3821-gf7.png

Throughout the study, precipitation ranged from 34.2 to 71.9 mm, RH between 42.3% and 100% and AT between 14 °C and 35 °C (SMN, 2023) with warm humid weather, rainfall in summer and high relative humidity. The greenhouse soil is a mixture of coconut fiber and pine bark, a specialized substrate for orchids that reduces waterlogging and root diseases.

The APIS demonstrated activating irrigation by detecting low moisture. In lines 2 and 4 (Figure 4), irrigation was not activated when the substrate moisture fell below the lower limit, respecting the time and temperature restrictions. This prevented excess water and favored the health of the plants.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Behavior of irrigation lines.

2007-0934-remexca-16-06-e3821-gf8.jpg

Table 1 details the parameters of soil moisture (SM), ambient temperature (AT) and relative humidity (RH), achieving 100% survival and keeping SM levels within the limits established for each orchid.

Table 1

Table 1. Records of moisture and survival of the plants by cultivation line.

Line L1 L2 L3 L4 L5
SM (%) LL 60 60 50 70 70
UP 85 85 85 90 90
SM (%) (min, max) 77.61 (52, 98) 69.43 (39, 95) 69.7 (26, 95) 75.75 (51, 98) 73.16 (34, 98)
AT (°C) (min, max) 25.21 (20, 34) 24.63 (16, 34) 22.62 (14, 35) 26.22 (18, 35) 21.72 (14, 35)
RH (%) (min, max) 94.64 (86, 95) 94.4 (92, 95) 93.96 (91, 95) 94.56 (81, 95) 93.72 (91, 95)
Live plants (%) 100 100 100 100 100
SM (average sensed) 77.61 69.43 69.7 75.75 73.16
SM (SD) 6.25 6.25 8.75 5 5
t-statistic 3.27 -1.964 1.002 -3.4 -5.47
p-value 0.0051 0.06823 0.3305 0.00395 6.4346

[i] L1= Phalaenopsis; L2= Phalaenopsis; L3= Dendrobium; L4= Vanda; L5= Vanda.

A t-test was applied to compare the sensed moisture with the operating range (Table 1), considering H0: the mean sensed moisture does not differ from the midpoint of the range and H1: there is a significant difference. With 95% confidence (α= 0.05), the results showed that the sensed moisture does not differ in five lines. Nevertheless, in L4 and L5 (Vanda), it is recommended to adjust watering, increase volume or frequency, and monitor temperature.

The APIS reduced water use by 95% compared to manual irrigation and weekly supervision from 10 to 2 h (Table 2). Before its implementation in Orquiazul®, manual irrigation, carried out three times a week, consumed 90 L per semester. The amount of water depended on the farmer’s perception, generating variations in moisture, a mortality of 13%-20%, and favoring fungi and root rot.

Table 2

Table 2. Comparison between manual and automated irrigation by semester.

Records Irrigation method
Manual Manual Manual Manual Automated
Semester 2021-2 2022-1 2022-2 2023-1 2023-2*
Water consumption (liters-average) 100 80 100 90 5
Initial plants 35 30 30 40 75
Dead plants 6 4 5 7 0
Mortality rate (%) 20 13 16 17.5 0
Required supervision (hours/week) 10 12 10 16 2
Subjective water application Yes Yes Yes Yes No

* = In all cases, the value of n= 16 was considered, which corresponds to the number of weeks in which the system was validated.

The Shapiro-Wilk test for water consumption, mortality rate, and required supervision showed (p> 0.05), indicating that the data do not present significant deviations from a normal distribution (Table 3). Therefore, Student’s t-test was applied for independent samples with uneven variances (Welch’s test) to evaluate the difference between manual and automated irrigation methods (Table 3).

Table 3

Table 3. Comparison of irrigation methods.

Irrigation method Water consumption (L) Mortality rate (%) Required supervision (hours/week)
Average (manual) 96.62 ±7.6843 15.91 ±1.8777 13.68 ±2.05
Average (automated) 4.56 ±1.1528 0.98 ±0.5455 2.05 ±0.5123
Shapiro-Wilk 0.9194 0.9507 0.8976
p- value 0.1655 0.5015 0.0737
t-statistic 47.3913 30.5587 22.8843
p- value 0 0 0

[i] In all cases, the value of n= 16 was considered, which corresponds to the number of weeks in which the system was validated.

Student’s t-test shows significant differences (p< 0.001) between irrigation methods. With the APIS, water consumption decreased by 94% (90 to 5 L per semester) without affecting the development of orchids. There were no fungal diseases or mortality, achieving 100% survival, compared to the mortality observed with manual irrigation.

