https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v16i5.3784

elocation-id: e3784

Verdú-Amat, Granados-Nevárez, Heredia-Sandoval, Islas-Rubio, and Vásquez-Lara: Image analysis applied to morphological properties in wheat and oat cookies

Journal Metadata

Journal Identifier: remexca [journal-id-type=publisher-id]

Journal Title Group

Journal Title (Full): Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

Abbreviated Journal Title: Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc [abbrev-type=publisher]

ISSN: 2007-0934 [pub-type=ppub]

Publisher

Publisher’s Name: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias

Article Metadata

Article Identifier: 10.29312/remexca.v16i5.3784 [pub-id-type=doi]

Article Grouping Data

Subject Group [subj-group-type=heading]

Subject Grouping Name: Articles

Title Group

Article Title: Image analysis applied to morphological properties in wheat and oat cookies

Contributor Group

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Verdú-Amat

Given (First) Names: Samuel

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Superscript: 1

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Granados-Nevárez

Given (First) Names: María del Carmen

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

Superscript: 2

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Heredia-Sandoval

Given (First) Names: Nina Gisella

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

Superscript: 2

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Islas-Rubio

Given (First) Names: Alma Rosa

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

Superscript: 2

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Vásquez-Lara

Given (First) Names: Francisco

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

Superscript: 2

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=corresp; rid=c1]

Superscript: §

Affiliation [id=aff1]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 1

Institution Name: in an Address: Departamento de Tecnología de Alimentos-Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. Camino de Vera s/n, Valencia, España. CP. 46022. (saveram@upvnet.upv.es). [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Departamento de Tecnología de Alimentos [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

State or Province: Valencia

Postal Code: 46022

Country: in an Address: Venezuela [country=ES]

Email Address: saveram@upvnet.upv.es

Affiliation [id=aff2]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 2

Institution Name: in an Address: Coordinación de Tecnología de Alimentos de Origen Vegetal-Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo AC. Carretera Gustavo Astiazarán Rosas núm. 46, Col. La Victoria, Hermosillo, Sonora. México. CP. 83304. (pame@ciad.mx; nina.heredia@ciad.mx; aislas@ciad.mx). [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo A. C. [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Coordinación de Tecnología de Alimentos de Origen Vegetal [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo AC [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

City: Hermosillo

State or Province: Sonora

Postal Code: 83304

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Email Address: pame@ciad.mx

Email Address: nina.heredia@ciad.mx

Email Address: aislas@ciad.mx

Author Note Group

Correspondence Information: [§] Autor para correspondencia: fvas@ciad.mx. [id=c1]

Publication Date [date-type=pub; publication-format=electronic]

Day: 18

Month: 07

Year: 2025

Publication Date [date-type=collection; publication-format=electronic]

Season: Jul-Aug

Year: 2025

Volume Number: 16

Issue Number: 5

Electronic Location Identifier: e3784

History: Document History

Date [date-type=received]

Day: 01

Month: 03

Year: 2025

Date [date-type=accepted]

Day: 01

Month: 06

Year: 2025

Permissions

License Information [license-type=open-access; xlink:href=https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/; xml:lang=es]

Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons

Abstract

Title: Abstract

The present study was conducted at the Center for Research in Food and Development in 2024. Image analysis is an essential tool that can be used in food process control. This study aimed to analyze, using imaging techniques, the morphological properties of cookies made with wheat and oats in different percentages and their relationship with cookie firmness. The texture profile of the dough obtained from the different formulations, and the weight, diameter, height, and firmness of the cookies were determined. A morphological characterization of the cookies was carried out by means of image analysis. These measurements focused on the overall color of the surface, as well as the characteristics of the surface and internal texture of the cookies through the analysis of the crumb. The results showed decreased firmness (151.96 N to 103.17 N) as the percentage of substitution increased, a similar behavior was observed in the weight and height of the cookie, whereas the diameter was not affected. Regarding the image analysis, greater cracking of the cookie surface was observed as the percentage of substitution increased. Color changes were observed in the crumb towards lighter areas, indicating a decrease in bubbles in the cookie crumb. Image analysis can be an important alternative to determine the quality of a finished product, in this case, a cookie.

