https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v16i3.3633

elocation-id: e3633

Uribe-Rivera, Cerna-Chávez, Ochoa-Fuentes, Orozco-Plancarte, and Rueda-Puente: Extracts with nano and microparticles on Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Journal Metadata

Journal Identifier: remexca [journal-id-type=publisher-id]

Journal Title Group

Journal Title (Full): Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

Abbreviated Journal Title: Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc [abbrev-type=publisher]

ISSN: 2007-0934 [pub-type=ppub]

Publisher

Publisher’s Name: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias

Article Metadata

Article Identifier: 10.29312/remexca.v16i3.3633 [pub-id-type=doi]

Article Grouping Data

Subject Group [subj-group-type=heading]

Subject Grouping Name: Investigation note

Title Group

Article Title: Extracts with nano and microparticles on Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Contributor Group

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Uribe-Rivera

Given (First) Names: Saúl Enrique

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Superscript: 1

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Cerna-Chávez

Given (First) Names: Ernesto

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Superscript: 1

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Ochoa-Fuentes

Given (First) Names: Yisa María

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Superscript: 1

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Orozco-Plancarte

Given (First) Names: Antonio

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

Superscript: 2

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Rueda-Puente

Given (First) Names: Edgar Omar

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff3]

Superscript: 3

Affiliation [id=aff1]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 1

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro. Calzada Antonio Narro 1923, Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, México. CP. 25315. Tel. 844 2711563. (sauluribe.rivera@gmail.com; yisa8a@yahoo.com). [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

City: Saltillo

State or Province: Coahuila

Postal Code: 25315

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Email Address: sauluribe.rivera@gmail.com

Email Address: yisa8a@yahoo.com

Affiliation [id=aff2]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 2

Institution Name: in an Address: Culta, SA de CV. Blvd. Luis Echeverría Álvarez 1700, colonia AltaVista, Ciudad Mante, Tamaulipas, México. CP. 89880. Tel. 846 7353677. (antonioorozco25@outlook.es). [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Culta [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Culta, SA de CV. [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

City: Ciudad Mante

State or Province: Tamaulipas

Postal Code: 89880

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Email Address: antonioorozco25@outlook.es

Affiliation [id=aff3]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 3

Institution Name: in an Address: Departamento de Agricultura y Ganadería-Universidad de Sonora. Carretera a Bahía de Kino km 21.5, Hermosillo, Sonora, México. CP. 83323. Tel. 662 4548401. (edgar.rueda@unison.mx). [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad de Sonora [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Departamento de Agricultura y Ganadería [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad de Sonora [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

City: Hermosillo

State or Province: Sonora

Postal Code: 83323

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Email Address: edgar.rueda@unison.mx

Author Note Group

Correspondence Information: [§] Autor para correspondencia: jabaly1@yahoo.com. [id=c1]

Publication Date [date-type=pub; publication-format=electronic]

Day: 19

Month: 05

Year: 2025

Publication Date [date-type=collection; publication-format=electronic]

Season: Apr-May

Year: 2025

Volume Number: 16

Issue Number: 3

Electronic Location Identifier: e3633

History: Document History

Date [date-type=received]

Day: 01

Month: 01

Year: 2025

Date [date-type=accepted]

Day: 01

Month: 03

Year: 2025

Permissions

License Information [license-type=open-access; xlink:href=https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/; xml:lang=es]

Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons

Abstract

Title: Abstract

Sitophilus zeamais is an insect considered a primary pest of stored corn grains whose damage compromises corn production. In the search for options for its control, nanotechnology combined with plant extracts could be a viable option. The research was conducted in 2023 at the Department of Agricultural Parasitology with the aim of evaluating the insecticidal effect of two commercial extracts: Higuer® and Etos®, alone and in combination with nano- and microparticles of silicon, copper, zinc and graphite. The residual film bioassay technique was used for the evaluation; the nanoformulations were prepared at the concentration of 3% of each of the nano- and micromaterials. LC50 of two commercial extracts alone and in combinations with nano- and microparticles was determined. It was observed that extracts combined with silicon nanoparticles have the lowest values of LC50, followed by a copper, graphite, and zinc nanoparticles. In the values of the combinations with microparticles, they were equal to or higher than those found with the extract alone. It was concluded that the combination of the two extracts with the silicon nanoparticles stands out from the rest of the materials as they have lower LC50 values.

