Revista Mexicana Ciencias Agrícolas volume 12 number 5 June 30 - August 13, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v12i5.2987
Article
Zinc oxide nanoparticles and their effect on melon yield and quality
Rubén Guadalupe Rivera-Gutiérrez1
Pablo Preciado-Rangel1
Manuel Fortis-Hernández1§
Rebeca, Betancourt-Galindo2
Pablo Yescas-Coronado1
Jorge Arnaldo Orozco-Vidal1
1National Technological Institute of Mexico-Campus Technological Institute of Torreón. Old road Torreón-San Pedro km 7.5, Torreón, Coahuila, Mexico. ZC. 27170. Tel. 871 7507199. (ing.ruben-faz@hotmail.com; ppreciador@yahoo.com.mx; joorvi66@hotmail.com; pyescas@hotmail.com). 2Center for Research in Applied Chemistry. Enrique Reyna H. num. 140, San José de los Cerritos, Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico. ZC. 25294. Tel. 844 4389830. (rebeca.betancourt@ciqa.edu.mx).
§Corresponding author: fortismanuel@hotmail.com.
Abstract
The research consisted of the foliar application of zinc oxide nanoparticles (NPs ZnO), two commercial sources (Z40 and GZ), in addition to a control treatment and their effect on yield and commercial and nutraceutical quality in cv Cruiser melon fruits (Cucumis melo L.). The treatments consisted of the foliar application of five doses of NPs ZnO: 50, 100, 150, 200 and 250 mg L-1. The results indicated that the highest yield was for the treatment with 200 mg L-1 of NPs ZnO, with an increase of 53 t ha-1 in relation to the control, the same trend was for the weight of the fruit that showed values of 1.74 kg, 1.45 kg and 1.33 kg, respectively. Concerning flavonoid content, doses of 50 and 100 mg L-1 exceeded the control treatment and commercial sources; however, as the concentration of NP increased, flavonoids decreased. Phenols, antioxidant capacity (DPPH) and vitamin C decreased by 17, 10. 8 and 9% with the control, respectively. The highest concentration of zinc in pulp was observed with 200 mg L-1 of NPs ZnO. The use of zinc nanoparticles is a good alternative to improve the yield and nutraceutical content and the concentration of Zn in melon fruits, being an option to combat the malnutrition of this micronutrient.
Keywords: Cucumis melo L., DPPH, flavonoids, nanoparticles, phenols.
Reception date: May 2021
Acceptance date: August 2021
Introduction
Melon (Cucumis melo L.) is one of the vegetables grown in many regions of the world, in 2019, 1 039 691 hectares were reported, with China, Iran and Turkey being the main producing countries (FAOSTAT, 2020). In Mexico, it is planted in places that present warm climates and low precipitation, in 2019 about 20 thousand ha were reported (SIAP, 2021). The state of Coahuila is in the north of the country, where 1 800 producers planted more than 6 thousand ha with a high degree of specialization, quality and safety, which has allowed its export (Arellano et al., 2017).
Melon is a fruit characterized by providing a significant number of benefits for both health and the economy, which is why it is one of the most consumed worldwide. Melon pulp is rich in water, proteins, lipids, vitamin C source and beta-carotenes (Maietti, 2012). It is a source of antioxidants and bioactive polyphenols, which provide important health benefits, particularly for the cardiovascular system (López et al., 2007). In addition, it is slightly diuretic, as it removes toxins from the body (Bayer, 2018).
The use and application of metal nanoparticles in agriculture has been successful, especially in crops that are produced in dry climates, since they stimulate their growth, increase the yield and commercial quality of their fruits (Prasad et al., 2014). They are also reported to induce oxidative stress in plants (Chandra et al., 2020) and have an influence on photosynthetic and antioxidant activity (Kumar et al., 2020). In general, the effects of nanomaterials on plants vary greatly not only because of the nature of the materials but also depending on the species studied (Wang et al., 2015). Zinc is an essential micronutrient for plants and humans, worldwide more than 30% of the population is deficient in this element (Amarakoon et al., 2012), negatively affecting the cognitive, brain and reproductive development of people (Salgueiro et al., 2004).
It has a direct effect on growth, neurological, behavioral development and the immune system (López de Romaña et al., 2010), in addition, it promotes the intellectual development of children, accelerates the growth of adolescents, affects the palate, appetite and male fertility (Yin et al., 2012). Strategies have been proposed to mitigate this problem, one of them has been biofortification, where it is possible to obtain fruits enriched with minerals (Restrepo et al., 2020). Reports have shown that it is possible to obtain biofortified fruits with minerals, increasing their concentration in the edible portions of plants (Neeraja et al., 2017).
In the case of zinc in plants, this is a micronutrient involved in protein synthesis, is a stabilizing agent for membranes of wide propagation and cell elongation (Mousavi et al., 2014), maintains protection against environmental stress (Sturikova et al., 2018), and helps adaptability to harsh environmental conditions (Cakmak, 2017). The application of zinc oxide nanoparticles (NPs ZnO) has been shown to have positive effects on nutritional and physiological parameters in some crops (Rizwan et al., 2018), in addition to increasing their content in the edible part of the plant (Subbaiah et al., 2016), these changes can induce stress and toxicity in plants and stimulate antioxidant systems (García-Gómez et al., 2017).