Keyword Group [xml:lang=en]

Title: Keywords:

Keyword: cookie firmness

Keyword: image segmentation

Keyword: surface cracks

Counts

Figure Count [count=5]

Table Count [count=2]

Equation Count [count=0]

Reference Count [count=31]

Page Count [count=0]

Abstract

The present study was conducted at the Center for Research in Food and Development in 2024. Image analysis is an essential tool that can be used in food process control. This study aimed to analyze, using imaging techniques, the morphological properties of cookies made with wheat and oats in different percentages and their relationship with cookie firmness. The texture profile of the dough obtained from the different formulations, and the weight, diameter, height, and firmness of the cookies were determined. A morphological characterization of the cookies was carried out by means of image analysis. These measurements focused on the overall color of the surface, as well as the characteristics of the surface and internal texture of the cookies through the analysis of the crumb. The results showed decreased firmness (151.96 N to 103.17 N) as the percentage of substitution increased, a similar behavior was observed in the weight and height of the cookie, whereas the diameter was not affected. Regarding the image analysis, greater cracking of the cookie surface was observed as the percentage of substitution increased. Color changes were observed in the crumb towards lighter areas, indicating a decrease in bubbles in the cookie crumb. Image analysis can be an important alternative to determine the quality of a finished product, in this case, a cookie.

Keywords:

cookie firmness, image segmentation, surface cracks.

Introduction

There are many products made from soft wheat flour and leavening chemical agents; nevertheless, among the main products are cookies. Soft wheat flour is characterized by a lower protein content, lower granulometry, and lower ash or mineral content (Serna, 2003). These characteristics of flour favor the processes of manufacturing cookies; however, manufacturers frequently observe disparity in the functionality of soft wheat flour when used in various recipes and cookie-making processes.

From uncontrolled dimensions and densities of cookies, variation in texture and surface appearance, and sticky or very consistent doughs are examples of technological difficulties encountered during cookie making (Fustier et al., 2009). There is a growing interest in understanding the microstructure of food and its correlation with the textural and rheological attributes of food in the development of food products in academia and the food industry.

This knowledge about the rheology and microstructure of foods helps to minimize textural defects in processed foods and improve the perception of consumer satisfaction (Ahmed and Basu, 2022). For this reason, different methodologies have been implemented to control food processes or to establish analytical measurements of finished products that are easy to apply, fast and non-destructive, such as the use of image analysis.

This is a technique capable of interpreting and making a detailed analysis of the pixels of the images captured by a camera. This allowed vision systems to become automated structures that can analyze, identify, and read a series of characters through the analysis of the details capable of being extracted from an image.

In recent years, machine vision analysis, computer image processing and analysis systems, as a fast, non-destructive, and low-cost means, have gained many interesting applications in the food industry, they are also susceptible to industrial applications online and even the baking process can be monitored by these techniques (Abdollahi Moghaddam et al., 2015).

These methods have also been successfully applied for the identification and evaluation of quality (Gerrard et al., 1996; Abdullah et al., 2004; Brosnan and Sun, 2004; Du and Sun, 2004, 2006; Qiao et al., 2004, 2005; Pace et al., 2011; Shafiee et al., 2013), the classification and selection of fruits and vegetables, meat and fish, and bakery products (Mendoza and Aguilera, 2004; Blasco et al., 2009; Zapotoczny, 2011), as well as the detection and segmentation of surface defects (Bennedsen et al., 2005; Munkevik et al., 2007; Dammer et al., 2011; Atas et al., 2012). Based on the above, the objective of this study was to analyze, through imaging techniques, the morphological properties of cookies made with wheat flour and oat flour in different percentages and their relationship with cookie firmness.

Materials and methods

Raw material

The oat flakes (Granvita brand) were crushed in a mill (Pulvex 200 model, Mexico) to obtain a flour of 1 mm particle size. The cookie wheat flour was donated by Munsa Molinos from Cd. Obregón, Sonora. The rest of the ingredients, such as vegetable shortening, sugar, salt, baking soda, and dextrose, were purchased from a local store in Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico.

Treatments

The mixtures of cookie wheat flour (CWF) with oat flour (OF) were in the following proportions: 95-5, 90-10 and 80-20 (w/w), respectively. In addition, it was considered to use only CWF as a control to establish the cookie obtained as a reference with respect to the rest of the formulations.

