Revista Mexicana Ciencias Agrícolas volume 14 number 1 January 01 - February 14, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v14i1.3386
Article
Characterization of the seed bank of a grassland in southeastern Coahuila
Sait Juanes-Márquez1
Juan Antonio Encina-Domínguez1
Perpetuo Álvarez-Vázquez1
Eduardo Alberto Lara-Reimers1§
Neymar Camposeco-Montejo1
Josué Israel García-López1
1Department of Natural Resources-Saltillo Unit-Antonio Narro Autonomous Agrarian University. Antonio Narro road num. 1923, Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico. CP. 25315. (saitjuanes@gmail.com; jaencinad@gmail.com; perpetuo.alvarezv@uaaan.edu.mx).
2Forestry Department-Antonio Narro Autonomous Agrarian University. Antonio Narro road num. 1923. Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico. CP. 25315.
3Plant Breeding Department, Center for Training and Development in Seed Technology-Antonio Narro Autonomous Agrarian University. Antonio Narro road num. 1923, Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico. CP. 25315. (neym-33K@hotmail.com; g.lopezj90@gmail.com).
§Corresponding author: agroforestal33@gmail.com.
Abstract
The seed bank includes viable propagules present in the soil for variable periods of time, its study allows obtaining information on the richness, abundance and prediction of the presence of native species, when the area is impacted. In order to characterize the seed bank of an Amelichloa clandestina grassland in an area of 60 ha in southeastern Coahuila, 36 soil samples were collected in the 10 cm of the surface, in a quadrant of 12 × 12 cm. The samples were placed on aluminum trays and covered to prevent wind pollution. Periodic irrigation was applied. Species were counted at two-day intervals. The germination record was carried out for three months. The species richness is made up of 23 species belonging to 12 families. A. clandestina began the greatest germination after 48 days and was the species that had the highest seed germination with 1 030 (ind m-2). In the grassland there is a high reserve of seed of A. clandestina, in addition to the fact that it is the dominant species and therefore the species richness of the grassland is low.
Keywords: diversity, opportunistic species, seed bank.
Reception date: October 2022
Acceptance date: January 2023
Introduction
According to Marañón (2005), seed banks represent the first link in the regeneration cycle of a plant community, considering that the first condition to be met for a seed to be part of the seed bank is that it does not germinate immediately, these latency processes are part of the evolution to perpetuate the existence in forests, scrublands and grasslands. Thompson and Grime (1979); Archibold (1989) describe it as those seeds and fruits (achenes and caryopses), since they are a reserve of viable propagules present on or within the soil.
The importance of its structure and dynamics has been recognized in the ecology of plant communities by Fenner and Thompson (2005); nevertheless, there is still a lack of knowledge about the processes that regulate it. Several studies have described the structure and composition of the seed bank of the communities, such as the works by Caballero et al. (2003, 2008a) in Chinchon, Madrid, Spain. But the understanding of the processes involved such as dispersal, predation and persistence in the soil that affect its formation and dynamics, as well as its connection with vegetation, is still limited.
Experimental and field evidence proposes that seed banks of communities such as forest, grassland and wetland have a similar composition in annual species (Hopfensperger, 2007). Water availability is the most important factor affecting the dynamics of plant populations in annual communities, as it is a limiting resource in arid environments (Miranda et al., 2011). Water acts as a filter that determines the richness and diversity of plants in semiarid environments that affect seed germination, in addition to plant growth (Valladares et al., 2004).
All these changes occur in vegetation and affect seed bank characteristics (Caballero et al., 2008b). In semiarid areas degraded by intensive grazing, the positive effects that shrubs and scrublands have by significantly increasing the number of seeds trapped in the soil, improving the microclimate, promoting better conditions in production, diversity, abundance and germination of seeds of different plants, especially herbaceous plants, have been studied (Barnes et al., 2009; Erfanzadeh et al., 2014).
The richness and abundance of the seeds of the bank allows predicting which native plant species will colonize an area if vegetation is impacted, or the hydrological conditions present are modified (Cronk and Fennessy 2016). In addition, it indicates the possibility of future invasions of alien species that threaten habitats, affecting their structure, function and local dynamics (Alharthi et al., 2021). The analysis of seed banks reveals the potential stored in sediments and is therefore a useful tool in vegetation restoration programs (Espeland et al., 2010).
