Revista Mexicana Ciencias Agrícolas   volume 12   number 5   June 30 - August 13, 2021

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v12i5.2638

Article

Growth of Agave angustifolia Haw. in relation to its nutritional condition

Suzel del Carmen Ríos-Ramírez1

José Raymundo Enríquez-del Valle

Gerardo Rodríguez-Ortiz2

Judith Ruíz-Luna2

Vicente Arturo Velasco-Velasco2

1Autonomous University of Baja California-Institute of Oceanological Research. Ensenada-Tijuana highway num. 3917, Fractionation Playitas, Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico. ZC. 69500. (suzelriosramirez@gmail.com). 2TecNM-Technological Institute of the Valley of Oaxaca. Former Hacienda de Nazareno, Xoxocotlán, Oaxaca, Mexico. ZC. 71230. Tel. 951 5170444. (gerardo.rodriguez@voaxaca.tecnm.mx; judith.rl@voaxaca.tecnm.mx; vicente.vv@voaxaca.tecnm.mx).

§Corresponding author: jose.ev@voaxaca.tecnm.mx.

Abstract

Agave angustifolia Haw. plants, which are obtained by asexual propagation (inflorescence bulbils and rhizome suckers), are established in a nursery where they are provided with agronomic management that is considered to include the supply of nutrients, to achieve quality plants in health and vigor that are successfully established in the field. The research was carried out from January 2017 to August 2018, in the nursery of the Technological Institute of the Valley of Oaxaca, located in the Exhacienda de Nazareno, Xoxocotlán, Oaxaca, Mexico, the objective was to evaluate the nutritional contents in foliar tissues and the size of Agave angustifolia plants, in nursery conditions, fertigated at different concentrations of nutrients. For seven months, four groups of plants that were in soil of loamy-sandy texture were applied different types of irrigation: water or nutrient solution (SN) at 50, 75 and 100% of the Steiner formulation, after that time, their growth was evaluated. In leaf samples, the nutritional contents were analyzed, and the plants to which water was applied, SN-50%, SN-75% and SN-100%, had in mg kg-1 of foliar dry matter: 7 225, 10 641, 12 575 and 14 957 of N; 3 017, 5 018, 5 297 and 6 719 of P; 7 827 19 604, 16 220.1 and 18 847 of Mg, accumulated, 282.74, 340.11, 431.98 and 453.05 g of foliar dry matter, as well as 75.01, 77.21, 95.92 and 103.14 g of dry matter in the root, respectively.

Keywords: agave, fertigation, nutrients.

Reception date: June 2021

Acceptance date: August 2021

Introduction

In the state of Oaxaca, Mexico, Agave angustifolia is used as a raw material to produce mezcal. It is a plant with morphological characteristics of succulence, which forms a large rosette 1.5 to 2 m in height and 1.5 to 2 m in diameter, with rigid leaves, with marginal and apical spines; it develops a flower scape that reaches up to 6 m in height. The stem of the rosette, called pineapple, which has an average fresh weight of 80 kg, contains 21.16% of total reducing sugars of the fresh weight (González-González et al., 2007; Cruz et al., 2013), its root is shallow, it grows in land with moderate to steep slopes, stony soils.

The species supports environmental conditions, such as water deficit, high temperature, moderately saline soils and with low fertility, that limit the growth and productivity of other crop plants (Andrade et al., 2007; García, 2007; Enríquez-del-Valle, 2008). This species presents photosynthesis of the Crassulacean acid metabolism type, MAC (Matiz et al., 2013) and it allows them to obtain net carbon gains with minimal water losses (Winter and Smith, 1996).

Being an alcohol-producing plant of economic interest to produce mezcal, plant material is needed to establish in the field. Although this species produces viable seeds, the plantations are established with plants that are obtained by asexual propagation, mainly rhizome suckers and inflorescence bulbils, and in a small proportion, plants obtained by plant tissue cultures have been established (Arizaga and Ezcurra, 2002; Enríquez-del Valle, 2008).