Chemical composition of cookies

It was determined in the control cookie and in the cookies obtained from CWF-OF mixtures. The analyses of moisture, protein, crude fat, and ash were performed according to the following methods: 44-15A, 46-13, 30-25 and 08-01 (AACC, 2000); these analyses were performed in triplicate. The calculation of carbohydrates was made by subtracting the sum of the obtained percentages of moisture, protein, crude fat and ash from 100.

Preparation of the control cookie and the cookies of the different treatments

A cookie was made only with CWF (control) in addition to those made with the different ratios of CWF-OF mentioned above. Vegetable shortening (64 g), sugar (130 g), salt (2.1 g) and baking soda (2.5 g) were blended for 3 min in a blender (Model Artisan, KitchenAid 4.7 L, Mexico). Dextrose (33 g) and distilled water (16 ml) were added to continue blending for more 2 min, then flour (225 g) was added and mixed for 2 min at a low speed.

At the end of the kneading, the dough obtained was weighed and placed on a previously greased baking tray. A rolling pin was passed over until obtaining the desired height of the dough, then the circumferences were molded and cut to the desired diameter and finally baked for 10 min at 205 °C. The cookies obtained were left to cool to room temperature and stored in polyethylene bags for 1 h (method 10-50D, AACC 2000).

Dough analysis

Texture profile. The doughs obtained from the different CWF-OF mixtures were subjected to a texture profile (Texture Analyser TA-XT2 Godalming, Surrey, England) with the TA-25 attachment. Dough cylinders (3.8 cm high and 4.2 cm in diameter) were formed and 50% of their height was compressed. The test speed was 5 mm s-1. The parameters obtained were firmness (N), adhesiveness (Ns), elasticity, cohesiveness, gumminess, and chewiness (Islas et al., 2012).

Cookie analysis

Cookie weight. An Ohaus Pioneer scale (PX3302 model/E, USA) was used.

Thickness and diameter. A Vernier (Mitutoyo model, 530 Series, Japan) was used to take these measurements. The measurements of weight, thickness, and diameter of the cookie are referenced in the same method of preparation (method 10-50D, AACC 2000).

Firmness. The TA-XT2 texture meter (Texture Analyser Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, UK) was used with the HDP/BS attachment. The test speed was 1.7 mm s-1. The rupture distance was 5 mm (Fustier et al., 2009).

Morphological characterization by image analysis

The morphological properties of the cookies were analyzed using image analysis techniques in order to measure characteristics on which visual appreciation depends, as well as textural properties. These properties are essential to understand the effect of composition and processing on the product; however, they are difficult to quantify using traditional physicochemical methods.

In this research, the measurements focused on exploring the global color of the surface and the characteristics of the surface and internal texture of the cookies through the exploration of the crumb of the product. The digital images were captured using a 12 MP wide-angle camera: 26 mm, ƒ/1.5 aperture, sensor-shift optical image stabilization, 100% Focus Pixels, with a resolution of 2532 x 1170 pixels at 460 ppi, and stored in JPEG format. The different blocks of information that were extracted from the images were.

RGB histograms

The study of pixel frequency histograms in the RGB (red, blue, and green) color space was applied to determine patterns of color change on the entire surface simultaneously.

Surface color texture

Surface color patterns were studied to determine the impact of changes in composition on the surface. To do this, 8-bit images were analyzed, segmenting them on the gray value 153, with the aim of quantifying the number of pixels belonging to the surface patterns produced by cracks in the product.

Internal structure analysis

The crumb of the cookies was analyzed using grayscale histograms to determine the number of pixels belonging to cereal and bubble structure. In this case, values tending to 0 represent pixels related to empty (dark) spaces, whereas pixels close to 255 represented those related to structure. Each analysis was performed on 10 cookie samples using the free software of Fiji (Schindelin et al., 2012).

Experiment design and statistical analysis

The design of experiments was completely random of one factor, the degree of substitution of CWF with OF. The results were analyzed by applying a multiple comparison procedure to determine which means are significantly different from others with a significance level of 95%. Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) procedure was used to discriminate between the means. Statistical analysis was conducted with the Statgraphics Centurion XVI Program (2010 StatPoint Technologies, Inc.)

