https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v15i5.3719

elocation-id: e3719

Aviles-Rivera, Hernández-Mendoza, Heredia, Mata-Haro, Santiago-López, and Muy-Rangel: Fermentation ability of specific strains of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum using mango as base material

Journal Metadata

Journal Identifier: remexca [journal-id-type=publisher-id]

Journal Title Group

Journal Title (Full): Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

Abbreviated Journal Title: Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc [abbrev-type=publisher]

ISSN: 2007-0934 [pub-type=ppub]

Publisher

Publisher’s Name: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias

Article Metadata

Article Identifier: 10.29312/remexca.v15i5.3719 [pub-id-type=doi]

Article Grouping Data

Subject Group [subj-group-type=heading]

Subject Grouping Name: Articles

Title Group

Article Title: Fermentation ability of specific strains of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum using mango as base material

Contributor Group

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Aviles-Rivera

Given (First) Names: Yudit Aimee

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Superscript: 1

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Hernández-Mendoza

Given (First) Names: Adrián

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

Superscript: 2

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Heredia

Given (First) Names: José Basilio

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Superscript: 1

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Mata-Haro

Given (First) Names: Verónica

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff3]

Superscript: 3

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Santiago-López

Given (First) Names: Lourdes

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

Superscript: 2

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Muy-Rangel

Given (First) Names: María Dolores

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Superscript: 1

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=corresp; rid=c1]

Superscript: §

Affiliation [id=aff1]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 1

Institution Name: in an Address: Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, AC-Coordinación Regional Culiacán. Carretera a Eldorado km 5.5, Col. Campo El Diez, Culiacán, Sinaloa, México. CP. 80110. [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo A. C. [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, AC [content-type=orgname]

Institution Name: in an Address: Coordinación Regional Culiacán [content-type=orgdiv1]

Address Line

City: Culiacán

State or Province: Sinaloa

Postal Code: 80110

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Affiliation [id=aff2]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 2

Institution Name: in an Address: Laboratorio de Química y Biotecnología de Productos Lácteos-Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, AC. Carretera Gustavo Enrique Astiazarán Rosas Núm. 46, Col. La Victoria, Hermosillo, Sonora, México. CP. 83304. [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo A. C. [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Laboratorio de Química y Biotecnología de Productos Lácteos [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, AC [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

City: Hermosillo

State or Province: Sonora

Postal Code: 83304

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Affiliation [id=aff3]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 3

Institution Name: in an Address: Laboratorio de Microbiología e Inmunología-Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, AC. Carretera Gustavo Enrique Astiazarán Rosas Núm. 46, Col. La Victoria, Hermosillo, Sonora, México. CP. 83304. [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo A. C. [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Laboratorio de Microbiología e Inmunología [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, AC. [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

City: Hermosillo

State or Province: Sonora

Postal Code: 83304

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Author Note Group

Correspondence Information: [§] Autora para correspondencia: mdmuy@ciad.mx [id=c1]

Publication Date [date-type=pub; publication-format=electronic]

Day: 23

Month: 07

Year: 2024

Publication Date [date-type=collection; publication-format=electronic]

Season: Jul-Aug

Year: 2024

Volume Number: 15

Issue Number: 5

Electronic Location Identifier: e3719

History: Document History

Date [date-type=received]

Day: 01

Month: 04

Year: 2024

Date [date-type=accepted]

Day: 01

Month: 07

Year: 2024

Permissions

License Information [license-type=open-access; xlink:href=https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/; xml:lang=es]

Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons

Abstract

Title: Abstract

The fermentation ability of two potentially probiotic bacteria, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Lp6 and Lp32, was evaluated on juice from mango cv Ataulfo as a substrate. To do this, the strains (1010 CFU ml-1) were added in three levels of inoculum (1, 2, and 3%, v/v) in mango juice and incubated for 36 h at 37 °C. Samples were taken (0, 18, and 36 h) to assess bacterial growth, total soluble solids, individual sugars, pH, and titratable acidity (% lactic acid). Additionally, the effect of fermentation on the color and sugars (glucose, fructose, and sucrose) of the juice was determined. Both strains have fermentation ability and a cell growth of four logarithmic cycles after 12 h of fermentation. No differences in color were observed between fermented and unfermented juice. Lp6 and Lp32 bacteria can be used as starter cultures for the production of mango-based functional beverages.