Application of NPs ZnO via foliar minimize the use of fertilizers, increase efficiency and greater availability of nutrients in plants (Nandhini et al., 2019), in addition the effects on plant growth and development are greater compared to traditional forms of Zn (Kolĕncík et al., 2019). However, the information of the effects of its application in this way is still scarce, so the objective of this research was to determine the effect of foliar spray of zinc nanoparticles on the production, nutraceutical quality and their concentration of this micronutrient in fruits of melons developed under open field conditions.
Materials and methods
Study site
The experiment was carried out on agricultural land in the Rosas ejido, Municipality of Tlahualilo, Durango, Mexico, it is located at 1 095 masl. It is located at the coordinates 26° 06’ 38’’ north latitude and 103° 26’ 17’’ west longitude. According to the classification of Köppen modified by García (2004): dry desert or warm steppe climate with rains in the summer and cool winters. The rainfall is 258 mm, and the average annual temperature is 22.1 °C, with ranges of 38.5 as the maximum average and 16.1 as the minimum average. The average annual evaporation is approximately 2 396 mm.
Zinc oxide nanoparticles
The nanoparticles used were zinc oxide (NPs ZnO), with a size between 20 and 60 nm, a purity of 97%, white and structurally hemispherical and polygonal (Figure 1). NPs ZnO were synthesized through controlled precipitation as reported by Ramírez Barrón et al. (2019), using the chemical hydrolysis method. Twenty-four liters of ethanol and 530.4 g of zinc acetate (CH3CO2)2Zn were poured into a 200 L reactor with heating by a boiler at a temperature of 80 °C, using a temperature controller. The reaction remains in agitation for 3 h.
Subsequently, a solution of 0.22 M of NaOH is added to the reactor. It is left in agitation for 1 h to achieve the precipitation of NPs. The precipitate obtained was washed several times with distilled water for subsequent characterization by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to determine the particle size of the material obtained.
Figure 1. Structural form of zinc oxide nanoparticles (NPs ZnO).
Plant material and cultivation
The vegetative material used was hybrid melon (Cucumis melo L.) cv crusier type cantaloupe (Harris Moran Seed Companyr®). Direct sowing took place on March 20, 2019. Double-row ridges were built forming a microplot (melon bed) at 4 m between ridges and a separation between plants of 30 cm for a density of 16 665 plants per hectare. According to the technological package for this crop (Cano et al., 1992), soil preparation was carried out which consisted of plowing at a depth of 30 cm, double harrowing, followed by leveling, construction of melon beds and ridges for conduction and retention of irrigation water.
Fertilization was mechanical using the chemical formula 120-60-00 (N-P2O5-K2O); all the phosphorus and half of the nitrogen were incorporated at the time of planting and the rest of the nitrogen at flowering. The fertilizers were monoammonium phosphate (NH4H2PO4) and ammonium sulfate [(NH4)2SO4]. The irrigation was with water from the Francisco Zarco dam, a pre-sowing irrigation of 30 cm was applied, during the cultivation cycle six auxiliary irrigations were given with water levels of 15 cm each, in total a water level of 120 cm was applied.
Treatments and experimental design
The experimental design was random blocks considering eight treatments with four repetitions, forming 32 experimental units, each of them consisting of an area of 4 m wide by 10 m long (40 m2). The concentrations of NPs ZnO applied were as follows: T1= control, T2= 50 mg L-1; T3= 100 mg L-1; T4= 150 mg L-1; T5= 200 mg L-1; T6= 250 mg L-1; T7= Z 40 (1 L ha-1) and T8= GZ (1 ml L-1 of water). Treatments T7 and T8 consisted of the application of commercial foliar fertilizers, zinc 40 (Z40: concentration 40%) Tec-Fort® and Gro-zinc (GZ: concentration 9.66%) Grodeco®, both chelated fertilizers.
The nanoparticles were applied with a 20 L Lola manual sprinkler (Swissmex®). Each concentration of NPs ZnO was dissolved in eight liters of deionized water (Quimicrón®) and for better adhesion, a non-ionic acidifier - adherent (AF-optimus®) was added at a dose of 1 - 2 ml L-1 of spray water. Three foliar applications of NPs ZnO and conventional fertilizers were made, the first at 20 days after sowing, when the crop presented expansion of the foliage, then every 15 days, on average 40 ml per plant were applied. The applications were made in the morning, without the presence of wind and they wet the entire plant (Trinidad and Aguilar, 1999).
Variables evaluated
Weight, soluble solids and fruit firmness
For the analysis of all the variables, eight plants per treatment were considered, two for each repetition and the harvested fruits considered were those that presented commercial maturity; that is, firm-mature state or 3/4 detached, between 1.2-1.5 kg and without physical damage (Beaulieu and Jeanne, 2007). For the fruit weight (PF), all the fruits harvested were weighed on a digital scale (Adir®, USA) with a capacity of 5 000 g. The total soluble solids (SST) were measured with a Master T 0-53 brix AT-Master53T optical Refractometer (Twiligth®, USA), for this the fruits were split, and a drop of juice was placed in the glass and the reading was taken. The results were expressed as ºBrix. The firmness of the fruit (FF) was measured in two melons of each repetition with a Penetrometer of the Extech® Instruments brand model FHT200 (USA), the tip or plunger of 8 mm was used. The exocarp (peel) was removed and placed on a flat surface, four penetrations were made per fruit (Azam et al., 2015) and the results were averaged, recording as maximum compression force (N).