Results and discussion

Chemical composition of cookies

Table 1 shows the results obtained from the proximate chemical analysis that was carried out on the cookie made only from cookie wheat flour (control) and those obtained from the different mixtures with oat flour. The values of protein and fat did not show significant differences (p> 0.05) between the different cookies, there were differences only in the measurements of moisture and ash, although these were minimal compared to the control treatment.

Table 1

Table 1. Proximate chemical analysis of cookies made with CWF and mixtures of CWF and OF.

Components (%)
Cookie Moisture Protein Ash Fat Carbohydrates
Control 3.67 ±0.03 d 5.95 ±0.0 a 1.14 ±0.01 b 14.37 ±0.49 a 74.87
95% CWF-5% OF 3.74 ±0.03 c 5.91 ±0.12 a 1.15 ±0.02 b 14.63 ±0.29 a 74.57
90% CWF-10% OF 3.99 ±0 a 5.96 ±0.1 a 1.15 ±0.02 b 14.11 ±0.03 a 74.79
80% CWF-20% OF 3.9 ±0.02 b 5.77 ±0.11 a 1.19 ±0.01 a 14.68 ±0.43 a 74.46

[i] CWF= cookie wheat flour; OF= oat flour; a, b, c= means with the same letter within the column are not significantly different (p> 0.05). The measurements made are the average of three replications ± standard deviation. Carbohydrates were calculated by difference.

Maldonado and Pacheco (2000) made a cookie with a mixture of wheat flour and green banana flour; they observed very similar values when they analyzed carbohydrates and fat content; nevertheless, important differences were found when the percentage of protein was analyzed, which was higher by up to 3%. This explanation may be based on the compositional differences of the raw materials used in the production of the different cookies, mainly in the type of wheat flour used.

Dough analysis

Table 2 shows the results of the texture profile performed on the doughs obtained from the control flour and the different mixtures of wheat flour and oat flour. Texture parameters can be considered of great importance in food quality control; specifically, the hardness in starchy products indicates their degree of freshness, whereas crunchiness provides information about their internal structure and compositional characteristics (Torres et al., 2015).

Table 2

Table 2. Texture profile of the control dough and of the doughs obtained from mixtures of CWF and OF.

Dough Firmness (N) Adhesiveness (Ns) Elasticity Cohesiveness Gumminess Chewiness
Control 17.11 ±0.39 a 3.5 ±0.86 a 0.23 ±0.03 a 0.17 ±0.01 b 2.95 ±0.31 a 0.7 ±0.15 b
95% CWF-5% OF 15.33 ±0.65 ab 4.78 ±0.75 a 0.26 ±0.03 a 0.21 ±0.01 a 3.27 ±0.23 a 1.03 ±0.16 a
90% CWF-10% OF 15.79 ±1.82 ab 3.42 ±0.88 a 0.27 ±0.02 a 0.2 ±0.02 ab 3.15 ±0.53 a 0.77 ±0.13 ab
80% CWF-20% OF 14.52 ±1.91 b 3.39 ±1.71 a 0.31 ±0.09 a 0.19 ±0.01 ab 2.77 ±0.48 a 0.98 ±0.02 ab

[i] CWF= cookie wheat flour; OF= oat flour; a, b= means with the same letter within the column are not significantly different (p> 0.05).The measurements made are the average of three replications ± standard deviation.

Texture assessment is usually based on the judgment of sensory panels; however, the use of an instrument, such as the texture profile analyzer (TPA), provides a quick and cost-effective way to measure texture under well-defined and controlled conditions (Szczesniak, 2002).

In this study, firmness values maintain a downward trend when using oat flour in the substitution of wheat flour; nonetheless, this behavior became more evident when 20% oat flour was used, where significant differences were observed compared to the control dough. On the other hand, the parameters of adhesiveness, elasticity, and gumminess were not affected by the different levels of substitution with oat flour.

Regarding the measurements of cohesiveness and chewiness, the observed behaviors show an important similarity. No significant differences (p> 0.05) were observed between the doughs obtained from the different mixtures of CWF with OF, but there was a significant difference (p< 0.05) when the substitution was analyzed, which was 5% compared to the control dough.