Keyword Group [xml:lang=en]

Title: Keywords:

Keyword: Mangifera indica

Keyword: fermentation

Keyword: lactic acid bacteria

Keyword: quality.

Funding Group

Award Group [award-type=contract]

Funding Source: CONAHCYT-FORDECYT

Award Identifier: 292474

Counts

Figure Count [count=1]

Table Count [count=3]

Equation Count [count=2]

Reference Count [count=23]

Page Count [count=0]

Abstract

The fermentation ability of two potentially probiotic bacteria, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Lp6 and Lp32, was evaluated on juice from mango cv Ataulfo as a substrate. To do this, the strains (1010 CFU ml-1) were added in three levels of inoculum (1, 2, and 3%, v/v) in mango juice and incubated for 36 h at 37 °C. Samples were taken (0, 18, and 36 h) to assess bacterial growth, total soluble solids, individual sugars, pH, and titratable acidity (% lactic acid). Additionally, the effect of fermentation on the color and sugars (glucose, fructose, and sucrose) of the juice was determined. Both strains have fermentation ability and a cell growth of four logarithmic cycles after 12 h of fermentation. No differences in color were observed between fermented and unfermented juice. Lp6 and Lp32 bacteria can be used as starter cultures for the production of mango-based functional beverages.

Keywords:

Mangifera indica, fermentation, lactic acid bacteria, quality.

Introduction

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are used in the food and beverage industries as starter cultures or adjunct cultures, including some with probiotic properties for the production of fermented beverages, which can increase the shelf life, nutritional value, and sensory properties of the beverage.

During the fermentation process, bacteria are able to convert carbohydrates into organic acids such as lactic acid, which, during fermentation, is influenced by temperature, nutrients and the strain used, such as Leuconostoc, Pediococcus, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Oenococcus and Lactobacillus; from the last genus cited, the most widely used species is Lactiplantibacillus plantarum due to its ecological adaptability (Punia et al., 2022). Yang et al. (2018) indicated that strains of L. plantarum are successfully used for the formulation of fruit and vegetable beverages.

In this regard, Cele et al. (2022) reported the use of L. plantarum for the fermentation of juice from mango cv ‘Sabre’, ‘Peach’ and ‘Tommy Atkins’. Their results showed that the strain of L. plantarum used improved the content of volatile compounds, ascorbic acid, phenolic content, and antioxidants, which could have a beneficial effect on human health, which in turn places it as a substrate for the development of functional beverages (García et al., 2020; Lan et al., 2023).

Functional beverages are one of the fastest-growing categories of functional foods due to consumer interest in healthier beverages (Ahmed et al., 2023; Isas et al., 2023). For this reason, fermentable substrates are sought to obtain value-added products. Of particular interest is the mango cv Ataulfo (Mangifera indica L.), which contains significant amounts of bioactive compounds, such as carotenoids, fiber, polyphenols, minerals, vitamins, and is also sweet in taste, with low acidity, intense aroma, and its high sugar content can act as a substrate for the growth of fermentative bacteria (Palafox et al., 2012; Quirós et al., 2017; Kesa et al., 2021).

Although there are studies that have shown that fruit juices of pineapple (Toan et al., 2019), blueberries (Li et al., 2021), pomegranate (Kumar et al., 2015) and peaches (Managa et al., 2021), there is limited information on the use of mango, Ataulfo variety, as a matrix for the fermentation of lactic acid bacteria. The work aimed to evaluate the fermentation ability (cell growth and percentage of lactic acid) of two potentially probiotic bacteria, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Lp6 and Lp32, using juice from mango cv Ataulfo as a substrate.

Materials and methods

Preparation of a mango-based beverage

Fruits of mango cv Ataulfo in commercial maturity were obtained from Chiapas, Mexico; the pulp of the fruit was collected manually (°Brix 16-17, pH 4.2-4.5), vacuum-packed and stored at -20 °C. The thawed pulp was ground in an Oster domestic blender (model: BLST4126R, Newell Brands, Mexico) to make the fermentable matrix with mango pulp/water in a 50:50 ratio, adjusted to 13 °Brix with sucrose. Mango juice (200 ml) was pasteurized using a water bath at 85 °C (Thermo Scientific, Precision CIR 35, MA, USA) for 5 min and cooled with an ice bath. The prepared juice was kept refrigerated (4 ±1 °C) until use.