Irrigation supervision decreased from 10 to 2 h, optimizing labor effort and redistributing resources to other agricultural activities. The economic benefits per cultivation line increased from 4 000 to 12 000 MXN, depending on the species. The Arduino-R1-based® APIS improves water efficiency, plant health, and agricultural productivity.

Advantages and disadvantages of the APIS

The APIS improves irrigation, preventing waterlogging and root rot, preventing diseases and improving water use. However, the initial investment of 19 000.00 MXN and annual maintenance of 2 500.00 mxn to 3 000.00 mxn can be a complication for small producers. In addition, electrical components require careful handling, and the farmer must understand how they work in order to operate it properly.

Technical implications

The technical implications of the APIS operation include ensuring a continuous water supply, conducting regular inspections of sensors, valves, relays, and connections, and incorporating electrical protection. Training staff in the operation of the APIS and preserving the system periodically are essential for its proper functioning.

Discussion

The APIS improved water efficiency, reducing consumption by 95% and eliminating the subjectivity of manual irrigation, achieving 100% survival. The savings of 85 L per semester are significant due to the total volume of water used in Mexican agriculture; on a larger scale, it would improve the water resilience of rural agricultural systems by optimizing the available resource.

This confirms the effectiveness of automated systems in optimizing irrigation and crop health (Brahmanand and Singh, 2022; García-Salazar et al., 2023). In lines 4 and 5 (Vanda), irrigation was adjusted to guarantee the moisture of the substrate, improving the efficiency of the system and reducing root rot and fungal diseases through the APIS.

Compared to other automated irrigation systems, the Arduino R1-based® APIS stands out for its accessibility and water efficiency (Akter et al., 2018). Although advanced technologies, such as AI or IoT, reduce water consumption by 30% to 80% (Dahane et al., 2022), their costs and complexity limit their adoption in rural communities (Qazi et al., 2022).

Although commercial systems are effective on a large scale (Al-Hazmi et al., 2023), their high cost limits their adoption by small producers. Automated irrigation systems with commercial controllers offer similar efficiencies, but with higher operating costs (Brahmanand and Singh, 2022). The open-source, low-cost, Arduino-R1®-based APIS is a viable alternative for producers in rural contexts (García-Salazar et al., 2023).

This study has important limitations. Although the four-month experiment showed initial benefits, it is not enough to assess long-term performance. Prolonged studies are required in various climatic conditions. In addition, the results, focused on greenhouse orchids, are not generalizable to other species or agricultural configurations (González-Lorence et al., 2024).

Conclusions

The results show that the Arduino R1-based® automated polyculture irrigation system (APIS) significantly improves water efficiency in small-scale agriculture. Its implementation in the Orquiazul® greenhouse reduced water consumption by 95%, going from 90 to only 5 L per semester, and guaranteed 100% survival in orchid plants, eliminating the mortality recorded with manual irrigation. In addition, it optimized operational management by reducing irrigation supervision from 10 to 2 hours per week, allowing an efficient redistribution of working time and available resources.

From an economic perspective, the reduction of losses due to plant mortality represented benefits of between 4 000.00 mxn and 12 000.00 mxn per cultivation line and reduced the costs associated with water consumption and manual supervision. The APIS is presented as an accessible and profitable solution for small farmers, promoting sustainable and efficient agricultural practices. Nonetheless, the study was limited to a period of four months, which makes it impossible to evaluate its performance in the long term and in various climatic conditions. It is recommended that additional studies be carried out to validate its operational stability and analyze its economic impact in scenarios with longer periods.

Financing

The first author received a scholarship for postgraduate studies from the National Council of Humanities, Sciences and Technologies (CONAHCYT), for its acronym in Spanish with CVU number 633731. This article has the Indautor registration in Mexico (No. 03-2023-071911280500-01, July 19, 2023) and the consent of the authors for the use of the documented information of the process presented in the article.

Bibliography

1 

Akter, S.; Mahanta, P.; Mim, M. H.; Hasan, M. R.; Ahmed, R. U. and Billah, M. M. 2018. Developing a smart irrigation system using Arduino. International Journal of Research Studies in Science, Engineering and Technology. 6(1):31-39. http://www.ijrsset.org/pdfs/v6-i1/5.pdf.

2 

Al-Hazmi, H. E.; Mohammadi, A.; Hejna, A.; Majtacz, J.; Esmaeili, A.; Habibzadeh, S.; Saeb, M. R.; Badawi, M.; Lima, E. C. and Mąkinia, J. 2023. Wastewater treatment for reuse in agriculture: Prospects and challenges. Environmental Research. 236(1):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.116711.

3 

Barnes, A. P.; Soto, I.; Eory, V.; Beck, B.; Balafoutis, A.; Sánchez, B.; Vangeyte, J.; Fountas, S.; Van W. T. and Gómez, M. B. 2019. Exploring the adoption of precision agricultural technologies: a cross regional study of EU farmers. Land Use Policy. 80:163-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.10.004.

