Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas   volume 9  number 6   August 14 - September 27, 2018

Article

Sensitivity to metalaxyl and pathogenic potential of Phytophthora hydropathica isolated from irrigation canals of the Valley of Culiacán

Brando Álvarez-Rodríguez1

Raymundo Saúl García-Estrada1

José Benigno Valdez-Torres1

Josefina León-Félix1

Raúl Allende-Molar2§

1Center for Research in Food and Development AC. Coordination Culiacán. Road to Eldorado km 5.5, Col. Campo El Diez, Culiacán, Sinaloa, CP. 80110. Tel 01(667) 7605536. (brando-alvarez@estudiantes.ciad.mx; rsgarcia@ciad.mx; jvaldez@ciad.mx; ljosefina@ciad.mx). 2Faculty of Biological and Agricultural Sciences-Veracruz University. Road Tuxpan-Tampico km 7.5, Tuxpan, Veracruz. CP. 92895. Tel. 01 (783) 8344350.

§Corresponding author: rallende@uv.mx.

Abstract

Phytopthora hydropathica is a species with few reports related to its ability to infect agricultural crops in a natural way, so it can be inferred that it has not been in contact with chemical agents; therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the pathogenicity and sensitivity to metalaxyl of 18 strains of P. hydropathica from irrigation canals in Culiacán, Sinaloa. The pathogenicity evaluation of the isolates was carried out on zucchini and cucumber leaves and on zucchini, cucumber and tomato fruits. Resistance to metalaxyl was evaluated in vitro in PDA medium added with metalaxyl. The isolates of P. hydropathica caused symptoms of necrosis and softening in fruits and symptoms of leaf necrosis of the evaluated plant species; no resistant strains were found, seven strains showed intermediate sensitivity and the rest were susceptible to metalaxyl. The CE50 of the isolates ranged from 0.000013 μg L-1 to 1 μg L-1. It can be concluded that the use of metalaxyl would be effective in controlling some disease outbreak caused by P. hydropathica.

Keywords: Phytophthora hydropathica, CE50, Oomycetes, Ridomil Gold.

Reception date: July 2018

Acceptance date: September 2018

Introduction

In the genus Phytophthora, there are about 124 species described (Martin et al., 2014), which have the capacity to infect hundreds of plant species around the world (Gallegly and Hong, 2008). At present, the presence of Phytophthora species in aquatic environments has increased (Zappia et al., 2014), for example, in recent years the presence of Phytophthora hydropathica stands out mainly in irrigation water (Hulvey et al., 2010; Hüberli et al., 2013; Bienalfp and Balci, 2014; this is to be expected, since etymologically, the name of this microorganism derives from the Greek words ‘hydro’ which refers to its aquatic nature and ‘pathica’ to its pathogenic nature (Hong et al., 2010). Most of the reports of P. hydropathica are related to infections in ornamental plants, such as foliar necrosis in azalea (Rhododendron catawbiense), neck rot in mountain laurel (Kalmia latifolia) (Hong et al., 2010), as well as wilting and regressive death of wild laurel (Viburnum tinus) (Vitale et al., 2014).

Before being formally described as P. hydropathica, Hong et al. (2008) showed that this species is capable of causing ‘damping off’ in cucumber seedlings, while in tomato and pepper plants it caused root infections; In addition, they mention that P. hydropathica penetrates in fruits of tomato and chili by means of wounds. In Mexico, the presence of P. hydropathica was reported in irrigation water in the Valley of Culiacan and was shown to cause necrosis in tomato and chili leaves (Álvarez et al., 2017).

To control diseases caused by Phytophthora, the chemical ingredient metalaxyl, which is a phenylamide-type fungicide that protects plants systemically is mainly used for the control of oomycetes (Urech et al., 1977). Metalaxyl acts on specific sites of the pathogen by preventing protein biosynthesis through interference in the synthesis of ribosomal RNA (Nunninger et al., 1995); however, excessive use of this product can cause pathogens to generate resistance (Damicone, 2004). An example is the rapid development of resistance in populations of P. infestans, which was detected in the 80s in Europe (Davidse et al., 1981) and in the 90s in the USA, Canada and Mexico (Matuszak et al., 1994; Power et al., 1995).