Mango juice inoculation

Fermentation was carried out with the Lp6 and Lp32 strains of the strain collection of the CIAD Dairy Products Laboratory (García et al., 2022; Santiago et al., 2023). The bacteria were propagated in MRS broth (Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe; Condalab, St. Forja, Madrid, Spain) using three consecutive subcultures (12, 10, and 8 h) at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions. Bacteria were recovered from the last subculture by centrifugation (4 500 × g, 10 min, 4 °C), washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; 0.1 M, pH 7.2), and adjusted to an initial concentration of 1010 CFU ml-1. Fermentation was carried out with 1, 2 and 3% v/v inoculum and incubated at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions for 36 h. Samples were taken at 0, 18 and 36 h of fermentation in triplicate. Fermentation efficiency with 1% inoculum was determined with different fermentation times (0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h) and color and sugars were analyzed.

pH determination

Changes in pH values were recorded with a digital pH potentiometer (Thermo Scientific, Orion Versa Star, MA, USA); the electrode was inserted into the samples (10 ml, temperature 35 °C) and the reading was recorded (AOAC, 1990; Cele et al., 2022).

Determination of titratable acidity

Titratable acidity was determined following the procedures described in AOAC (2000); Chen et al. (2023) with slight modifications. Five milliliters of sample were mixed with 50 ml of deionized water and placed in an automatic titrator (Mettler Toledo, T50, CDMX, Mexico), using 1 N sodium hydroxide standard solution until the pH was 8.0. The result was expressed as (%) lactic acid:

[% titratable acidity=ml of NAOH used N from NaOH 0.09 ml of titrated juice ] .09= milliequivalent of lactic acid

Determination of total soluble solids (TSS)

The TSS in the samples were performed in a digital refractometer (Mettler Toledo, RE40D, CDMX, Mexico) at 20 °C. The refractometer was calibrated with distilled water. The value of TSS (° Brix) was determined in triplicate by placing a drop of sample in the equipment.

Determination of sugars

Glucose, fructose, and sucrose in the samples were analyzed with the Megazyme kit (Megazyme, International Ireland Ltd Wicklow, Ireland), measuring the glucose concentration before and after the hydrolysis of sucrose by the β-fructosidase (invertase) enzyme. For D-fructose, it is determined after D-glucose, with isomerization caused by the phosphoglucose isomerase (PGI) enzyme. All measurements were made on a spectrophotometer at 340 nm (Cary 60 UV-Vis spectrophotometer, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and reported as a percentage.

Cell growth

The cell growth of the bacteria was determined using the plate emptying method (Sanders, 2012) with MRS agar (Merck Millipore®, Darmstadt, Germany). One milliliter of each sample was added to a tube with 9 ml of peptone water, then serial dilutions were performed; 1 ml of the dilution was placed on the plates and the culture medium was added to the point of gelling. All plates were incubated in anaerobic conditions at 37 °C for 24-48 h and the results were expressed as Log colony-forming units (CFU) ml-1.

Color determination

The color of the samples was determined with a spectrophotometer (Konica CM-700, Minolta Inc., Japan) and the color coordinates L*, a*, b*, chromaticity (C) and hue (h) angle were calculated using the OnColor QC program version 5 (Siller et al., 1994; Minolta, 1994).

Statistical analysis

An A*B (A: % inoculum and B: time, h) factorial design with units repeated over time was used for the inoculum level. Factor A: 0, 1, 2 and 3% inoculum and factor B: fermentation time (0, 18, and 38 h). To determine the effect of the strains, an A*B (A: type of strain and B: time, h) factorial design with units repeated over time was performed. Factor A, 0, Lp6 and Lp32 and factor B, fermentation (0, 6, 24, and 48 h). For the variables of pH, titratable acidity, °Brix and sugars, a design of repeated measures over time was used. The differences in the parameters evaluated were determined by an Anova with significance of 5% and a Tukey test in the MINITAB 19 statistical package (Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA). Data were reported as means.

Results and discussion

The results for TSS (°Brix), pH and acidity (% lactic acid) are shown in Table 1 A decrease in TSS content was observed in samples with the three inoculum levels during the fermentation process; no difference (p> 0.05) was recorded in inoculum level and time for the Lp6 strain, while for the Lp32 strain, only 2% inoculum at 36 h was significantly lower. This behavior could indicate that the bacteria consumed the sugars (added and from the fruit) to generate energy and continue their growth (Punia et al., 2022; Cele et al., 2022).

