https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v16i2.3504

elocation-id: e3504

Sandoval-García, Alanís-Rodríguez, Astudillo-Sánchez, and Mora-Olivo: Mycorrhization of Lupinus spp. in nursery to improve the development of plants in ecological restoration strategies

Journal Metadata

Journal Identifier: remexca [journal-id-type=publisher-id]

Journal Title Group

Journal Title (Full): Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

Abbreviated Journal Title: Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc [abbrev-type=publisher]

ISSN: 2007-0934 [pub-type=ppub]

Publisher

Publisher’s Name: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias

Article Metadata

Article Identifier: 10.29312/remexca.v16i2.3504 [pub-id-type=doi]

Article Grouping Data

Subject Group [subj-group-type=heading]

Subject Grouping Name: Investigation note

Title Group

Article Title: Mycorrhization of Lupinus spp. in nursery to improve the development of plants in ecological restoration strategies

Contributor Group

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Sandoval-García

Given (First) Names: Rufino

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Superscript: 1

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Alanís-Rodríguez

Given (First) Names: Eduardo

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

Superscript: 2

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Astudillo-Sánchez

Given (First) Names: Claudia Cecilia

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff3]

Superscript: 3

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Mora-Olivo

Given (First) Names: Arturo

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff3]

Superscript: 3

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=corresp; rid=c1]

Superscript: §

Affiliation [id=aff1]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 1

Institution Name: in an Address: Departamento Forestal-Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro. Calzada Antonio Narro 1923, Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, México. CP. 25315. Tel. 951 2404608 (rufino.sandoval.garcía@gmail.com). [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Departamento Forestal [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

City: Saltillo

State or Province: Coahuila

Postal Code: 25315

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Email Address: rufino.sandoval.garcía@gmail.com

Affiliation [id=aff2]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 2

Institution Name: in an Address: Facultad de Ciencias Forestales-Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León. Carretera Linares-Cd. Victoria km 145, Linares, Nuevo León, México. CP. 67700. Tel. 821 1182009. (eduardoforestal@gmail.com). [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Facultad de Ciencias Forestales [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

State or Province: Nuevo León

Postal Code: 67700

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Email Address: eduardoforestal@gmail.com

Affiliation [id=aff3]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 3

Institution Name: in an Address: Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias-Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas. Centro Universitario Victoria, Ciudad Victoria, Tamaulipas, México. CP. 87149. Tel. 834 2754902. (ccastudillo@docentes.uat.edu.mx). [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

City: Ciudad Victoria

State or Province: Tamaulipas

Postal Code: 87149

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Email Address: ccastudillo@docentes.uat.edu.mx

Author Note Group

Correspondence Information: [§] Autor para correspondencia: amorao@docentes.uat.edu.mx. [id=c1]

Publication Date [date-type=pub; publication-format=electronic]

Day: 16

Month: 04

Year: 2025

Publication Date [date-type=collection; publication-format=electronic]

Season: Feb-Mar

Year: 2025

Volume Number: 16

Issue Number: 2

Electronic Location Identifier: e3504

History: Document History

Date [date-type=received]

Day: 01

Month: 12

Year: 2024

Date [date-type=accepted]

Day: 01

Month: 02

Year: 2025

Permissions

License Information [license-type=open-access; xlink:href=https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/; xml:lang=es]

Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons

Abstract

Title: Abstract

The species of the genus Lupinus are considered to be of great ecological and nutritional importance due to their ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen to the soil and to the high content of proteins (seeds), fibers (leaves), sugars (leaves), and minerals (seeds). The present study aimed to evaluate the development of Lupinus montanus and L. campestris as a response to seed mycorrhization. Inoculation was performed with Rhizophagus irregularis-BIOFertilizante INIFAP®. The treatments were 400 inoculated plants (200 per species) and 400 without inoculation, which were considered as controls. The variables evaluated were growth in basal diameter (mm), total height (cm), and nodule production one year after establishment. The experiment was conducted in January 2022 at the nursery of the Faculty of Forestry Sciences of the Autonomous University of Nuevo León, in Linares, Nuevo León, Mexico. The average growth in plants with mycorrhization showed a difference of 20% in basal diameter and 14% in height in L. montanus, whereas in L. campestris, it was 5% in basal diameter and 4% in height. In nodule production, a difference of 12.5% was observed in L. montanus and 28% in L. campestris compared to uninoculated seeds (control). The mycorrhization of the seeds had a significant impact (p< 0.001) on the development of Lupinus and its growth characteristics one year after its establishment. Both L. campestris and L. montanus are ideal for use in ecological restoration strategies because they generate beneficial microhabitats for the associated species.

