Revista Mexicana Ciencias Agrícolas   volume 10   number 8   November 12 - December 31, 2019

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v10i8.1987

Investigation note

First report of Monascus purpureus in corn silage, oats, triticale and lucerne

Jazmín Janet Velázquez-Guerrero1

Ernesto Cerna Chávez1

Juan Carlos Delgado Ortiz2

Anselmo Hernández Perez3

Teódulo Quezada Tristán4

Yisa María Ochoa Fuentes

1Department of Parasitology-Antonio Narro Autonomous Agrarian University. Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico. CP. 25315. Tel. 449 1389427. (jazzguerrero@hotmail.com; jabaly1@yahoo.com). 2CONACYT-Antonio Narro Autonomous Agrarian University-Department of Parasitology. Buenavista, Saltillo, Coahuila, Mexico. CP. 25315. (moe-788@hotmail.com). 3Experimental Field Uruapan-INIFAP. Av. Latinoamericana 1101, Uruapan, Michoacán CP. 60150. Mexico. Tel. 452 5237392. (hernandez.anselmo@inifap.gob.mx). 4Center for Agricultural Sciences-Autonomous University of Aguascalientes. Jesus Maria, Aguascalientes, Mexico. (tquezada@correo.uaa.mx).

§Corresponding author: yisa8a@yahoo.com.

Abstract

Monascus purpureus is used in the food industry as a natural pigment, mainly by Asian countries; however, this fungus produces a mycotoxin called citrinin, which causes diseases such as hepatotoxicity, teratogenicity, tumors and mutations, in mammals. This fungus was found in Serbia in corn and lucerne silage. The objective of this work was to identify the presence of the Monascus purpureus fungus in corn, oats, triticale and lucerne silage, the sampling was carried out in the periods of November December 2017 and April-May 2018, in the states of Jalisco, Zacatecas, Aguascalientes and Guanajuato of the Mexican Republic, silage isolation was carried out in the middle of Papa Dextrosa Agar (PDA), they were morphologically and molecularly identified. 63 different strains were obtained, seven were Monascus purpureus, one in lucerne, two in corn, two in oats and two in triticale. This research reports, for the first time, the presence of Monascus purpureus fungi in corn, oats, triticale and lucerne silages.

Keywords: fungi, identification, safety.

Reception date: November 2019

Acceptance date: December 2019

In the 1960s the use of silage in the livestock industry increased considerably and became the method of forage preservation that is most used for feeding cattle (Cheli et al., 2013), this represents between 45-60% of diets in dairy cattle production systems throughout the world, as well as in the production of beef cattle in America and Europe (Adesogan, 2009; Millen et al., 2009; Tangni et al., 2013; Alpizar, 2015), the silage can be of different crops or forages such as lucerne, oats, corn, corncob mix or beet pulp (Tangni et al., 2013), the objective of this is to maximize the preservation of original nutrients from the forage crop, with a minimal loss in nutritional quality (Alonso et al., 2013). One of the problems presented by silage is contamination by bacteria and fungi, which cause the loss of dry matter and nutrients (Garon et al., 2006; Alonso et al., 2013), causing cattle to reduce their consumption , affecting milk production, daily weight gain performance (GDP) and animal health (Alpizar, 2015).

Carrillo (2003) indicates that fungal contamination in food can be before, during and after harvest, in transport and storage, since food is permanently in direct contact with spores of toxicogenic fungi, Reyes-Velázquez et al. (2008); Keller et al. (2012); Alpizar (2015), report that the contamination of corn silage in Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Lithuania, Switzerland, Holland, Ireland and Denmark, is caused by fungi mainly of the genera: Mucor spp., Penicillium spp., Aspergillus spp., Fusarium spp., Alternaria spp., Cladosporium spp. and Geotruchum spp.

While other studies in Lithuania and Brazil have reported the presence of fungi of the genus: Aspergillus spp., Rhizopus spp. and Penicillium spp., in clover silages, ryegrass, sorghum, triticale, oats and pasture mix (Baliukoniene et al., 2012; Keller et al., 2012). Something very similar has been reported in corn and lucerne silages, where the contaminating fungi were: Penicillium spp., Aspergillus fumigatus, Trichoderma viride, Geotrichum candidum, Paecilomyces variotii, Monascus ruber and Monascus purpureus (Bočarov-Stančić et al., 2014).

