https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v15i6.3237

elocation-id: e3237

Rivas-Robles, Cruz-Espinosa, Posada-Toledo, Esponda-Pérez, Caballero-Roque, and Vargas-Ortiz: Influence of crop age on the production and physicochemical composition of Ataulfo mango

Journal Metadata

Journal Identifier: remexca [journal-id-type=publisher-id]

Journal Title Group

Journal Title (Full): Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas

Abbreviated Journal Title: Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc [abbrev-type=publisher]

ISSN: 2007-0934 [pub-type=ppub]

Publisher

Publisher’s Name: Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias

Article Metadata

Article Identifier: 10.29312/remexca.v15i6.3237 [pub-id-type=doi]

Article Grouping Data

Subject Group [subj-group-type=heading]

Subject Grouping Name: Research note

Title Group

Article Title: Influence of crop age on the production and physicochemical composition of Ataulfo mango

Contributor Group

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Rivas-Robles

Given (First) Names: Emanuel

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Superscript: 1

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Cruz-Espinosa

Given (First) Names: Vidal

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Superscript: 1

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Posada-Toledo

Given (First) Names: Alejandra

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff1]

Superscript: 1

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Esponda-Pérez

Given (First) Names: Jorge Alberto

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

Superscript: 2

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Caballero-Roque

Given (First) Names: Adriana

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff2]

Superscript: 2

Contributor [contrib-type=author]

Name of Person [name-style=western]

Surname: Vargas-Ortiz

Given (First) Names: Manuel Alejandro

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=aff; rid=aff3]

Superscript: 3

X (cross) Reference [ref-type=corresp; rid=c1]

Superscript: §

Affiliation [id=aff1]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 1

Institution Name: in an Address: Facultad de Ciencias de la Nutrición y Alimentos Subsede Acapetahua-Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas. Calle Central Norte S/N, Col. San Valentín, Acapetahua, Chiapas, México. CP. 30580. [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Facultad de Ciencias de la Nutrición y Alimentos Subsede Acapetahua [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

State or Province: Chiapas

Postal Code: 30580

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Affiliation [id=aff2]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 2

Institution Name: in an Address: Facultad de Ciencias de la Nutrición y Alimentos-Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas-Ciudad Universitaria. Libramiento Norte Poniente 1150, Col. Lajas Maciel, Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas, México. CP. 29039. [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: Facultad de Ciencias de la Nutrición y Alimentos [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Universidad de Ciencias y Artes de Chiapas [content-type=orgname]

Address Line

City: Tuxtla Gutiérrez

State or Province: Chiapas

Postal Code: 29039

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Affiliation [id=aff3]

Label (of an Equation, Figure, Reference, etc.): 3

Institution Name: in an Address: CONACYT-Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo-Laboratorio de Calidad, Autenticidad y Trazabilidad de los Alimentos. Carretera Gustavo Enrique Astiazarán Rosas núm. 46, Col. La Victoria, Hermosillo, Sonora, México. CP. 83304. [content-type=original]

Institution Name: in an Address: Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo A. C. [content-type=normalized]

Institution Name: in an Address: CONACYT [content-type=orgdiv1]

Institution Name: in an Address: Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo [content-type=orgname]

Institution Name: in an Address: Laboratorio de Calidad, Autenticidad y Trazabilidad de los Alimentos [content-type=orgdiv2]

Address Line

City: Hermosillo

State or Province: Sonora

Postal Code: 83304

Country: in an Address: Mexico [country=MX]

Author Note Group

Correspondence Information: [§] Autor para correspondencia: manuel.vargas@ciad.mx [id=c1]

Publication Date [date-type=pub; publication-format=electronic]

Day: 30

Month: 10

Year: 2024

Publication Date [date-type=collection; publication-format=electronic]

Season: Aug-Sep

Year: 2024

Volume Number: 15

Issue Number: 6

Electronic Location Identifier: e3237

History: Document History

Date [date-type=received]