The plants, which are obtained in an asexual way, are kept for six to 18 months in nursery, to obtain 30-50 cm in height, convenient to establish them in the field, and during this period it is necessary to give agronomic management, stage in which the health and the supply of nutrients are considered convenient to achieve plants of quality and vigor that are successfully established in the field. When the plants are extracted from the soil of the nursery to transfer them to the field, the roots are pruned and sometimes immersed for a few minutes in fungicidal solution, to later be placed in a ventilated place in the shade for two days to a week so that their tissues lose slightly moisture, which according to the nurserymen promotes the plant to establish successfully in the field.

Plantations are established during the first months of the rainy season to ensure that plants develop new roots to establish themselves in the soil and restart growth (Díaz et al., 2011). Plants generally depend on the energy of solar radiation captured through the photosynthetic process for carbon fixation and synthesis of structural and metabolic compounds. But the efficiency of the plant to capture solar radiation, fix carbon and accumulate dry matter depends on its physiological condition, which is positively related to the nutrimental condition.

In A. tequilana, soil fertility studies have been carried out, which conclude the need to apply fertilizers to increase crop yields (Álvarez-Sánchez et al., 2010). A. angustifolia in field conditions (Martínez-Ramírez and Bautista-Sánchez, 2013), as well as in micropropagated plants of A. americana var. oaxacensis (Enríquez-del-Valle et al., 2013) in greenhouse and A. potatorum (Enríquez-del Valle et al., 2016) in nursery conditions, show the favorable effect of nutrient supply on plant growth. There are 17 essential nutrients that are classified into macronutrients (nitrogen, N, phosphorus, P, potassium, K, calcium, Ca, magnesium, Mg and sulfur, S) and micronutrients (iron, Fe, copper, Cu, manganese, Mn, zinc, Zn, boron, B and molybdenum, Mo) (Vitosh et al., 1994; Grusak, 2001; Zúñiga, 2013).

Of all the essential elements for the plant, carbon (C), hydrogen (H) and oxygen (O) constitute about 90% of the dry weight of a plant (Medina, 1999). Inside the plant, these elements are used for the synthesis of carbohydrates, through photosynthesis, which occurs in the chloroplasts of the cells, using light as an energy source. The remaining 14 elements only represent about 10% of the dry weight of a plant (Rodríguez and Flores, 2004).

In previous works on the development of A. angustifolia in greenhouse-nursery, it has been demonstrated the convenience of supplying fertigation, which has positive effects on the development of plants, in characteristics such as number of leaves, plant height, stem diameter, fresh and dry weight (Enríquez-del-Valle et al., 2009). But more information is required for agave to show the relationship between nutrient supply, nutrient content in plant tissues and plant growth. That is why the objective of this work was: To evaluate plants of A. angustifolia, which in nursery conditions were fertigated at different concentrations of nutrients, the size they reached in relation to the nutritional contents of their foliar tissues.

Materials and methods

Experimental material

This work is a continuation of the experimental procedure, in which plant growth data were reported, by Ríos-Ramírez et al. (2018). The plant material consisted of 27 18-month-old plants of A. angustifolia obtained from inflorescence bulbils. Which were in nursery conditions, individually established in pots of 4 dm3 with soil of loamy-sandy texture. They were separated into four groups, which received twice a week for seven months various types of irrigation (treatments): 1) only water; or irrigation with nutrient solution (SN) in different dilutions of Steiner's formulation (1984), 2) SN-50%; 3) SN-75%; 4) SN-100%.

SN-100% contains in mg L-1: 166.42 N, 30.68 P, 276.44 K, 182.34 Ca, 49.09 Mg, 111.15 S, 1.25 Fe, 0.21 Mn, 0.025 Zn, 0.076 B, 0.005 Cu and 0.021 Mo. Also, all groups were sprayed twice a week with agricultural fungicide N-trichloromethylthio-4-cyclohexene-1,2-dicarboximide of the brand Bayer® and systemic antibiotic, agricultural terramycin 5% Oxytetracycline, of the brand Zoetis®. After seven months in the aforementioned conditions, the plants were harvested and the following was quantified, their height, number of leaves, leaf area (cm2) determined with a Laser scanner Area Meter (CID Bio-Science, Copyrigh© 2016 CID Bio-Sciencie, Inc. Camas, WA USA), the leaf and root volume (cm3) by dipping them in a known volume of water in a graduated cylinder.