Monascus purpureus is used in the pharmaceutical and food industry as a natural dye in Eastern culture and in Asian countries. This fungus grows at a temperature of 25 to 37 °C, with a maximum of 45 °C, it can grow in a wide range of pH, from 2.5 to 8 (Pineda-Insuasti et al., 2016). It is capable of producing citrinin, a mycotoxin that affects the kidney, but other target organs have also been reported, such as the liver and bone marrow, this mycotoxin is nephrotoxic, embryonic, fetotoxic, teratogenic and genotoxic causing damage to humans and animals (Flajs and Peraica. 2009; Bensassi et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2017).

The possible toxicological mechanisms of citrinin are located in the renal and hepatic mitochondria, causing atrophy in the interference of the electron transport process, in addition to the alteration of Ca2+ homeostasis and the generation of oxidative stress (Chia-Ding et al., 2014). The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified citrinin in group 3 of carcinogens, due to limited evidence of its carcinogenicity in animals and there is no evidence for humans (Flajs and Peraica, 2009). On the other hand, Bočarov-Stančić et al. (2014), conducted studies on maize and lucerne silage in Serbia finding fungi of the Monascus genus in their samples. The objective of this research was to identify the presence of the Monascus purpureus fungus in corn, oats, triticale and lucerne silage.

In the periods of November-December 2017 and April-May 2018, the ‘W’ technique was used for the taking of the samples (Bautista and Santos, 2004), a total of 16 silage samples of corn, oats, triticale and lucerne were obtained, from four locations for each entity, Aguascalientes, Zacatecas, Guanajuato and Jalisco. With the use of the aforementioned technique, a kilogram of five points of the silage was taken, which were homogenized obtaining a total of five kilograms and a subsample of 5 g was extracted, they were made cuts of approximately 5 mm, obtaining 12 subsamples per sample, they were disinfected with a 3% sodium hypochlorite solution for one minute, rinsed three times with sterile distilled water, allowed to dry, inoculated in 20 mL petri dishes with acidified PDA medium (200 μL lactic acid 85% per liter), were incubated at 28 ±2°C for seven days.

Subsequently, the mycelial growth of the inoculated silo samples was observed; purification of each fungus was performed, in acidified PDA medium and incubating at 27 °C, during 8 days in which the reproductive structures necessary for the identification of the fungus develop. Portions of mycelium were taken with spores, stains were performed, placed on a slide where there was already a drop of the blue cotton dye and placed on the covers object, then they were observed under a microscope and identified based on the keys taxonomies of Barnett and Hunter (1998).

By means of the PCR-ITS technique, molecular identification was performed, the isolated strains were extracted with DNA using the modified Doyle and Doyle method (1990). The extraction product was run on a 1% agarose gel by electrophoresis. Subsequently, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method was developed for the internal regions transcribed ITS1 (5’- TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3’) and ITS4 (5’- TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3’), using Taq & GO Matermix (1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM DNTP’s) following manufacturer recommendations (MP®); 0.5 µL of ITS1 at 20 µM; 0.5 µL of ITS4 at 20 µM; 1 µL of problem DNA set to 100 ng and sterile double-distilled water to volume to 15 µL.

The PCR reaction conditions were: 1 cycle of initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 seconds, 30 alignment cycles at 57 °C for 30 s, 30 extension cycles at 72 °C for 2 min and 1 final extension cycle at 72 °C for 5 min. The amplification was visualized on a 1% agarose gel by electrophoresis. The PCR product was sequenced to the Macrogen laboratory in Maryland, United States of America.

The samples of silage of lucerne, corn, oats and triticale underwent a macroscopic evaluation to identify possible abnormalities in their appearance, observing that the silages were compact and presented a hard consistency that made cutting difficult, in the evaluation tones were observed intense red as seen in Figures 1 and 2, which show similar tones to those reported for Fusarium spp.

Of the 16 samples obtained from the silages, 63 different strains of fungi were isolated, of which 11.1% (7/63) corresponded to the fungus Monascus purpureus. Seven strains of Monascus purpureus fungi were obtained, two in corn silage, one in lucerne, two in triticale and two in oats representing 3.17, 1.58, 3.17 and 3.17% respectively.