Keyword Group [xml:lang=en]

Title: Keywords:

Keyword: corn weevil

Keyword: nanotechnology

Keyword: stored grains

Counts

Figure Count [count=0]

Table Count [count=2]

Equation Count [count=0]

Reference Count [count=21]

Page Count [count=0]

Abstract

Sitophilus zeamais is an insect considered a primary pest of stored corn grains whose damage compromises corn production. In the search for options for its control, nanotechnology combined with plant extracts could be a viable option. The research was conducted in 2023 at the Department of Agricultural Parasitology with the aim of evaluating the insecticidal effect of two commercial extracts: Higuer® and Etos®, alone and in combination with nano- and microparticles of silicon, copper, zinc and graphite. The residual film bioassay technique was used for the evaluation; the nanoformulations were prepared at the concentration of 3% of each of the nano- and micromaterials. LC50 of two commercial extracts alone and in combinations with nano- and microparticles was determined. It was observed that extracts combined with silicon nanoparticles have the lowest values of LC50, followed by a copper, graphite, and zinc nanoparticles. In the values of the combinations with microparticles, they were equal to or higher than those found with the extract alone. It was concluded that the combination of the two extracts with the silicon nanoparticles stands out from the rest of the materials as they have lower LC50 values.

Keywords:

corn weevil, nanotechnology, stored grains.

The pest of Sitophilus zeamais (Motschulsky) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) is considered the primary pest of corn grain, causing losses due to direct and indirect damage amounting to about 90% of production in severe infestations (Achimon et al., 2022). Although the chemical method represents the main means of control, there have been situations such as resistance, damage to non-target insects, and environmental pollution (Andrade-Bustamante et al., 2023).

Recent research highlights the benefits of nano and microparticles and their combinations with extracts of the genus Sitophilus; for example, silicon as it provides high mortality and reduction in LC50 values (Seham and Sleem, 2020), copper and zinc with mortalities of up to 90 and 70%, respectively (Badawy et al., 2021), and graphene with mortalities of 100% (Moisidis et al., 2022).

Derived from this, the need arises to explore new technologies that allow more efficient control; in this sense, we find the use of nano- and micro-scale particles focused on agricultural applications (Sousa et al., 2023), generating the development opportunity to use extracts of plant origin and their mixtures with nano- and microparticles of different elements and materials, providing a potential alternative to the method chemical to achieve control of pest insects of stored grains (Jasrotia et al., 2022).

The objective of this research was to evaluate the insecticidal effect of two commercial plant extracts and their combination with nano and microparticles of silicon, copper, zinc, and graphite on adult insects of S. zeamais, a pest of stored corn grains, under the hypothesis that combinations with nanomaterials will present an insecticidal effect with LC50 values lower than their microparticulate counterparts and extracts alone.

This research was conducted at the Insect Toxicology Laboratory of the Department of Agricultural Parasitology of the Antonio Narro Autonomous Agrarian University (UAAAN), for its acronym in Spanish, located in Buena Vista, Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico. The adult insects of S. zeamais were obtained from pre-existing colonies of the toxicology laboratory of the UAAAN, free of chemical applications, kept in corn grains with a photoperiod of 12:12 (L:D) and relative humidity (RH) of 35%.

The extracts used, Higuer®, made from castor oil plant (Ricinus communis L.) and Etos®, made from pepper (Piper nigrum L.), as well as the nano- and microparticles of silicon, copper, zinc, and graphite, with spheres of 40-80 nanometers and particles of 100 microns, were provided by the company Culta, SA de CV, located in Ciudad Mante, Tamaulipas, Mexico.

The experimental design used was completely randomized with six concentrations plus a control for each extract alone and its combination with each type of material. Three replications per concentration and 30 insects per experimental unit. The nano and microformulations were prepared at the concentration of 3% in 100 ml beakers using test tubes, micropipettes, and distilled water.

