Revista Mexicana Ciencias Agrícolas   volume 11   number 5   June 30 - August 13, 2020

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v11i5.2325

Article

Trichoderma harzianum antagonism against chickpea fusariosis
and its biofertilizing effect

Talina Olivia Martínez-Martínez1

Brenda Zulema Guerrero-Aguilar1

Víctor Pecina-Quintero1

Patricia Rivas-Valencia2

Enrique González-Pérez1

Juan Gabriel Angeles-Núñez1§

1Bajío Experimental Field-INIFAP. San Miguel de Allende-Celaya highway km 6.5, Celaya, Guanajuato, Mexico. CP. 38110. Tel. 5538718700, ext. 85242. (martinez.talina@inifap.gob.mx; guerrero.brenda@inifap.gob.mx; pecina.victor@inifap.gob.mx; gonzalez.enrique@inifap.gob.mx. 2Experimental Field Valle de México-INIFAP. Los Reyes-Texcoco highway km 13.5, Coatlinchán, Texcoco, Mexico. CP. 56250. Tel. 5538718700, ext. 85214. (rivas.patricia@inifap.gob.mx).

§Corresponding author: angeles.gabriel@inifap.gob.mx.

Abstract

Chickpea is a legume, which is grown in two regions of Mexico mainly, Northwest (Sonora, Sinaloa and Baja California) and El Bajío region (Guanajuato, Michoacán and Jalisco); however, each year the production of the culture is compromised with vascular fusariosis, one of the main diseases that affect the culture and that is associated with the fungal complex Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium solani, Rhizoctonia solani, Macrophomina phaseolina and Sclerotium rolfsii. An alternative of biological control is the application of Trichoderma, which also has an indirect effect on the nutrition of the plant. The objective of this study was to determine the in vitro antagonism of two strains of Trichoderma harzianum (T1 and T2) and its effect as a biofertilizer. In vitro confrontations were carried out against strains of the Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris (Foc 0, 1B/C, 5 and 6), Fusarium solani, Macrophomina phaseolina (M-Sonora and M-GTO) and Sclerotium rolfsii. The effect of T2 as a biofertilizer (TB) was evaluated by measuring the variables: number of flowers, pods, plant height, stem diameter, root length and grain yield. The two strains of T. harzianum showed antagonism on different scales against pathogens. Additionally, with the treatment where T. harzianum (TB) was applied, there were increases in the number of flowers (30%), pods (24%), height (3%), plant diameter (3.5%), as well as root length (13%) and grain yield (23%).

Keywords: crop growth, grain yield, mycoparasitism.

Reception date: February 2020

Acceptance date: June 2020

Introduction

The diseases represent one of the causes in the decrease in yields in the chickpea crop, among the most important in the world, are those caused by soil fungi, such as: Fusarium oxysporum Schltdl., Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc., Rhizoctonia solani Kühn, Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid and Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc.; however, due to the damage they cause and the frequency with which they occur, Fusarium spp. It is of greater importance, especially the special form ciceris.

This disease called fusariosis, wilt or rabies of chickpea appears, mainly, in clay soils or with drainage problems, a condition that favors the development of these pathologies (Jiménez-Gasco et al., 2004). The yield losses quantified with the weight of 100 seeds can be 82% and up to 100% in susceptible varieties (Navas-Cortés et al., 2000). Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris (FOC) produces chlamydospores that can survive in the soil in the absence of the host for more than six years (Haware et al., 1996).

This pathogen spreads rapidly, attacks the root of the plant and causes water stress and nutrient deficiency due to occlusion of the xylem-conducting vessels, in addition to chlorosis, necrosis, and leaf abscission (Jiménez-Gasco et al., 2004). Eight races of have been described FOC: 0, 1A, 1B/C, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 (Haware and Nene, 1982; Jiménez-Diaz et al., 1993) and two pathogenicity biotypes: yellowing and wilt.

In the first, foliar yellowing and vascular coloration appear, the plant dies 40 days after inoculation of the pathogen. In wilt, severe chlorosis, flaccidity and vascular coloration are observed, the plant dies 20 days after inoculation (Jiménez-Gasco et al., 2004). Races 0 and 1B/C correspond to yellowing pathotypes, while races 1A, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 to wilt pathotypes (Arvayo-Ortiz et al., 2011).