Figure 1. Sample of corn silage where you can see the hue of the fungus and caking of the silage.

Figure 2. Sample of corn silage where the caking of the silage is observed.

Also, in the cultures that were made of each of the samples, a range of colors could be observed

that were from white, cream, orange, intense red to a red color in the mycelium as observed on the obverse of the boxes Petri (Figure 3), while on the reverse the colorations were orange to red as seen in Figure 4.

C:\Users\jazzg\Desktop\DOCUMENTOS JAZZ\DOCTORADO UAAAN 2017-2019\FOTOS DOCTORADO\HOMGOS\M11 44\20180215_142645.jpg

Figure 3. In the mycelium the different shades of the fungus are observed.

C:\Users\jazzg\Desktop\DOCUMENTOS JAZZ\DOCTORADO UAAAN 2017-2019\FOTOS DOCTORADO\HOMGOS\M11 44\20180215_142652.jpg

Figure 4. The intense red that characterizes the Monascus fungus is observed.

Microscopically, it was possible to observe ascocarp with thin walls and round conidia chains (Figure 5), in parallel, it was also possible to observe ascospores inside the ascocarp (Figure 6).

Pineda-Insuasti et al. (2016), indicate that the Monascus fungus easily grows in agro-industrial waste such as corn husk or oil palm leaf, coupled with the growth conditions: temperature, pH, humidity and concentration of nutrients (nitrogen, zinc, manganese and iron) cause the fungus to develop and spread in the field, which leads to one of the main problems of contamination of silage (Kim et al., 2002).

Bočarov-Stančić et al. (2014), conducted studies on maize and lucerne silage in Serbia finding fungi of the genus Monascus in their samples. Garon et al. (2006), report the presence of Monascus in maize silage in France, they made the sampling of maize silage in the months of November, December and February, data that coincide with our sampling of different types of silage and the presence of the Monascus fungus in corn, lucerne, triticale and oat silages.

The sequences obtained from the molecular analysis were compared with the sequences reported in the database of the gene bank of the National Center for Biotechnology Information NCBI of the USA (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), using the BLAST program, where it was obtained that 95.58% of the isolated samples showed similarity to the Monascus purpureus fungus (Table 1).

Table 1. Molecular characterization of the isolates of the sequences reported in the gene bank with the intergenic sequences (STIs) of the rDNA genes, present in the silages of lucerne, corn, oats and triticale.

Isolated

Species

Number access

IS (%)

1

Monascus purpureus

KY828906.1

95.58

2

Monascus purpureus

MK087167.1

95.58

3

Monascus purpureus

MK087147.1

95.58

4

Monascus purpureus

GQ503882.1

95.58

5

Monascus purpureus

MK621210.1

95.06

6

Monascus purpureus

MK087172.1

95.06

7

Monascus purpureus

MG576116.1

95.58

Isolated= 1 lucerne silage; 2, 3= corn silage; 4, 5= oat silage; 6, 7= triticale silage.

Conclusions

This research reports the presence of Monascus purpureus in corn, oats, triticale and lucerne silages from the states of Aguascalientes, Guanajuato, Jalisco and Zacatecas.

Cited literature

Adesogan, A. T. 2009. Challenges of tropical silage production. Proc. 15th international silage conference, Madison, Wisconsin. 139-156 p.

Alonso, V. A.; Pereyra, C. M.; Keller, L. A. M.; Dalcero, A. M.; Rosa, C. A. R.; Chiacchiera S. M. and Cavaglieri, L. R. 2013. Fungi and mycotoxins in silage: an overview. J. Appl. Microbiol. 115(3):637-643.

Alpizar, S. C. 2015. Presencia de hongos y contaminación con micotoxinas en ensilajes para alimentación de rumiantes. Rev. Cienc. Veterin. 33(1):7-31.

Baliukoniene, V.; Bakutis B.; Vaivadaite T.; Bartkienė E. and Jovaišienė, J. 2012. Prevalence of fungi and mycotoxins in silage and milk in Lithuania. Veterinarija ir Zootechinika 59(81):3-9.