The bioassay was by the residual film technique (FAO, 1974), in which each Petri dish was impregnated with 1 ml of each concentration, both of extract alone and nano and microformulated, with data collection at 24, 48 and 72 h, considering those insects that did not respond to the heat stimulus when placed on a plate as death criteria. The mortality data were corrected using Abbott (1925) formula, considering a mortality value not greater than 15% of the control for each treatment; in those treatments where there was no mortality in the control, direct data were recorded and the median lethal concentration (LC50) was estimated by means of a probit analysis (Finney, 1971) using the statistical program of SAS System for Windows, version 9.0.

The estimated LC50 values for Higuer®, alone and its combinations, are shown in Table 1. The combination with nano silicon presents the lowest value of LC50 with 57.2 ppm, followed by graphite, copper, and zinc. For its part, the combination of the Higuer® extract with the micromaterials leads to an increase in LC50 compared to the extract alone (81.8 ppm). The use of R. communis extract has been reported as an effective method for controlling S. zeamais, such as Wale and Assegie (2015), who estimated an LC50 value of 2 040 ppm.

Table 1

Table 1. Median lethal concentration, fiducial limits, and prediction equation for S. zeamais with Higuer ® and its combination with nano- and micromaterials.

Higuer® extract LC50 ppm LFL-UFL Prediction equation
Nanoparticles Alone 81.8 67.7-95.7 Y= -4.7037 ±2.4592
Si 57.2 10.5-193.4 Y= -2.1701 ±1.2347
Cu 71.8 24.1-153.8 Y= -2.442 ±1.3159
Zn 78.1 9.8 - 277.9 Y= -2.377 ±1.2558
Gr 68.3 35-114.2 Y= -2.5862 ±1.4094
Microparticles Si 85.2 16.9-334.5 Y= -2.8252 ±1.453
Cu 99.8 21.4-270.9 Y= -2.877 ±1.4395
Zn 107.8 29.5-444.5 Y= -2.7638 ±1.3594
Gr 103.8 84.2-125.5 Y= -3.0668 ±1.521

[i] LC50= median lethal concentration; LFL= lower fiducial limit; UFL= upper fiducial limit (95%); ppm= parts per million; Si= silicon; Cu= copper; Zn= zinc; Gr= graphite.

For their part, El-naby et al. (2020) evaluated nanoemulsions of R. communis and the extract alone against Sitophilus oryzae, estimating the LC50 of the nanoemulsion at 1 300 vs. 2 500 ppm of the extract alone, results that differ from the one obtained in this work (Higuer® 81.8 and Higuer® + nano silicon 57.2 ppm), which is much lower than those reported by these authors.

Although it was observed that the fiducial limits overlap and are statistically equal, the treatment that presents the lowest LC50 value is sought among the extracts alone and their combinations with nano- and microparticulate materials.

The estimated LC50 values for the Etos® extract alone and its combinations are shown in Table 2. In the combination of the extract with nanoparticles, the values of LC50 decrease compared to the extract alone, with silicon standing out with 67.77 ppm, followed by copper, graphite, and zinc. P. nigrum extract is a good tool for the control of the genus Sitophilus in accordance with mortalities reported by Abdel-Mogib et al. (2017), 100% on adults of S. oryzae; however, the estimated LC50 value corresponds to 2 400 ppm.

Table 2

Table 2. Median lethal concentration, fiducial limits, and prediction equation for S. zeamais with Etos ® and its combinations with nano- and microparticles.

Etos® Extract LC50 (ppm) LFL-UFL Prediction equation
Nanoparticles Alone 102.2 13.7- 316.1 Y= -2.6992 ±1.3431
Si 67.7 19.0-154.9 Y= -2.3558 ±1.2854
Cu 79.2 14.0-218.2 Y= -2.5056 ±1.3192
Zn 85.4 19.6-190 Y= -3.0722 ±1.5902
Gr 83.8 12.3-230.4 Y= -2.7277 ±1.4182
Microparticles Si 100.4 41.9-190.5 Y= -2.6139 ±1.3056
Cu 108.5 17.5-318 Y= 2.7252 ±1.3388
Zn 113.4 58.4-181 Y= -3.2658 ±1.5894
Gr 106.2 20.5-272.5 Y= -2.8522 ±1.4077

[i] LC50= median lethal concentration; LFL= lower fiducial limit; UFL= upper fiducial limit (95%); ppm= parts per million; Si= silicon; Cu= copper; Zn= zinc; Gr= graphite.