The fresh weight (g) of the leaves and roots was measured on a triple beam scale (IROSA® 700 PPW, Mexico) with precision of 0.1 g. Subsequently, the leaves and roots were placed separately in paper bags properly labeled, to be placed for two weeks at a temperature of 65 °C in a convection oven (Felisa® Fabricantes Feligneo, SA de CV, Mexico). After this time, the dry root and foliar material were weighed again in the triple beam scale.

Determination of nutrients in foliar tissues

To analyze the nutrient contents, the dry leaves of Agave were pulverized in a mill (Apex Construction Ltd V110), of which 0.5 g of sample was weighed in duplicate on an analytical balance (Sartorius CP2245), these samples were subjected to wet digestion with a mixture of HNO3:HClO4 (ratio 2:1) in a Kjeldahl digester of the SEV brand DIK-20 model.

The determination of nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) was performed by the combustion method, in an organic elemental analyzer (Mod: Perkin Elmer Series II CHNS/0 analyzer 2400), phosphorus (P) was evaluated by the Vanadate-Molybdate-Yellow method in an ultraviolet visible light spectrophotometer (UV-Vis GBC Cintra 10) at a wavelength of 470 nm, the elements potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na), copper (Cu), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn) and zinc (Zn) were determined by Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometry, in an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, model ICE 3000 series AA) with air-acetylene flame by direct aspiration; and sulfates (SO4) by the turbidimetric method, in a ultraviolet visible light spectrophotometer (UV-Vis GBC Cintra 10) at a wavelength of 340 nm.

Experimental design and data analysis

The experiment was established according to a completely random design. The experimental unit was a plant and with different number of repetitions per treatment (from four to 11). In the data for each variable, the homogeneity of variance was analyzed using the Bartlet test and the Shapiro-Wilk normality test. The variables N, Na, K, Zn, Fe, Cu were transformed to log10 (x) to satisfy the assumptions of homogeneity and normality. Data were subjected to an analysis of variance, comparisons of means (Duncan, 0.05), correlations (0.05). Correlation analyses between the leaf dry weight and the contents of nutrients in the leaves were performed, as well as between the amounts of the various nutrients. For statistical analysis routines, the SAS® Statistical Analysis System, version 9.0, was used.

Results and discussion

The nutrient contents found in foliar tissues of A. angustifolia plants were influenced by the increasing concentrations of fertigation they received for seven months in the nursery. Analyses of variance (Table 1) show that nutrient supply levels had significant different effects (p≤ 0.  05) in the contents of N, Mg, Zn and not significant effects for K, SO4, P, Na, Fe, Cu, as well as in the accumulated leaf dry matter.

The amount of leaf dry matter and root dry matter that the plants accumulated were also positively related to the amount of nutrients supplied to them. Thus, plants irrigated with only water and fertigated plants with SN-100% accumulated 282.7 and 453.05 g of leaf dry matter, as well as 75 and 103.1 g of dry matter in the root, which in each case were significantly different magnitudes (Duncan, 0.05) (Table 2).

Table 1. Summary of the analysis of variance of dry matter and nutrient contents in foliar tissues of Agave angustifolia plants, which, in nursery, were fertigated at different concentrations of nutrients.

Fv

Gl

Mean squares and significance

P

C

N

Na

Mg

K

Trat

3

14847174.6ns

489539571ns

68167267.3*

1.60107727ns

198638940*

0.33048079ns

Err

24

12454715.2

668481315

10267603.5

0.57726192

61911784

0.12158501

Tot

27

Fv

Gl

Zn

Fe

SO4

Cu

MSF

MSR

Trat

3

0.27210426*

0.20388993ns

36743275.7ns

0.1886378ns

2.67ns

1508.2ns

Err

24

0.08453928

0.4057517

21039730.1

0.35015818

0.96

1869.2

Tot

27

Fv= sources of variation; Gl= degrees of freedom; Trat= treatment; Err= error; Tot= total; P= phosphorus; C= carbon; N= nitrogen; Na= sodium; Mg= magnesium; K= potassium; Zn= zinc; Fe= iron, SO4= sulfates; Cu= copper; MSF= leaf dry matter; MSR= root dry matter; ns= non-significant values (p> 0.05); *=values with significant effects (p≤ 0.05); **=values with highly significant effects (p≤ 0.01).