Table 1

Table 1. Changes recorded during fermentation by the Lp6 and Lp32 strains in the mango-based matrix.

Inoculum (%) Time (h) °Brix pH Lactic acid (%) °Brix pH Lactic acid (%)
0 0 13.01*A 4.29A 0.23E 12.97A 4.23A 0.32EF
18 12.96A 4.24A 0.25E 12.95A 4.27A 0.31F
36 12.96A 4.26A 0.25E 12.96A 4.21A 0.311F
1 0 13A 4.29A 0.25E 12.95A 4.31A 0.32EF
18 12.9A 3.5BC 0.52C 12.88AB 3.58B 0.66D
36 12.82A 3.4C 0.99A 12.76AB 3.31C 0.89B
2 0 12.93A 4.28 A 0.24E 12.96A 4.26A 0.34E
18 12.87A 3.59BC 0.38D 12.86AB 3.74B 0.69C
36 12.84A 3.43 C 0.73B 12.68B 3.32C 0.92B
3 0 12.95A 4.28A 0.25E 12.95AB 4.19A 0.31F
18 12.84A 3.52B 0.42D 12.78AB 3.74B 0.71C
36 12.83A 3.43C 0.67B 12.72AB 3.35C 0.95A

[i] *Means of three repetitions. Same literal by response variable is statistically equal (Tukey> 0.05).

The initial pH value of the samples was 4.26, with a decrease of 20% for the three inoculum levels after 36 h of fermentation, showing no difference (p> 0.05) between the inoculum concentration levels, but in the fermentation time (Table 1), where the fermentation process in mango is not dependent on the inoculum concentration level, and 1% can be used.

The decrease in pH is due to the fermentation process, where the LAB use the carbohydrates present in mango as a substrate for the transformation into acidic products (H+) (Punia et al., 2022). Mwanzia et al. (2022) reported that the pH of mango juice (cv Sabre, Peach, and Tommy Atkins) fermented decreased after 72 h of process with three cultures: pH= 3.23 for Abt-5 (S. thermophilus, Bifidobacterium and L. acidophilus), pH= 3.6 for Fiti (L. rhamnosus) and pH= 3.7 for L. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus. Cele et al. (2022) point out that L. plantarum was the one that developed the lowest pH= 3.66.

In mango juice fermented with the Lp6 and Lp32 strains, a difference (p≤ 0.05) was observed in the percentage of acidity between inoculum levels and fermentation time (Table 1), behaving inversely to pH. The maximum acidity values (0.99%) were recorded in juice fermented by Lp6 at 36 h with 1% inoculum, while for Lp32, it was with 3% inoculum. Kumar et al. (2015) report an increase in acidity (0.49 to 0.66%) in a mango beverage with L. plantarum NCDC LP 20 at 72 h.

Cell concentration

The initial count for mango juices was 7.7 log10 CFU ml-1 in both strains (Lp6 and Lp32), after 18 h of fermentation an increase of 4 log10 CFU ml-1 was observed regardless of the initial inoculum concentration (p> 0.05), followed by a decrease (p≤ 0.05) of 1 log10 CFU ml-1 at 36 h (Figure 1).

The cell growth observed during fermentation with the Lp6 and Lp32 strains was higher than previously reported in mango beverage fermented with three LAB cultures (Mwanzia et al., 2022) and with the strain L. plantarum NCDC LP20 (Kumar et al., 2015). The increase in cell concentration could indicate that the strains adapted to the mango-based matrix, while the decrease recorded at 36 h could be due to the fact the strains are in competition for nutrients and due to the antimicrobial effect of organic acids (lactic acid) produced by bacteria (Coban, 2020).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Cell concentration of Lp6 (A) and Lp32 (B) strains during the fermentation time of mango juice added at different inoculum levels.

2007-0934-remexca-15-05-e3719-gf2.jpg

LAB are microorganisms capable of hydrolyzing proteins and their sustainable growth depends on the production of specific proteinases, peptidases, and peptides (Parra, 2010), the low amount of protein in mangoes limits their growth; however, their metabolic capacity of proteins, sugars and lipids favor the sensory properties of fermented foods (Palafox et al., 2012; Punia et al., 2022). As no difference (p> 0.05) was found between the three inoculum levels for the variables of cell concentration, °Brix and pH, it was decided to use the inoculum level of 1% to corroborate their fermentation ability and include new study variables (color and sugars).