Yield
For this variable, the weight of all fruits harvested per experimental unit, the planting density were considered and extrapolated for one hectare, the results were reported in t ha-1.
Total flavonoids (FLVT)
Total flavonoid content was determined by the colorimetric method (Zhishen et al., 1999) and the results were expressed in mg quercetin equivalents per 100 g-1, based on fresh weight (mg equiv. Q 100 g-1 FW).
Total phenolic compounds
Total phenolic content was measured using the Folin-Ciocalteau method (Singleton et al., 1999). The determinations were made in triplicate and were reported in mg of gallic acid equivalent per 100 g of fresh weight (mg equiv GA 100 g-1 FW).
Antioxidant activity
Antioxidant capacity was determined using the DPPH method (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhhydrazyl), developed by Brand-Willams et al. (1995). Analyses were performed in triplicate and reported in μM Trolox equivalent per 100 g fresh weight (μM equiv Trolox 100 g-1 FW).
Vitamin C
Ascorbic acid was determined by the technique of Doner and Hicks (1981). The readings were performed on a Varian ProStar 320 HPLC equipped with a UV-Vis detector (ProStar 210, Varian Prostar Inc., Greek Walnut, CA, USA), using a 10 cm Varian amine column and a 20 mL injection loop, the units are reported in mg per 100 grams of fresh weight (mg 100 g-1 FW).
Zinc content in fruit
The zinc content in the peel, pulp and seeds of six melon fruits per treatment was determined. The method used was by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AOAC, 1995), using equipment of the Perkin Elmer brand ® model 3110. Results were reported in mg kg-1.
Statistical analysis
The data of the variables were analyzed by analysis of variance and means separations test using the Tukey test (p≤ 0.05) with the Statistical Analysis System Institute (SAS) version 9.1 statistical package.
Results and discussion
Quality parameters of melon fruits
The foliar applications of NPs ZnO had favorable effects on melon fruits, the concentration of 200 mg L-1 was the one that promoted greater fruit weight, yield, soluble solids and firmness, exceeding by 32% the control treatment and with respect to the commercial sources of Zn (Z-40 and GZ), it exceeded them in 24% and 20%, respectively. On the other hand, the concentration of 250 mg L-1 decreased the weight of the fruit by 11% (Table 1). Regarding yield, the treatment of 200 mg L-1 reported the highest yield with 53 t ha-1, the treatment with the commercial source of zinc (GZ) 43.95 t ha-1 and the control 40 t ha-1.
Table 1. Comparison of parameters of commercial quality of cantaloupe melon fruits by effect of foliar application of NPs ZnO at different concentrations.
NPs ZnO (mg L-1) | Fruit weight (kg) | Yield (t ha-1) | Soluble solids (°Brix) | Firmness (Newton) |
Control | 1.33 ±0.27 d* | 40.09 ±8.35 d | 11.26 ±0.38 b | 17.75 ±1.25 b |
50 | 1.49 ±0.11 bdac | 44.95 ±3.64 bdac | 11.37 ±0.22 b | 21.25 ±3.59 ba |
100 | 1.7 ±0.09 ba | 51.63 ±2.93 ba | 11.85 ±0.75 b | 22.25 ±3.59 ba |
150 | 1.61 ±0.23 bac | 48.93 ±7.13 bac | 11.76 ±1.05 b | 23 ±5.83 a |
200 | 1.74 ±0.18 a | 52.96 ±5.59 a | 12.73 ±0.31 a | 24.5 ±6.45 a |
250 | 1.64 ±0.16 bac | 49.73 ±5.03 bac | 11.94 ±0.48 b | 20.5 ±5.68 ba |
Z40 | 1.4 ±0.17 dc | 42.53 ±5.36 dc | 11.65 ±0.21 b | 21.75 ±2.21 ba |
GZ | 1.45 ±0.17 bdc | 43.95 ±5.39 bdc | 11.6 ±0.13 b | 21.75 ±3.77 ba |
*= averages with different letters, within the same column, indicate significant difference (Tukey; p≤ 0.05). Where: LSD= minimum significant difference.
The average regional yields reported for this crop are 45.2 t ha-1 and with a fruit weight of 1.7 kg (García-Mendoza et al., 2019), in both cases the applications of the nanoparticles exceeded these values. Results report for Vigna mungo (L.), with doses of 200 ppm of NPs ZnO, the best results for seed germination and plant growth (Rajitha et al., 2020). In lettuce, they report a better response when applying 20 ppm (NPs Ag) and when applying the double, the fresh weight of the leaves decreased (Jurkow et al., 2020).
In plants of Capsicum chinense, foliar applications of 1 000 mg L-1 had positive effects on growth and with 2 000 mg L-1 there is a negative effect. Various studies point out that the positive effects of NPs ZnO can be attributed to the fact that zinc is indispensable for developing metabolic and catalytic activities in plant growth (Fageria et al., 2016), regulates enzymatic activities and biochemical reactions that lead to the formation of chlorophyll and carbohydrates (Gawrońska et al., 2018). However, the effect of nanoparticles varies depending on their properties such as their size, chemicals, structure, surface coating, speed and dose of application (Khodakovskaya et al., 2012).
