https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v16i6.3805

elocation-id: e3805

García-Andrade, Cruz-Torres, Rubí-Arriaga, Laguna-Cerda, and Sangerman-Jarquín: Molecular characterization of wild and cultivated Chenopodium berlandieri (Chenopodiaceae) from central Mexico

Journal Metadata

Journal Identifier: remexca [journal-id-type=publisher-id]

Journal Title Group

Journal Title (Full): Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

Abbreviated Journal Title: Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc [abbrev-type=publisher]

ISSN: 2007-0934 [pub-type=ppub]

Publisher

Publisher’s Name: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias

Article Metadata

Article Identifier: 10.29312/remexca.v16i6.3805 [pub-id-type=doi]

Article Grouping Data

Subject Group [subj-group-type=heading]

Subject Grouping Name: Articles

Title Group

Article Title: Molecular characterization of wild and cultivated Chenopodium berlandieri (Chenopodiaceae) from central Mexico

Contributor Group

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: García-Andrade

Given (First) Names: Juan Manuel

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Superscript: 1

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Cruz-Torres

Given (First) Names: Eulogio De la

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Superscript: 1

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=corresp; rid=c1]

Superscript: §

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Rubí-Arriaga

Given (First) Names: Martín

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

Superscript: 2

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Laguna-Cerda

Given (First) Names: Antonio

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

Superscript: 2

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Sangerman-Jarquín

Given (First) Names: Dora Ma.

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff3]

Superscript: 3

Affiliation [id=aff1]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 1

Institution Name: in an Address: Departamento de Biología-Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares. Carretera México-Toluca s/n, La Marquesa, Ocoyoacac, México. CP. 52750. Tel. 55 53297200, ext. 12310. (jmanuel.garcia@inin.gob.mx). [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Departamento de Biología [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

Postal Code: 52750

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Email Address: jmanuel.garcia@inin.gob.mx

Affiliation [id=aff2]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 2

Institution Name: in an Address: Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas-Campus El Cerrillo-Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. El Cerrillo Piedras Blancas, Toluca, México. CP. 50200. Tel. 722 2965529. (mrubia@uaemex.mx; m-rubi65@yahoo.com.mx; alagunac@uaemex.mx). [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Facultad de Ciencias Agrícolas [content-type=orgdiv2]

Institution Name: in an Address: Campus El Cerrillo [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

City: Toluca

Postal Code: 50200

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Email Address: mrubia@uaemex.mx

Email Address: m-rubi65@yahoo.com.mx

Email Address: alagunac@uaemex.mx

Affiliation [id=aff3]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 3

Institution Name: in an Address: Campo Experimental Valle de México-INIFAP. Carretera Los Reyes-Texcoco km 13.5, Coatlinchán, Texcoco, Estado de México, México. Tel. 55 8718700, ext. 85353. (sangerman.dora@inifap.com.mx). [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Campo Experimental Valle de México [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: INIFAP [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

City: Texcoco

State or Province: Estado de México

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Email Address: sangerman.dora@inifap.com.mx

Author Note Group

Correspondence Information: [§] Autor para correspondencia: eulogio.delacruz@inin.gob.mx. [id=c1]

Publication Date [date-type=pub; publication-format=electronic]

Day: 21

Month: 09

Year: 2025

Publication Date [date-type=collection; publication-format=electronic]

Season: Aug-Sep

Year: 2025

Volume Number: 16

Issue Number: 6

Electronic Location Identifier: e3805

History: Document History

Date [date-type=received]

Day: 01

Month: 06

Year: 2025

Date [date-type=accepted]

Day: 01

Month: 08

Year: 2025

Permissions

License Information [license-type=open-access; xlink:href=https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/; xml:lang=es]

Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons

Abstract

Title: Abstract

The genus Chenopodium contains two species of importance in the diet of Mesoamerica and South America, namely Chenopodium quinoa Willd. (Quinoa) and Chenopodium berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae, the genetic resources of which have not been characterized despite their great nutritional potential and adaptability. In order to molecularly characterize germplasm of red chia, huauzontle (Chenopodium berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae) and quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), we molecularly studied 48 genotypes from the Germplasm Banks of the National Institute of Nuclear Research and the Plant Genetic Resources Laboratory of Brigham Young University. To determine the genetic variability, 14 microsatellite markers (SSRs), specific for Chenopodium, were used. Genetic affinity was assessed using the Jaccard similarity coefficient and the analysis of results was performed using the UPGMA method. The results indicate that, within the studied genotypes of both species, 175 alleles were produced, ranging from 8 (KGA16, QCA88) to 16 (QCA37, QAAT74, QCA57), these being the ones that obtained the most alleles per locus. The dendrogram showed that, at a coefficient of 0.9, four main groups were formed, where groups 1 and 2 join advanced lines of quinoa and red chia, mutants of red chia and huauzontle, groups 3 and 4 joins chia and huauzontle, and group five includes all the germplasm of the Plant Genetic Resources Laboratory of BYU, mostly made up of subspecies of Chenopodium zsachei, boscianum and zinatum. It was concluded that there is a great genetic affinity between quinoa, huauzontle and red chia, which opens the possibility of inter- and intraspecific crosses for the genetic improvement of both species.

Keyword Group [xml:lang=en]

Title: Keywords:

Keyword: Chenopodium berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae

Keyword: Chenopodium quinoa

Keyword: molecular markers

Keyword: SSR.

Counts

Figure Count [count=1]

Table Count [count=3]

Equation Count [count=0]

Reference Count [count=16]

Page Count [count=0]

Abstract

The genus Chenopodium contains two species of importance in the diet of Mesoamerica and South America, namely Chenopodium quinoa Willd. (Quinoa) and Chenopodium berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae, the genetic resources of which have not been characterized despite their great nutritional potential and adaptability. In order to molecularly characterize germplasm of red chia, huauzontle (Chenopodium berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae) and quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), we molecularly studied 48 genotypes from the Germplasm Banks of the National Institute of Nuclear Research and the Plant Genetic Resources Laboratory of Brigham Young University. To determine the genetic variability, 14 microsatellite markers (SSRs), specific for Chenopodium, were used. Genetic affinity was assessed using the Jaccard similarity coefficient and the analysis of results was performed using the UPGMA method. The results indicate that, within the studied genotypes of both species, 175 alleles were produced, ranging from 8 (KGA16, QCA88) to 16 (QCA37, QAAT74, QCA57), these being the ones that obtained the most alleles per locus. The dendrogram showed that, at a coefficient of 0.9, four main groups were formed, where groups 1 and 2 join advanced lines of quinoa and red chia, mutants of red chia and huauzontle, groups 3 and 4 joins chia and huauzontle, and group five includes all the germplasm of the Plant Genetic Resources Laboratory of BYU, mostly made up of subspecies of Chenopodium zsachei, boscianum and zinatum. It was concluded that there is a great genetic affinity between quinoa, huauzontle and red chia, which opens the possibility of inter- and intraspecific crosses for the genetic improvement of both species.

Keywords:

Chenopodium berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae, Chenopodium quinua, molecular markers, SSR.

Introduction

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in recovering and valuing crops with high protein content and nutritional value, which have a promising potential for exploitation and that contribute to reducing malnutrition, an example of which is red chia (Chenopodium berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae), huauzontle (Chenopodium berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae) and quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd), edible grain pseudocereals (García, 2017).

Pseudocereals are of great relevance since they are a biological resource of high nutritional value and great hardiness since they tolerate cold climates, drought, salinity, and poor soils (Eisa et al., 2012; Jacobsen et al., 2012). Due to these characteristics, they constitute a cultivation alternative for the marginal regions of the country (De la Cruz et al., 2010).

Within this group are quinoa, red chia, huauzontle, and species of the genus Amaranthus (Xingú-López, 2010). These crops had great food, economic and religious importance among pre-Hispanic civilizations since they constituted the basis of the diet, like corn (Zea mays L.) and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.); however, upon the arrival of the Spaniards, their cultivation and consumption were left behind and even prohibited, surviving in very remote areas (Ramírez et al., 2011). Red chia, huauzontle, and quinoa have exceptional nutritional qualities (12.5 to 16.7% protein, 5% lipids, and 58 to 76.2% carbohydrates) (Yasui et al., 2016).