For their part, Blanco et al. (2019) used oat fiber in the production of cookies and observed important changes in the ability of the dough to lose water, associating this with the beta-glucans contained in oats. This may be related to the results obtained in dough firmness when performing the texture profile, where higher substitutions with OF can retain a greater amount of water in the doughs, with this being associated with the lower firmness values.

In their work, Wang et al. (2017) analyzed the effect on the rheological properties of wheat flours added with oat beta-glucans, their results also coincide with a decrease in the strength of the dough when increasing the proportion of beta-glucans. This behavior could be attributed to the weakening of the molecular network of gluten and starch, which is caused by the inhibition of the association between gluten and starch itself, related in part to the dilution of gluten, as well as by the state of the water, affecting the hydration properties of the doughs (Fustier et al., 2009).

Cookies analysis

The values obtained for weight, height, diameter, and firmness of the cookies are shown in Figure 1. Regarding cookie weight, the substitutions made with 10 and 20% OF showed significant differences (p< 0.05) compared to the control. The diameter of the cookie was not affected by any level of substitution; however, the height showed a decrease as the percentage of substitution increased, with the lowest value of 1.12 cm being observed when using 20% OF. One of the most important parameters analyzed from a sensory point of view was firmness. A similar behavior to that of height was observed, firmness decreased at higher levels of substitution with OF.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Physical measurements in control cookies and in cookies made from mixtures of CWF and OF. CWF= cookie wheat flour; OF= oat flour.

2007-0934-remexca-16-05-e3784-gf6.png

Ahmed and Basu (2022) determined that particle size significantly regulates the rheological behavior of food, either in dispersion or in doughs; these same authors also have seen that a suspension/dough with the finest particle size behaves completely differently from a dough with coarse particles. On the other hand, it has also been reported that the texture of cookies is influenced by the relationship between geometry and water content and by the dependence of the mechanical properties of water content and sugar concentration (Slade and Levine, 1994).

Morphological characterization by image analysis

Image processing has the advantage of providing reproducible color measurements that allow the characterization of both macro and microstructural aspects of food. Surface color data based on RGB histograms are included in Figure 2. It is observed that the peaks of the three channels are higher in the case of control cookies.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Study of average RGB color histograms of cookie surfaces. Black= control; white= 95% CWF-5% OF; gray= 90% CWF-10% OF; yellow= 80% CWF-20% OF.

2007-0934-remexca-16-05-e3784-gf7.png

This form represents reduced base distributions compared to the rest of the formulas, which indicated a more homogeneous overall color. That is, there are a large number of pixels at very close frequencies. This behavior is altered with the increase in the amount of oats. The blue (B) channel was the most affected, shifting the peak of this channel towards lower values (darkness).

The 80-20 formula presented the biggest change, showing a drastic increase in pixel dispersion at the base of the bell, accompanied by a decrease in the maximum peak value.

To locate the main causes of the surface color change in the real product, the images were segmented based on two types of pixels observed in the visual texture of the cookies: those belonging to the dough itself and those contained in the cracks derived from the addition of oats. Figure 3 shows the result of the segmentation of the image into the two indicated groups, and the increase in the area related to these cracks as the oat content increases can be observed.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Real images (top). Real 8-bit grayscale images (middle). Images segmented on gray value= 153 (bottom). CWF= cookie wheat flour; OF= oat flour.

2007-0934-remexca-16-05-e3784-gf8.png

The relationship between the area corresponding to surface cracks, percentage of substitution, and hardness of the cookies is included in Figure 4. It shows the direct relationship of the phenomenon with the oat content and therefore with the effect on mechanical resistance. A higher amount of oats produces an increase in cracks on the surface, which lead to more fragile cookies.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Correlation between (%) substitution (A) and cookie texture (B) with the area of pixels belonging to the surface cracks.

2007-0934-remexca-16-05-e3784-gf9.png

Studies by Inglett et al. (2015) observed a trend of decrease in the firmness of the cookie with the texture of the dough, which coincides with the results obtained in this research. Hoseney and Rogers (1994) attributed the firmness of cookies to the interaction of proteins and starch by hydrogen bonds.