Their structural complexity and the need to quantitatively estimate the reserve stored in the soil haspromoted the creation and combination of several methods of analysis, which are concentrated in two groups: 1) separation methods; and 2) germination methods (Piudo and Cavero 2005). According to McFarland and Shafer (2011), the methods of separating seeds from the soil consist of separating them by flotation using a saline solution or washing from soil samples and passing them through a series of sieves of different mesh sizes, to reduce the volume of the sample and remove as much organic matter as possible, and then separate and observe all the seeds under the microscope.
Germination methods are based on the emergence of seedlings from soil samples, which are placed under controlled conditions to favor the germination of the largest number of viable seeds (Bernhardt et al., 2008). Small seeds are detected with this method, and they are the most used to analyze sediment banks (de Winton et al., 2000). Therefore, the objective of this work was to characterize a seed bank of a grassland dominated by Mexican ricegrass (Amelichloa clandestina) in southeastern Coahuila, Mexico. With the information obtained in this study, it is intended to generate information for its control.
Materials and methods
The soil studied was collected in the ranch ‘Los Angeles’, owned by the Antonio Narro Autonomous Agrarian University (UAAAN) for its acronym in Spanish, with an area of 7 000 ha. It is located 34 km southeast of the city of Saltillo, between 25° 04’ 12” and 25° 08’ 51” north latitude and 100° 58’ 07” and 101° 03’ 12” west longitude (Figure 1) with an altitude of 2 150 m. Land use is the grazing of cattle, in addition to horses. The dominant climate, according to the Köeppen classification system, modified by García (2004), is semiarid, with cool winter [BWhw(x’) (e)], with average annual temperature fluctuating between 18 and 20 °C, with average annual rainfall of 350 mm, distributed mainly in summer and winter (López-Santos et al., 2008).
Figure 1. Geographical location of the study area in the ranch Los Angeles, Saltillo, Mexico.
The study was carried out in two agricultural areas abandoned in 2012, of 40 and 60 ha. After the suppression of agriculture, the Mexican ricegrass (A. clandestina) settled, with the advance of the succession, a dense grassland settled. The soils are of alluvial origin, they are in lowlands, which are part of the valley, the soils are deep with well-defined profiles and horizons, characteristic of grassland vegetation, the soils are brown and light reddish brown, they are soils of the Feozem calcaric type, in addition, the study area is surrounded by semidesert grassland.
In the two selected areas, 18 plots of 10 ×10 m were established, with 5 m of separation, where the three treatments were placed with their six repetitions. Two samples per each plot (36 total samples) were collected, on the 10 cm of the surface of the sediment (Liu et al., 2005). A metal quadrant 12 × 12 cm in diameter was used. The samples were temporarily stored in plastic bags and kept in a dark room, for further establishment in the greenhouse in May 2019. The collected samples were established in greenhouses, according to the methodology of Bernhardt et al. (2008).
Aluminum trays of 22 x 30 cm, perforated at the bottom for proper drainage, were used and covered with plastic to avoid contamination of species other than the seed bank. The irrigation was carried out every day at field capacity and the species were counted at two-day intervals to determine the density of each species and the days to germination were recorded in a period from May 18 to August 18, 2019.
Data were analyzed under a completely randomized experimental design, with 36 repetitions. To determine if there is a difference in the density and germination days of the seeds by species, an analysis of variance was performed with the PROC GLM procedure of SAS for Windows version 9.0 (SAS Institute Inc. Cary, North Caroline, USA). A comparison of means with Tukey’s test was performed. After identifying the species, the diversity indices most used in ecology were calculated: Margalef, Shannon-Weaver (H), Simpson (D) and Pielou (J). Diversity as a unique value combines the parameters of specific richness and equity, fundamental factors that define the diversity of a community.
Results and discussion
In total, 708 seedlings germinated, which belong to 12 families, the dominant ones were: Asteraceae, Poaceae, Lamiaceae and Euphorbiaceae. Twenty-three species were recorded in the richness of the seed bank, 16 species are annual and seven are perennial. The density of the species found in the grassland presents a significant difference (p< 0.05). The results showed that the highest density occurred in Amelichloa clandestina followed by Euphorbia serrula Engelm., and species such as Dyssodia papposa (Vent.) Hitchc., Erodium cicutarium (L.) L’Hér., Eruca vesicaria (L.) Cav., Pseudognaphalium roseum (Kunth) Anderb and Sonchus oleraceus L., had low densities (Table 1).