The study of genetic diversity is very important for the conservation, evaluation and use of genetic resources for plant breeding and to determine the authenticity of cultivars or varieties, facilitating sustainable agriculture practices, which can lead to food sovereignty (Xingú, 2010).

There are currently several molecular techniques that allow us to know the genetic variability in natural populations. Thus, there are several types of molecular markers that are used in genetic improvement to obtain estimates of genetic distances between populations, varieties, lines or hybrids, as well as to establish kinship relationships between lines or varieties by detecting polymorphisms in single or multiple loci of dominant or co-dominant type (Xingú, 2010).

Molecular markers are also used for the genetic characterization of Chenopodium germplasm since they have been employed to differentiate genotypes under environmental conditions that confused their phenotypes (Nolasco et al., 2013). Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) are one of the frequently used molecular markers for genotyping crops (Jarvis et al., 2008).

Simple sequence repeats (SSR) microsatellites, also known as short or simple sequences, are repeats of mono-, di-, tri- and tetranucleotides made up of 2 to 10 base pairs as a basic unit, and are found throughout the genome of eukaryotic organisms in both coding and non-coding regions. Their technique requires little DNA, without having a high quality of purity, and provides highly polymorphic results, with its interpretation being relatively simple (Allende, 2014).

In order to determine the genetic variability in the germplasm of red chia, huauzontle (Chenopodium berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae), and quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) collected in producing areas of the State of Mexico and wild materials from the United States, 48 materials were molecularly characterized, which include the collection of the National Institute of Nuclear Research of Mexico and the Plant Genetic Resources Laboratory of Brigham Young University, USA, using 14 primers for microsatellites developed specifically for Chenopodium by Maughan et al. (2013).

This characterization made it possible to determine the degree of variability within species, as well as the affinity within quinoa, huauzontle and chia, to design genetic improvement strategies through hybridization that allow combining desirable traits. This study also corroborated evolutionary work since it is considered that Chenopodium quinoa Willd. and Chenopodium berlandieri were independently domesticated, the latter in Mesoamerica and North America, whereas the former in South America (Maughan et al., 2024).

Materials and methods

A total of 48 genotypes were evaluated, including varieties (a group of plants resulting from breeding work) and collections (samples taken in the field from cultivated and wild specimens) from the Germplasm Bank of the National Institute of Nuclear Research (ININ, for its acronym in Spanish) and the Germplasm Bank of the Plant Genetic Resources Laboratory of Brigham Young University.

Seed of the genus Chenopodium was used: three collections of Chenopodium berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae var. huauzontle (H3, H16, and H18 from the Toluca Valley), five collections of Chenopodium berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae var. red chia (J. Silva, D. Oros, R. Rguez, P. Bravo, and Zumbaro from the shores of Lake Pátzcuaro, Michoacán), two advanced lines of Chenopodium quinoa donated by the National Germplasm Bank of the College of Postgraduates (640304 and 11L240), four lines of Chenopodium quinoa obtained by radiation mutagenesis (ININ136, ININ240, ININ311, and ININ333), one F1 line from the cross (42AdeM x Red Chia), and 33 collections of Chenopodium berlandieri ssp. donated from the Germplasm Bank of the BYU Plant Genetic Resources Laboratory (Table 1 and 2).

Table 1

Table 1. Genetic material and origin of Chenopodium used for genetic diversity assessment using simple sequence repeats (SSR) (part 1).