Resistant isolates are equal to or more aggressive than susceptible isolates, thus converting metalaxyl resistance into an important agronomic characteristic in the integrated management of diseases caused by Phytophthora, especially in late potato blight caused by P. infestans (Forbes et al., 1998); in addition, in vitro bioassays have been used to characterize and classify Phytophthora isolates and other oomycetes according to the level of susceptibility to metalaxyl (Peters et al., 2001; Fontem et al., 2005; Tian et al., 2016).

The objectives of the present study were: 1) to determine the pathogenic potential of isolates of P. hydropathica in leaves and fruits of tomato, cucumber and zucchini; and 2) determine the sensitivity or resistance of said isolates to metalaxyl.

Materials and methods

Pathogenic potential. To determine the pathogenic potential, three representative strains of P. hydropathica were used [13F2 (KX298864), 16-1F2 (KX298868) and 18-2F1 (KX298873). Strains were reactivated in potato dextrose agar medium (PDA). In the pathogenicity experiments three fruits of tomato (Saladette), cucumber (SFPP) and pumpkin (Nurizeli) were used, as well as three leaves of pumpkin (Nurizeli) and cucumber (SFPP) of 1 month of age. The plant materials were washed with running water and disinfested with 70% ethanol. Both leaves and fruits were wounded with a sterile dissection needle and inoculated by placing 5 mm diameter discs of PDA medium with active growth of the three strains. The inoculated leaves and fruits were placed in a humid chamber for 120 h (Orlikowski et al., 2012). As control, fruits and leaves were used in which wounds were made and discs of culture medium were placed.

Metalaxyl sensitivity. To evaluate the susceptibility of the strains of P. hydropathica to metalaxyl, an in vitro study was carried out, which consisted of adding 10 mg L-1 of metalaxyl to the PDA culture medium (Shattock, 1988; Rekanovic et al., 2011), the commercial formula Ridomil Gold 480 EC (480 g of active ingredient of metalaxyl) was used, which was added to the culture medium after sterilization and just before emptying it in Petri dishes. From the border of the colonies of each strain, 5 mm diameter discs of culture medium with mycelial growth were taken and placed in Petri dishes with PDA medium added with metalaxyl and without metalaxyl (control). The in vitro growth of each isolate was evaluated after six days at 25 °C (Paez et al., 2001).

The growth was determined by measuring the diameter of the colony perpendicularly. To determine the relative growth, the formula PC= (DMC-5mm/DMCA)100 was used; where PC= percentage of growth, DMC= diameter of the colony with metalaxyl and DMCA= diameter of the colony without metalaxyl. A percentage of growth in diameter of the colony equal to or greater than 60% is considered to be resistant isolate, a growth of the colony between 10-60% is classified as intermediate and when the colony is less than 10% it is considered as susceptible (Shattock, 1988; Deahl et al., 1995; Riveros et al., 2003).

To determine the CE50 values in each strain, four concentrations of metalaxyl 0.1, 1, 5 and 10 mg L-1 were used; the CE50 was calculated by a linear regression between the log10 of the relative radial growth and the log10 of the concentration of the fungicide (Paez et al., 2001). Three repetitions were performed for each isolate and concentration of metalaxyl.

Design of experiments. In the assay with PDA culture medium with 10 mg L-1 of metalaxyl, a totally random factor design was used, where the factor was the 18 isolates. An analysis of variance and comparisons of means were made using the Tuckey test. For the in vitro assay in which the resistance or sensitivity of the isolates to metalaxyl was determined, a completely randomized two-factor design was used; one factor consisted of the isolates with 18 levels and the other factor in the concentration of metalaxyl. The response variable was the growth of the colony of the strains in millimeters.