Meanwhile, Macrophomina phaseolina is commonly present when there are high temperatures and low soil moisture, due to its ability to form sclerotia, allowing the fungus to survive adverse environmental conditions, it can cause losses due to the decrease in root length (44 -49%), sprouts length (5-16%) and fresh weight (55-63%) (Khan et al., 2017). Sclerotium rolfsii can cause a mortality of 55-95% of chickpea seedlings, high rainfall and temperatures above 25 °C are optimal conditions to cause disease, it survives as a mycelium in plant remains and as sclerotic structures in soil (Sharma and Ghosh, 2017).

Due to the above, the identification of biocontrol agents is required to counteract the effects of these pathogens, alternative to conventional control with chemical products, which represents a severe risk to human health and contributes to increased contamination of the environment. (Abdel-Monaim et al., 2011), in addition to the fact that they have given rise to highly resistant microorganisms that lead to fungal diseases with a higher incidence (Hoyos-Carvajal et al., 2019).

An alternative is the use of fungi of the Trichoderma genus, which is recognized as a biocontrol agent due to its capacity for antibiosis, mycoparasitism, competition for space and nutrients, as well as the production of secondary metabolites (Hernández-Melchor et al., 2019). Most Trichoderma species have accelerated growth and development, can tolerate extreme environmental conditions, and are capable of parasitizing, controlling, and destroying fungi, nematodes, and other plant pathogens (Ruiz Cisneros et al., 2018), in addition to tolerating the presence of agrochemicals.

Chickpea Trichoderma has been noted for its antagonistic capacity (Rajput et al., 2010) and the control of pathogens such as Rhizoctonia solani, Fusarium solani, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri (Abdel-Monaim et al., 2011; Khan et al., 2014). Different investigations show that the use of biological control is a viable alternative for the control of fusariosis in chickpea, in addition to improving the microbiological characteristics of the soil and therefore its physicochemical characteristics, at the same time promoting growth through the production of growth hormones, mineral solubilization, and induction of systemic resistance (Hernández-Melchor et al., 2019).

Given the information that has been developed by various investigations, the possibility of using Trichoderma strains for the control of fusariosis and its possible effect on the development of chickpea cultivation has been considered. In this context, the following objectives were set: 1) To determine the antagonistic effect in vitro of two strains of T. harzianum (T1 and T2) for the biological control of phytopathogenic fungi that cause chickpea fusariosis; 2) Evaluate the in vivo effect of the application of T2 on the development of the chickpea crop.

Materials and methods

Biological material

Four isolates of the Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris (Foc) breed were used. The Foc 5 breed from the Northwest zone and the Foc. 0, Foc. 1 B/C and Foc 6 breeds of El Bajio Guanajuatense area, the strains were previously identified by means of molecular markers type SCARs and RAPDs described by Jiménez-Gasco et al. (2004). One strain of F. solani and Sclerotium rolfsii, and two strains of Macrophomina phaseolina isolated from Sonora (M-Sonora) and Guanajuato (M-GTO).

The Trichoderma harzianum strains (T1 and T2) were donated by the Bajio Experimental Field (CEBAJ) of the National Institute for Forest, Agricultural and Livestock Research (INIFAP), isolated from agricultural soils in Valle de Santiago, Guanajuato. White chickpea seed var. Blanoro (spring autumn 2013 harvest) provided by the CEBAJ germplasm bank, whose protection was at -4 °C with 80% RH.

In vitro antagonism tests (dual cultures)

The antagonistic mechanisms of action of T1 and T2 against the eight phytopathogens involved in chickpea fusariosis (Foc 250. Foc. 71, Foc 27, Foc 12, Macrophomina phaseolina and Sclerotium rolfsii) were evaluated using the dual culture technique (Dennis and Webster, 1971). The evaluation was performed by observing the mechanisms of competition, mycoparasitism and antibiosis according to the scale described by Bell et al. (1982) (Table 1).