Num. Genotype Species Variety Locality City State Country
1 H-3 C. berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae Huauzontle Atlacomulco Toluca Sta. of Mex. Mexico
2 H-16 C. berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae Huauzontle San Andrés, Cuexcontitlán Toluca Sta. of Mex. Mexico
3 H-18 C. berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae Huauzontle Valle de Toluca Toluca Sta. of Mex. Mexico
4 J.Silva C. berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae Red chia Opopeo S. Escalante Mich. Mexico
5 D.Oros C. berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae Red chia Opopeo S. Escalante Mich. Mexico
6 R.Rguez C. berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae Red chia Sta. Ma. Huiramangaro Pátzcuaro Mich. Mexico
7 P.Bravo C. berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae Red chia Opopeo S. Escalante Mich. Mexico
8 Zumbaro C. berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae Red chia Sta. Ma. Huiramangaro Pátzcuaro Mich. Mexico
9 640304 C. quinoa Quinoa C.P. Texcoco Sta. of Mex. Mexico
10 11L240 C. quinoa Quinoa C.P. Texcoco Sta. of Mex. Mexico
11 ININ136 C. quinoa Mutant quinoa ININ La Marquesa Sta. of Mex. Mexico
12 ININ240 C. quinoa Mutant quinoa ININ La Marquesa Sta. of Mex. Mexico
13 42AdeM x CR C. quinoa x C. berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae cross F1 ININ La Marquesa Sta. of Mex. Mexico
14 ININ311 C. quinoa Mutant quinoa ININ La Marquesa Sta. of Mex. Mexico

Table 2

Table 2. Genetic material and origin of Chenopodium used for genetic diversity assessment using simple sequence repeats (SSR) (part 2).

Num. Genotype Species Variety Locality City State Country
15 ININ333 C. quinoa Mutant quinoa ININ La Marquesa Sta. of Mex. Mexico
16 HBYUMEX C. berlandieri Huauzontle Provo BYU UT USA
17 BYU 14108 C. berlandieri Sinuatum AZ Hwy 181 Cochise UT USA
18 402 C. berlandieri - Torrey Pines San Diego CA USA
19 423 C. berlandieri Zschackei - LA CA USA
20 447 C. berlandieri Zschackei Orem Utah UT USA
21 457 C. berlandieri Zschackei - Duchesne UT USA
22 505 C. berlandieri Zschackei - Garfield UT USA
23 544 C. berlandieri Zschackei - Yavapai AZ USA
24 629 C. berlandieri Zschackei S of Lusk Niobrara WY USA
25 641 C. berlandieri Zschackei Pine Creek Ranch Sanpete UT USA
26 642 C. berlandieri Zschackei 1 mi S of Ephraim Sanpete UT USA
27 880 C. berlandieri Zschackei Ramah McKinley NM USA
28 881 C. berlandieri Zschackei Provo Utah UT USA
29 882 C. berlandieri Zschackei Spanish Fork Cyn Utah UT USA
30 902 C. berlandieri Zschackei Laguna Mts San Diego CA USA
31 922 C. berlandieri Zschackei BYU Provo UT USA
32 937 C. berlandieri Boscianum Galveston, Virginia Point Brazoria TX USA
33 1007 C. berlandieri Zschackei Kyle Cyn. Rd., Spring Mts Clark NV USA
34 1301 C. berlandieri Boscianum Eagle Point Marina, St. Leon Galveston TX USA
35 1303 C. berlandieri - Kamas Valley Summit UT USA
36 1306 C. berlandieri - N Amstrong Rd Clark NV USA
37 1312 C. berlandieri - Cty Rd C St. Charles MO USA
38 1316 C. berlandieri - N P. I-15 Frontage RD Iron UT USA
39 1448 C. berlandieri Zschackei Sherman Oaks LA CA USA
40 1449 C. berlandieri + C. boscianum - Sherman Oaks LA CA USA
41 1452 C. berlandieri Zschackei Big Tujunga Cyn. LA CA USA
42 1454 C. album - Big Tujunga Cyn. LA CA USA
43 1455 C. berlandieri Boscianum Cypremort Point St. Mary LA USA
44 1456 C. berlandieri Boscianum Cypremort Point St. Mary LA USA
45 1457 C. berlandieri Boscianum Golden Meadow Lafourche LA USA
46 1458 C. berlandieri Boscianum Golden Meadow Lafourche LA USA
47 1459 C. berlandieri Boscianum Point Fourchon Lafourche LA USA
48 1460 C. berlandieri Boscianum Grand Isle Jefferson LA USA

Molecular characterization

For DNA extraction, the tissue used was healthy leaf tissue from 10 individual plants 30 days after sowing (das) established under greenhouse conditions. The leaf tissue sample (four leaves) was introduced into Eppendorf microtubes to be placed in a LABIST FDL1R-1a freeze-drying chamber with a freezing dryer at 0.7 atm pressure for 24 h.