Keyword Group [xml:lang=en]

Title: Keywords:

Keyword: Rhizophagus irregularis

Keyword: nitrogen fixation

Keyword: nurse plants

Keyword: symbiosis

Counts

Figure Count [count=2]

Table Count [count=1]

Equation Count [count=0]

Reference Count [count=21]

Page Count [count=0]

Abstract

The species of the genus Lupinus are considered to be of great ecological and nutritional importance due to their ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen to the soil and to the high content of proteins (seeds), fibers (leaves), sugars (leaves), and minerals (seeds). The present study aimed to evaluate the development of Lupinus montanus and L. campestris as a response to seed mycorrhization. Inoculation was performed with Rhizophagus irregularis-BIOFertilizante INIFAP®. The treatments were 400 inoculated plants (200 per species) and 400 without inoculation, which were considered as controls. The variables evaluated were growth in basal diameter (mm), total height (cm), and nodule production one year after establishment. The experiment was conducted in January 2022 at the nursery of the Faculty of Forestry Sciences of the Autonomous University of Nuevo León, in Linares, Nuevo León, Mexico. The average growth in plants with mycorrhization showed a difference of 20% in basal diameter and 14% in height in L. montanus, whereas in L. campestris, it was 5% in basal diameter and 4% in height. In nodule production, a difference of 12.5% was observed in L. montanus and 28% in L. campestris compared to uninoculated seeds (control). The mycorrhization of the seeds had a significant impact (p< 0.001) on the development of Lupinus and its growth characteristics one year after its establishment. Both L. campestris and L. montanus are ideal for use in ecological restoration strategies because they generate beneficial microhabitats for the associated species.

Keywords:

Rhizophagus irregularis, nitrogen fixation, nurse plants, symbiosis.

The genus Lupinus stands out for the ability of its root system to fix atmospheric nitrogen and improve soil fertility (Weisany et al., 2013). This process occurs through the symbiosis between roots and native bacteria of the genus Rhizobium (Masson-Boivin and Sachs, 2018). In addition to this capacity, its high content of proteins, minerals, and vitamins stands out, mainly in its seeds (Sujak et al., 2006; Pablo-Pérez et al., 2013, 2015). Likewise, it contains secondary metabolites, mainly flavonoids and quinolizidine alkaloids, of utmost importance for their pharmacological and agricultural applications (Zamora-Natera et al., 2019).

More than 100 species of the genus Lupinus have been recorded in Mexico, which are distributed in temperate and cold zones as well as in humid or dry regions, from Baja California to Chiapas, along mountain ranges and at altitudes ranging from sea level to above 3 700 masl in subalpine forests (Bermúdez et al., 2000; Águila et al., 2018). Some species such as Lupinus montanus and L. campestris have a wide distribution in Mexico, mainly in lands disturbed by human activity, where they play an important role in the nitrogen cycle (Rzedowski and Rzedowski, 2005).

On the other hand, it has been proven that species of the genus Lupinus can be nurse species since, due to their rapid development, they provide shade, humidity, and nutrients, which increases the survival of species of ecological interest established under their protection (Ramírez-Contreras and Rodríguez-Trejo, 2009). Within the agricultural applications, Lupinus species have been used in association with various crops of economic importance to improve their yield, such as L. mutabilis Sweet with corn (Rodas et al., 2001) and L. albus L. and L. angustifolius L. with wheat (Barrientos et al., 2002). On the other hand, species such as L. montanus L. have been used with Pinus hartwegii Lindl. (Ramírez-Contreras and Rodríguez-Trejo, 2009).

Various studies have shown greater survival and development in plants inoculated with mycorrhizae, such as research carried out on pines (Montes-Rivera et al., 2001; Gómez-Romero et al., 2013) and legumes (Liriano et al., 2012; Trejo et al., 2021), so it is of utmost importance to deepen the knowledge of the potential of mycorrhizal associations to be used in ecological restoration programs (Carrillo-Saucedo et al., 2022).

Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the development of Lupinus montanus and L. campestris as a response to inoculation with Rhizophagus irregularis-BIOFertilizante INIFAP® 12 months after its establishment. The hypothesis is that the mycorrhization of Lupinus contributed to the general development of the plant (basal diameter and total height) as well as to the production of nodules, in which the interaction between roots and atmospheric nitrogen-fixing bacteria occurs, for use in the ecological restoration of degraded forest ecosystems.