Table 1. Trichoderma antagonistic capacity according to the Bell et al. (1982).

The discs were placed at the equidistant ends of the box and incubated at room temperature (22 °C). The evaluation of the antagonistic capacity was calculated estimating the percentage of radial growth inhibition (PRGI). This was obtained from the growth of each pathogen in dual culture, with respect to the controls, using the formula used by Suárez et al. (2008).

The tests were performed with five replications (plates), in a two-factor factorial design (Trichoderma strain and phytopathogens), an analysis of variance and comparison of Tukey means (p≤ 0.05) M was performed. The level of mycoparasitism was estimated considering the criteria established by Widyastuti (2006), for the microscopic observations the imprinting technique with diurex was used, a Carl Zeiss Axiostar plus compound microscope with a 40X field of view was used.

Effect of Trichoderma harzianum on chickpea cultivation

A chickpea plot of the Blanoro variety was established with a randomized block design with three experimental treatments corresponding to TC: control without fertilization, TQ: application of 60 kg of nitrogen ha-1 and 40 kg of phosphorus ha-1, using urea (50-00-00) and triple superphosphate (50-00-00) and TB: application of the T2 strain (1x108 CFU g-1).

For the effect of Trichoderma application in the field, the T2 strain was used, since the time for obtaining conidia was faster. Each treatment consisted of three repetitions, for a total of 9 experimental units, each with 10 plants distributed in 39 rows of 100 m and 0.8 m wide. At 45 days after sowing (DDS) the ‘in drench’ applications of the TQ and TB treatments were performed.

Two days after the application, weekly measurements were started up to the 108 DDS of the plant height, stem diameter, number of flowers and pod and at the end of the cycle the length of the root, plant weight and yield were measured. The height of the plant was measured from the neck to the apex using a flexometer; the diameter was considered from the middle part of the plant and was evaluated with a digital vernier.

After harvest, the length of the root was determined with a flexometer; the grain yield was estimated by obtaining the weight of the grains of the plants harvested per experimental unit and transformed into yield per hectare at a humidity of 12%. The data obtained was analyzed with SAS v. 9, using an analysis of variance and comparison of Tukey means (p≤ 0.05).

Results and discussion

In vitro confrontations with Trichoderma harzianum (dual cultures)

According to the scale described by Bell et al. (1982), the level of T1 antagonism against Fusarium strains was class 1 since the T1 strain invaded the box surface. While in the confrontations with S. rolfsii, M. phaseolina (M-Sonora) and (M-GTO) the level of T1 antagonism was found in class 2, because it only covered two thirds of the growth area of the pathogens (Figure 1).

Figure 1. In vitro antagonistic evaluation of T1 strain (dual cultures). Evaluation of the interaction 7 days of growth a) Foc 250, mycoparasitism and competition for nutrients; b) Foc 71, mycoparasitism and competition for nutrients; c) F. solani, mycoparasitism and possible antibiosis; d) S. rolfsii, mycoparasitism and competition for nutrients; e) Foc 27, mycoparasitism and presence of antifungal enzymes; f) Foc 12, mycoparasitism and competition for nutrients; g) M-Sonora, mycoparasitisms and competition for nutrients and h) M-GTO, mycoparasitisms and competition for nutrients.

According to the criteria of Widyastuti (2006), the T1 strain exhibited greater growth with respect to the growth of pathogens associated with vascular fusariosis of chickpea. Compared to the Foc 250, Foc 71, Foc 12 strains, there was mild mycoparasitism and competition for nutrients; with F. solani possible antibiosis, while with Foc 27 there was production of antifungal enzymes due to the change of pale pink coloration at the contact site.

As for S. rolfsii, it presented moderate mycoparasitism and competition for nutrients, the two strains of M. phaseolina (M-Sonora) and (M-GTO) maintained moderate mycoparasitism and competition for nutrients. Regarding the T2 strain, a similar behavior of T1 colonization was obtained, the antagonism against the Foc 250, Foc 27, Foc 71 and Foc 12, F. solani, S. rolfsii and M. phaseolina (M-GTO) strains, was found in class 1, while colonization of half the surface of the medium was observed with the M-Sonora strain, which corresponded to a level of class 2 antagonism (Figure 2).