With respect to conventional sources of zinc, it is noted that foliar nanofertilizers may be more effective than these because their release can be slow and gradual (DeRosa et al., 2010). Regarding the decrease in weight and yield of melon fruits, an ambivalent effect of nanoparticles has been reported (Méndez-Arguello et al., 2016). For example, in Lycopersicon esculentum, growth parameters decreased when 200 mg L-1 of NPs ZnO were applied via foliar (Faisan and Hayat, 2019). The causes are diverse from a possible toxicity (Reed et al., 2011; Jurkow et al., 2020) or due to factors linked to the shape, size, seasonal period and number of applications of Nanoparticles (Kolenčík et al., 2019).
Regarding soluble solids and firmness, the values reported for this vegetable in the region are between 6.5 to 11 °Brix and firmness of 38 N (Moreno-Reséndez et al., 2014). The treatment of 200 mg L-1 exceeded the regional value but was inferior in terms of firmness. According to international standards melons with sugar content of 12-14 °Brix are suitable for the international market and values of 9 °Brix are optimal for the optimal internal quality of melons (Bower et al., 2002).
Bioactive compounds in fruits
The results indicate that the highest flavonoid content was obtained with the concentrations of 50 and 100 mg L-1, exceeding the control treatment by 13.5% and the two sources of commercial Zinc by 10% (Z40) and 12% (GZ). It should be noted that as the concentration of nanoparticles increased, flavonoids decreased by 8%. The same behavior occurred for phenols, antioxidant capacity (DPPH) and vitamin C, decreasing by 17%, 10.8% and 9%, respectively (Table 2).
Table 2. Bioactive compounds present in melon fruits by foliar application of NPs ZnO.
NPs ZnO (mg L-1) | Flavonoids (mg QE 100 g-1 FW) | Phenols (mg gallic acid 100 g-1 FW) | DPPH (mg equiv Trolox 100 g-1 FW) | Vitamin C (mg 100 g-1 FW) |
Control | 122.65 ±0.22 e* | 145.07 ±0.36 g | 63.86 ±0.29 h | 50.51 ±0.59 e |
50 | 141.85 ±0.55 a | 231.36 ±1.32 a | 88.14 ±0.22 a | 61.36 ±1.04 a |
100 | 140.18 ±3.53 a | 222.43 ±0.97 b | 81.79 ±0.77 c | 59.13 ±0.83 b |
150 | 135.22 ±0.45 b | 211.8 ±1.1 c | 85.29 ±0.19 b | 56.87 ±0.31 c |
200 | 133.21 ±0.14 b | 199.9 ±3.27 d | 78.62 ±0.22 d | 53.53 ±0.99 d |
250 | 130.11 ±0.77 c | 192.04 ±1.68 e | 75.32 ±0.11 e | 54.17 ±1 d |
Z40 | 127.71 ±0.17 d | 178.44 ±6.54 f | 72.02 ±0.11 f | 53.81 ±0.5 d |
GZ | 124.41 ±0.72 e | 150.98 ±8.39 g | 68.78 ±0.7 g | 55.9 ±0.43 c |
*= averages with different letters, within the same column, indicate significant difference (Tukey; p≤ 0.05). Where: PF= fresh weight; DPPH= 1,1-Diphenyl-2-Picrylhydrazil.
The applications of commercial zinc sources exceeded the control treatment for flavonoids by 4%, phenols by 18%, antioxidant capacity by 11.3% and vitamin C by 9.6%; however, these percentages were lower than those obtained by NPs ZnO. The quantity of flavonoids present in melon depends on the genotype, ripening of the fruit and the date of harvest (Tadmor et al., 2010). They have various functions, it acts as an excellent antioxidant agent, it has antimicrobial compounds, UV protectors, insect protectors (Harborne and Williams, 2000).
Values of 106.18 mg 100 g-1 (Morais et al., 2015) up to 168 mg 100 g-1 (Ismail et al., 2010) have been reported, in our study, the average values were 141.85 with 50 mg L-1 of NPs ZnO. These results may be associated with the foliar application of NPs ZnO has a greater transport potential, greater bioavailability and absorption that allows them to interact with intracellular structures that stimulate the formation of ROS (Ghosh et al., 2016; García-López et al., 2019).
Phenolic compounds also play a very important role in this crop, as they protect the fruit from insects and microorganisms, and determine the color and appearance of the fruits (Jeong et al., 2004; Mallek-Ayadi et al., 2019). Values of 168 mg 100 g-1 have been reported in cantaloupe melon pulp (Ismail et al., 2010). The phenolic content is associated with its antioxidant activities due to its redox properties that allows it to act as a reducing agent and oxygen donor (Chang et al., 2001).
In this sense, the results clearly indicate that the application of NP ZnO induces a higher content of antioxidant compounds (phenols, flavonoids and vitamin C) in melon fruits.