Table 1. Average of plant density (ind m-2) by species in the grassland seed bank.
Amelichloa clandestina | 1 030 A | Amaranthus blitoides | 6 B |
Euphorbia serrula | 60 B | Marrubium vulgare | 6 B |
Solidago velutina | 48 B | Rumex crispus | 4 B |
Anoda cristata | 21 B | Laennecia coulteri | 4 B |
Eragrostis mexicana | 18 B | Parthenium hysterophorus | 4 B |
Eragrostis barrelieri | 18 B | Euphorbia exstipulata | 4 B |
Salvia reflexa | 17 B | Pseudognaphalium roseum | 2 B |
Glandularia bipinnatifida | 13 B | Erodium cicutarium | 2 B |
Sanvitalia angustifolia | 12 B | Dyssodia papposa | 2 B |
Disakisperma dubium | 12 B | Eruca vesicaria | 2 B |
Argemone echinata | 10 B | Sonchus oleraceus | 2 B |
Asphodelus fistulosus | 8 B | ||
p > F | <0.05 | <0.05 |
Equal capital letters between columns do not differ (p> 0.001).
Differences (p< 0.05) were observed on germination days of the species of the seed bank of the grassland. D. papposa was the species that germinated in the shortest time, with seven days on average, followed by Parthenium hysterophorus L. and Disakisperma dubium (Kunth) P. M. Peterson & N. Snow, with 9 and 11 days of average germination, respectively. The germination of A. clandestina was 48 days and the species that presented later germination, with 74 and 76 days, were E. vesicaria and E. cicutarium (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Average number of days to germination by species in the seed bank of a grassland, with dominance of Amelichloa clandestina in southeastern Coahuila, Mexico.
The composition, structure and diversity of the seed bank is a result of the disturbance of the area. This is, to a large extent, due to agricultural activities such as the clearing of native vegetation, it has generated that the seed bank includes a high amount of A. clandestina seeds and a low richness of species, with a total dominance of Mexican ricegrass.
The high amount of A. clandestina is due to the large seed production (Barkworth et al., 1989). The presence of cleistogamous spikelets in the Mexican ricegrass increased the number of seeds (Valdés-Reyna et al., 2015). This can be compared to what was reported by Dong et al. (2020), who recorded a high production of seed of Ambrosia trifida L., with a maximum result of 41 100 seeds m-2. Seed banks are variable in space and time and are affected by several factors, including climate, vegetation, population demographics, plant density, dispersal strategy and seed predation (Parker, 1989).
Studies carried out in a secondary forest and a grassland report density of 147 seeds m-2 and 190 seeds m-2 and a richness between 21 and 28 species (Caicedo et al., 2018). On the other hand, in this study the density is higher with 1 030 (ind m-2) and comparing results obtained by Cano et al. (2012) in the composition and abundance of the seed bank in a semiarid region in central Mexico, the richness of 23 species found in the grassland is lower than the 38 species found. The Shannon-Weaver species richness and abundance index (H) is shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Margalef, Shannon, Pielou and Simpson diversity indices for species. *Present in the seed bank.
Annual species* | Perennial species* | Wealth index (Margalef) | Diversity index (Shannon) | Equity index (Pielou) | Dominance index (Simpson) |
16 | 7 | 3.352 | 0.995 | 0.317 | 0.347 |
A Shannon-Weaver diversity index of H’=1.8 was recorded in the secondary forest area and H’= 2.2 in the grassland area, compared to this study, which found a diversity of H’= 0.995 nats. The Shannon diversity index had low values for the seed bank, in its equity index and Margalef wealth index. In the dominance index it has a lower value, which indicates that, in the seed bank, A. clandestina is the dominant species of this grassland.
Species richness was low because A. clandestina is a species with large seed production and as seedling recruitment increases, species richness decreases. As a basis for the regeneration of plant community richness, the number of seedling recruitment is related to species richness (Houseman, 2014). Seed dispersal may be influenced by the behavior of dispersal agents and natural barriers that are important for spatial patterns of seed deposition (Myers and Harms, 2009).