Likewise, Choden et al. (2021) evaluated P. nigrum extract on adults of S. zeamais and obtained an LC50 of 500 ppm, higher than in this research (102.2 ppm). Regarding nanoformulations with P. nigrum, Rajkumar et al. (2020) evaluated chitosan nanoparticles loaded with the essential oil against S. oryzae and reported an LC50 of 25.03 vs 48.97 ppm of the extract alone, although the LC50 value decreased, it differs from the present work (Etos® 102.2 vs Etos® + nano silicon 67.7 ppm).

For copper nanoparticles, LC50 values in ppm of 71.8 and 79.2 ppm, Higuer® and Etos®, respectively, were obtained; in contrast, Dikbaş et al. (2021), when evaluating copper nanoparticles on S. zeamais, achieved mortalities of 100% with an LC50 of 6 ppm, thanks to the addition of chitinase of bacterial origin to the nanoformulation. On the other hand, Wazid et al. (2020) reported that silicon nanoparticles were the most effective on S. oryzae, followed by copper and zinc. As for nanographene, Moisidis et al. (2022) evaluated two types of nanographene and reported that they achieved 100% mortality against S. oryzae at 500 ppm.

In the case of micromaterials, the lowest values were found with silicon microparticles and only with this, there is a slight decrease in the value of LC50 compared to extracts alone. Ciniviz and Mutlu (2020) evaluated microparticulate silicon (8-12 μ) on S. zeamais, achieving mortalities from 91 to 100% with 1 500 to 2 000 ppm. For their part, Das et al. (2019) evaluated nano- and microparticles of aluminum, titanium, and zinc on S. oryzae and achieved mortalities of 100% with aluminum nanoparticles, followed by titanium and zinc, and they conclude that nanomaterials were better than microparticles, coinciding with this study.

The fact that nanoparticles combined with extracts have lower values of LC50 compared to microparticles is attributed to the fact that they exhibit properties such as carriers of active compounds, large specific surfaces, and better capacity of adhesion and penetration into insect structures (Menossi et al., 2021).

Conclusions

The combinations of the Higuer® and Etos® extracts with the silicon nanoparticles represented a viable option in the control of S. zeamais since all the treatments presented the lowest LC50 values, respectively, followed by options with copper, graphite and zinc. In relation to microparticles, they presented values equal to or higher than those reported in the extracts alone. Therefore, it is recommended to carry out research on this type of particles.

Bibliography

1 

Abbott, W. S. 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology. 18(2):265-267.

2 

Abdel-Mogib, M. and Abou-Elnaga, Z. 2017. Toxicity of three chemical extracts of black pepper fruits against two stored grain insect pests. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science Invention. 6(10):20-29.

3 

Achimón, F. F.; Peschiutta, M. L.; Brito, V. D.; Beato, M. M.; Pizzolitto, R. P.; Zygadlo, J. A. and Zunino, M. P. 2022. Exploring contact toxicity of essential oils against Sitophilus zeamais through a meta-analysis approach. Plants. 11(22):3070. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223070.

4 

Andrade-Bustamante, G.; Suárez-Hernández, A. M.; Aispuro-Hernández, E. y Martínez-Ruiz, F. E. 2023. Trichoderma harzianum y espinosina en el control de gorgojo del trigo Sitophilus granarius (L. 1758). Biotecnia. 25(1):94-99. 10.18633/biotecnia.v25i1.1819.

5 

Badawy, A. A.; Abdelfattah, H. N.; Salem, S. S.; Awad, M. F. and Fouda, A. 2021. Efficacy assessment of biosynthesized copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO-NPs) on stored grain insects and their impacts on morphological and physiological traits of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plant. Biology. 10(3):2-20.

6 

Choden, S. S.; Yangchen, U. U. and Tenzin, J. J. 2020. Evaluation on the efficacy of Piper nigrum as a bio-pesticide against Sitophilus zeamais. Naresuan University Journal: Science and Technology. 29(2):84-95.

