https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v15i7.3428

elocation-id: e3428

Valenzuela-Herrera, Cota-Barreras, Padilla-Valenzuela, Acosta-Gallegos, López-Guzmán, and Ramírez-Soto: Combo-743: a new variety of Kabuli-type chickpea for producing areas of the northwest and El Bajío

Journal Metadata

Journal Identifier: remexca [journal-id-type=publisher-id]

Journal Title Group

Journal Title (Full): Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

Abbreviated Journal Title: Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc [abbrev-type=publisher]

ISSN: 2007-0934 [pub-type=ppub]

Publisher

Publisher’s Name: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias

Article Metadata

Article Identifier: 10.29312/remexca.v15i7.3428 [pub-id-type=doi]

Article Grouping Data

Subject Group [subj-group-type=heading]

Subject Grouping Name: Description of cultivar

Title Group

Article Title: Combo-743: a new variety of Kabuli-type chickpea for producing areas of the northwest and El Bajío

Contributor Group

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Valenzuela-Herrera

Given (First) Names: Víctor

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Superscript: 1

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Cota-Barreras

Given (First) Names: Carlos Iván

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Superscript: 1

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Padilla-Valenzuela

Given (First) Names: Isidoro

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

Superscript: 2

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Acosta-Gallegos

Given (First) Names: Jorge Alberto

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff3]

Superscript: 3

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: López-Guzmán

Given (First) Names: Jesús Asunción

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Superscript: 1

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Ramírez-Soto

Given (First) Names: Milagros

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Superscript: 1

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=corresp; rid=c1]

Superscript: §

Affiliation [id=aff1]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 1

Institution Name: in an Address: Campo Experimental Valle de Culiacán-INIFAP. Carretera Culiacán-Eldorado km 16.5, Culiacán, Sinaloa. CP. 80430. Tel. 55 38718700, ext. 81415, 81430, y 81401. (valenzuela.victor@inifap.gob.mx; cota.carlos@inifap.gob.mx; guzman.jesus@inifap.gob.mx). [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Campo Experimental Valle de Culiacán [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: INIFAP [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

City: Culiacán

State or Province: Sinaloa

Postal Code: 80430

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Email Address: valenzuela.victor@inifap.gob.mx

Email Address: cota.carlos@inifap.gob.mx

Email Address: guzman.jesus@inifap.gob.mx

Affiliation [id=aff2]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 2

Institution Name: in an Address: Campo Experimental Norman E. Borlaug-INIFAP. Calle Norman E. Borlaug km 12, Ciudad Obregón, Sonora. CP. 85000. Tel. 55 38718700, ext. 81906. (padilla.isidoro@inifap.gob.mx). [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Campo Experimental Norman E. Borlaug [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: INIFAP [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

City: Ciudad Obregón

State or Province: Sonora

Postal Code: 85000

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Email Address: padilla.isidoro@inifap.gob.mx

Affiliation [id=aff3]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 3

Institution Name: in an Address: Campo Experimental Bajío-INIFAP. Carretera Celaya-San Miguel de Allende km 6.5, Celaya, Guanajuato. CP. 38000. Tel. 55 38718700, ext. 85227. (acosta.jorge@inifap.gob.mx). [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Campo Experimental Bajío [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: INIFAP [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

City: Celaya

State or Province: Guanajuato

Postal Code: 38000

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Email Address: acosta.jorge@inifap.gob.mx

Author Note Group

Correspondence Information: [§] Autora para correspondencia: ramirez.milagros@inifap.gob.mx. [id=c1]

Publication Date [date-type=pub; publication-format=electronic]

Day: 13

Month: 12

Year: 2024

Publication Date [date-type=collection; publication-format=electronic]

Season: Oct-Nov

Year: 2024

Volume Number: 15

Issue Number: 7

Electronic Location Identifier: e3428

History: Document History

Date [date-type=received]

Day: 01

Month: 10

Year: 2024

Date [date-type=accepted]

Day: 01

Month: 11

Year: 2024

Permissions

License Information [license-type=open-access; xlink:href=https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/; xml:lang=es]

Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons

Abstract

Title: Abstract

Mexico is the twelfth largest chickpea producer worldwide. The production of Kabuli-type chickpea is located in the states of Sinaloa, Michoacán, Sonora, Guanajuato, and Baja California Sur, where grain of high caliber is obtained, which has made the Mexican chickpea famous worldwide. The new Kabuli-type chickpea variety, ‘Combo-743’, was derived from the cross between from two commercial varieties, Progreso-95 × Blanco Sinaloa-92. The Combo-743 variety adapts to all chickpea production areas in Mexico; the plant is semi-erect, the flower is white, its pod is medium in size, and its grain is creamy white with pronounced roughness, similar to that of Blanco Sinaloa-92. This new variety is resistant to the wilting disease caused by Fusarium species. On average of five trials, Combo-743 yielded 2 317 kg ha-1 compared to 2 146 kg ha-1 of Blanco Sinaloa-92 (the commercial variety with the largest sown area). Combo-743 has a caliber of 43 grains/30 g and an export percentage of 94% (grains> 9 mm) compared to 91% of Blanco Sinaloa-92.

Keyword Group [xml:lang=en]

Title: Keywords:

Keyword: Cicer arietinum L.

Keyword: export

Keyword: seed yield

Keyword: wilting tolerance.

Counts

Figure Count [count=1]

Table Count [count=1]

Equation Count [count=0]

Reference Count [count=14]

Page Count [count=0]

Abstract

Mexico is the twelfth largest chickpea producer worldwide. The production of Kabuli-type chickpea is located in the states of Sinaloa, Michoacán, Sonora, Guanajuato, and Baja California Sur, where grain of high caliber is obtained, which has made the Mexican chickpea famous worldwide. The new Kabuli-type chickpea variety, ‘Combo-743’, was derived from the cross between from two commercial varieties, Progreso-95 × Blanco Sinaloa-92. The Combo-743 variety adapts to all chickpea production areas in Mexico; the plant is semi-erect, the flower is white, its pod is medium in size, and its grain is creamy white with pronounced roughness, similar to that of Blanco Sinaloa-92. This new variety is resistant to the wilting disease caused by Fusarium species. On average of five trials, Combo-743 yielded 2 317 kg ha-1 compared to 2 146 kg ha-1 of Blanco Sinaloa-92 (the commercial variety with the largest sown area). Combo-743 has a caliber of 43 grains/30 g and an export percentage of 94% (grains> 9 mm) compared to 91% of Blanco Sinaloa-92.

Keywords:

Cicer arietinum L., export, seed yield, wilting tolerance.

Worldwide, chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) are established in 10 main countries with a production of 11 080 000 t, with India being the main producer, followed by Turkey, Pakistan, Myanmar, Ethiopia, Russia, Australia, Iran, Canada, and the United States (FAO, 2022). Mexico ranks as the twelfth largest producer worldwide and production is mainly concentrated in the states of Sinaloa, Michoacán, Sonora, Guanajuato, and Baja California Sur.

During the 2021 agricultural cycle, Sinaloa contributed 74.5% of the value of chickpea production with $1 927 000 000.00 pesos, which represented a 55.7% increase compared to that obtained in 2020 (SIAP, 2022). There are two types of chickpeas based on their color and geographical distribution, both grown in Mexico. Kabuli (native to the Mediterranean and Middle East regions) white to cream, white flowers, and larger than the small-grained Desi (native to India) brown, yellow, orange, black or green (Adsule et al., 1989).

In recent years, the impact of climate change has increased vulnerability in the production and productivity of pulses (Choudhary et al., 2022). The limiting factor is susceptibility to various types of biotic and abiotic stresses, particularly due to fungal diseases, which decrease yield by 80% (Padilla-Valenzuela et al., 2008). Therefore, it is necessary to identify the different characteristics of the germplasm that provide information about the variety and specific traits (Nabati et al., 2022).

It is important to constantly evaluate genotypes that provide a broad genetic base to respond to chickpea production constraints (Shagarodsky et al., 2001). As a result of genetic improvement work to develop chickpea varieties with export characteristics by the National Institute of Forestry, Agricultural, and Livestock Research (INIFAP, for its acronym in Spanish) in Mexico, the new variety ‘Combo-743’ is described as resistant to root diseases.