The experimental site was established in the nursery of the Faculty of Forestry Sciences of the Autonomous University of Nuevo León, located at km 145 of the national highway # 85, Linares, NL, between the geographical coordinates 24° 47’ north latitude and 99° 32’ west longitude, at an altitude of 379 m. The annual rainfall in Linares, NL, fluctuates between 500 and 1 100 mm, whereas the temperature varies from 14 to 24 °C.

The germplasm was collected in pine-oak forests in the state of Oaxaca. Specimens of Lupinus campestris were collected in the community of Santiago Laxopa (north latitude, 17° 13.038’, west longitude 96° 18.882’, 1 854 masl.) and specimens of Lupinus montanus in Teococuilco de Marcos Pérez (north latitude 17° 19.890’, west longitude 96° 398.688’, 2 127 masl). The collection was carried out in November and December 2021 through the selection of individuals with adequate phenotypic characteristics, such as larger diameter and height, separated at a minimum distance of 10 m (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Figure 1. A). Specimens of Lupinus montanus; and B) L. campestris.

2007-0934-remexca-16-02-e3504-gf3.png

The collected pods were placed in kraft paper bags, labeled and classified by species, then exposed to the sun for gradual opening (Sujak et al., 2006; Pablo-Pérez et al., 2013). Seeds of similar size and color were selected by removing the seeds that did not reach their full maturity to guarantee greater germination.

Experimental units of 50 plants were established, randomly distributed with four replications. The treatments were 400 inoculated plants (200 per species) and 400 without inoculation, which were considered as controls. The inoculation process consisted of impregnating the seeds with the adhesive mixture and applying 5 g of powdered mycorrhizae (Rhizophagus irregularis-BIOFertilizante INIFAP®) to each seed. The sowing was carried out on January 10, 2022, using germination trays and they were placed in the nursery with a 40% shade cloth.

After 30 days, transplantation was carried out in black polyethylene bags of 23 x 30 cm, using a mixture of peat moss, sand, silt, and clay was used as substrate, and they bags were placed in the open field in the nursery facilities. The variables evaluated were growth in basal diameter (mm), total height (cm), and nodule production 12 months after establishment. The variables of growth in diameter and height were evaluated with a digital vernier and a tape measure, whereas nodule counting was performed manually in each individual.

The data were subjected to an analysis of variance and a comparison of means using Tukey’s test with a confidence level of 95% in the R-project Software (R Core Team, 2023). The dataset was normal according to the Shapiro-Wilk test. Lupinus montanus seedlings began to emerge at six days, with a total germination of 85% at 20 days; for its part, L. campestris did so at eight days, with a germination of 92% at 20 days of establishment.

At 12 months, L. montanus showed an average growth of 6.9 mm in basal diameter and 69 cm in total height while its control reached 5.5 mm and 59 cm, respectively. On the other hand, L. campestris had an average of 6.0 mm in basal diameter and 56 cm in total height while its control had 5.7 mm and 54 cm in the corresponding variables (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Fifure 2. rowth in diameter and height (cm) of Lupinus montanus and L. campestris.

2007-0934-remexca-16-02-e3504-gf4.png

The superiority in height growth of Lupinus montanus is related to its adaptation to microclimatic conditions because it is a species that is distributed from 2 500 masl in Quercus-Pinus forests to 4 100 masl in alpine meadows (Rzedowski and Rzedowski, 2005) whereas L. campestris is found from 2 400 to 3 200 masl (Pablo-Pérez et al., 2013).

The Anova analysis (α= 0.05) indicates that Lupinus montanus with mycorrhization differs significantly from the rest of the treatments in height growth (F= 32.782, p< 0.001). Regarding basal diameter, L. montanus differs from the rest of the treatments; however, there is no significant difference between L. montanus control with L. campestris with mycorrhization and L. campestris control (F= 70.0387, p< 0.001). As for the production of nodules, there is a difference between L. montanus and the other treatments (F= 27.774, p< 0.000); nonetheless, there is no significant difference between L. campestris with mycorrhization and L. montanus control (Table 1).

Table 1

Table 1. tatistical parameters of treatments.