Fermentation of mango pulp juice with 1% Lp6 and Lp32

In the TSS (°Brix) content in the samples, a significant decrease (p≤ 0.5) was found between the Lp6 and Lp32 strains compared to the control (juice without LAB) (Table 2). Nevertheless, the changes in °Brix were numerically minimal but significant because the °Brix were expressed as dissolved solids of sugars and acids; in this sense, the total sugars were statistically different (p≤ 0.5) at 48 h of fermentation with the strains, related to the degradation of glucose by the LAB, with no difference (p> 0.5) in glucose and fructose. When glucose degraded, lactic acid increased and pH decreased, with differences (p≤ 0.5) between the strains at 48 h of fermentation.

Table 2

Table 2. Changes recorded during fermentation of the mango-based matrix by the Lp6 and Lp32 strains.

Strain Time (h) °Brix Total sugars Gluc g 100 g-1 Fruc g 100 g-1 Suc g 100 g-1 pH Acidity
Control 0 13*A 11.1A 0.59B 1.5A 9A 4.19A 0.32E
6 13A 11.2AB 0.64B 1.4A 8.1A 4.19A 0.32E
12 13A - - - - 4.19A 0.32E
24 13A 10.6B 0.97A 1.7A 7.9A 4.18A 0.32E
48 13A 9.5AB 1.1A 1.9A 6.6BC 4.12B 0.33E
Lp6 0 12.97AB 10AB 0.53B 1.3AB 8.1A 4.19A 0.36E
6 12.87A 9.1 C 0.55B 1.2B 7.4A 4.11C 0.36DE
12 12.81A - - - - 4.73D 0.5C
24 12.81B 9.1C 0.79AB 1.2B 6.9B 3.57E 0.54C
48 12.78BC 7.5D 0.91A 1.5A 5.1C 3.57E 0.82B
Lp32 0 12. 96AB 10.1AB 0.59B 1.5A 8.2A 4.18A 0.32A
6 12.87A 9.1C 0.5B 1.3AB 7.4A 4.09B 0.35E
12 12.81A - - - - 3.71D 0.49CD
24 12.78B 8.6CD 0.74AB 1.6A 6.3C 3.37F 0.72B
48 12.71C 8.4CD 1.1A 1.8A 5.5C 3.2 G 0.98 A

[i] Gluc= glucose; Fruc= fructose; Suc= sucrose. Acidity (% lactic acid). *Average of three repetitions. Same letter by column is statistically equal (Tukey> 0.05).

Mango mainly contains three sugars: sucrose, fructose, and glucose, substrates that bacteria such as Lp6 and Lp32 may be using in the production of lactic acid, demonstrating that both strains can be used to obtain a fermented mango-based beverage (Punia et al., 2022).

Growth of bacteria inoculated at 1%

The initial count of the Lp6 and Lp32 strains was 7.7 log10 CFU ml-1, with maximum cell growth of 4.5 log10 CFU ml-1 at 12 h of fermentation. After reaching the stationary phase of the bacteria, a decrease occurred at 24 and 48 h of fermentation, while the sample without inoculum remained without bacterial growth. The bacterial behavior may be due to the decrease in pH and increase in the percentage of acidity, which causes the inhibition of bacterial growth, reducing LAB, in addition to the accumulation of metabolites (propionic, acetic, lactic acid and bacteriocins), which could develop a toxic system, the cytoplasm acidifies, energy consumption increases to maintain the pH, and enzymatic reactions are inhibited (Punia et al., 2022; Cele et al., 2022).

Color

Table 3 shows that the fermentation process by the Lp6 and Lp32 strains did not affect the color of the mango juice, expressed in luminosity (40.8 to 42.8), a* value (0.1-0.4) and hue angle (°Hue) or true color (87.2-89.5), placing the beverage in a yellow color, according to the Minolta (1994) color circle.

Table 3

Table 3. Changes in the color variables of the mango beverage fermented with Lp6 and Lp32 strains.