In contrast, vegetation recruitment is influenced by abiotic factors, seedling characteristics, and competition (Baldwin et al., 2010). Species with high reproductive potential, high germination values, short life cycles and rapid growth with highly competitive efficiency, increase their population distribution in a short period of time, benefiting from the large presence of anthropogenic disturbances, become superior species and begin to be considered harmful, even if they are native, when they decrease local biodiversity, alter their ecological balance, cycle of nutrients, affect local biota and their ecosystem services, being particularly harmful in arid regions (Bonanomi et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019; Abd El-Gawad et al., 2020; Alharthi et al., 2021).
Also, some previous studies conducted by Molina-Montenegro et al. (2015); Kenany et al. (2017); Alharthi et al. (2021) on the alterations caused in places with disturbances and dominated by invasive species indicate decreases in seed banks in the soil, allelopathic inhibition, exclusion of native species in canopies dominated by invaders, decrease in the efficiency of the dispersal capacity in seeds, modification of the composition of the soil, nutrients and its microbiota.
All these modifications directly reduce the floristic density and abundance in a short period of time and indirectly affect the local fauna, biogeochemical cycles and water runoff, impacting the succession of the invaded habitat in the short term. Studies conducted by Alharthi et al. (2021) recorded the decrease in abundance, richness and population distribution in seed banks related to alterations caused by invasive species in places with disturbances, as is the case of the alteration by the canopy of Nicotiana glauca in genera of Euphorbia and Eragrostis in Saudi Arabia.
The results are comparable with the densities found in the study area for the species of Euphorbia serrula, E. mexicana and E. barrelieri, species that are usually abundant in the areas surrounding the study area and highly representative of the Mexican semidesert (Duran, 1970; Bekele and Lester, 1981; Peterson and Giraldo-Canas, 2012). Dyssodia papposa also showed low levels of abundance within the grassland studied. It is a species highly studied for its rapid and continuous spread on the side of roads in different provinces in North America (Oldham and Klymko, 2011; Oldham et al., 2011).
The success of invasive plants can be evaluated using different dimensions, among the most important are the range of plant size, local abundance, impact with the abundance of native plants and their diversity, these species are less preferred by herbivores, this promotes their rapid colonization when there are changes or opening of clearings in the vegetation (Liao et al., 2021). Amelichloa clandestina has a height of 40-60, with rigid basal leaves with a sharp tip, caryopsis with three longitudinal ribs and persistent style bases, and cleistogamous axillary panicles in the basal sheaths of the leaves (Arriaga and Barkoth, 2006), its populations are dense, and these create a high spatial competition.
The height and size of shrub species have negative effects on the ability of plants to settle, due to the dense upper layer between the soil and their cover (canopy), causing a microhabitat with low light and temperature, causing some seeds of the bank to lose their viability (Yu et al., 2008). Bonanomi et al. (2018) have recorded the damage caused by early invasive plants in the plant succession of areas with disturbances and changes in their microhabitat, disturbances generated in root growth, in the wind current and increase in biomass in the spaces between plants.
Some species increase nitrogen nitrate content but decrease ammoniacal nitrogen by 29-4% in summer-autumn. There are currently no related studies on the chemical changes or allelopathic effects on soil caused by A. clandestina. Although A. clandestina presented latency in its seed, since it was the fourteenth species to initiate germination, this was the dominant species and most adapted to the arid conditions of the grassland.
According to Baskin and Baskin (2014), seed latency prevents or delays germination, and generally plays an important role in ensuring germination at the right time to maximize the likelihood that they settle successfully. Hu et al. (2014) mention that latency can be caused by the tissues surrounding the embryo, by the low growth potential of the embryo or by a combination of both, the lemma and palea are also important in the germination of seeds, since their elimination releases latency.
This coincides with other studies reporting that these bracts led to latency in grasses such as Stipa viridula (Fulbright et al., 1983), S. tenacissima (Gasque and Garcia 2003), Leymus secalinus (Zhu et al., 2007). Annual species such as D. papposa, P. hysterophorus, S. reflexa and E. serrula have a lower latency, since they are the species that germinated in the shortest time, which is consistent with a study by Figueroa et al. (2004) in a Mediterranean scrubland in central Chile.
The presence of species such as Disakisperma dubium in the surrounding natural grassland indicate that the seeds are transferred to this grassland through the wind and by animals, as mentioned by Cronk and Fennessy (2016). Annual and ruderal species such as E. serrula, A. cristata, Salvia reflexa Hornem, Sanvitalia angustifolia Engelm. Ex A. Gray, remain in the seed bank; however, their density is lower, which, according to Morlans (2005), indicates a greater advance in the process of vegetation succession.