Day: 01

Month: 08

Year: 2024

Date [date-type=accepted]

Day: 01

Month: 09

Year: 2024

Permissions

License Information [license-type=open-access; xlink:href=https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/; xml:lang=es]

Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons

Abstract

Title: Abstract

For the producers of Acapetahua, it is essential to know the age at which the crops will produce the highest quantity of quality mangoes due to the profits obtained from their sale. To this end, in 2021, the quantitative and experimental methodology was applied in three cultivars (7, 12, and 22 years old) to evaluate the production behavior through a linear regression analysis and the Anova of the physical characteristics of the fruits: total fresh mass of the fruit (TFMF), fruit length (FL), fruit diameter (FD), peel weight (PW), seed weight (SW), and pulp weight (PW), as well as color angles L, a* and b* (peel and pulp) and proximate chemical composition (moisture, total ash, lipid, crude fiber, crude protein, and total soluble solids) by Tukey’s test at 5%. The production of first-quality mangoes showed a favorable trend over time as the harvested crates increased at an older age of the crop. The best physical characteristics were found in first-quality fruits from the 22-year-old crop: TFMF (320.2 g), length (11.58 cm), diameter (6.62 cm), PW (69.8 g), SW (33.5 g), and PW (209.3 g); on the other hand, color attributes (L, a*, and b*) were observed outstanding in first-quality fruits from the seven-year-old crop both in the peel and in the pulp. It was concluded that the 22-year-old crop has a higher production of high-quality fruits, and the quality decreases as the crop age decreases.

Keyword Group [xml:lang=en]

Title: Keywords:

Keyword: Mangifera indica L.

Keyword: harvested crates

Keyword: pulp

Keyword: quality classification

Counts

Figure Count [count=2]

Table Count [count=2]

Equation Count [count=0]

Reference Count [count=20]

Page Count [count=0]

Abstract

For the producers of Acapetahua, it is essential to know the age at which the crops will produce the highest quantity of quality mangoes due to the profits obtained from their sale. To this end, in 2021, the quantitative and experimental methodology was applied in three cultivars (7, 12, and 22 years old) to evaluate the production behavior through a linear regression analysis and the Anova of the physical characteristics of the fruits: total fresh mass of the fruit (TFMF), fruit length (FL), fruit diameter (FD), peel weight (PW), seed weight (SW), and pulp weight (PW), as well as color angles L, a* and b* (peel and pulp) and proximate chemical composition (moisture, total ash, lipid, crude fiber, crude protein, and total soluble solids) by Tukey’s test at 5%. The production of first-quality mangoes showed a favorable trend over time as the harvested crates increased at an older age of the crop. The best physical characteristics were found in first-quality fruits from the 22-year-old crop: TFMF (320.2 g), length (11.58 cm), diameter (6.62 cm), PW (69.8 g), SW (33.5 g), and PW (209.3 g); on the other hand, color attributes (L, a*, and b*) were observed outstanding in first-quality fruits from the seven-year-old crop both in the peel and in the pulp. It was concluded that the 22-year-old crop has a higher production of high-quality fruits, and the quality decreases as the crop age decreases.

Keywords:

Mangifera indica L., harvested crates, pulp, quality classification.

Mango (Mangifera indica L.) is found in tropical and subtropical agroecosystems; the tree reaches 40 m in height (Hernández-Guerrero et al., 2015). It is a perennial cultivar with an area of 77 993 ha harvested and a production of 510 700 t in Mexico (SIAP, 2019). Mendoza-Hernández et al. (2020) point out that Chiapas ranked fourth nationally, generating 237 530 t year-1. Mazariegos-Sánchez et al. (2017) mention that Acapetahua has a planting area of 1 506.5 ha and production of 10 828.5 t.