The freeze-dried leaf tissue was ground in a Retsch-Mill 200. DNA extraction was performed according to the procedures described by Maughan et al. (2013). The extracted DNA was quantified with a GBC Nanodrop spectrophotometer and diluted to 30 ng μl-1 in TE buffer solution (Tris 10 mM, EDTA 1 mM, pH 7.5).

All plants were grown in the greenhouse of the Plant Genetic Resources Laboratory of Brigham Young University in Provo, Utah, USA, in 15 cm pots at 25 °C under halogen lamps with a photoperiod of 12 h.

SSR primers used

Fourteen microsatellite primers (Table 3) developed by Mason et al. (2005), specific for Chenopodium, were used for the study of genetic diversity of the 48 genotypes, namely: QCA37, KGA20, QAAT74, QAAT50, QAAT70, QGA02, QCA14, KGA16, QCA57, QCA88, QAAT76, QAAT78, QCA38, and QAAT24.

Table 3

Table 3. List of primers and sequences used in the study.

Num. Primer Forward sequence (5’- 3’) Reverse sequence (5’-3’) T (°C)
1 QCA37 gcttctccgttcttccagaccaattc tcatgagccacttcatacacg 66
2 KGA20 gcttcttcacctacctcggtaaaggaaa ggagcagatgatgaacatgg 64
3 QAAT74 gcttctatggaacacccatccgataa atgcctatcctcatcctcca 66
4 QAAT50 ggcacgtgctgctactcata gcttctatggcaatggttaaatttgc 68
5 QAAT70 tgaacaggatcgtcatagtcaa gcttctcgttcatcatctgacccaat 64
6 QGA02 gcttctgaacctttaataggtcgtaccaaatc aagaaatgtcacaagcaagca 64
7 QCA14 gcttctccctgagctgatttatcaaaggac cctcttgcgagatttctgct 66
8 KGA16 ccctgcttaatctccgtgaa gcttctccgaaccaagactacgaaaca 65
9 QCA57 gcttcttgcaaggaaaccatctttgg tgcctcacagtcacacctaca 69
10 QCA88 gcttcttctggctgcttccacctaat cagtcccggaatcgtaactc 66
11 QAAT76 gcttcatgtgttataaaatgccaat gcttcttctcggcttcccactaatttt 63
12 QAAT78 agcgaaggaaatttggaact gcttcttaacgatacgctccaaggaa 63
13 QCA38 gcttctcatttcccaaactgcatgaat atgtgtgttgcgtgtgagtg 67
14 QAAT24 gcttctaccataacagcacccacctt agggatcaatcttgttcattca 62

SSR amplification by PCR

PCR amplifications were performed in 12 μl reactions consisting of 3 μl (30 ng μl-1) of DNA, 0.5 μl of every 10 μm of forward and reverse primers, 6 μl of MyTaq HS Red Master Mix (Bioline, Taunton, Massachusetts, USA) and 2 μl of H2O. PCR reactions were performed using a C1000 or T100 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) with the following parameters: 95 °C for 60 s, 35 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 15 s, 72 °C for 10 s, and a final extension cycle of 72 °C for 60 s.

Amplified product electrophoresis

Electrophoresis of the amplified products was performed with 1.5% agarose gel (250 ml of TBE, 7.5 g of agarose, and 12.5 μl of midori green). DNA samples were run in an electrophoresis chamber with Bio-Rad power supply (Power-PAC 300, Berkely, Ca.) for 30 min. At the end of this time, the gel was washed with distilled water and placed in a Bio-Rad Universal Hood II ultraviolet (UV) light transilluminator and the gels were recorded and stored in a database using the Quantity one program.

Statistical analysis

For the statistical analysis, a binary matrix of absence (0) and presence (1) was generated. Diffuse bands were not considered, genetic similarity between individuals was assessed using the Jaccard similarity coefficient. The cluster analysis was performed using the UPGMA method. The corresponding dendrogram was generated using the statistical package of the numerical taxonomy system for personal computers (NTSYS), PC 2.02 version, to determine the similarities between the genotypes in question.