Although several works have been carried out in semiarid areas, this is the first work where an estimate of the density and richness in the seed bank is made for a grassland invaded by A. clandestina in southeastern Coahuila. This study constructs an approach to understand the dynamics of areas abandoned by agriculture in semiarid regions of northeastern Mexico.
Conclusions
The seed bank presented a high number of viable seeds of Amelichloa clandestina, and the annual and ruderal species that are found have a lower density and the presence of perennial species such as Solidago velutina and Disakisperma dubium indicate a greater advance in the process of succession of vegetation and thus greater stability. In the grassland studied, A. clandestina is the dominant species and therefore the species richness is low.
Cited literature
Abd El-Gawad, A. M.; Rashad, Y. M.; Abdel, A. A. M.; Barati, S. A.; Assaeed, A. M. and Mowafy, A. M. 2020. Calligonum polygonoides L. Shrubs provide species pacific facilitation for the understory plants in coastal ecosystem. Biology. 9(8):1-22. MDPI AG. https://doi.org /10.3390/biology9080232.
Alharthi, A. S.; Abd, G. A. M. and Assaeed, A. M. 2021. Influence of the invasive shrub Nicotiana glauca graham on the plant seed bank in various locations in taif region, western of Saudi Arabia. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 28(1):360-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.10.014.
Archibold, O. W. 1989. Seed banks and vegetation processes in coniferous forests. In: ecology of soil seed banks. Academic Press. 107-122 pp.
Arriaga, M. O. and Barkworth, M. E. 2006. Amelichloa: a new genus in the stipeae (Poaceae). SIDA, contributions to botany. 145-149 pp.
Baldwin, A. H.; Kettenring, K. M. and Whigham, D. F. 2010. Seed banks of Phragmites australis-dominated brackish wetlands: relationships to seed viability, inundation, and land cover. Aquatic Botany. 93(3):163-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2010.06.001.
Barkworth, M. E.; Valdes, R. J. and Landers, R. Q. 1989. Stipa clandestina: new weed threat on southwestern rangelands. Weed Technol. 699-702 pp.
Barness, G.; Zaragoza, S. R.; Shmueli, I. and Steinberger, Y. 2009. Vertical distribution of a soil microbial community as affected by plant ecophysiological adaptation in a desert system. Microb. Ecol. 57(1):36-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-008-9396-5.
Baskin, C. C. and Baskin, J. M. 2014. Seeds: ecology, biogeography and evolution of dormancy and germination. Second Ed. San Diego: Elsevier/academic press. California, USA. 1586 p.
Bekele, E. and Lester, R. N. 1981. Biochemical assessment of the relationships of Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) trotter with some wild Eragrostis species (Gramineae). Ann. Bot. 48(5):717-725.
Bernhardt, K. G.; Koch, M.; Kropf, M.; Ulbel, E. and Webhofer, J. 2008. Comparison of two methods characterizing the seed bank of amphibious plants in submerged sediments. Aquatic Bot. 88(2):171-177.
Bonanomi, G.; Incerti, G.; Abd, G. A. M.; Sarker, T. C.; Stinca, A.; Motti, R.; Cesarano, G.; Teobaldelli, M.; Saulino, L.; Cona, F.; Chirico, G. B.; Mazzoleni, S. and Saracino, A. 2018. Windstorm disturbance triggers multiple species invasion in an urban Mediterranean forest. Iforest Biogeosciences and Forestry. 11(1):64-71. https://doi.org/10. 3832/ifor2374-010.
Caballero, I.; Olano, J. M.; Escudero, A. and Loidi, J. 2008a. Seed bank spatial structure in semiarid environments: beyond the patch bare area dichotomy. Plant Ecol. 195(2):215-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-007-9316-7.
Caballero, I.; Olano, J. M.; Loidi, J. and Escudero, A. 2003. Seed bank structure along a semi-arid gypsum gradient in central Spain. J. Arid Environ. 55(2):287-299. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00029-6.
Caballero, I.; Olano, J. M.; Loidi, J. and Escudero, A. 2008b. A model for small scale seed bank and standing vegetation connection along time. Oikos. 117(12):1788-1795. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2008.17138.x.