7 

Ciniviz, G. G. and Mutlu, Ç. C. 2020. Effectiveness of some native diatomaceous earth against maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), under controlled conditions. Agriculture & Forestry. 66(4):151-162.

8 

Das, S. S.; Yadav, A. A. and Debnath, N. N. 2019. Entomotoxic efficacy of aluminium oxide, titanium dioxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles against Sitophilus oryzae (L.). Journal of Stored Products Research. 83(1):92-96.

9 

Dikbaş, N. N.; Uçar, S. S.; Tozlu, G. G.; Öznülüer Özer, T. and Kotan, R. 2021. Bacterial chitinase biochemical properties, immobilization on zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticle and its effect on Sitophilus zeamais as a potential insecticide. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 37(10):1-14.

10 

El-Naby, A.; Shimaa, S. I.; Mahmoud, F. H.; El-Habal, N. A.; Abdou, M. S. and Abdel-Rheim, K. H. 2020. Efficacy of prepared castor oil nanoemulsion formulation against rice weevil Sitophilus Oryzae on stored wheat grain and Its Acute. Egyptian Scientific Journal of Pesticides. 6(4):33-34.

11 

Finney, D. J. 1971. Probit Analysis. Cambridge at the Univ. Press. 3rd Ed. 120 p.

12 

FAO. 1974. Food and Agriculture Organization. Recommended methods for the detection and measurement of the resistance of agricultural pests to pesticides. FAO plant protection bulletin 27.

13 

Jasrotia, P. P.; Nagpal, M. M.; Mishra, C. N.; Sharma, A. K.; Kumar, S. S.; Kamble, U. R. and Singh, G. P. 2022. Nanomaterials for postharvest management of insect pests: Current state and future perspectives. Frontiers in Nanotechnology. 3(1):1-19. Doi.org/10.3389/fnano.2021.811056.

14 

Menossi, M. M.; Ollier, R. P.; Casalongué, C. A. and Alvarez, V. A. 2021. Essential oil‐loaded bio‐nanomaterials for sustainable agricultural applications. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology. 96(8):2109-2122.

15 

Moisidis, I. C.; Sakka, M. K.; Karunagaran, R. U.; Losic, D. D. and Athanassiou, C. G. 2022. Insecticidal effect of graphene against three stored-product beetle species on wheat. Journal of Stored Products Research. 98(1):1-8.

16 

Rajkumar, V. V.; Gunasekaran, C. C.; Dharmaraj, J. J.; Chinnaraj, P. C.; Paul, C. A. and Kanithachristy, I. I. 2020. Structural characterization of chitosan nanoparticle loaded with Piper nigrum essential oil for biological efficacy against the stored grain pest control. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology. 166(1):1-9.

17 

SAS. 2002. Statistical Analysis System: Version 9.0. SAS Institute Inc., Cary.

18 

Seham, I. M. and Fatma, S. M. A. 2020. Contact toxicity, repellent activity and residual effect of Syzygium aromaticum L. (Myrtaceae) and Piper nigrum L. (Pipeaceae) powders against Sitophilus oryzae L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 8(6):2053-205.

19 

Sousa, P. A.; Neto, J. J.; Barbosa, J. V.; Peres, J. J.; Magro, A. A.; Barros, G. G. and Bastos, M. M. 2023. Novel approach for a controlled delivery of essential oils during long-term maize storage: clove bud and pennyroyal oils efficacy to control Sitophilus zeamais, reducing grain damage. Insects.14(4):366-383.

20 

Wale, M. M. and Assegie, H. H. 2015. Efficacy of castor bean oil (Ricinus communis L.) against maize weevils (Sitophilus zeamais Mots.) in northwestern Ethiopia. Journal of Stored Products Research. 63(1):38-41.

21 

Wazid, S. N.; Prabhuraj, A. A.; Naik, R. H.; Shakuntala, N. M. and Sharanagouda, H. H. 2020. The persistence of residual toxicity of zinc, copper and silica green nanoparticles against important storage pests. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 8(5):1207-1211.