Figure 2. In vitro antagonistic evaluation of the T2 strain (dual cultures). Evaluation of the interaction 7 days of growth a) Foc 250, mycoparasitism and competition for nutrients; b) Foc 71, mycoparasitism and competition for nutrients; c) F. solani, mycoparasitism and competition for nutrients; d) S. rolfsii, micoparasitism and competition for nutrients; e) Foc 27, mycoparasitism; f) Foc 12, mycoparasitism and competition for nutrients; g) M-Sonora, micoparasitism and competition for nutrients; and h) M-GTO, mycoparasitism and competition for nutrients.

Regarding the antagonism mechanism, seven of the strains of the pathogen presented mycoparasitism and competition for nutrients, except for the Foc 27 strain that exhibited mycoparasitism and rapid growth (Widyastuti, 2006). Other studies have agreed that Trichoderma species maintain mycoparasitism values against plant pathogens on a scale of 1 (complete invasion); 2 (invasion two thirds); and 3 (Trichoderma and the plant pathogen each colonize half of the surface) (Michel-Aceves et al., 2009).

According to Guedez et al. (2012) a main characteristic in the choice of Trichoderma strains to be used in biological control is the aggressiveness for mycoparasitization and the growth rate, which must exceed that of the pathogen to be controlled. Invasion of the mycelium exerted Trichoderma confirmed its hyperparasitic effect act on reducing mycelial growth of pathogens, to respect, have been indicated different mechanisms antagonism ranging from competition for nutrients and space, production of antifungal metabolites and hydrolytic enzymes.

The antagonistic properties of this fungus are based on the activation of multiple mechanisms that also promote the production of specific compounds and metabolites that function as plant growth factors and improve their systemic resistance against diseases (Hernández-Melchor et al., 2019). Microscopically, mycoparasitism mechanisms T1 and T2 strains on the eight strains phytopathogenic generally observed through the winding, penetration and vacuolization (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Mechanisms T2 micoparasitism against a Foc 250. a)= curl (yellow arrow); b) penetration (black arrow); c) penetration arrow blue; and d) vacuolization (red arrow).

Different studies indicate that the process of mycoparasitism is best antagonistic mechanism shown by Trichoderma, it starts when recognizes the host and joins hyphae by appressoria then degrades the cell wall by secreting enzymes, particularly chitinase and β-1, 3-glucanases, cellulases, proteases and phosphatases (Qualhato et al., 2013).

The values of the percentage of radial growth inhibition (PRGI) in the eight strains evaluated were found in a range of 49 to 85% (Table 2). According to the analysis of variance (p≤ 0.05) a significant difference was observed in PRGI regarding T1 and T2 and its effect on the eight pathogenic (Table 2). T1 strain showed greater inhibition against F. solani, Foc 250, Foc Foc 71 and 12.

Table 2. Percentage of radial growth inhibition (PRGI) of the pathogens evaluated against the Trichoderma harzianum T1 and T2 strains.

Means with the same literal between columns, are statistically equal, Tukey (p≤ 0.05).

A similar effect was observed with T2 against F. solani, Foc 250 and Foc 71; however, the inhibition increased to 27 Foc, S. rolfsii, M-GTO and M-Sonora, ultimately it was the considerable PRGI the observed an increase of 53% compared to T1. These results coincide with those documented by authors like Michel-Aceves et al. (2009) who indicated PRGI in a range of 16.4 to 77.8% when evaluated Trichoderma against F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici and 13.1 to 94.4% for S. rolfsii.

In another study by Rudresh et al. (2005) using T. harzianum, obtained inhibition values in a range from 12.2 to 59.9% for S. rolfsii and from 65.2 to 77% for F. oxysporum f. sp. ciceri. Meanwhile, for M. phaseolina Salazar et al. (2012) determined PRGI intervals of 67 to 91%; while Cubilla-Rios et al. (2019) obtained inhibition between 55.6 to 52.8%.