The Ataulfo mango is appreciated for its sensory properties: succulent, fleshy, oval shape, thin seed, and abundant pulp; it contains vitamins A and C and is rich in minerals, fibers, and antioxidants; its calorie, fat, and sodium contents are low (Wall-Medrano et al., 2015). The management of these orchards includes pruning, fertigation, postharvest management and pest and disease control (Cruz-Barrón et al., 2014).

The objective of identifying the influence of the age of the crop on the production and physicochemical composition of the mango harvested in Acapetahua arose due to the curiosity of producers to know at what age their crop produces better quality mangoes, which is reflected in higher profits. The study was conducted in Acapetahua, Chiapas, Mexico, in orchards aged 7, 12, and 22 years in May 2021. The orchards are located at 15° 17’ 09.8” north latitude, 92° 41’ 39.0” west longitude, 15° 16’ 26.7” north latitude, 92° 44’ 17.8” west longitude and 15° 16’ 18.6” north latitude, 92° 41’ 19.4” west longitude with 29, 25, and 33 masl.

The municipality’s climate is warm sub-humid with rains in summer, and warm humid with abundant rains in summer, with temperatures between 26 and 30 °C and rainfall of 1 500 to 3 500 mm (Galán, 1999). The management consisted of cultural practices, flower induction with phosphonitrate 33-03-00, biological control with Bankit® and Cypermethrin®, and Bioforte® to improve yield.

A total of 60 healthy fruits were collected at physiological maturity according to their quality and classified according to the (NMX-FF-038-SCFI, 2016). The fruits were transported to UNICACH, disinfected, and ripened for 5 ±1 days under environmental conditions of 31 ±2 °C. The production of 15 trees was evaluated, and the number of crates was counted, which had an average weight of 30 kg. Production was measured at physiological maturity. TFMF, PW, PW, and SW were determined with an OHAUS® Scout-Pro balance. A PRETUL® vernier was used to calculate FL and FD.

The color of the pulp and peel was evaluated through individual images. A 16 Mpx camera was used, without zoom, 0° angle, 15 cm distance, natural lighting, in automatic mode, without flash, and JPEG format of 3456 x 4608 px, and the images were analyzed with the Adobe Capture software (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Parameters evaluated L, a*, and b* in: a) pulp; and b) peel.

2007-0934-remexca-15-06-e3237-gf3.jpg

In the proximate chemical analysis of the pulp, the methodology proposed by Zumbado (2002) was used. Samples were independent for each analysis, with 300 g per quality level. To determine the optimal age of quality mango production, a linear regression analysis was performed, correlating production according to its quality and the age of the crop with a significance level of 95%.

The physical characteristics of the fruits, as well as the proximate chemical composition of the pulp, were statistically compared using a one-way analysis of variance (Anova), Tukey’s test p≤ 0.05; the data were analyzed in the JMP program version 7.0. The production of first-quality Ataulfo mango increased with the age of the crop; this behavior showed a relationship between the production and the age of the crop with an R2 of 0.9995, but not for the production of second and third-quality fruits (Figure 2).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Production of Ataulfo mango according to the age of the crop, classified by its quality.

2007-0934-remexca-15-06-e3237-gf4.jpg

Studies such as that of Ureña-Bogantes et al. (2007) indicate that the harvest begins in the third or fourth year of planting, and from this year onwards, the production increases until reaching its maximum yields in the eighth year. Fallas et al. (2009) indicate that in commercial plantations, the highest yields are usually obtained when the tree is between 8 and 15 years old. Thirty-eight point four six percent of the variables studied in the first-quality fruits did not show statistically significant differences. The best traits were observed in fruits from the 22-year-old cultivar (Table 1).

Table 1

Table 1. Physical characteristics of Ataulfo mango fruits.