Table 2. Dry matter of leaves (g) and root (g), and nutrient contents (mg kg-1) in foliar tissues of Agave angustifolia plants, which, in nursery, were fertigated at different concentrations of nutrients.

Variables

Irrigation type treatment

Water

SN50%

SN75%

SN100%

MSF

MSR

P

C

N

Mg

K

Na

Zn

Fe

Cu

SO4

282.74 ±0.6 b

75.01 ±32.6 a

3017 ±3024.4 a

413508 ±250382.1 a

7225 ±5773.8 c

7827 ±4950.5 b

18057 ±16352.4 a

153.2 ±265 a

12.88 ±11.5 a

23.55 ±23.3 a

14.83 ±12.1 a

1371 ±1957.8 a

340.11 ±1 ab

77.21 ±48 a

5018 ±4009.5 a 403786 ±423534.2 a 10641 ±16475.7 bc

19604 ±9389.9 a

45048 ±16475.7 a

892.7 ±16475.7 a

26.89±15.4 a

65.32 ±56.8 a

36.63 ±30.5 a

6087 ±4607 a

431.98 ±0.7 ab

95.92 ±25.7 a

5297 ±2783 a

395363 ±217209.9 a

12575 ±9162.3 ab

16220.1 ±4670.3 ab

42522 ±9956.9 a

543.2 ±463.9 a

29.23 ±26.8 a

67.37 ±53.6 a

46.14 ±42.7 a

5843 ±3934.5 a

453.05 ±121.5 a

103.14 ±53.4 a

6719 ±537.9 a

416057 ±55592.8 a

14957 ±2381.6 a

18847 ±992.4 a

45943 ±3094.2 a

779 ±124.9 a

33.85 ±0.0004 a

55.02 ±0.0009 a

30.21 ±0.0004 a

6510 ±0.07 a

P= phosphorus; C= carbon; N= nitrogen; Na= sodium; Mg= magnesium; K= potassium; Zn= zinc; Fe= iron, SO4= sulfates; Cu= copper; MSF= leaf dry matter; MSR= root dry matter. In each variable horizontally, means with the same letter are not significantly different (Duncan, 0.05).

According to the concentration for each nutrient determined in the foliar tissues of A. angustifolia, the macroelements with the highest concentration were C, N, Mg, K and the microelement Fe, compared to the rest of the nutrients determined (Table 2). The plants accumulated in their foliar tissues more N, P and Zn in response to the increasing amounts of nutrients in fertigation, up to SN-100%, in such a way, the plants irrigated with water and the plants fertigated with SN-100% had in mg kg-1 of dry matter: 7 225 and 14 957 of N, 3 017 and 6 719 of P, 12.88 and 33.85 of Zn, respectively, amounts that in each case were significantly different (Duncan, 0.05).

A similar trend was observed in the case of Fe and Cu, but the maximum accumulation of these nutrients occurred when up to SN-75% was applied. Plants irrigated only with water had, in their foliar tissues, 1 371 mg kg-1 of SO4 and 18 057 mg kg-1 of K of dry matter, while in fertigated plants, a non-significant tendency to have more SO4 and K was observed (Table 2). So, it can be said that the increasing supply of nutrient solution to plants of A. angustifolia for seven months accumulated greater amount of nutrients in the foliar tissues of these plants, which showed higher growth.

The data of the nutrition analysis A. angustifolia obtained in the present study are consistent with those reported by Cruz et al. (2013), who, in adult plants of this species from three localities of Oaxaca, Mexico, determined a higher concentration of the macroelements Mg and Ca; and the microelement Fe. Silos-Espino et al. (2011) studied plants from eight to 12 years (before flowering) of A. salmiana Gentry, in which they analyzed components of nutritional value in forage quality and main minerals (Ca, P, Mg, Fe, Zn, Cu, Bo and Se) of the foliar tissues. Ca was mainly found with 5 870 mg 100 g-1, P with 220 mg 100 g-1, Zn 16.9 mg 100 g-1 and 33.2 mg 100 g-1 of Fe.