Effect of T. harzianum in the chickpea

Plants inoculated with TB (application of the Trichoderma T2 strain) presented height increases of 2.2, 3 and 2.3% on days 66, 73 and 81, respectively, compared to the control (Figure 4a); while with TQ (application of chemical fertilizer) the values were 1.3% lower. Regarding the stem diameter, the main differences were observed from day 94, during this period, the plants with the application of Trichoderma and chemical fertilization presented increases of 3.3 and 3.5%, respectively (Figure 4b).

Figure 4. Evaluation of height (a) and stem diameter (b) in chickpea plants. n= 30.

The effect on the height and diameter of the plants found in this study were less compared to other studies, such as the one documented by Boureghda and Bouznad (2009), who applied T. harzianum to chickpea plants, their results indicated increases in average of 8% in the height of the plants. Meanwhile Oliva-Ortiz et al. (2017) to evaluate the effect of the Trichoderma strains obtained increases of 26% over the control additionally, they observed an increase in the diameter of the stem of 8% over the control.

Regarding the variable number of flowers and pods, it was observed that TB stimulated bloom from day 56, thus, for the day 66 increased 30% over estimated to control, whereas treatment TQ 10% less flowers were determined in relation to the control. In general, no significant differences were observed (p< 0.05). After day 81, both treatments showed similar behavior (Figure 5a).

As pod formation TB there was an increase of these from day 73 compared to control, whereas TQ this showed a slight increase from the day 87, the average increase was 24 and 11%, with TB and TQ, respectively (Figure 5b). Authors like Mukherjee et al. (2019) found advancement of flowering (7-10 days) in chickpea and lentil when they applied T. virens, in addition to observing a 26% increase in production.

Figure 5. Evaluation of the number of flowers (a) and pods (b) in chickpea plants. n= 30.

In this regard Mishra and Nautiyal (2018) obtained in 20% increments production chickpea pods when applied T. viride. In another study conducted by Ávila-Miramontes et al. (2015) where they evaluated different treatments based on T. harzianum, B. subtilis, Mesorhizobium ciceri and nitrogen fertilization, they were able to observe that with the T. harzianum + fertilization combination there was higher earliness and constant flower emission, as well as a long period of fruiting bodies.

For the variable root length, a significant difference (p≤ 0.05) was determined between TB and TQ treatments, causing an increase of 40 and 13%, respectively, with reference to the control (Table 3). This behavior has been presented in various studies in which Trichoderma is applied and which register increases in root length, due to the stimulation of the production of hormones, mainly auxins, which are synthesized from a source of tryptophan that is naturally secrete in exudates from plant roots (Hoyos-Carvajal et al., 2009).

Table 3. Agronomic variables determined after harvest.

Means with the same literal between columns, are statistically equal, Tukey (p≤ 0.05).

It is then that the increase of the root allows the plants to cover large volumes of soil and increase the absorption of available nutrients and those that have been solubilized by the same fungus (Jyotsna et al. 2008; Hoyos-Carvajal et al., 2009). In this regard, Kumar et al. (2014) obtained similar results when using 5% of T. harzianum in relation to one kg of chickpea seed, additionally, it reduced the incidence of wilt associated with the F. oxysporum f. sp. ciceris, M. phaseolina and S. rolfsii.

Similarly, Jyotsna et al. (2008) detected increases in the size of the root between 25 to 27% and the decrease of diseases in 40 to 60%, the authors indicated that the stimulation of the production of hormones in early stages of growth can help the growth of the plant and root development. Hoyos-Carvajal et al. (2009) recommends that growth promoting strains of Trichoderma can be used to formulate new products that are beneficial for agriculture.

Regarding performance, it was determined that with TQ there was an increase of 13% and with TB of 23%, both data with respect to TC. These results coincide with different authors who point out increases in crop yield (Oliva-Ortiz et al., 2017; Ávila-Miramontes et al., 2015; Ruiz-Cisneros et al., 2018).

In chickpea, most of the studies carried out with Trichoderma are focused on the control of pathogens, mainly, F. oxysporum f. sp. ciceris and secondarily estimate the effects on the growth and production of plants, in such a way that their results indicate a decrease in the severity of the disease, as well as increases in yield, such is the case of Oliva-Ortiz et al. (2017) who found an increase of more than 70% when applying the HRG-060 strain.