Origin

Combo-743 is a variety of Kabuli-type white chickpea that originated from the simple cross of Progreso-95 × Blanco Sinaloa-92. The Progreso-95 variety has an erect stem for direct mechanical harvesting, with tolerance to the pathogens that cause Fusarium wilt, and medium grain size (58 to 64 seeds in 30 g) (Gómez, 2001). Blanco Sinaloa-92 is the most widely sown chickpea variety in Mexico, it has a creamy white grain that is large in size (38-46 seeds in 30 g), as demanded by the international market (Gómez et al., 2003).

In the different generations F2 and F3, it was harvested in mass form, individual selection was made in F4 due to health in a field lot intentionally infested with pathogenic fungi of the root (experimental wilting lot). In the F5, F6 and F7 generations, it was harvested in mass form due to its uniform characteristics of plant and grain size. Its genealogy is IIGaC0211M-M-4-M-M-M.

During the autumn-winter agricultural cycles 2017-2018, 2018-2019, 2019-2020, 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, it was evaluated as a line in experimental lots and validation plots in northwestern Mexico, in various areas of Sonora (Hermosillo Coast, Yaqui Valley and Mayo Valley), Sinaloa (Fuerte Valley and Culiacán Valley), Baja California Sur (Santo Domingo Valley) and Guanajuato (El Bajío).

The Combo-743 variety has a competitive adaptation with the best commercial varieties of each region. Its great acceptance among chickpea producers in northwestern Mexico is due to its yield capacity of 2 146 kg ha-1, and to the resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris race 5 (Velarde et al., 2013) and creamy grain color characteristics.

Varietal description

The phenotypic descriptors that identify the ‘Combo-743’ variety were registered in accordance with the guidelines of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV, 2020). The most important characteristics of Combo-743 are that it presents a plant of medium branching and height, with a semi-erect bearing, similar to the Blanco Sinaloa-92 variety, the foliage color is green with medium intensity, the leaf is of the compound type with large, oval, semi-opaque green leaflets, the flower is white, the pod is medium in size, light green in color, and with average measurements of 25 × 15 mm.

The average grain size of Combo-743 is 70-74 g 100 seeds-1, equivalent to a caliber of 40-42 seeds 30 g-1 in weight, larger than that of Blanco Sinaloa-92, its color is creamy white with pronounced roughness, similar to that of Blanco Sinaloa-92. The shape of the grain is angular round, similar to that of Jamu-96 (Gómez and Salinas, 2001).

Combo-743 produces branches 66 cm long, with an average of two primary branches and ten secondary branches. It developed the first flowers between 40 and 44 days after sowing (das), finished flowering at 90 das on average, and the maturity to cut fluctuated between 110 and 120 das, while the maturity to harvest between 126 and 135 days; therefore, it was considered to have an intermediate maturity cycle (Figure 1A-1F).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Phenotypic characteristics of the Combo-743 variety. a) plan size; b) foliage color; c) type of leaf; d) flower color; e) pod shape and color and f) grain shape and color.

2007-0934-remexca-15-07-e3428-gf2.jpg

It was registered in the National Catalog of Plant Varieties (CNVV, 2021) of the National Seed Inspection and Certification service (SNICS, 2023) with registration number: GRZ-026-170222 and breeder’s title number 2952, the original seed is available at the Valle de Culiacán Experimental Field of INIFAP.

Grain caliber and yield

In the evaluations in regional yield trials and validation plots for the producing areas of Mexico, the average was 2 317 kg ha-1 of Combo-743 compared to 2 146 kg ha-1 of Blanco Sinaloa-92 in five evaluation cycles. Combo-743 has a larger grain size, which contributes to a higher percentage of grain for export, between 89 and 98%, and an average caliber of 43 compared to 44 of Blanco Sinaloa-92 (Table 1).

Table 1

Table 1. Yield of origin (field), export percentage, and grain caliber of two chickpea varieties in different agricultural cycles.

Agricultural cycles Combo-743 Blanco Sinaloa-92
Yield (kg ha-1) Export (%) Caliber* Yield (kg ha-1) Export (%) Caliber*
2017-2018 1 806 96 44 1 685 95 45
2018-2019 3 229 98 43 2 776 96 45
2019-2020 1 549 91 45 1 893 89 46
2020-2021 2 010 89 44 1 890 80 45
2021-2022 2 990 95 37 2 488 93 40
Average 2 317 94 43 2 146 91 44

* = number of seeds in 30 g.