The content of vitamin C in melon fruits (Cucumis melo L.) showed a decrease when increasing the concentration of NPs ZnO between treatments. The highest value of vitamin C was found in fruits of sprinkled plants with 50 mg L-1 of NPs ZnO, this concentration was 21.48% higher compared to the control treatment. Doses of 100, 150, 200 and 250 mg L-1 of NPs ZnO showed increases of 17.06, 12.59, 5.97, 7.24%, respectively. While the commercial sources of zinc-40 (6.53%) and Gro-zinc (10.67%) compared to control treatment.
Results obtained by López-Vargas et al. (2018) showed that applications of 250 mg L-1 of NPs of Cu significantly increased the concentration of vitamin C, which increased the nutraceutical quality of tomato fruits. Mathpal et al. (2015) state that zinc is involved in enzyme activation, protein biosynthesis and carbohydrates. Padayatty et al. (2003) mention that vitamin C is an antioxidant whose effects reduce human diseases such as atherosclerosis and cancer, which occur by oxidative damage to tissues, diets abundant in fruits and vegetables decrease the risk of cardiovascular disease, stroke and cancer.
Zinc content in fruits
Foliar applications of NPs ZnO influenced the zinc content present in the peel, pulp and seeds of melon fruits. In the control treatment, the amount of zinc was 52.68 mg kg-1 the largest amount of zinc is present in the pulp (76%), then in the seed (21%) and a small amount in the peel (2.5%). On the other hand, the treatment of 200 mg L-1 presented 67.43 mg kg, with values of 78%, 19% and 2.5%, respectively. While in fruits with commercial fertilization (GZ), the amount was 57.6 mg kg, with values of 77% (pulp), 20% (seed) and 2.5% (peel) (Figure 2).
The treatment of 200 mg L-1 NPs ZnO was the one that presented the highest zinc content in pulp (52.96 mg kg-1), surpassing the control treatment by 24% and GZ by 17%. However, as a higher concentration was applied, zinc pulp values decreased by 6%. Other studies have reported zinc content of 22 mg kg-1 dry weight in melon pulp (López-Zaplana et al., 2020).
Figure 2. Zinc content in peel, pulp and seeds of melon fruits with foliar applications of zinc nanoparticles and conventional commercial fertilizers. Averages with different letters indicate significant difference according to Tukey’s test (p≤ 0.05).
On the other hand, Wang et al. (2019) found that applying NPs Cu increased the copper content in wheat grains between 18.86% and 30.45% compared to the control and with a dose of 500 mg kg-1 of NPs TiO. Rizwan et al. (2018) observed that when applying Nanoparticles of Zn and Fe there was an increase in the concentrations of both elements in Triticum aestivum. The Institute of Medicine (2002) reports a requirement of 11 mg day-1 of zinc in adolescents from 14 to 18 years and 9.4 mg for people over 19 years, it is not recommended to ingest doses greater than 25 mg, as it can cause anemia and copper deficiency (Lenntech, 2021).
In this sense, the use of NPs with zinc is an effective way to enrich crops, since moving Zn through plant tissues will cause an accumulation of this micronutrient, which could help solve Zn deficiency in the human diet (Cakman and Kutman, 2018).
Conclusions
The foliar application of NPs ZnO improves the yield and commercial and nutraceutical quality of melon fruits. The yield and quality of the melon crop depend on the concentration used of NPs ZnO, since high doses favor the yield and a higher concentration of Zn in pulp; on the other hand, with the application of intermediate doses of NPs ZnO, a greater accumulation of bioactive compounds is favored. Foliar spray of NPs ZnO is a practical way to enrich melon fruits and mitigate the deficiencies of this micronutrient in the population.
Acknowledgements
Rubén Guadalupe Rivera-Gutiérrez thanks the financial support provided by the National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACYT) for doctoral studies, the technical assistance of the technicians of the Laboratory of Water and Soil Analysis of the Technological Institute of Torreón (ITT) for their support and sponsorship to carry out the project and to CIQA for the donation of the nanoparticles.
Cited literature
Amarakoon, D. 2012. Guisantes de campo ricos en hierro, zinc y magnesio (Pisum sativum L.) con ácido fítico naturalmente bajo: una posible solución a base de alimentos para la desnutrición global de micronutrientes. Rev. Composic. Anális. Alimen. 27(1):8-13.
AOAC. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of official analytical chemists. Arlington VA, USA. 16 p.
Arellano, M.; Blundell, R. y Bonhomme, S. 2017. Dinámica de ingresos y consumo: un marco de datos de panel no lineal. Econometrica. 85(3):693-734. 10.3982/ecta13795.
Azam, M. M.; Eissa, A. H. A. and Hassan, A. H. 2015. Monitoring of change in cantaloupe fruit quality under pre-cooling and storage treatments. J. Food Process Technol. 6(12):1-6.
Bayer. 2018. Bayer cross design and seminis melón, una fresca opción para tu siembra de verano. Agronomic Spotligths. https://www.seminis.mx/melon-una-fresca-opcion-para-tu-siembra -de-verano/.
Beaulieu, J. C. 2007. Cambios de calidad en el melón durante el crecimiento, la maduración y en cubos recién cortados almacenados preparados a partir de frutas cosechadas en varios vencimientos J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 132(5):720-728.