Quality AC TFMF Length Diameter PW (g) SW (g) PW (g) Peel color Pulp color
L a* b* L a* b*
First 7 277.12 b 11.48 a 6.34 a 58.12 b 29.25 a 185.87 b 70.25 a 16.25 a 55.62 a 62.62 a 20.62 a 57.37 a
12 303.41 a 11.5 a 6.39 a 51.75 b 32.5 a 212.25 a 69.1 a 10.7 b 47.7 b 59 b 18.6 a 51.4 b
22 320.2 a 11.58 a 6.62 a 69.8 a 33.5 a 209.3 a 65.8 a 13 ab 49 b 56.7 c 16 a 53.5 b
Second 7 207.1 b 10.52 a 5.74 a 38.3 b 25.5 a 138.8 b 63 a 15.1 a 49.1 a 61.7 a 25.2 a 58.1 a
12 244.91 a 10.58 a 5.97 a 45.33 a 23.91 a 169.16 a 68.3 a 10.4 b 46.6 a 59.6 a 18.2 b 48 c
22 204.3 b 9.97 b 5.78 a 47.2 a 21.9 a 130.7 b 60.1 a 17.4 a 50.8 a 56.5 b 19.6 b 55 b
Third extra 7 161.5 a 9.3 a 5.29 a 37.71 a 16.5 a 103.21 b 68 a 15 a 55.6 a 61.9 a 20.7 a 59.1 a
12 186.3 a 9.16 a 5.76 a 34.6 a 20.6 a 126.2 a 58 b 13.3 a 44.2 b 59.3 a 15.6 b 46.7 c
22 156 a 8.69 a 5.36 a 30.1 a 17.7 a 102.7 b 56.1 b 16.8 a 51.9 a 55.6 b 22.2 a 56.7 b

[i] AC= age of the crop in years; TFMF= total fresh mass of the fruit; PW= peel weight; SW= seed weight; and PW= pulp weight.

The TFMF of the first-quality fruit is classified according to the caliber code established in the (NMX-FF-058, 1999) as fruits of codes 14 and 16, where the 12 and 22-year-old cultivars were the ones with the best characteristics. The difference observed in TFMF can be attributed to climate, nutrition, irrigation, cultural practices and plant age (Aular and Rodríguez, 2003). The first-quality FL is similar to what was reported by Maldonado-Astudillo et al. (2016) but not for the diameter, which was 20% smaller.

The first-quality fruits corresponding to the 7, 12, and 22-year-old crops had 68, 72, and 67% pulp, respectively; these results coincide with what was published by Guzmán et al. (2013) for Tommy Atkins mango. The proportion of SW with respect to TFMF was homogeneous over the years, and an average of 10.80% was reported. The composition of SW and PW was among the values published by Hemawathy et al. (1988).

The proportion of these components can vary (Guzmán et al., 2013). Peel and stone can be considered waste with important bioactive compounds (Sumaya-Martinez et al., 2012). The highest values of L, a*, and b* were identified in the fruits of the seven-year-old cultivar in both peel and pulp, according to the methodology of Almanza-Mosqueda et al. (2016).

The association of yellowness with the content of β-carotenes present in the fruit and its desirable appearance was corroborated. The proximate chemical composition of the first, second, and extra mango pulp showed statistically significant differences according to Tukey’s test p≤ 0.05.

The pulp of the extra-quality Ataulfo mango obtained from the seven-year-old cultivar showed greater homogeneity in its composition. The variables of moisture, lipid, and crude fiber of the pulp extracted from first-quality fruits of the 12-year-old and 22-year-old cultivars were similar; on average, the following values were reported: 74.55, 1.11, and 10.61%, respectively; in the same sense, the highest composition of protein (0.95%), and TSS (21.20 °Bx) (Table 2).

Table 2

Table 2. Proximate chemical composition of the Ataulfo mango pulp (mean ± S, n= 3).