As well as the decrease in incidence and root wilt, the authors obtained different results between strains, noting that not all maintain the same effects with respect to the variables studied. Meanwhile, Khan et al. (2014) showed that when applying Trichoderma in soil, they obtained a reduction in the severity of the disease from 25% to 67%, while obtaining increases in yields in an interval of 8 to 24%. Also, Kumar et al. (2014) showed that the application of T. harzianum increased the yield by 68% and at the same time the incidence decreased by 91%.

The increases in production can be attributed, on the one hand, to the antagonistic protection of Trichoderma sp. Against causal agents of plant diseases and, on the other hand, to the synthesis of compounds that regulate growth or that intervene in the assimilation of nutrients for the plant (Hoyos-Carbajal et al., 2009; Hernández-Melchor et al., 2019).

Likewise, in some crops such as beans it is recognized that Trichoderma sp. It favors the germination of the seed through the production of lytic enzymes that degrade the episperm, which is a seminal covering that constitutes the testa; additionally, the fungus is capable of promoting the development of primary meristematic tissues, which are responsible for plant growth in relation to height, weight, and root development (Zuñiga-Silgado and Velez-Vargas, 2016).

According to the results obtained with T1 and T2, both strains had the potential to be used to control pathogens, as well as to increase the agronomic characteristics that were evaluated; however, considering the experience of the producers, it is necessary to carry out evaluations to determine the optimal dose of Trichoderma application (CFU g-1) considering, in the conditions of each production unit, mainly the initial level of inoculation of phytopathogens, the availability of nutrients and the climatic and edaphological conditions of the area.

Conclusions

According to the results of this research, both strains of T. harzianum (T1 and T2) had the potential to be used to control vascular fusariosis in chickpea cultivation. The antagonism mechanisms exhibited by both strains were competition for nutrients, mycoparasitism, production of antifungal enzymes and possible antibiosis. The T1 strain showed greater inhibition against the FOC 250, FOC 71 and Fusarium solani strains, while T2 for Sclerotium rolfsii, FOC 27, FOC 12 and for the Macrophomina phaseolina isolates. Additionally, the application of Trichoderma allowed increases in pod production (24%), root length (40%) and yield (23%).

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out with resources granted through INIFAP fiscal projects-2013 through agreement No. 15534132023.

Cited literature

Abdel-Monaim, M. F.; Abo-Elyousr, K. A. M. and Morsy, K. M. 2011. Effectiveness of plant extracts on suppression of damping-off and wilt diseases of lupine (Lupinus termis Forsik). Crop Prot. 30(2):185-191.

Arvayo-Ortiz, R. M.; Esqueda, M.; Acedo-Felix, E.; Sánchez, A. and Gutiérrez, A. 2011. Morphological variability and races of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris associated with chickpea (Cicer arietinum) crops. Am. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 6(1):114-121.

Ávila-Miramontes, J. A.; Padilla-Zaldo, G.; Martínez-Heredia, D.; Rivas-Santoyo, F. J.; Coronado-Espericueta, M. A. y Ortega-Murrieta, P. 2015. Respuesta de algunos componentes del rendimiento del cultivo de garbanzo (Cicer arietinum l.) a la inoculación de Mesorhizobium ciceri, Trichoderma harzianum y Bacillus subtilis en la región agrícola de la costa de Hermosillo. Biotecnia. 17(3):3-8.

Bell, D. K.; Wells, H. D. and Markam, C. R. 1982. In vitro antagonism of Trichoderma spp. against six fungal pathogens. Phytopathol. 72(4):379-382.

Boureghda, H. and Bouznad, Z. 2009. Biological control of Fusarium Wilt of chickpea using isolates of Trichoderma atroviride, T. harzianum and T. longibrachiatum. Acta Phytopathol. Entomol. Hung. 44(1):25-38.