In their research, Fustier et al. (2009) showed how a higher dough consistency resulted in higher values of cookie hardness. Nevertheless, this was not the case for the various mixtures of fractions that they themselves analyzed due to the complex interactions between their constituents; an increase in the consistency of the dough was not necessarily accompanied by an increase in the hardness of the cookies. This further indicates that the other ingredients in the dough (sugar, fat and water) used in each recipe exert an important influence on altering the final texture of the cookie.

The observed changes in the structural properties of cookie crumbs followed the pattern previously observed. Figure 5 shows how the increase in oat content caused the color to shift to lighter areas. In this case, pixels with values tending to 250 indicate crumb lightening, that is bubble removal. The elimination of wheat produces a reduction in the gas retention capacity, collapse of the dough and thus a greater number of pixels of light tones.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Study of average histograms of grays of cookie crumbs. Black= control; white= 95% CWF-5% OF; gray= 90% CWF-10% OF; yellow= 80% CWF-20% OF.

2007-0934-remexca-16-05-e3784-gf10.png

Conclusions

Through image analysis, it was possible to detect an increase in surface fissures in the cookie; at the same time, there was a decrease in the bubbles observed in the crumb, which resulted in a reduction in the firmness values in the cookies with higher percentages of oat flour substitution. Based on the above, it is possible to use image analysis as a quick alternative for morphological quality control in production processes of this type of cookie.

Bibliography

1 

AACC, 2000. Approved Methods of American Association of Cereal Chemists. 10th Ed. The Association, St. Paul, MN, USA. Methods 44-15, 46-13, 30-25, 08-01. Baking Quality of Cookie Flour Method 10-50D.

2 

Abdollahi-Moghaddam, M. R.; Rafe, A. and Taghizadeh, M. 2015. Kinetics of color and physical attributes of cookies during Deep fat frying by image processing techniques. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. 39(1):91-99. https://doi:10.1111/jfpp.12268.

3 

Abdullah, M. Z.; Guan, L. C.; Lim, K. C. and Karim, A. A. 2004. The applications of computer vision system and tomographic radar imaging for assessing physical properties of food. Journal of Food Eng. 61(1):125-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00194-8.

4 

Ahmed, J. and Basu, S. 2022. Advances in food rheology and its applications. development in food rheology. Woodhead Publishing, Second Edition. 1-4 pp.

5 

Ataş, M.; Yardimci, Y. and Temizel, A. 2012. A new approach to aflatoxin detection in chili pepper by machine vision. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 87(8):129-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2012.06.001.

6 

Bennedsen, B. S.; Peterson, D. L. and Tabb, A. 2005. Identifying defects in images of rotating apples. Comput. Electron. Agric. 48(2):92-102. https://doi:10.1016/j.compag.2005.01.003.

7 

Blanco, M. S.; León, A. E. and Ribottaa, P. D. 2019. Incorporation of dietary fiber on the cookie dough. Effects on thermal properties and water availability. Food Chemistry. 271(2):309-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.07.146.

8 

Blasco, J.; Aleixos, N.; Cubero, S.; Gomez-Sanchis, J. and Molto, E. 2009. Automatic sorting of satsuma (Citrus unshiu) segments using computer vision and morphological features. Comput. Electron. Agric. 66(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2008.11.006.

9 

Brosnan, T. and Sun, D. W. 2004. Improving quality inspection of food products by computer vision: a review. Journal of Food Eng. 61(1):3-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(03)00183-3.

10 

Dammer, K. H.; Möller, B.; Rodemann, B. and Heppner, D. 2011. Detection of head blight (Fusarium ssp.) in winter wheat by colour and multispectral image analyses. Crop Protection. 30(4):420-428. https://doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2010.12.015.

11 

Du, C. J. and Sun, D. W. 2004. Recent developments in the applications of image processing techniques for food quality evaluation. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 15(5):230-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2003.10.00.

12 

Du, C. J. and Sun, D. W. 2006. Learning techniques used in computer vision for food quality evaluation: a review. Journal of Food Eng. 72(1):39-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.11.017.