Time (h) Luminosity a* value b* value Chromaticity °Hue
Control 0 42.8*A 0.3A 16C 16C 89A
6 42.4A 0.4A 17.6A 17.6A 87.2A
12 42A 0.4A 17.6A 17.6A 88.4A
24 41.4A 0.4A 14.6BC 14.6BC 88.6A
48 42.3A 0.3A 14.2BC 14.2BC 88.6A
Lp6 0 42.7A 0.3A 17.1 AB 17.1 AB 88.8A
6 41A 0.3A 16.8B 16.8B 88.7A
12 40.3A 0.3A 16.7 B 16.7 B 88.8A
24 41A 0.1A 17.6A 17.6A 89.3A
48 41.8A 0.1A 14.4BC 14.4BC 89.7A
Lp32 0 40.8A 0.1A 14.7 BC 14.7 BC 89.5A
6 41.2A 0.4A 15.1C 15.1BC 89.4A
12 41A 0.3A 15.6AB 15.6BC 89A
24 41.2A 0.3A 15.1BC 15.1BC 89.4A
48 40.8A 0.1A 14.7A 14.7BC 89.5A

[i] *Average of three repetitions. Same letter by response variable is statistically the same (Tukey> 0.05).

Nonetheless, a decrease (p≤ 0.5) in the value of b* and chromaticity was observed between the hours of fermentation, but not between the samples with the strain and the control at 48 h of fermentation. This suggests that the fermentation process does not affect the color of the juice. In addition, the color changes in the juice confirm that the pasteurization process was sufficient to reduce the enzymatic activity associated with pigment oxidation or other biochemical processes that affect the visual quality of mango juice (Managa et al., 2021; Quiros et al., 2017). Cele et al. (2022) reported a reduction in color values (L*, a*, and chroma) in beverages of mango cv Sabre and Peach fermented with the Lactiplantibacillus plantarum strain, but not when using Tommy Atkins mango. The authors point out that the increased acidity of fermented juices helps protect against enzymatic browning, in this sense, the mangoes studied presented different amounts of sugars and organic acids; they also comment that food products with dark colors due to the enzymatic effect are less likely to be accepted by consumers.

Conclusions

The strains of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Lp6 and Lp32 can be used for their fermentative ability (in reference to cell growth and percentage of lactic acid) for the production of a functional beverage based on mango cv Ataulfo, with good characteristics in terms of color, acidity, sugars, as well as other sensory properties offered by lactic acid bacteria.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the technical support provided by MSc Rosalba Contreras Martínez and MSc Rosabel Vélez de la Rocha of CIAD Culiacán, and the project No. 292474 of CONAHCYT-FORDECYT

Bibliography

1 

Ahmed, T.; Sabuz, A. A.; Mohaldar, A.; Fardows, H. S.; Inbaraj, B. S.; Sharma, M.; Rana, M. R. and Sridhar, K. 2023. Development of novel whey mango based mixed beverage: effect of storage on physicochemical, microbiological, and sensory analysis. Foods. 12(2):237-256. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12020237.

2 

AOAC, 1990. Association of official analytical chemists. Official methods of analysis. AOAC: Official methods of analysis. 15:69-90.

3 

Cele, N. P.; Akinola, S. A.; Manhivi, V. E.; Shoko, T.; Remize, F. and Sivakumar, D. 2022. Influence of lactic acid bacterium strains on changes in quality, functional compounds and volatile compounds of mango juice from different cultivars during fermentation. Foods. 11(5):682-701. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11050682.

4 

Chen, M.; Xie, C.; He, Q.; Sun, J. and Bai, W. 2023. Improvement in color expression and antioxidant activity of strawberry juice fermented with lactic acid bacteria: A phenolic based research. Food Chemistry. 5(17):100535-100545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100535.

5 

Coban, H. B. 2020. Organic acids as antimicrobial food agents: applications and microbial productions. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering. 43(4):569-591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-019-02256-w.

6 

García, C.; Guerin, M.; Souidi, K. and Remize, F. 2020. Lactic fermented fruit or vegetable juices: past, present and future. Beverages. 6(1):8-38. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages6010008.

7 

García, H. S.; Santiago, L. L.; González, C. F.; Vallejo, C. B. and Hernández, M. A. 2022. Evaluation of a pseudocereal suitability to prepare a functional fermented beverage with epiphytic lactic acid bacteria of huauzontle (Chenopodium berlandieri spp. nuttalliae). LWT- Food Science and Technology. 155(5):112913-112919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112913.

8 

Isas, A. S.; Escobar, F.; Alvarez, E. V.; Molina, V.; Mateos, R.; Lizarraga, E.; Mozzi, F. and Van, C. N. 2023. Fermentation of pomegranate juice by lactic acid bacteria and its biological effect on mice fed a high-fat diet. Food Bioscience. 11(53):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2023.102516.