Species Treatments # Nodules Model f= y0+a*x+b*x^2 R2 Shapiro-Wilk
L. montanus Mycorrhization 32 y0 = 96.619 a = -17.286 b = 1.881 0.818 0.9749
L. campestris Mycorrhization 25 y0 = -230.288 a = 77.3723 b = -4.8704 0.8906 0.9069
L. montanus Control 28 y0 = 69.1809 a = -19.2035 b = 3.1288 0.9225 0.9887
L. campestris Control 18 y0 = 79.3889 a = -28.6283 b = 4.2373 0.9391 0.9805

Rapid growth is closely related to an efficient symbiosis between roots and bacterial nodules during the early stages of growth (Zamora-Natera et al., 2019). Lupinus campestris had a better response to seed mycorrhization with a 28% increase compared to L. montanus, which presented a 12.5% increase in nodule production. These results are consistent with what was reported by Águila et al. (2018), who obtained, as a result, a high nitrogen fixation capacity in L. campestris compared to Pisum sativum L. and Trifolium spp.

The atmospheric nitrogen fixed by L. montanus and L. campestris significantly benefits species that develop in association with them because nitrogen is an essential element for plants as part of proteins, nucleic acids, and chlorophyll, which are mainly required in growing plant tissues (Ferrari and Wall, 2004), as documented by Zamora-Natera et al. (2019) in their analysis with Lupinus exaltatus Zucc., L. mexicanus Cerv. ex Lag., and L. rotundiflorus M.E. Jones, where they conclude that the nitrogen contribution was higher compared to other legumes, which is closely related to the production of nitrogen-fixing nodules.

According to Ferrari and Wall (2004), the advantage of this plant-fungus symbiosis is that L. montanus and L. campestris can be self-sufficient in nitrogen, which considerably increases their protein content and nitrogen contribution to an associated crop, as well as the possibility of leaving nitrogen available in the soil by incorporating dry matter.

The implementation of L. montanus and L. campestris as nurse plants will allow a decrease in water stress and solar radiation due to the rapid development of the leaf area, and this contributes to the survival of species of ecological interest established under their protection (Ramírez-Contreras and Rodríguez-Trejo, 2009).

Nurse plants develop microhabitats, which can be demonstrated by work carried out by Aerts et al. (2007) with seedlings of Olea europaea L., which showed a higher survival under shrub cover compared to those established in patches of bare soil and work conducted by Mendoza-Hernández et al. (2013), who found that plant density and species richness was significantly higher under the canopies of Buddleja cordata, Ageratina glabrata (Spreng.) R.M. King & H. Rob., and Sedum oxypetalum Kunth compared to open sites.

Conclusions

The application of mycorrhizae (Rhizophagus irregularis-BIOFertilizante INIFAP®) in seeds of L. montanus and L. campestris contribute significantly to the growth in height and diameter as well as to the production of nodules, in which the interaction between roots and atmospheric nitrogen-fixing bacteria occurs. The symbiosis between fungus, root, and bacteria contributes significantly to the development of these two species due to the growth (diameter and height) and production of roots (production of nodules), which allow efficient use of the water and nutrients available in the soil, whereas bacteria fix atmospheric nitrogen to improve soil fertility; therefore, they can be used as nurse plants in ecological restoration strategies.

Bibliography

1 

Aerts, R.; Negussie, A.; Maes, W.; November, E.; Hermy, M. and Muys, B. 2007. Restoration of dry afromontane forest using pioneer shrubs as nurse-plants for Olea europaea ssp. cuspidata. Restoration Ecology. 15(1):129-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00197.x

2 

Águila, S. I.; Vázquez, C. O.; López, U. J.; López, L. A.; Martínez, R. E.; García, G. E. y Zamora, C. E. M. 2018. Variación morfológica y reproductiva de nueve poblaciones naturales de Lupinus campestris Schltdl. & Cham., de la región centro oriente de Puebla, México. Revista Científica Biológico-Agropecuaria Tuxpan. 6(2):89-95. https://doi.org/10.47808/revistabioagro.v6i2.Especial.261.

3 

Barrientos, D. L.; Montenegro, B. A. y Pino, N. I. 2002. Evaluación de la fijación simbiótica de nitrógeno de Lupinus albus y L. angustifolius en un Andisol Vilcun del sur de Chile. Terra Latinoamericana. 20(1):39-44. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=57320107.

4 

Bermúdez, T. K.; Robledo. Q. N.; Martínez. H. J.; Andreas, T. and Wink, M. 2000. Biodiversity of the genus Lupinus in Mexico. In: Van Santen, E. M.; Wink, S. Weissmann y Römer, P. Ed. In: Proceedings 9th International Lupin Conference. International Lupin Association. Klink/Müritz, Germany. 294-296 pp.