Plants fix atmospheric CO2 through the process of photosynthesis and synthesize organic compounds (Glime, 2017). Subsequently, the products of photosynthesis and mineral substances from the soil are used in the processes of synthesis of proteins, lipids and other organic compounds that are structural and metabolic constituents of plants. And the magnitude of accumulated biomass and economic yield result from the efficiency of those processes (Gutiérrez-Rodríguez et al., 2005). Since it is important that the plants in the nursery show vigorous growth, attention should be paid so that they have high net photosynthesis, as well as plant health, the elimination of other competing plant species and that the plants are in appropriate water and nutritional condition.

The nutritional analyses of the plants of A. angustifolia show differences between the different groups of plants according to the amount of fertigation they received (Water, SN-50%, SN-75%, SN-100%) and that they are related to the data reported by Ríos-Ramírez et al. (2018), which show that, after seven months in nursery, the plants of A. angustifolia increased their number of leaves, the size of the root and the leaves, evaluated in leaf area, leaf volume, leaf dry weight, in positive relationship to the amount of nutrients they received through irrigation.

Since the plants that received higher doses of fertilization had a higher concentration of nutrients in their leaf dry matter and were also the largest (Table 2). Therefore, the convenience of fertigation is shown, since it maintains the availability of water and nutrients in the root zone at optimal levels to obtain a higher growth of the plants and subsequently the potential productivity of the crop (Guzmán, 2004).

In young trees of forest species that are produced in nursery, it has also been shown that the nutritional condition of the plant influences the total height, the diameter of the stem, the aerial and root biomass, characteristics that are related to the ability of the plant to overcome the stress condition when it is established in the field and restarts growth (McDowell et al., 2008). In general, all plants need nutrients for the synthesis of structural and metabolic substances, which determines their photosynthetic efficiency for the assimilation of C, which constitutes between 40 to 50% of the plant dry matter, as well as through photosynthesis, the energy of solar radiation is conserved in compounds that provide this energy for the processes of synthesis (Grusak, 2001).

The higher the concentration of nutrient solution supplied to the plants, the more they grew, and their foliar tissues had a higher concentration of N, and this element N is part of metabolically important compounds such as amino acids, proteins, photosynthetic pigments, so their supply has a direct impact on the increase of dry matter (McDonald et al., 1996; Uchida, 2000). Correlation analyses (Table 3) show that leaf dry weights had a positive and significant correlation with N content (r= 0.678, p≤ 0.0 1), with phosphorus (r= 0.743, p≤ 0.01), with Mg (r= 0.899, p≤ 0.01), with K (r= 0.830, p≤ 0.01), with Fe (r= 0.786, p≤ 0.01), Cu (r= 0.699, p≤ 0.01), SO4 (r= 0.977, p≤ 0.01).

Table 3. Correlations between leaf dry matter (g) and nutrient contents (mg kg-1) in foliar tissues of Agave angustifolia plants, which for seven months in nursery were fertigated at different concentrations of nutrients.

T

MSF

P

C

N

Mg

K

Mn

Zn

Fe

SO4

T

1

0.43*

0.36ns

-0.002 ns

0.67**

0.404*

0.34ns

0.53ns

0.39*

0.22ns

0.37*

MSF

1

0.74**

0.036ns

0.68**

0.899**

0.83**

-0.11ns

0.5*

0.79**

0.98**

P

1

-0.192ns

0.03ns

0.63**

0.55*

0.05ns

0.56**

0.61**

0.74**

C

1

0.11ns

0.002 ns

-0.05 ns

0.94ns

0.09ns

-0.06ns

0.08ns

N

1

0.845**

0.72**

-0.57ns

0.45*

0.55*

0.87**

Mg

1

0.89**

-0.24ns

0.62*

0.66*

0.87**

K

1

0.22ns

0.53*

0.52*

0.82**

Mn

1

0.87ns

-0.25ns

-0.08ns

Zn

1

0.37ns

0.45*

Fe

1

0.8**

SO4

1

T= fertilization dose; P= phosphorus; C= carbon; N= nitrogen; Mg= magnesium; K= potassium; Ca= calcium; Zn= zinc; Fe= iron, SO4= sulfates; Cu= copper; MSF= leaf dry matter. In each correlation value, ns= not significant ( 0.05); *= significant (p≤ 0.05). **= highly significant (p≤ 0.01).