Results and discussion

The results indicate that, within the population of 48 genotypes from the Germplasm Banks of the National Institute of Nuclear Research and the Plant Genetic Resources Laboratory of BYU, they produced 175 alleles at 14 SSR loci. These alleles vary from 8 (KGA16, QCA88) to 16 (QCA37, QAAT74, QCA57), these being the loci with the highest number of observed alleles.

The primer QAAT74, according to Ormeño’s (2015) work, is one of those with the highest number of observed alleles, whereas QCA88 presented the fewest alleles and was used in Donaire’s (2018) work, where a high number of alleles was also recorded. This indicates that, in each job where they are used, they act differently.

Clustering analysis

The analysis was performed using data obtained from 14 loci recorded for 48 genotypes. From the results obtained, it is possible to have an approximate idea about the genetic diversity of the samples analyzed contained in the information from the microsatellites. The objective of cluster analysis is to form groups where the individuals in each group are more similar to each other than to the individuals of another group (Allende, 2017). To visualize the relationships between populations according to their distance, a hierarchical dendrogram was constructed.

The dendrogram in Figure 1 shows that, at a similarity coefficient of 0.9, five groups were formed; in contrast, in Ormeño (2015), where only 16 genotypes were evaluated, six groups were formed and in Xingú (2018), where 38 genotypes were evaluated, 10 fewer than in this study, six groups were formed.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Dendrogram of 48 genotypes of Chenopodium berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae and Chenopodium quinoa from molecular data of SSR based on genetic distance by the UPGMA method.

2007-0934-remexca-16-06-e3805-gf2.png

Group 1 consisted of four genotypes, two advanced lines (11L240 and 640304) of quinoa, an F1 single cross between quinoa and red chia (42AdeMXCR), and a red chia (D. Oros).

Group 2 consisted of seven genotypes, one red chia (Zumbaro), three mutant quinoas (ININ311, ININ136, and ININ240), two huauzontle genotypes (H-3 and H-18), and a collection of BYU from Chenopodium berlandieri (HBYUMEX); in contrast to Allende (2014), there is a separation between the huauzontles and the chias.

Groups 3, 4 and 5 only had two genotypes each. Group 3 had a huauzontle (H-16) and a red chia (J. Silva). Group 4 had two genotypes of red chia (R. Rguez and P. Bravo). Group 5 was made up of a collection of BYU from C. berlandieri (BYU14108) and a mutant quinoa (ININ333).

Conclusions

The following conclusions were derived from the present research: Great genetic affinity was detected between the species C. quinoa Willd. and C. berlandieri since the primers designed for quinoa adequately amplified for huauzontle. A high genetic affinity was detected between the cultivated genotypes of C. quinoa and C. berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae local breeds red chia and huauzontle, which were only in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4.

The genetic affinity between cultivated accessions allows us to predict favorable results in genetic improvement work by hybridization between C. quinoa Willd and C. berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae. The dendrogram shows two very interesting groups, such as groups 1 and 2, where the advanced quinoa lines join with red chia and mutant quinoas with red chia and huauzontle and groups 3 and 4 had all the germplasm from the Plant Genetic Resources Laboratory of BYU.

Bibliography

1 

Allende, C. M. J. 2017. Caracterización morfológica y molecular de accesiones de Quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) para estimar variabilidad genética. Tesis maestría en mejoramiento genético de plantas. Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina Escuela de Posgrado. Lima, Perú. 1-90 pp.

2 

Allende, C. L. 2014. Estudio de radiosensibilidad de pseudocereales mediante marcadores moleculares y microscopía electrónica. Tesis Licenciatura, Facultad de ciencias. Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México (UAEM). 17-40 pp.

3 

De la Cruz, T. E.; Rubluo, I. A.; Palomino, G. H.; García, A. J. M. and Laguna, C. A. 2007. Characterization of Chenopodium germplasm selection of putative mutants and its cytogenetic study. In: Ochat, S.; Mohan, J. S. Ed. Breeding of neglected and underutilized crops species and herbs. Science Publishers. Enfield, NH, USA. 123-36 pp.

4 

Donaire, T. G. V. 2018. Caracterización molecular de 75 accesiones de quinua (Chenopodium quínoa Willd) del departamento de puno mediante marcadores microsatélites. Tesis Facultad de ciencias. Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina. Lima, Perú. 122 p.