Conclusions

The Combo-743 variety presented, on average, a higher yield than Blanco Sinaloa-92, of 171 kg ha-1. As for its phenotypic characteristics, it has a light green plant foliage compared to the dark green of Blanco Sinaloa-92, leaves with leaflets and pronounced serrated margin, and not pronounced in Blanco Sinaloa-92.

Bibliography

1 

Adsule, R. N.; Kadam, S. S. and Salunkhe, D. K. 1989. Lathyrus bean. In: Salunkhe, D. K.; Kadam, S. S. Ed. Handbook of world food legumes: Nutritional Chemistry, Processing Technology and Utilization. 2:115-130.

2 

Choudhary, A. K.; Jain, S. K.; Dubey, A. K.; Kumar, J.; Sharma, M. Gupta, K. C.; Sharma L. D.; Prakash, V. and Kumar, S. 2022. Conventional and molecular breeding for disease resistance in chickpea: status and strategies. Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews. 1-32 pp. https://doi.org/10.1080/02648725.2022.2110641.

3 

CNVV. 2021. Catálogo Nacional de Variedades Vegetales. Gobierno de México. https://www.gob.mx/snics/articulos/catalogo-nacional-de-variedades-vegetales-cnvv-2021.

4 

FAO. 2022. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Statistics Division. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QV.

5 

Gómez, G. R. M. 2001. PROGRESO 95: variedad erecta de garbanzo para exportación. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA). Campo Experimental Valle de Culiacán (CEVACU). Culiacán, Sinaloa, México. Folleto técnico núm. 19. 16 p.

6 

Gómez, G. R. M.; Gómez, G. L. y Salinas, P. R. A. 2003. Blanco Sinaloa-92, variedad de garbanzo blanco para exportación. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA). Campo Experimental Valle de Culiacán (CEVACU). Culiacán, Sinaloa, México. Folleto técnico núm. 24. 12 p.

7 

Gómez, G. R. M. y Salinas, P. R. A. 2001. JAMU-96, variedad de garbanzo blanco cremoso de hábito erecto. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA). Campo Experimental Valle de Culiacán (CEVACU). Culiacán, Sinaloa, México. Folleto técnico núm. 20

8 

Nabati, J.; Mirmiran, S. M.; Yousefi, A.; Zare-Mehrjerdi, M.; Ahmadi‐lahijani, M. J. and Nezami, A. 2022. Identification of diverse agronomic traits in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm lines to use in crop improvement. Legume Science. e167: 5(2)1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.167.

9 

Padilla, V. I.; Valenzuela, V. R. I.; Armenta, C. C. M.; Salinas, P. R. A. y Sánchez, S. E. 2008. Comportamiento agronómico de genotipos de garbanzo en siembras tardías en el Valle del Mayo, Sonora, México. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana. 31(1):43-49.

10 

Shagarodsky, T.; Chiang, M. L. y López, Y. 2001. Evaluación de cultivares de garbanzo (Cicer arietinum L.) en Cuba. Agron. Mesoam. 12(1):95-8. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v12i1.17298.

11 

SIAP. 2022. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. Avance de siembras y cosechas. Resumen por estado. Gobierno de México. https://nube.siap.gob.mx/avance-agricola/.

12 

SNICS. 2023. Servicio Nacional de Inspección y Certificación de Semillas. Gobierno de México. https://www.gob.mx/snics.

13 

UPOV. 2020. Unión Internacional para la Protección de las Obtenciones Vegetales. https://www.upov.int/test-guidelines/es/fulltext-tgdocs.jsp?q=garbanzo.

14 

Velarde, F. S.; Zamora, G. F.; Valdez, R. N.; Cárdenas, M. L.; López, M. R.; Valdez, A. J. A.; Fierros, L. G. A.; Ortega, M. P. F.; Padilla, V. I. y Gutiérrez, P. E. 2013. Distribución y presencia de la fusariosis del garbanzo (Cicer arietinum L). en el noroeste de México y búsqueda de resistencia en condiciones controladas. Memoria 1 del Simposio Nacional de Garbanzo. 54-64 pp.