Analysis 1st quality 2nd quality Extra
7 12 22 Average R2 7 12 22 Average R2 7 12 22 Average R2
Moisture (%) 75.94a 74.47a 74.64a 75.01±0.8 0.4658 78.5a 78.36ab 74.7b 77.18±2.15 0.7776 77.09a 78.35a 76.81a 77.41±0.82 0.0291
Total ash (%) 2.71a 2.5b 2.44b 2.55±0.14 0.9067 3.17a 2.35b 2.43b 2.65±0.45 0.6698 3.05a 2.3b 2.24c 2.53±0.45 0.8052
Lipid (%) 0.81b 1.11a 1.12a 1.01±0.17 0.7742 0.79c 1.08a 0.95b 0.94±0.14 0.3033 0.84a 0.8a 0.57b 0.73±0.14 0.8583
Crude fiber (%) 10.25a 11.03a 10.2a 10.49±0.46 0.0029 7.53c 9.64b 17.04a 11.4±4.99 0.9065 7.32c 9.32b 18.58a 11.74±6 0.8783
Crude protein (%) 0.68b 0.95a 0.72b 0.78±0.14 0.0188 1.06a 0.86b 0.74c 0.88±0.16 0.9796 0.97ab 1a 0.91b 0.96±0.04 0.4286
TSS (°Bx) 18.75b 18.91b 21.2a 19.63±1.36 0.7988 17.14b 18.42ab 19.86a 18.47±1.36 0.9988 19.43a 18.87a 19.89a 19.39±0.51 0.2027

The average values of the proximate chemical composition of the fruits are similar to those published by Rivas-Robles et al. (2020). The fiber content was greater than 2%, so they were classified as fruits with high fiber content. As the quality of the fruits decreases and the age of the cultivar increases, the fiber content in the pulp increases. Kader (2008) indicates that fiber content is part of the fruit quality index.

Conclusions

The production of first-quality fruits increases with the age of the crop since the 22-year-old mango cultivar presented the highest production of first-quality fruits, and due to their characteristics, these fruits are destined for the primary sector. The best physical characteristics were found in the first-quality fruits in the 22-year-old cultivar; this behavior declines as the age and quality of the crop decrease.

The proximate chemical composition of the pulp of the Ataulfo mango fruits showed greater homogeneity, while the crude fiber content increased as the quality declined and the age of the cultivar increased; for their composition, second- and extra-quality fruits have the potential for the secondary sector.

Bibliography

1 

Almanza-Mosqueda, M. D.; Ruíz-Hernández, K.; Sosa-Morales, M. E.; Cerón-García, A. y Martínez-Soto, G. 2016. Caracterización fisicoquímica de seis variedades de mango. Investigación y Desarrollo en Ciencia y Tecnología de Alimentos. 1(2):267-272.

2 

Aular, J. , RodríguezY. 2003. Algunas características físicas y químicas de fruto de cuatro especies de Passiflora. Bioagro. 15(1):41-46. http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci-arttext&pid=S1316-33612003000100005.

3 

Cruz-Barrón, V.; Bugarín-Montoya, R.; Alejo-Santiago, G.; Luna-Esquivel, G. y Juárez-López, P. 2014. Extracción y requerimiento de macronutrimentos en mango Ataulfo (Mangifera indica L.) con manejo de poda anual y bianual. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. 5(2):229-239.

4 

Fallas, R.; Bertsch, F.; Miranda, E. y Henríquez, C. 2009. Análisis de crecimiento y absorción de nutrimentos de frutos de mango, cultivares Tommy Atkins Y Keith. Agronomía Costarricense. 34(1):1-15. 10.15517/rac.v34i1.6695.

5 

Galán, S. V. 1999. El cultivo del mango. Primera edición. Mundi-Prensa. 10-20 pp.

6 

Guzmán, O.; Lemus, C.; Bugarin, J.; Bonilla, J. y Ly, J. 2013. Composición y características químicas de mangos (Mangifera indica L.) destinados a la alimentación animal en Nayarit, México. Revista Cubana de Ciencia Agrícola. 47(3):273-277.

7 

Hemawathy, J.; Prabhakar, J. V. and Sen, D. P. 1988. Drying and storage behavior of mango (Mangifera indica) and composition of kernel fat. Asian Food J. 4(2):59-63.