5 

Eisa, S.; Hussin, S.; Geissler, N. and Koyro, H. W. 2012. Effect of NaCl salinity on water relations, photosynthesis and chemical composition of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) as a potential cash crop halophyte. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 6(2):357-368.

6 

García, A. J. M. 2017. Caracterización molecular de Chenopodium mediante SSR. Informe técnico Científico GB 209/2017. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares, México. 1-3 pp.

7 

Jacobsen, S. E.; Jensen, C. R. and Liu, F. 2012. Improving crop production in the arid Mediterranean climate. Field Crop Res. 128:34-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.12.001.

8 

Jarvis, D. E.; Kopp, O.; Jellen, E. N.; Marllory, M. C.; Pattee, J.; Bonifacio, F. A.; Coleman, C. E.; Stevens, M. R.; Fairbanks, D. J. and Maughan, P. J. 2008. Simple sequence repeats marker development and genetic mapping in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). J. Genet. 87(1):39-51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12041-008-0006-6.

9 

Mason, S. L.; Stevens, M. R.; Jellen, E. N.; Bonifacio, F. A.; Fairbanks, D. J.; Coleman C. E.; McCarty, R. R.; Rasmussen, A. G. and Maughan, P. J. 2005. Development and use of microsatellite markers for germplasm characterization in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Crop Sci. 45(4):1618-1630. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.0295.

10 

Maughan, P. J.; Jellen E. R.; Stevens, M. R.; Coleman, C.E.; Ricks, M.; Mason, S. L.; Jarvis, D. E. and Gardunia, B. and Fairbanks, D. J. 2013. Manual. DNA Microprep extraction. Plant genetic resources laboratory of Brigham young university (BYU). Provo, Utah, USA. 1-3 pp.

11 

Maughan, P. J.; Jarvis, D. E.; Cruz-Torres, E.; Jaggi, K. E.; Warner, H. C.; Marcheschi, A. K.; Gomez-Pando, L.; Fuentes, F. ; Mayta-Anko, M. E.; Curti, R.; Rey, E.; Tester, M. and Jellen, E. N. 2024. North American pitseed goosefoot (Chenopodium berlandieri) is a genetic resource to improve Andean quinoa (C. quinoa). Scientific reports. 14:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-63106-8.

12 

Nolasco, O. C.; Cruz, W.; Santa-Cruz, C. and Gutiérrez, A. 2013. Evaluation of the DNA polymorphism of six varieties of Chenopodium quinoa Willd, using AFLP. The Biologist. 11(2):277-286.

13 

Ramírez, V. M. L.; Espitia, R. E.; Carballo, C. A.; Zepeda, B. R.; Vaquera, H. H. and Córdova T. L. 2011. Fertilization and plant density in varieties of amaranth (Amaranthus hypochondriacus L.). Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. 2(6):855-866. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=263121473005.

14 

Xingú, L. A. 2010. Caracterización del germoplasma de Huauzontle (Chenopodium berlandieri subsp. nuttalliae) en el Estado de México mediante técnicas moleculares (SSR), Tesis de Maestría, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México. 9-16 pp.

15 

Xingú-López, A.; Balbuena-Melgarejo, A.; Laguna-Cerda, A. L. G.; Iglesias-Andréu, L. G.; Olivares-Cruz, V. y Cruz-Torres. E. 2018. Caracterización de huauzontle (Chenopodium berlandieri spp. nuttalliae) del Estado de México mediante microsatélites. Ciencia y Tecnol. Agrop. México. 2(6):9-16.

16 

Yasui Y.; Hirakawa, H.; Oikawa, T.; Toyoshima, M.; Matsuzaki, C.; Ueno, M.; Mizuno, N.; Nagatoshi, Y.; Imamura, T.; Miyago, M.; Tanaka, K.; Mise, K.; Tanaka, T.; Mizukoshi, H.; Mori, M. and Fujita, Y. 2016. Draft genome sequence of an inbred line of Chenopodium quinoa, an allotetraploid crop with great environmental adaptability and outstanding nutritional properties. DNA Res. 23(6):535-546. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsw037.