4 

Brahmanand, P. S. and Singh, A. K. 2022. Precision irrigation water management-current status, scope, and challenges. Indian J. Fertil. 18:372-380. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360119350.

5 

Carrera, F. F.; Sánchez, H. S.; García-Orellana, Y. and Chadrina, O. 2021. A system for measuring water levels in open-air irrigation canals. In: EPJ Web of Conferences. 248:1-6. EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202124802011.

6 

CONAGUA. Comisión Nacional del Agua. 2023. Estadísticas del agua en México 2023. Ciudad de México. https://acortar.link/FrkxpX. 69-84 pp.

7 

Dahane, A.; Benameur, R. and Kechar, B. 2022. An innovative smart and sustainable low-cost irrigation system for smallholder farmers' communities. 3rd international conference on embedded & distributed systems (EDiS). 37-42 pp. Doi: 10.1109/edis57230.2022.9996498.

8 

FAO. 2023. World Food and Agriculture. Statistical Yearbook 2023. Rome. Doi: 10.4060/cc8166en. 39-45 pp.

9 

García-Salazar, J. A.; Bautista-Mayorga, F. y Reyes-Santiago, E. 2023. Factores que condicionan la tasa de adopción de sistemas de riego tecnificados en México. Agronomía Mesoamericana. 34(2). 51202-51202 pp. Doi: https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v34i2.51202.

10 

González-Lorence, A.; Morales, C. M.; Castro-Bello, M.; Navarrete-Damián, J.; Ayala-Landeros, J. G. and Ramírez, M. S. G. 2024. Farms connect: real-time monitoring platform for poultry farms. In 2024. Argentine Conference on Electronics (CAE) IEEE. 92-98 pp. Doi: 10.1109/CAE59785.2024.10487159.

11 

Juárez, K. R. C. and Agudelo, L. B. 2021. Towards the development of homemade urban agriculture products using the internet of things: a scalable and low-cost solution. 2nd Sustainable Cities Latin America Conference (SCLA). 1-6 pp. IEEE. Doi:10.1109/SCLA53004.2021.9540204.

12 

Kamienski, C.; Soininen, J. P.; Taumberger, M.; Dantas, R.; Toscano, A.; Cinotti, T. S.; Maia, R. F. and Torre, A. N. 2019. Smart water management platform: iot-based precision irrigation for agriculture. Sensor. 19(2):1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19020276.

13 

Klerkx, L.; Rose, D. 2020. Dealing with the game-changing technologies of Agriculture 4.0: how do we manage diversity and responsibility in food system transition pathways? Global Food Security. 24:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100347.

14 

Lu, Y.; Liu, M.; Li, C.; Liu, X.; Cao, C.; Li, X. and Kan, Z. 2022. Precision fertilization and irrigation: progress and applications. AgriEngineering. 4(3):626-655. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering4030041.

15 

Lucín-Álvarez, E. J. y Torres-Lima, G. A. 2023. Diseño e implementación de una estación de monitorización de parámetros ambientales y calidad de aire aplicados al cultivo de pitahaya utilizando internet de las cosas y hardware de bajo costo. Tesis para obtener el grado de ingeniero electrónico. Universidad Politécnica Salesiana. Ecuador. 4-6 pp. http://dspace.ups.edu.ec/handle/123456789/26381.

16 

Molina, M. 2022. Paso a paso. Prueba de la t de Student para muestras independientes. Revista Electrónica AnestesiaR. 14(8):3-5. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8704951.

17 

Qazi, S.; Khawaja, B. A. and Farooq, Q. U. 2022. IoT-equipped and AI-enabled next generation smart agriculture: a critical review, current challenges and future trends. LEEE Access. 10:21219-21235. Doi: 10.1109/access.2022.3152544.

18 

SIAP. 2024. Servicio de información agroalimentaria y pesquera. Comportamiento del PIB Agroalimentario al primer trimestre de 2024. 1-3 pp. https://acortar.link/cmM7Gk.

19 

SMN. 2023. Reporte anual del clima 2023. Servicio Meteorológico Nacional de la Comisión Nacional del Agua. 31-63 pp. https://acortar.link/de2sqo.

20 

Statista. 2024. Valor de la producción agrícola en México de 2007 a 2023. https://acortar.link/Cqg4f7.

21 

Tapia, C. E. F. y Cevallos, K. L. F. 2021. Pruebas para comprobar la normalidad de datos en procesos productivos: Anderson-Darling, Ryan-Joiner, Shapiro-wilk y Kolmogórov-Smirnov. Societas. 23(2):83-106.