Cubilla-Rios, A. A.; Ruíz-Díaz-Mendoza, D. D.; Romero-Rodríguez, M. C.; Flores-Giubi, M. E. y Barúa-Chamorro, J. E. 2019. Antibiosis de proteínas y metabolitos en especies de Trichoderma contra aislamientos paraguayos de Macrophomina phaseolina. Agron. Mesoam. 30(1):63-77.

Dennis, C. and Webster, J. 1971. Antagonistic properties of species-groups of Trichoderma: II. Production of volatile antibiotics. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 57(1):41-47.

Zúñiga-Silgado, D. and Vélez-Vargas L. D. 2016. Evaluation of phosphodissolvent IAA producing strains of Trichoderma spp. through biometric response of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Int. J. Biosci. 8(6):103-118.

Guédez, C.; Cañizalez, L.; Castillo, C. y Olivar, R. 2012. Evaluación in vitro de aislamientos de Trichoderma harzianum para el control de Rhizoctonia solani, Sclerotium rolfsii y Fusarium oxysporum en plantas de tomate. Rev. Soc. Ven. Microbiol. 32(1):44-49.

Haware, M. P. and Nene, Y. L. 1982. Races of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri. Plant Dis. 66(9):809-810.

Haware, M. P.; Nene, Y. L. and Natarajan, M. 1996. The survival of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri in the soil in the absence of chickpea. Phytopathol. Mediterr. 35(1):9-12.

Hernández-Melchor, D. J.; Ferrera-Cerrato, R. y Alarcón, A. 2019. Trichoderma: importancia agrícola, biotecnológica, y sistemas de fermentación para producir biomasa y enzimas de interés industrial. Chil. J. Agric. Anim. Sci. 35(1):98-112.

Hoyos-Carvajal, L.; Orduz, S. and Bisset, J. 2009. Growth stimulation in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) by Trichoderma. Biol. Control. 51(3):409-416.

Jiménez-Díaz, R. M.; Alcalá-Jiménez, A. R.; Hervás, A. and Trapero-Casas, J. L. 1993. Pathogenic variability and host resistance in the Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceris/Cicer arietinum pathosystem. In: proceeding of the 3rd European seminars Fusarium mycotoxins, taxonomy, pathogenicity and host resistance. Jiménez-Díaz, R. M.; Alcalá-Jiménez, A. R.; Hervás, A. and Trapero-Casas, J. L. (Comps.). Radzikóv, Poland. 87-94 pp.

Jiménez-Gasco, M. M.; Navas-Cortés, J. A. and Jiménez-Díaz, R. M. 2004. The Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceris/ Cicer arietinum pathosystem: a case study of the evolution of plant-pathogenic fungi into races and pathotypes. Int. Microbiol. 7(2):95-104.

Jyotsna, A. S.; Rajat, P. S.; Alok, K. S.; Anil, K. S. and Dilip, K. A. 2008. Growth promotion and charcoal rot management in Chickpea by T. harzianum. J. Plant. Prot. Res. 48(1):81-92.

Khan, M. R.; Ashraf, S.; Rassol, F.; Salati, K. M.; Mohiddin, F. A. and Haque, Z. 2014. Field performance of Trichoderma species against wilt disease complex of chickpea caused by F. oxysporum f. sp. ciceri and Rhizoctonia solani. Turk. J. Agric. For. 38(4):447-454.

Khan, A. N.; Shair, F; Malik, K.; Hayat, Z.; Khan, M. A.; Hafeez, F. Y. and Hassan, M. N. 2017. Molecular identification and genetic characterization of Macrophomina phaseolina strains causing pathogenicity on sunflower and chickpea. Front Microbiol. 8:1309. 

Kumar, V; Shahid, M.; Srivastava, M.; Singh, A.; Pandey, S. and Sharma. 2014. Enhancing seed germination and vigor of chickpea by using potential and effective Strains of Trichoderma Species. Virol. Mycol. 3(2):1-7.

Michel-Aceves, A. C.; Otero-Sánchez, M. and Solano-Pascacio, L. 2009. Biocontrol in vitro con Trichoderma spp. de Fusarium subglutinans (Wollenweb y Reinking) Nelson, Toussoun y Marasas y F. oxysporum Schlecht., agentes causales de la ‘escoba de bruja’ del mango (Mangifera indica L.). Rev. Mex- Fitopatol. 27(1):18-26.