Bower, J. H.; Latché, P. and Jean-Claude. 2002. Culture conditions and detachment of the fruit influence the effect of ethylene on the climateric respiration of melon. Postharvest Biol. Tec. 26(4):135-146.
Brand-Williams, W. C. and Berset, C. 1995. Use of free radical method to evaluuate antioxidant activity. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 28:25-30.
Cakmak, I. y K, U. B. 2017. Biofortificación agronómica de cereales con zinc: una revisión. Rev. Europea. Cienc. Suel. 69(1):172-180.
Cano, R. P.; Moreno, L. E.; Espinoza, J. J.; Jiménez, F. y Nava, U. 1992. Guía para cultivar melón en la comarca lagunera. Campo Experimental ‘La Laguna’ de INIFAP. Matamoros, Coahuila. 2-15 pp.
Chandra, P.; Sharma, R. K. and Arora, D. S. 2020. Antioxidant compounds from microbial sources: a review. Food Res. Int. 129 p.
Chang, J. y Lin, C. Y. 2001. Cinética de decoloración de una cepa recombinante de escherichia coli que alberga determinantes que decoloran azo-colorantes de rhodococcus sp. Biotechnol. Lett. 23:631-636. 10.1023/A: 1010306114286.
De-Rosa, M.; Monreal, C.; Schnitzer, M.; Walsh, R. y Sultan, Y. 2010. Nanotecnología en fertilizantes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5(2):91-91.
Doner. L. W. 1981. Hiah-nerformance liouid chromatographic separation of ascorbic acid, erythorbic acid, dehydoascorbic acid, dehydroerythorbic acid, diketogulonic acid, and diketogluconic acid. Anal. Biochem. 115(1):225-230.
Fageria, N. K. 2016. The use of nutrients in crop plants. Boca raton: CRC press. 448 p. 10.1201/9781420075113.
Faizan, M. H. and Shamsul. 2019. Effect of foliar spray of zno-nps on the physiological parameters and antioxidant systems of lycopersicon esculentum. Polish J. Nat. Sci. 34(6):87-105.
Faostat. 2020. Food and Agriculture Organization the United Nations Statistics. 2020 p. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home.
García, E. 2004. Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen, adaptado a las condiciones de la República Mexicana. 5a (Ed.). No. 6. Instituto de Geografía- Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). 97 p.
García-Gómez, C.; Obrador, A.; González, D.; Babín, M. y Fernández, M. D. 2017. Efecto comparativo de NP de ZnO, ZnO a granel y ZnSO4 en las defensas antioxidantes de dos especies de plantas que crecen en dos suelos agrícolas en condiciones de invernadero. Sci. Total Environ. 589(7):11-24.
García-López, J. N. M.; Olivares-Sáenz, E.; Lira-Saldivar, R. H.; Barriga-Castro, E. D.; Vázquez-Alvarado, R.; Rodríguez-Salinas, P. A. y Zavala-García, F. 2019. La aplicación foliar de nanopartículas de óxido de zinc y sulfato de zinc aumenta el contenido de compuestos bioactivos en pimientos habaneros. Plants. 8(254):1-20.
García-Mendoza, V.; Cano-Ríos, P. and Reyes-Carrillo, J. L. 2019. Harper-type melon hybrids have higher quality and longer postharvest life than commercial hybrids. Rev. Chapingo Ser. Hortic. 25(3):185-197. 10.5154/r.rchsh.2019.05.008.
Gawrońska, H. P.; Arkadiusz, S.; Pawlak, K.; Brama, K.; Miszczak, A.; Stankiewicz-Kosyl, M. and Gawronski, S. 2018. Platinum uptake, distribution and toxicity in Arabidopsis thaliana L. plants. Ecotox Environ Safe. 147:982-989. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.09.065.
Ghosh, M.; Jana, A.; Sinha, S.; Jothiramajayam, M.; Nag, A.; Chakraborty, A.; Mukherjee, A. and Mukherjee, A. 2016. Effects of ZnO nanoparticles in plants: Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, deregulation of antioxidant defenses, and cell-cycle arrest. Mutation research. Gen. Toxicol Environ. Mutagen. 807(1):25-32. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2016.07.006.
Harborne, J. B. and Williams, C. A. 2000. Advances in flavonoid research since 1992. Phytochemistry. 55(6):481-504. 10.1016/s0031-9422(00)00235-1.
Ismail, H.; Chan, K. W.; Mariod, A. A. e Ismail, M. 2010. Contenido fenólico y actividad antioxidante de extractos metanólicos de melón (Cucumis melo). Química de los Alimentos. 119(2):643-647. 10.1016 / j.foodchem.2009.07.023.
Jeong, S. M.; Kim, S. Y.; Kim, D. R.; Jo, S. C.; Nam, K. C.; Ahn, D. U. y Lee, S. C. 2004. Efecto del tratamiento térmico sobre la actividad antioxidante de extractos de cáscaras de cítricos. Rev. Quím. Agríc. Aliment. 52(11):3389-3393. 10.1021 / jf049899k.
Jurkow, R.; Pokluda, R.; Sękara, A. y Kalisz, A. 2020. Impact of foliar application of some metal nanoparticles on antioxidant system in oakleaf lettuce seedlings. BMC Plant Biology. 20(290):1-12.