Barnett, H. L. and Hunter, B. B. 1998. Illustrated genera of imperfect fungi. APS Press, Saint Paul, Minnesota. 157-158 pp.

Bautista, A. y Santos, S. 2004. Manual de técnicas de muestreo para manejadores de recursos naturales. 351-355 pp.

Bensassi, F.; Bouslimi A.; El Golli-Bennour, E.; Gargouri S.; Hajlaoui, M. R. and Bacha H. 2011. Comparative cytotoxicity of the possibly occurring mycotoxins in wheat on the basis of a mycological analysis. J. Mycol. 32(3):295-306.

Bočarov-Stančić, A.; Stanković, S.; Lević, J.; Janković, S.; Adamović, M.; Novaković, Ž. and Kuzevski, J. 2014. Presence of mycobiota and mycotoxins in silage.  Feed technology.  In: XVI International Symposium Novi Sad, Serbia, octubre 28-30. 1-6 p.

Carrillo, L. 2003. Mohos y micotoxinas. In: Universidad Nacional de Salta. (Ed.). Los hongos de los alimentos y Forrajes. Salta, Argentina. 1-24 pp.

Cheli, F.; Campagnoli, A. and Dell’Orto, V. 2013. Fungal populations and mycotoxins in silages: From occurrence to analysis. J. Animal Feed Sci. Technol. 183(1-2):1-16. doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.01.013.

Chia-Ding, L.; Ying-Chun, C.; Hsu-Yang, L.; Lih-Ching, C. and Yang-Chih, S. D. 2014. Incidence of citrinin in red yeast rice and various comercial Monascus products in Taiwan from 2009 to 2012. J. Food Control. 38:178-183.

Doyle, J. J. and Doyle J. L. 1990.  Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus. 12(1):13-15.

Flajs, D. and Peraica, M. 2009. Toxicological properties of citrinin. Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Zagreb, Croatia. 60(4):457-464.

Garon, D.; Richard, E.; Sage, L.; Bouchart, V.; Pottier D. and Lebailly, P. 2006. Mycoflora and multimycotoxin Detection in corn silage: experimental study. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54(9):3479-3484.

Keller, L. A.; Keller K. M.; Monge, M. P.; Pereyra, C. M.; Alonso, V. A.; Cavaglieri, L. R.; Chiacchiera, S. M. and Rosa, C. A. 2012. Gliotoxin contamination in pre- and postfermented corn, sorghum and wet brewer’s grains silage in Sao Paulo and Río de Janeiro State, Brazil. J. Appl. Microbiol. 112(5):865-873.

Kim, H. J.; Kim, J. H.; Oh, H. J. and Shin, C. S. 2002.  Morphology control of Monascus cells and scale-up of pigment fermentation. Process Biochem. 38(5):649-655.

Millen, D. D.; Pacheco, R. D. L.; Arrigoni, M. D. B.; Galyean, M. L. and Vasconcelos, J. T. 2009. A snapshot of management practices and nutritional recommendations used by feedlot nutritionists in Brazil. J. Animal Sci. 87(10):3427-3439.

Pineda-Insuasti1, J. A.; Duarte-Trujillo, A. S.; Ayala-Pastaz, K. B.; Soto-Arroyave, C. P. y Pineda-Soto, C. A. 2016. Producción de metabolitos por Monascus spp. una revisión. Rev. ICIDCA. Sobre los Derivados de la Caña de Azúcar. 50(2):43-52.

Reyes-Velázquez, W. P.; Espinoza, V. H. I.; Rojo, F.; Jiménez, C.; Palacios, E. D.; Hernández, J. and Ramírez, A. 2008. Occurrence of fungi and mycotoxins in corn silage, Jalisco State, Mexico. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 25(3):182-185.

Tangni, E. K.; Pussemier, L. and Van Hove, F. 2013. Mycotoxin contaminating maize and grass silages for dairy cattle feeding: current state and challenges.  J. Animal Sci. Adv. 10(3):492-511.

Wang, H.; Zhang, S.; Lin, T.; Zheng, D. 2017. Introduction and safety evaluation of citrinin in foods. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 5(5):179-183. Doi: 10.11648/j.jfns.20170505.13.