13 

Fustier, P.; Castaigne, F.; Turgeon, S. L. and Billaderis, C. G. 2009. Impact of commercial soft wheat flour streams on dough rheology and quality attributes of cookies. Journal of Food Engineering. 90(2):228-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.06.026.

14 

Gerrard, D. E.; Gao, X. and Tan, J. 1996. Beef marbling and colour score determination by image processing. Journal of Food Science. 61(1):145-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1996.tb14745.x.

15 

Hoseney, R. C. and Rogers, D. E. 1994. Mechanism of sugar functionality in cookies: the science of cookie and cracker production. In: Faridi, H. Ed. 1st. St. Paul, MN. American Association of Cereal Chemists. 203-225 pp.

16 

Inglett, G. E.; Chen, D. and Liu, S. 2015. Physical properties of gluten-free sugar cookies made from amaranth-oat composites. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 63(1):214-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.03.056.

17 

Islas, A. R.; Preciado, R. E.; Granados, M. C.; Mercado, J. N. and Vásquez, F. 2012. Evaluación de textura en masas multigrano, maíz QPM y maíz blanco. Memorias 4to. Congreso Internacional de Nixtamalización. 77-81 pp.

18 

Maldonado, R. and Pacheco, E. 2000. Elaboración de galletas con una mezcla de harina de trigo y de plátano verde. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutrición. 50(4):1-11. https://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci-arttext&pid=S0004-06222000000400011.

19 

Mendoza, L. and Aguilera, J. M. 2004. Application of image analysis for classification of ripening bananas. Journal Food Science. 69(9):471-477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.tb09932.x.

20 

Munkevik, P.; Hall, G. and Duckett, T. 2007. A computer vision system for appearance based descriptive sensory evaluation of meals. Journal of Food Eng. 78(1):246-256. https://doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.09.033.

21 

Pace, B.; Cefola, M.; Renna, F. and Attolico, G. 2011. Relationship between visual appearance and browning as evaluated by image analysis and chemical traits in fresh-cut nectarines. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 61(2-3):178-183. https://doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.03.005.

22 

Qiao, J.; Sasao, A.; Shibusawa, S.; Kondo, N. and Morimoto, E. 2004. Mobile fruit grading robot (part 1): development of a robotic system for grading sweet peppers. J. JSAM. 66(2):113-122. https://doi:10.11357/jsam1937.66.2-113.

23 

Qiao, J.; Sasao, A.; Shibusawa, S.; Kondo, N. and Morimoto, E. 2005. Mapping yield and quality using the mobile fruit grading robot. Biosyst. Eng. 90(2):135-142. https://doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.10.002.

24 

Schindelin, J.; Arganda-Carreras, I. and Frise, E. 2012. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9(7):676-682. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2019.

25 

Shafiee, S. S.; Minaei, S.; Charkari, N. M.; Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti, M. and Barzegar, M. 2013. Potential application of machine vision to honey characterization. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 30(2):174-177.https://doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2012.12.004.

26 

Serna-Saldívar, S. R. O. 2003. Manufactura y control de calidad de productos basados en cereales. AGT Editor, SA. 193-194 pp.

27 

Szczesniak, A. S. 2002. Texture is a sensory property. Food quality and preference. 13(4):215-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(01)00039-8.

28 

Slade, L. and Levine, H. 1994. Structure-function relationships of cookie and cracker ingredients. In: Faridi, H. Ed. The Science of Cookie and Cracker Production. Chapman and Hall, London. 23-142 pp.

29 

Torres, J. D.; Torres, R.; Acevedo, D. and Gallo, L. A. 2015. Evaluación instrumental de los parámetros de textura de galletas de limón. Revista Vector. 10(1):14-25.

30 

Wang, L.; Ye, F.; Li, S.; Wei, F.; Chen, J. and Zhao, G. 2017. Wheat flour enriched with oat b-glucan: a study of hydration, rheological and fermentation properties of dough. Journal of Cereal Science. 75(3):143-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2017.03.004.

31 

Zapotoczny, P. 2011. Discrimination of wheat grain varieties using image analysis and neural networks. Part I. Single kernel texture. Journal Cereal Science. 54(1):60-68. https://doi:10.1016/j.jcs.2011.02.012.