9 

Kumar, B. V.; Sreedharamurthy, M. and Reddy, O. S. 2015. Probiotication of mango and sapota juices using Lactobacillus plantaru NCDC LP 20. Nutrafoods. 4(14):97-106.

10 

Lan, T.; Wang, J.; Bao, S.; Zhao, Q.; Sun, X.; Fang, Y.; Ma, T. and Liu, S. 2023. Effects and impacts of technical processing units on the nutrients and functional components of fruit and vegetable juice. Food Research International. 6(168):112784-112813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2023.112784.

11 

Li, S.; Tao, Y.; Li, D.; Wen, G.; Zhou, J.; Manickam, S.; Han, Y.; Siong, W. and Chai, H. 2021. Fermentation of blueberry juices using autochthonous lactic acid bacteria isolated from fruit environment: fermentation characteristics and evolution of phenolic profiles. Chemosphere. 12(276):130090-1300100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere. 2021.130090.

12 

Managa, M. G.; Akinola, S. A.; Remize, F.; Garcia, C. and Sivakumar, D. 2021. Physicochemical parameters and bioaccessibility of lactic acid bacteria fermented chayote leaf (Sechium edule) and pineapple (Ananas comosus) smoothies. Frontier. Nutrition. 8(120):649189-649202. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2021.649189.

13 

Minolta. 1994. Precise color communication: color control from feeling to instrumentation. Tokyo, Japan. 51-61 pp.

14 

Mwanzia, M.; Kiio, J. and Okoth, E. 2022. Formulation, processing and characterization of fermented probiotic mango juice using selected starter cultures. European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences. 1(4):86-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.24018/ejfood.2022.4.1.437.

15 

Palafox, H. C.; Yahia, E. M. and González, A. G. 2012. Identification and quantification of major phenolic compounds from mango (Mangifera indica, cv Ataulfo) fruit by HPLC-DAD-MS/MS-ESI and their individual contribution to the antioxidant activity during ripening. Food Chemistry . 1(135):105-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.04.103.

16 

Parra, H. R. 2010. Review. Bacterias ácido lácticas: papel funcional en los alimentos. Biotecnología en el Sector Agropecuario y Agroindustrial. 18(1):1-13.

17 

Punia, B. S.; Suri, S.; Trif, M. and Ozogul, F. 2022. Organic acids production from lactic acid bacteria: a preservation approach. Food Bioscience . 11(46):101615-101630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101615.

18 

Quirós, S. E.; Chen, C. O.; Blumberg, J. B.; Astiazaran, G. H., Wall, M. A. and González, A. G. 2017. Processing ‘Ataulfo’ mango into juice preserves the bioavailability and antioxidant capacity of its phenolic compounds. Nutrients. 9(10):1082-1093. https://doi:10.3390/nu9101082.

19 

Sanders, E. R. 2012. Aseptic laboratory techniques: plating methods. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 1(63):3064-3081. https://doi:10.3791/3064.

20 

Santiago, L. L.; Almada, C. A.; García, H. S.; Mata, H. V.; González, C. F.; Vallejo, C. B. and Hernández, M. A. 2023. Antidepressant and anxiolytic effects of fermented huauzontle, a prehispanic Mexican pseudocereal. Foods. 12(1):53-68. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12010053.

21 

Siller, C. J.; Muy, R. D.; Araiza, L. E.; Báez, S. M.; Rodríguez, J.; Báez, R. and Ireta, O. A.1994. Evaluación de la calidad de clones de mango introducidos a Sinaloa. Proceedings of the Interamerican Society for Tropical Horticulture. 38(1):37-42.

22 

Toan, N. B.; Erika, B.; Fekete, N.; Tran, A. T. M.; Rezessy, S. M.; Prasad, R. and Nguyen, Q. D. 2019. Probiotic Beverage from pineapple juice fermented with Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains. Frontiers in Nutrition. 6(1):54-60. https://doi: 10.3389/fnut.2019.00054.

23 

Yang, X.; Zhou, J. L.; Quin, Z.; Chen, Q. and Zhao, L. 2018. Antioxidant properties of a vegetable-fruit beverage fermented with two Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Food Science and Biotechnology. 27(2):1719-1726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-018-0411-4.