5 

Carrillo-Saucedo, S. M.; Puente-Rivera, J.; Montes-Recinas, S.; Cruz-Ortega, R. 2022. Las micorrizas como una herramienta para la restauración ecológica. Acta Botánica Mexicana. 129:1-27. Doi.org/ 10.21829/abm129.2022.1932.

6 

Ferrari, A. E. y Wall, L. G. 2004. Utilización de árboles fijadores de nitrógeno para la revegetación de suelos degradados. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía. 105(2):63-87. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2007388.

7 

Gómez-Romero, M.; Villegas, J.; Sáenz-Romero, C. y Lindig-Cisneros, R. 2013. Efecto de la micorrización en el establecimiento de Pinus pseudostrobus en cárcavas. Madera y Bosques. 19(3):51-63. https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2013.193327.

8 

Liriano, G. R.; Núñez, S. D. B. y Barceló, D. R. 2012. Efecto de la aplicación de Rhizobium y Mycorriza en el crecimiento del frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L) variedad CC-25-9 negro. Centro Agricola. 39(4):17-20.

9 

Masson-Boivin, C. and Sachs, J. L. 2018. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation by rhizobia-the roots of a success story. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 44:7-15. Doi.org/ 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.12.001.

10 

Mendoza-Hernández, P. E.; Orozco-Segovia, A.; Meave, J. A.; Valverde, T. and Martínez-Ramos, M. 2013. Vegetation recovery and plant facilitation in a human-disturbed lava field in a megacity: searching tools for ecosystem restoration. Plant Ecology. 214:153-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11258-012-0153-y.

11 

Montes-Rivera, G.; Solís-González, S.; Quintos-Escalante, M. 2001. Efecto del inoculante comercial BURIZE® (Glomus intraradices) sobre el desarrollo de Pinus engelmannii Carr. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente. 7(2):123-126.

12 

Pablo-Pérez, M.; Lagunes-Espinosa, L. C.; López-Upton, J.; Ramos-Juárez, J. y Aranda-Ibáñez, E. 2013. Morfometría, germinación y composición mineral de semillas de Lupinus silvestres. Bioagro. 25(2):101-108. http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci-arttext&pid=S1316-33612013000200003.

13 

Pablo-Pérez, M.; Lagunes-Espinoza, L. C.; López-Upton, J.; Aranda-Ibáñez, E. M. y Ramos-Juárez, J. 2015. Composición química de especies silvestres del género Lupinus del estado de Puebla, México. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana. 38(1):49-55.

14 

R Core Team. 2023. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R. Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org/.

15 

Ramírez-Contreras, A. y Rodríguez-Trejo, D. A. 2009. Plantas nodriza en la reforestación con Pinus hartwegii Lindl. Revista Chapingo Serie Ciencias Forestales y del Ambiente. 15(1):43-48. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=62916073010.

16 

Rodas, C. A.; Núñez, E. R.; Espinoza, H. V. y Alcantar, G. G. 2001. Asociación lupino-maíz en la nutrición fosfatada en un andosol. Terra. 19(2):141-154. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/573/57319205.pdf.

17 

Rzedowski, G. C. y Rzedowski, J. 2005. Flora fanerogámica del Valle de México. 2a Ed. Instituto de Ecología y Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad. Pátzcuaro, Michoacán, México, DF. 1404 p.

18 

Sujak, A.; Kotlarz, A. and Strobel, W. 2006. Compositional and nutritional evaluation of several lupin seeds. Food Chemistry. 98(4):711-719. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.06.036.

19 

Trejo, D.; Hernández-Acosta, E.; Baeza-Guzmán, Y.; Pérez-Toledo, G.; Morgado-Viveros, E. and Bañuelos, J. 2021. Efectividad de los hongos micorrízicos arbusculares introducidos y nativos en seis leguminosas coberteras. Scientia. 51:1-13. https://doi.org/10.33885/sf.2021.51.1320.

20 

Weisany, W.; Raei, Y. and Allahverdipoor, K. H. 2013. Role of some of mineral nutrients in biological nitrogen fixation. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences. 2(4):77-84. Doi.org/ 10.1016/B978-0-443-18675-2.00004-3.

21 

Zamora-Natera, J. F.; Zapata-Hernández, I. y Villalvazo-Hernández, A. 2019. Fijación biológica del nitrógeno en tres especies silvestres del género Lupinus (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) en México. Acta Botánica Mexicana. 126:e1543. http://dx.doi.org/10.21829/abm126.2019.1543.