Mishra, A. and Nautiyal, C. S. 2018. Novel Trichoderma fusant for enhancing nutritional value and defence activity in chickpea. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants. 24(3):411-422.

Mukherjee, P. K.; Mehetre, S. T.; Sherkhane, P. D.; Muthukathan, G.; Ghosh, A.; Kotasthane, A. S.; Khare, N.; Rathod, P.; Sharma, K. K.; Nath, R.; Tewari, A. K.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Arya, M.; Pathak D.; Wasnikar, A. R.; Tiwari, R. K. S. and Saxena, D. R. 2019. A novel seed-dressing formulation based on an improved mutant strain of Trichoderma virens, and its field evaluation. Front. Microbiol. 10:1910

Navas-Cortés, J. A.; Hau, B. and Jiménez-Díaz, R. M. 2000. Yield loss in chickpeas in relation to development of Fusarium wilt epidemics. Phytopathology. 90(11):1269-1278.

Oliva-Ortiz, L. C.; Velázquez-Alcaraz, T. J.; Sosa-Pérez, R.; Partida-Ruvalcaba, L.; Díaz-Valdés, T.; Arciniega-Ramos, J y López-Orona, C. A. 2017. Control de la fusariosis vascular del garbanzo (Cicer arietinum L.) por microorganismos nativos de Sinaloa, México. Agrociencia. 51(6):683-695.

Qualhato, T.; Cardoso-Lopes, F. A.; Steindorff, A. S.; Brandão, R. S.; Jesuino, R. S. A. and Ulhoa, C. J. 2013. Mycoparasitism studies of Trichoderma species against three phytopathogenic fungi: evaluation of antagonism and hydrolytic enzyme production. Biotechnol. Lett. 35(9):1461-1468.

Rajput, V. A.; Konde, S. A. and Thakur, M. R. 2010. Evaluation of bioagents against chickpea wilt complex. J. Soils Crops. 20(1):155-158.

Rudresh, D. I.; Shivaprakash, M. K. and Ravulapalli, D. 2005. Potential of Trichoderma spp. as biocontrol agents of pathogens involved in wilt complex of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Biol. Control. 19(2):157-166.

Ruiz-Cisneros, M. F.; Ornelas-Paz, J. J.; Olivas-Orozco, G. I.; Acosta-Muñiz, C. H.; Sepúlveda-Ahumada, D. R.; Pérez-Corral, D. A.; Ríos-Velasco, C.; Salas-Marina, M. A. and Fernández-Pavía, S. P. 2018. Efecto de Trichoderma spp. y hongos fitopatógenos sobre el crecimiento vegetal y calidad del fruto de jitomate. Rev. Mex. Fitopatol. 36(3):444-456.

Salazar, L. A.; Aponte, G. Y.; Alcano, M. J.; Sanabria, N. H. y Guzmán, J. J. 2012. Importancia de las especies de Trichoderma para el control de Macrophomina phaseolina en las áreas agrícolas del estado Aragua, Venezuela. Agron. Trop. 62(1-4):7-15.

Sharma, M. and Ghosh, R. 2017. Heat and soil moisture stress differentially impact chickpea plant infection with fungal pathogens. In: plant tolerance to individual and concurrent stresses. Senthil-Kumar M. (Ed.). Springer press. New Delhi. 47-57 pp.

Suárez, C. L.; Fernández, R. J.; Valero, N. O.; Gomez, R. M. y Paez, A. R. 2008. Antagonismo in vitro de Trichoderma harzianum Rifai sobre Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc., asociado a la marchitez en maracuyá. Rev. Colomb. Biotecnol. 10(2):35-43.

Widyastuti, S. M. 2006. The biological control of Ganoderma root rot by Trichoderma. Heart rot and root rot in tropical Acacia plantations. In: Potter, K.; Rimbawanto, A. and Beadle, C. (Eds.). Proceedings of a workshop held in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. 7-9 February 2006. Canberra. ACIAR Proceedings 124. 67-74 pp.