Conclusions

Plants of Agave angustifolia Haw. accumulated more leaf and root dry matter, and had more N, P, K, Zn, Fe, Cu and SO4 than non-fertigated plants, and the amounts increased in direct relationship to the nutrients they received. Plants irrigated only with water and fertigated plants at 75 or 100% of nutrients of Steiner’s formulation had 282.74, 431.98 and 453.05 g of leaf dry matter,  75.01, 95.92 and 103.14 g of dry matter in the root, their leaves had in mg kg-1 of dry matter: 3 017, 5 297 and 6 719 of P; 7 225, 12 575 and 14 957 of N; 12.88, 29.23 and 33.85 of Zn; 23.55, 67.37 and 55.02 of Fe; 14.83, 46.14 and 30.21 of Cu, respectively. In general, leaf dry matter had high positive significant correlations with the contents of N, P, K, Mg, Zn, Fe, Cu, SO4.

Cited literature

Álvarez-Sánchez, M. E.; Velázquez-Mendoza, J.; Maldonado-Torres, R.; Almaguer-Vargas, G. y Solano-Agama, A. L. 2010. Diagnóstico de la fertilidad y requerimiento de cal de suelos cultivados con agave azul (Agave tequilana Weber). Terra Latinoam. 28(3):287-293.

Andrade, J. L. E.; Reyes-García, C.; Ricalde, M. F.; Vargas-Soto, G. y Cervera, J. C. 2007. El metabolismo ácido de las crasuláceas: diversidad, fisiología ambiental y productividad. Boletín de la Sociedad Botánica de México. 81:37-50.

Arizaga, S. and Ezcurra, E. 2002. Propagation mechanisms in Agave macroacantha (Agavaceae), a tropical arid-land succulent rosette. Am. J. Bot. 89(4):32-41.

Cruz, H.; Enríquez-del-Valle, J. R.; Velasco, V. A.; Ruiz, J.; Campos, G. V. y Aquino, D. E. 2013. Nutrimentos y carbohidratos en plantas de Agave angustifolia Haw. y Agave karwinskii Zucc. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. 6(4):1161-1173.

Díaz, J. G.; Rojas, G.; Him, F. Y.; Hernández, B. N.; Torrealba, E. y Rodríguez, Z. 2011. Efecto de la fertilización nitrogenada sobre el crecimiento en vivero de Cocuy (Agave cocui Trelease). Rev. Facult. Agron. Luz. 28(1):264-272.

Enríquez-Valle, J. R. 2008. La propagación y crecimiento de agaves. Fundación Produce Oaxaca, AC. e Instituto Tecnológico del Valle De Oaxaca. Oaxaca, México. 42 p.

Enríquez-Valle, J. R.; Velasco-Velasco, V. A.; Campos-Ángeles, G. V.; Hernández-Gallardo, E. and Rodríguez-Mendoza, M. N. 2009. Agave angustifolia plants grown with different fertigation doses and organic substrates. Acta Hortic. 843:49-55.

Enríquez-Valle, J. R.; Estrada, A.; Rodríguez, G.; Velasco, V. A. y Campos, G. V. 2013. Sustrato y dosis de fertirriego en la aclimatación de vitroplantas de Agave americana var. oaxacencis. Rev. Facul.  Cienc. Agr. Uncuyo. 45(2):341-348.

Enríquez-Valle, J. R.; Alcara-Vásquez, S. E.; Miguel-Luna, M. E. y Manuel-Vásquez, C. 2016. Fertirriego en vivero a plantas de Agave potatorum Zucc. micropropagadas-aclimatizadas. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agríc. 7(5):1167-1177. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id= 263146723016.

García, A. J. 2007. Los agaves de México. Rev. Cienc. 87:14-23.

Glime, J. M. 2017. Photosynthesis: the process. In: Glime J. M. (Ed.) bryophyte ecology. Physiological ecology. Ebook sponsored michigan technological university and the international association of bryologists. USA. 1-11 p.

González-González, L. R.; García-Pérez, M. I. B.; Gutiérrez, L. K. y García, A. 2007. Obtención de azúcares fermentables a partir de inulinasas inmovilizadas por el método del sol-gel. Rev. Cienc. Tecnol. 6(6):106-111.