Caicedo, R. I. V.; Guarín, K. J. D. y Perdomo, Y. R. 2018. Composición y diversidad del banco de semillas en áreas urbanas fragmentadas de piedemonte Villavicencio, Colombia. Ingenierías USBMed. 9(1):86-96. https://doi.org/10.21500/20275846.3317.
Cano, S. A.; Zavala, H. J. A.; Orozco, S. A.; Valverde, V. M. T. y Pérez, R. P. 2012. Composición y abundancia del banco de semillas en una región semiárida del trópico mexicano: patrones de variación espacial y temporal. Rev. Mex. Bio. 83(2):437-446.
Cronk, J. K. and Fennessy, M. S. 2016. Wetland plants: biology and ecology. CRC press. de Winton, M. D.; Clayton, J. S. and Champion, P. D. Seedling emergence from seed banks of 15 New Zealand lakes with contrasting vegetation histories. Aquatic Bot. 66(3):181-194. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420032925.
Dong, H.; Liu, T.; Liu, Z. and Song, Z. 2020. Fate of the soil seed bank of giant ragweed and its significance in preventing and controlling its invasion in grasslands. Ecol. Evol. 10(11):4854-4866. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6238.
Duran, R. 1970. Hosts and distribution records of Mexican smut fungi. Mycologia. 62(6):1094-1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1970.12019055.
Erfanzadeh, R.; Shahbazian, R. and Zali, H. 2014. Role of plant patches in preserving flora from the soil seed bank in an overgrazed high-mountain habitat in northern Iran. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 16(1):229-238.
Espeland, E. K.; Perkins, L. B. and Leger, E. A. 2010. Comparison of seed bank estimation techniques using six weed species in two soil types. Rangeland Ecology Management. 63(2):243-247. https://doi.org/10.2111/REM-D-09-00109.
Fenner, M. K. and Thompson, K. 2005. The ecology of seeds. John dick. Cambridge University Press. Ann. Bot. 97(1):151-152. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcj016.
Figueroa, J. A.; Teillier, S. and Jaksic, F. M. 2004. Composition, size and dynamics of the seed bank in a Mediterranean shrubland of Chile. Austral Ecol. 29(5):574-584. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2004.01392.x.
Fulbright, T. E.; Redente, E. F. and Wilson, A. M. 1983. Germination requirements of green needlegrass (Stipa viridula Trin.) for use in revegetation of disturbed lands in south dakota, montana. Rangeland Ecol. Manag. J. Range Manag. Archiv. 36(3):390-394.
García, E. 2004. Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen. Instituto de Geografía. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). 11-90 pp.
Gasque, M. and García, F. P. 2003. Seed dormancy and longevity in Stipa tenacissima L. (Poaceae). Plant Ecol. 168(2):279-290. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024471827734.
Hopfensperger, I. N. 2007. A review of similarity between seed bank and standing vegetation across ecosystems. Oikos. 116(9):1438-1448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007. 15818.x.
Houseman, G. R. 2014. Aggregated seed arrival alters plant diversity in grassland communities. J. Plant Ecol. 7(1):51-58. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtt044.
Hu, X. W.; Wu, Y. P.; Ding, X. Y.; Zhang, R.; Wang, Y. R.; Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 2014. Seed dormancy, seedling establishment and dynamics of the soil seed bank of Stipa bungeana (Poaceae) on the loess plateau of northwestern China. PLoS One. 9(11):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112579.
Kenany, E. T.; El-Darier, S. M.; Abdellatif, A. A. and Shaklol, S. M. 2017. Allelopathic potential of invasive species: nicotiana glauca graham on some ecological and physiological aspects of Medicago sativa L. and Triticum aestivum L. Rendiconti Lincei. 28(1):159-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-016-0587-6.
Liao, H.; Pal, R. W.; Niinemets, Ü.; Bahn, M.; Cerabolini, B. E. and Peng, S. 2021. Different functional characteristics can explain different dimensions of plant invasion success. J. Ecol. 109(6):1524-1536. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13575.
Liu, G. H.; Zhou, J.; Li, W. and Cheng, Y. 2005. The seed bank in a subtropical freshwater marsh: implications for wetland restoration. Aquatic Bot. 81(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. aquabot.2004.07.001.