Results and discussion

Pathogenic potential. In cucumber and zucchini leaves, symptoms of disease were visible at 48 h after inoculation (hdi). In cucumber leaves, the three inoculated isolates induced symptoms of necrosis with wrinkling and darkening of the affected tissues (Figure 1). There were some differences between the three inoculated isolates, the main one occurred in the leaf inoculated with strain 18-2F1, in which signs of the pathogen (whitish mycelium) were observed (Figure 1B).

Figure 1. Cucumber leaf lesion caused by P. hydropathica 48 hdi. A) isolated 16-2F1; B) isolated 18-2F1; C) isolated 13-F2; and D) control leaf.

In zucchini leaves, the isolates also caused symptoms of necrosis (Figure 2). In zucchini there are no reports of studies that consider it as a host of P. hydropathica. In contrast, cucumber P. hydropathica has been reported to cause damping-off in seedlings (Hong et al., 2008).

Figure 2. Symptoms on zucchini leaves caused by P. hydropathica 48 hdi. A) isolated 13-F2; B) isolated 18-2F1; C) isolated 16-2F1; and D) control leaf.

In zucchini fruits showed symptoms of necrosis; while, in tomato and cucumber there were symptoms of softening (Figures 3, 4 and 5). Strain 13F2 was the most aggressive in cucumber and tomato fruits, even at 72 hdi, signs of the pathogen were observed (Figures 3B and 3C). In contrast, strain 16-2F1 caused symptoms of barely visible necrosis in zucchini fruit and symptoms of softening in tomato (Figures 4A and 4B). Strain 18-2F1 was the most aggressive in zucchini fruits (Figure 5A), where as in tomato fruits, at 72 hdi signs of the pathogen were observed (Figure 5B), these differences observed between the different isolates were can attribute to the different degree of virulence of each strain.

Figure 3. Symptoms in fruits caused by P. hydropathica isolated 13-F2 72 hdi. A) zucchini; B) tomato; and C) cucumber.

Figure 4. Symptoms in fruits caused by P. hydropathica isolated 16-2F1 72 hdi. A) zucchini; B) tomato; C) cucumber.

Figure 5. Symptoms in fruits caused by P. hydropathica isolated 18-2F1 72 hdi. A) zucchini; B) tomato; C) cucumber.

Metalaxyl sensitivity. The 18 strains used in the trial showed a reduction in their growth when exposed to 10 mg L-1 of metalaxyl compared to growth in medium without metalaxyl (Figure 6); no resistant strains were found; this means that no isolate grew more than 60% in the medium added with 10 mg L-1 of metalaxyl. Seven strains showed intermediate resistance and 11 were susceptible according to the values proposed by Shattock, (1988) (Table 1). Of the 11 sensitive strains, six of them were totally inhibited at the concentration of 10 mg L-1 of metalaxyl, these data are similar to those obtained in tests conducted by Riveros et al. (2003), where the isolate used as control (sensitive to metalaxyl) was completely inhibited at the concentration of 10 mg L-1. In some cases, in vitro sensitivity results have been presented in oomycetes, which do not accurately predict the sensitivity they will have to chemicals in vivo conditions (Moorman and Kim, 2004).

For example, in P. infestans there was no good correlation between the results obtained in tuber discs with the results in culture medium (Straub et al., 1979). Despite this, the high degree of sensitivity presented by P. hydropathica isolates may be due to the fact that these isolates have not been exposed to this chemical, as there are no reports of this species causing damage to agricultural crops in the region.

Figure 6. Growth of P. hydropathica isolates in culture medium with 10 mg L-1 of metalaxyl and in a metalaxyl-free culture medium after 6 days of incubation. Different letters indicate significant differences (Tuckey p< 0.05).

Table 1. Sensitivity and effective concentration of metalaxyl in P. hydropathica isolates.

CE50= effective concentration at which the microorganism grows 50% compared to the control; R2= 94.5%.

The CE50 of the 18 strains were very low, fluctuating in concentrations less than 0.000013 μg L-1 and up to 1 μg L-1 (Table 1), similar CE50 were determined in strains of Phytophthora infestans considered sensitive to metalaxyl where the lowest concentration was 0.02 μg L-1 (Power et al., 1995), whereas, in a study with the species P. nicotianae, maximum CE50 concentrations of 0.04 μg mL-1were obtained for isolates classified as sensitive. (Hu et al., 2008), higher concentrations of CE50 have also been found in isolates classified as sensitive, such is the case of those obtained by Paez et al. (2001) where they determined minimum concentrations of 1 000 μg mL-1 for isolates of P. infestans.