Grusak, M. A. 2001. Plant macro-and micronutrient minerals. Encyclopedia of life sciences center, Texas, USA. 5 p.

Gutiérrez-Rodríguez, M.; Reynolds, M. P.; Escalante, E. y Larqué-Saavedra, J. A. 2005. Algunas consideraciones en la relación entre fotosíntesis y el rendimiento de grano en trigo. Rev. Cienc. Ergo Sum. 122):149-154.

Guzmán, M. 2004. Población, agua, suelo y fertilizantes: el ferti-riego. In: ferti-riego: tecnologías y programación en agroplasticultura. (Ed.). Programa CYTED Secretaría General. Madrid, España. 5-10 p.

Martínez-Ramírez, S. y Bautista-Sánchez, G. 2013. Adaptabilidad de Agave potatorum Zucc. a las condiciones ambientales y socioeconómicas de río azucena, San Juan Mixtepec, Oaxaca. Temas de Ciencia y Tecnología. 17(50):3-12.

Martínez-Ramírez, S.; Trinidad-Santos, A.; Bautista-Sánchez, G. y Pedro-Santos, E. C. 2013. Crecimiento de plántulas de dos especies de mezcal en función del tipo de suelo y nivel de fertilización. Rev. Fitot. Mex. 36(4):387-393.

Matiz, A.; Tamaso, M. P.; Yepes, M. A.; Freschi, L. and Helenice, M. 2013. CAM Photosynthesis in bromeliads and agaves: What can we learn from these plants? Creative Commons. 1:91-132.

McDonald, J.; Ericsson, T. and Larsson, C. M. 1996. Plant nutrition, dry mater gain and partitioning at the whole-plant level. J. Exp. Bot. 47:1245-53.

McDowell, N.; Pockman, W. T.; Allen, C. D.; Breshears, D. D.; Cobb, N. and Kolb, T. 2008. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytologist, Tansley Review. J. Compilation 178(4):719-739.

Medina, A. 1999. Manejo de la nutrición en el rosal después de la cosecha de san valentín. In: Lee, R. (Ed.). Mantenimiento de plantas de rosa, curso de actualización profesional. Centro de investigaciones y Asesorías Agroindustriales Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano. Chía. Colombia. 31-48 pp.

Ríos-Ramírez, S. C.; Enríquez-del Valle, J. R.; Rodríguez-Ortiz, G.; Ruíz-Luna, J. and Velasco-Velasco, V. A. 2018. In vitro formation of adventitious shoots on caulinary tissue of physiologically contrasting agave angustifolia plants. Emirates J. Food Agr. 30(1):49-56.

Rodríguez, S. M. y Flores, R. V. 2004. Elementos esenciales y beneficiosos en: ferti-riego: tecnologías y programación en agroplasticultura. (Ed.). Programa Cyted Secretaría General. Madrid, España. 25-35 pp.

Silos-Espino, H.; Tovar-Robles, C. L.; González-Cortés, N.; Méndez-Gallegos, S. J. y Rossel-Kipping, D. 2011. Estudio integral del maguey (Agave salmiana): propagacion y valor nutricional. Rev. Salud Pública y Nutrición. 5:75-82.

Uchida, R. 2000. Essential nutrients for plant growth: nutrient functions and deficiency symptoms. In: Silva, A. and Uchida, R. (Ed.) plant nutrient management in hawaii’s soils, approaches for tropical and subtropical agriculture. College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii at Manoa. USA. 31-55 pp.

Vitosh, M. L.; Warncke, D. D. and Lucas, R. E. 1994. Secondary and micronutrients for vegetables and field crops. Michigan State University Extension. USA. 486 p.

Winter, K. and Smith, J. A. C. 1996. An introduction to crassulacean acid metabolism: biochemical principles and ecological diversity. In: Winter, K. and Smith, J. A. C. (Ed.) crassulacean acid metabolism. Springer, Heidelberg. Alemania. 1-13 pp.

Zuñiga, E. L. 2013. Nutrición de Agave tequilana y manejo de los fertilizantes en un sistema de producción intensiva (riego por goteo). Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP). México, DF. 58 p.