López-Santos, A.; Zermeño-González, A.; Cadena-Zapata, M.; Gil-Marín, J. A.; Cornejo-Oviedo, E. y Ríos-Camey, M. S. 2008. Impacto de la labranza en el flujo energético de un suelo arcilloso. Terra Latinoam. 26(3):203-213.
Marañón, T. 2005. Ecología del banco de semillas y dinámica de comunidades mediterráneas. Ed. Ecosistemas mediterráneos. Análisis funcional. Sevilla. España. CSIC-AEET. Madrid. 153-181 pp.
Mcfarland, D. G. and Shafer, D. J. 2011. Protocol considerations for aquatic plant seed bank assessment. J. Aquatic Plant Manag. 49:9-11.
Miranda, J. D. D.; Armas, C.; Padilla, F. M. and Pugnaire, F. I. 2011. Climatic change and rainfall patterns: effects on semi-arid plant communities of the Iberian Southeast. J. Arid Environ. 75(12):1302-1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.04.022.
Molina-Montenegro, M. A.; Oses, R.; Torres-Díaz, C.; Atala, C.; Núñez, M. A. and Armas, C. 2015. Fungal endophytes associated with roots of nurse cushion species have positive effects on native and invasive beneficiary plants in an alpine ecosystem. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics. 17(3):218-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees. 2015.02.003.
Morlans, M. C. 2005. Introducción a la ecología del paisaje. Área ecológica. Catamarca: Ed. científica universitaria. Universidad Nacional de Catamarca. Argentina. 1-16 pp.
Myers, J. A. and Harms, K. E. 2009. Seed arrival ecological filters and plant species richness: a metaanalysis. Ecol. Letters. 12(11):1250-1260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009. 01373.x.
Oldham, M. J.; Gould, J. and Bowles, J. M. 2011. Fetid dogweed (Dyssodia papposa; Asteraceae) and slender russian thistle (Salsola collina; Amaranthaceae), New to alberta, Canada. The Canadian field-naturalist. 125(4):366-369. https://doi.org/10.22621/cfn.v125i4.1267.
Oldham, M. J. and Klymko, J. 2011. Fetid dogweed (Dyssodia papposa; Asteraceae) in Canada. Northeastern Naturalist. 18(3):347-356.
Parker, V. T. 1989. Pattern and process in the dynamics of seed banks. Ecology of soil seed banks. 367-384 pp.
Peterson, P. M. and Giraldo, C. D. 2012. The genus Eragrostis (poaceae: chloridoideae) in northwestern south America (Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru): morphological and taxonomic studies. Biblioteca José Jerónimo Triana. Bogota, Colombia. 24(1):85-166.
Piudo, M. J. y Cavero, R. R. Y. 2005. Banco de semillas: comparación de metodologías de extracción, de densidad y de profundidad de muestreo. Publ. Bio. Univ. Navarra, Ser. Bot. 16:71-85.
Thompson, K. and Grime, J. P. 1979. Seasonal variation in the seed banks of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats. The J. Ecol. 16(3):893-921.
Valdés-Reyna, J.; Villaseñor J. L; Encina-Domínguez, A. y Ortiz, E. 2015. Gramíneas de Coahuila. Comisión nacional para el conocimiento y uso de la biodiversidad. México, DF. 93(1):80-81. https://doi.org/10.17129/botsci.79.
Valladares, F.; Vilagrosa, A.; Peñuelas, J.; Ogaya, R.; Camarero, J. J.; Corcuera, L. y Gil, P. E. 2004. Estrés hídrico: ecofisiología y escalas de la sequía. Ecología del bosque mediterráneo en un mundo cambiante, Madrid. España. 165-192 pp.
Wang, Y. J.; Chen, D.; Yan, R.; Yu, F. H. and Kleunen, M. 2019. Invasive alien clonal plants are competitively superior over co-occurring native clonal plants. Perspectives in plant ecology, evolution and systematics. 40(1):1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2019. 125484.
Yu, S.; Bell, D.; Sternberg, M. and Kutiel, P. 2008. The effect of microhabitats on vegetation and its relationships with seedlings and soil seed bank in a Mediterranean coastal sand dune community. J. Arid Environ. 72(11):2040-2053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2008. 06.014.
Zhu, Y.; Dong, M. and Huang, Z. 2007. Caryopsis germination and seedling emergence in an inland dune dominant grass Leymus secalinus. Flora morphology, distribution, functional ecology of plants. 202(3):249-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flora.2006.05.006.