Khodakovskaya, M. V.; Silva, K.; Biris, A. S.; Dervishi, E. and Villagarcia, H. 2012. Carbon nanotubes induce growth enhancement of tobacco cells. ACS nano. 6(3):2128-2135. 10.1021/nn204643g.
Kolenčík, M.; Ernst, D.; Komár, M.; Urík, M.; Šebesta, M.; Dobročka, E.; Černý, I.; Illa, R.; Kanike, R.; Qian, Y.; Feng, H.; Orlová, D. and Kratošová, G. 2019. Effect of foliar spray application of zinc oxide nanoparticles on quantitative, nutritional, and physiological parameters of foxtail millet (Setaria italica L.) under field conditions. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland). 9(11):1559. 10.3390/nano9111559.
Lenntech. 2021. Ingesta diaria recomendada de vitaminas y minerales. https://www.lenntech.com/ recommended-daily-intake.htm.
López-Romaña, D.; Castillo, D.; Carlos y Diazgranados, D. 2010. El zinc en la salud humana. Revista Chilena de Nutrición. 37(2):240-247. 10.4067/S0717-75182010000200014.
López, V.; Santana, A. and Rodríguez, L. 2007. Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the dow jones sustainability index. J. Bus. Ethics. 75(3):285-300. 10.1007/s10551-006-9253-8.
López-Vargas, E.; Ortega-Ortiz, H.; Cadenas-Pliego, G.; Alba-Romenus, K.; Cabrera-Fuente, M.; Benavides-Mendoza, A. y Juárez-Maldonado, A. 2018. La aplicación foliar de nanopartículas de cobre aumenta la calidad de la fruta y el contenido de compuestos bioactivos en tomates. Ciencias Aplicadas. 8(7):10-20. 10.3390 / app8071020.
Maietti, A; Tedeschi, P.; Stagno, C.; Bordiga, M.; Travaglia, F.; Locatelli, M.; Arlorio, M. and Brandolini, V. 2012. Analytical traceability of melon (Cucumis melo var reticulatus): proximate composition, bioactive compounds, and antioxidant capacity in relation to cultivar, plant physiology state, and seasonal variability. J. Food Sci. 77(6):646-652. 10.1111 / j.1750-3841.2012.02712.x.
Mallek-Ayadi, S.; Bahloul, N. y Kechaou, N. 2019. Caracterización, compuestos fenólicos y propiedades funcionales de los peelings de Cucumis melo L. Food Chem. 221(1):1691-1697. 10.1016 / j.foodchem.2016.10.117.
Mathpal, B.; Srivastava, P. C.; Shankhdhar, D. y Shankhdhar, S. C. 2015. Mejora de las actividades enzimáticas clave y la calidad del arroz bajo varios métodos de aplicación de zinc. Fisiología y Biología Molecular de las Plantas. 21(4):567-572. 10.1007/s12298-015-0321-3.
Méndez-Argüello, B.; Vera-Reyes, I.; Mendoza-Mendoza, E.; García-Cerda, L. A.; Puente-Urbina, B. A. and Lira-Saldívar, R. H. 2016. Promoción del crecimiento en plantas de Capsicum annuum por nanopartículas de óxido de zinc. Nova Scientia. 8(17):140-156.
Morais, D.; Rotta, E. M.; Sargi, S. C.; Schmidt, E. M.; Bonafe, E. G.; Eberlin, M. N.; Sawaya, A. C. y Visentainer, J. V. 2015. Actividad antioxidante, fenólicos y UPLC ESI MS de extractos de diferentes partes de frutas tropicales y cáscaras procesadas. Food Res. Intern. 77(1):392-399.10.1016/j.foodres.2015.08.036.
Moreno-Reséndez, A.; García-Gutiérrez, L.; Cano-Ríos, P.; Martínez-Cueto, V.; Márquez-Hernández, C. y Rodríguez-Dimas, N. 2014. Desarrollo del cultivo de melón (Cucumis melo) con vermicompost bajo condiciones de invernadero. Ecosistemas y Recursos Agropecuarios. 1(2):163-173.
Mousavi, S. C. T.; Nguyen-Farmer, E. and Kellenberger, S. 2014. Measuring surface potential changes on leaves. Nature Protocols. 9(8):1997-2004. 10.1038/nprot.2014.136.
Nandhini, M. R.; Udayashankar, S. B.; Niranjana, S. R.; Søgaard, O.; Shetty, H. and Prakash, H. S, 2019. Biofabricated zinc oxide nanoparticles as an eco-friendly alternative for growth promotion and management of downy mildew of pearl millet. Crop Protection. 121(1):103-112. 10.1016/j.cropro.2019.03.015.
Neeraja, C. N. B; Ram, S.; Hossain, F.; Hariprasanna, K.; Rajpurohit, B. S.; Prabhakar, L. T.; Prasad, K. S.; Sandhu, J. S. and Datta, S. K. 2017. Biofortification in cereals: progress and prospects. Current Sci. 113(6):1050-1057. 10.18520/cs/v113/i06/1050-1057.
Padayatty, S.; Katz, A.; Wang, Y.; Eck, P.; Kwon, O.; Lee, J.-H. y Levine, M. 2003. La vitamina C como antioxidante: evaluación de su papel en la prevención de enfermedades. Rev. Coleg. Americ. Nutric. 22(1):18-35. 10.1080/07315724.2003.10719272.