Conclusion

P. hydropathica has the potential to infect leaves and fruits of tomato, cucumber and zucchini, plants that are important in the horticultural sector in Sinaloa. The 18 strains of Phytophthora hydropathica are sensitive to metalaxyl.

Acknowledgments

To CONACYT for financing the studies of B. Álvarez Rodríguez.

Cited literature

Álvarez, R. B.; García, E. R. S.; Valdez, T. J. B.; León, F. J.; Allende, M. R. and Fernández, P. S. P. 2017. Phytophthora hydropathica and Phytophthora drechsleri isolated from irrigation channels in the Culiacan Valley. México. Rev. Mex. Fitopatol. 35(1):20-39.

Bienapfl, J. C. and Balci, Y. 2014. Movement of Phytophthora spp. in Maryland’s trade. USA. Plant Dis. 98(1):134-144.

Damicone, J. 2004. Fungicide resistance management. Cooperative Oklahoma Extension Service EPP-7663. Stillwater, OK.

Davidse, L. C.; Looijen, D.; Turkesteen, L. J. and Van Der Wal, D. 1981. Occurrence of metalaxyl resistant strains of Phytophthora infestans in Dutch potato field. Holanda. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 87(2):65-68.

Deahl, K. L.; DeMuth, S. P.; Sinden, S. L. 1995. Identification of mating types and metalaxyl resistance in North American populations of Phytophthora infestans. USA. Am. Potato J. 72(1):35-49.

Fontem, D. A.; Olanya, O. M.; Tsopmbeng, G. R.; and Owona, M. A. P. 2005. Pathogenicity and metalaxyl sensitivity of Phytophthora infestans isolates obtained from garden huckleberry, potato and tomato in Cameroon. USA. Crop Protection. 24(5):449-456.

Forbes, G. A.; Goodwin, S. B.; Drenth, A.; Oyarzun, P.; Ordoñez, M. A. and Fry, W. E. 1998. A global marker database for Phytophthora infestans. USA. Plant Dis. 82(7):811-818.

Gallegly, M. E. and Hong, C. X. 2008. Phytophthora: identifying species by morphology and DNA fingerprints. Primera edición.  APS Press. St Paul, MN, USA. 168 p.

Hong, C. X.; Gallegly, M. E.; Richardson, P. A.; Kong, P.; Moorman, G. W.; Lea, C. J. D. and Ross, D. S. 2010. Phytophthora hydropathica, a new pathogen identified from irrigation water, Rhododendron catawbiense and Kalmia latifolia. Inglaterra. Plant Pathol. 59(5):913-921.

Hong, C. X.; Richardson, P. A. and Kong, P. 2008. Pathogenicity to ornamental plants of some existing species and new taxa of Phytophthora from irrigation water. USA. Plant Dis. 92(8):1201-1207.

Hu, J.; Hong, C.; Stromberg, E. L. and Moorman, G. W. 2008. Mefenoxam sensitivity and fitness analysis of Phytophthora nicotianae isolates from nurseries in Virginia, USA. Inglaterra. Plant Pathol. 57(4):728-736.

Hüberli, D.; Hardy, G. E. St J.; White, D.; Williams, N. and Burgess, T. I. 2013. Fishing for Phytophthora from Western Australia’s waterways: a distribution and diversity survey. Australia. Austr. Plant Pathol. 42(3):251-260.

Hulvey, J.; Gobena, D.; Finley, L. and Lamour, K. 2010. Co-occurrence and genotypic distribution of Phytophthora species recovered from watersheds and plant nurseries of eastern Tennessee. USA. Mycologia. 102(5):1127-1133.

Martin, F. N.; Blair, J. E. and Coffey, M. D. 2014. A combined mitocondrial and nuclear multilocus phylogeny of the genus Phytophthora. USA. Fungal Gen. Biol. 66(1):19-32.