8 

Hernández-Guerrero, S.; Balois-Morales, R. y Bello-Lara, J. 2015. Estenospermocarpia en mango Ataulfo: Nayarit y Chiapas. Acta Agrícola y Pecuaria, 1(3):86-92. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=193029230009.

9 

Kader, A. A. 2008. Parámetros de calidad y estándares de clasificación en mango: revisión de información disponible y futuras necesidades de investigación. 1-28 pp. http://mango.org/mango/sites/default/files/download/estandares-de-calidad-de-mango-reporte-completa.pdf.

10 

Maldonado-Astudillo, Y. I.; Navarrete-García, H. A.; Ortiz-Morales, Ó. D.; Jiménez-Hernández, J.; Salazar-López, R.; Alia-Tejacal, I. y Álvarez-Fitz, P. 2016. Propiedades físicas, químicas y antioxidantes de variedades de mango crecidas en la costa de Guerrero. Revista Fitotecnia Mexicana. 39(3):207-214. https://doi.org/10.35196/rfm.2016.3.207-214.

11 

Mazariegos-Sánchez, A.; Milla-Sánchez, A.; Martínez-Chávez, J.; Águila-González, J. M. y Villanueva-Vázquez, K. E. 2017. Identificación del sistema local de comercialización del mango Ataúlfo en el municipio de Huehuetán, Chiapas. Revista Mexicana de Agronegocios. 40:571-582. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=14152127006.

12 

Mendoza-Hernández, C.; Rosas-Quijano, R.; Vazquez-Ovando, A. y Gálvez-López, D. 2020. Retos y controversias del mango Ataulfo. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas . 11(7):1633-1645. 10.29312/remexca.v11i7.2199.

13 

NMX-FF-038-SCFI. 2016. Productos alimenticios no industrializados para consumo humano fruta fresca. Diario Oficial de La Federación. 24 p. http://www.sagarpa.gob.mx/agronegocios/Lists/InstrumentosTécnicos normalización y marcas colecti/Attachments/90/NMX-fresa.pdf.

14 

NMX-FF-058. 1999. Productos alimenticios no industrializados para consumo humano. Fruta fresca. Mango (Mangifera incida L.). 1-10 pp.

15 

Rivas-Robles, E.; Posada-Toledo, A.; Vela-Gutiérrez, G. y Vargas-Ortiz, M. A. 2020. Evaluación fisicoquímica y determinación sensorial de frutos descartados de Mangifera indica L. Variedad Ataulfo en Acapetahua, Chiapas, México. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnología Postcosecha. 21(1):51-60.

16 

SIAP. 2019. Avance de siembras y cosechas, resumen nacional por estado. http://infosiap.siap.gob.mx/infosiap.siap.gob.mx:8080/agricola-siap-gobmx/AvanceNacionalCultivo.do.

17 

Sumaya-Martínez, M. T.; Sánchez-Herrera, L. M.; García-Torres, G. y García-Paredes, D. 2012. Red de valor del mango y sus desechos con base en las propiedades nutricionales y funcionales. Revista Mexicana de Agronegocios . 30(16):826-833.

18 

Ureña-Bogantes, A.; González-Rojas, J.; Meneses-Contreras, R. y Alvarado-Barrantes, E. 2007. Agrocadena de mango. Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería. 45 p.

19 

Wall-Medrano, A.; Olivas-Aguirre, F. J.; Velderrain-Rodríguez, G. R.; González-Aguilar, A.; Rosa, L. A.; López-Díaz, J. A. y Álvarez-Parrilla, E. 2015. El mango: aspectos agroindustriales, valor nutricional/functional y efectos en la salud. Nutrición Hospitalaria. 31(1):55-66. 10.3305/nh.2015.31.1.7701.

20 

Zumbado, F. H. 2002. Análisis químico de los alimentos método clásico. Instituto de Farmacia y Alimentos Universidad de La Habana. 34-62 pp.