Prasad, R.; Shivay, Y. S. and Kumar, D. 2014. Chapter two agronomic biofortification of cereal grains with iron and zinc. In: Donald LS. (Ed) advances in agronomy. Academic Press. 55-91 pp.
Rajitha, B.; Rajarajeswari, V.; Sudhakar, P.; Naidu, N. V.; Prasad, T. y Reddy, B. 2020. Efecto de nutrientes de plantas a nanoescala en caracteres de plántulas de Blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). Rev. Farmacognosia y Fitoquímica. 9(2):670-672.
Ramírez-Barrón, S. N.; Sánchez-Valdés, S.; Puente-Urbina, B. A.; Martínez-Montemayor, S.; Esparza-González, S. C. Betancourt-Galindo, R. 2019. Preparación de un adhesivo sensible a la presión (PSA) con la incorporación de nanopartículas de ZnO. Estudio de sus propiedades fisicoquímicas y antimicrobianas. Rev. Mexic. Ingen. Biomédica. 40(1):201-838. 10.17488/rmib.40.1.5.
Reed, R.; Ladner, D. A.; Higgins, C. P.; Westerhoff, P. y Ranville, J. F. 2011. Solubilidad del óxido de nano-zinc en matrices importantes desde el punto de vista medioambiental y biológico. Toxicología y Química Ambiental. 31(1):93-99. 10.1002 etc.708.
Restrepo-Betancur y López-Marín, B. E. 2020. Biofortificación de tomate (Solanum lycopersicum L.) con cianocobalamina y micronutrientes aminoquelados (Zn, Fe). Rev. Esp, Nutr. Hum. Diet. 24(3):247-255. 10.14306/renhyd.24.3.1011.
Rizwan, M.; Ali, S.; Ali, B.; Adrees, M.; Arshad, M.; Hussain, A.; Zia, R. M. and Waris, A. A. 2018. Zinc and iron oxide nanoparticles improved the plant growth and reduced the oxidative stress and cadmium concentration in wheat. Chemosphere. 214(1):269-277. Doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.09.120.
Salgueiro, M. J.; Weill, R; Hernández-Triana, M.; Zubillaga, L. A.; Ruiz, C.; Vladimir, B. J. y Caro, R. 2004. Deficiencia de zinc en relación con el desarrollo intelectual y sexual. Rev. Cub. Sal. Públ. 30(2):1-13.
SIAP. 2021. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. Anuario Estadístico de la Producción Agrícola. https://nube.siap.gob.mx/cierreagricola/.
Singleton, V.; Orthofer, R. y Lamuela-Raventós, R. M. 1999. Análisis de fenoles totales y otros sustratos de oxidación y antioxidantes mediante reactivo folin-ciocalteu. Methods in Enzymology. 299:152-178. 10.1016/s0076-6879 (99) 99017-1.
Sturikova, H. K.; Huska, D.; Adam, V. 2018. Zinc, zinc nanoparticles and plants. J. Hazardous Materials. 349:101-110. 1016/j.jhazmat.2018.01.040.
Subbaiah, L. P.; Tollamadugu, N. V.; Gilidiará, K.; Timmavajjula, S. P.; Reddy, B. and Pradeep, T. N. 2016. Effects of nanoparticulate delivery of zinc on growth, productivity, and zinc biofortification in maize (Zea mays L.). J. Agr. Food Chem. 64(19):3778-3788. Doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00838.
Tadmor, Y.; Burger, J.; Yaakov, I.; Feder, A.; Libhaber, S. E.; Portnoy, V.; Meir, A.; Tzuri, G.; Sa'ar, U.; Rogachev, I.; Aharoni, A.; Abeliovich, H.; Schaffer, A. A.; Lewinsohn, E. and Katzir, N. 2010. Genetics of flavonoid, carotenoid, and chlorophyll pigments in melon fruit rinds. J. Agr. Food Chem. 58(19):10722-10728. 10.1021/jf1021797.
Trinidad, S. 1999. Fertilización foliar, un respaldo importante en el rendimiento de los cultivos. Terra Latinoam. 17(3):247-255.
Wang, M.; Liu, X.; Hu, J.; Li, J. y Huang, J. 2015. El óxido nano-férrico promueve el crecimiento de la sandía. Rev. Biomateriales y Nanobiotecnología. 6(3):160-167. 10.4236/jbnb. 2015.63016.
Wang, Y.; Jiang, F.; Ma, C.; Rui, Y.; Tsang, D. C. W. y Xing, B. 2019. Efecto de nanopartículas de óxido metálico sobre aminoácidos en granos de trigo (Triticum aestivum) en un estudio de ciclo de vida. J. Environ. Manage. 241:319-327. 10.1016 / j.jenvman.2019.04.041.
Yin, X.; Yuan, L.; Liu, Y. y Lin, Z. 2012. Phytoremediation and Biofortification: Two Sides of One Coin. Berlin, NY: Springer. 1-31 p. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1439-7-1.
Zhishen, J. M. y Jianming, W. 1999. La determinación del contenido de flavonoides en la morera y sus efectos depuradores sobre los radicales superóxidos. Food Chem. 64(1):555-559.