Matuszak, J. M.; Fernandez, E. J.; Gu, W. K.; Villarreal, G. M. and Fry, W. E. 1994. Sensitivity of Phytophthora infestans populations to metalaxyl in Mexico. Distribution and Dynamics. USA. Plant Dis. 78(1):911-916.

Moorman, G. W. and Kim, S. H. 2004. Species of Pythium from greenhouses in Pennsylvania exhibit resistance to propamocarb and mefenoxam. USA. Plant Dis. 88(6):630-632.

Nuninger, C.; Steden, C. and Staub, T. 1995. The contribution of metalaxyl-based fungicide mixtures to potato late bligth control. Phytophthora infestans 150. Pages 122-129. In: Dowley, L. J.; Bannon, E.; Cooke, L. R.; Keane, T. and OSullivan, E. (Eds.). European Association for Potato Research-Pathology Section Conference. Dublin, Ireland. Boole Press Ltd.

Paez, O.; Gomez, L.; Brenes, A. y Valverde, R. 2001. Resistencia de aislamientos de Phytophthora infestans al metalaxyl en papa de Costa Rica. Costa Rica. Agron. Costarric. 25(1):33-44.

Peters, R. D.; Sturz, V. A.; Matheson, B. G.; Arsenault, W. J. and Malone, A. 2001. Metalaxyl sensitivity of isolates of Phytophthora erythroseptica in Prince Edward Island. Inglaterra. Plant Pathol. 50(3):302-309.

Power, R. J.; Hamlen, R. A. and Morehart, L. A. 1995. Variation in sensitivity of Phytophthora infestans fields isolates to cimoxanil, chlorotalonil and metalaxyl. P 154-159. In: European Association for Potato Research. Phytophthora infestans. 1845-1995. Boole Press Ltd. Dublin, Ireland. 

Rekanovic, E.; Potocnik, I.; Milijasevic-Marcic, S.; Stepanovic, M.; Todorovic, B. and Mihajlovic, M. 2012. Toxicity of metalaxyl, azoxystrobin, dimethomotph, cymoxanil, zoxamide and mancozeb to Phytophthora infestans isolates from Serbia. USA. J. Environ. Sci. Health B. 47(5):403-409.

Riveros, F. B.; Sotomayor, R.; Rivera, V.; Secor, G. y Espinoza, B. 2003. Resistance of Phytophthora infestans (Montagne) de Bary to metalaxyl in potato crops in Northern Chile. Chile. Agricultura Técnica. http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci-arttext&pid=S0365-28072003000200001.

Shattock, R. C. 1988. Studies on the inheritance of resistance to metalaxyl in Phytophthora infestans. Inglaterra. Plant Pathol. 37(1):4-11.

Straub, T.; Dahmen, H.; Urech, P. and Schwinn, F. 1979. Failure to select for in vivo resistance in Phytophthora infestans to phenylamide fungicides. USA. Plant Dis. 63(1):385-389.

Tian, M.; Zhao, L.; Li, S.; Huang, J.; Sui, Z.; Wen, J. and Li, Y. 2016. Pathotypes and metalaxyl sensitivity of Phytophthora sojae and their distribution in Heilongjiang, China 2011-2015. Japón. J. General Plant Pathol. 82(3):132-141.

Urech, P. A.; Schwinn, F. and Staub, T. 1977. A novel fungicide for the control of late blight downy mildews, and related soil-borne disease. Proceedings British Crop Protection Conference. 623-631 pp.

Vitale, S.; Luongo, L.; Galli, M. and Belisario, A. 2014. First report of Phytophthora hydropathica causing wilting and shoot dieback on Viburnum in Italy. USA. Plant Dis. 98(11):1582.

Zappia, R. E.; Hüberli, D.; Hardy, G. E St. J. and Bayliss, K. L. 2014. Fungi and oomycetes in open irrigation systems: knowledge gaps and biosecurity implications. Inglaterra. Plant Pathol. 63(5):961-972.