Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas   volume 10  number 2   February 15 - March 31, 2019

 

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v10i2.1522

Investigation note

Effect of thermotherapy on emergence and vegetative
characteristics of genotypes of garlic

Rodolfo Velásquez-Valle§

Manuel Reveles Hernández

Experimental Field Zacatecas-INIFAP. Highway Zacatecas-Fresnillo km 24.5, Calera de VR, Zacatecas, Mexico. CP. 98500. (reveles.manuel@inifap.gob.mx).

§Corresponding author: velasquez.rodolfo@inifap.gob.mx.

Abstract

About 45% of the Mexican production of garlic is obtained in Zacatecas. Viral diseases of garlic can be transmitted by seed, thermotherapy has been used to reduce the viral concentration in garlic cloves; however, there is scarce local information about the impact of its impact on characteristics of plants originated from heat-treated bulbs; the purpose of this work was to determine the effect of heat treatment on the emergence and vegetative characteristics of 22 garlic genotypes. The garlic bulbs were preserved at 33 °C ±1 for six consecutive weeks. At the end of that period they were planted in the field. The emergence, height, neck diameter and number of leaves were recorded. The effect of the thermotherapy did not show a solid tendency, plants of seven heat-treated genotypes showed higher emergence and height values than those of their controls, while plants of only three and two genotypes from heat-treated bulbs had values of number of leaves and diameter of neck superior to those of their witnesses.

Keywords: emergence, height, neck diameter, number of leaves.

Reception date: February 2019

Acceptance date: March 2019


Approximately 45% of the Mexican production of garlic (Allium sativum L.) is contributed by the state of Zacatecas, which is produced in 2 000 ha (Reveles-Hernández et al., 2014). The production of this bulb in the region is confronted by diseases such as white rot (Sclerotium cepivorum Berk.) and viral infections, Velásquez-Valle et al. (2010) reported in plots of garlic the presence of several viruses, some of which could be transmitted through the material used as seed. One of the means of handling viruses is the use of high temperature to eliminate or reduce the ‘viral load’ prior to the cultivation of meristems; an alternative available to producers is the application of high temperature directly to garlic bulbs without damaging their capacity for germination or further development (Velásquez-Valle et al., 2017).

Perotto et al. (2010) indicated the negative effect of the viral infection on the number and weight of teeth, size and weight of bulb in varieties of garlic of the purple and white types, although the severity was lower in the purple varieties. There is little regional information on the effect of thermotherapy on agronomic characteristics of plants emerged from heat-treated bulbs. The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of heat treatment on the emergence and vegetative characteristics of 22 garlic genotypes.

The work was carried out in a plot of the Experimental Field Zacatecas (INIFAP) located in the municipality of Morelos Zacatecas (latitude 22.908611, length -102.659444, altitude 2 197 m) during the 2013-2014 crop cycle. Once the heat treatment was finished, the bulbs were shelled and planted in two double-row beds in experimental plots of four threads of one m in length with a useful plot in the two central furrows, eliminating the plants in the initial and final 25 cm each thread

Four bulbs of each of 22 genotypes of the mottled, white and purple types (Table 1), of 8 gauge, were selected at random, with a visual index of dormancy that fluctuated between 80 and 87% (Burba et al., 1983) and from asymptomatic plants. The bulbs were numbered and kept for six consecutive weeks at a temperature of 33± 1 °C in an Mca bacteriological stove Felisa Mod. FE 131 111 Series. Additionally, a similar number of bulbs of each genotype were kept at room temperature to be used as controls.

Table 1. Type of garlic and geographical origin of the 22 genotypes used in the current work.

Line

Origin

Type

Line

Origin

Type

1

Zacatecas

Marbled

2

Zacatecas

Marbled

3

Zacatecas

Marbled

4

Zacatecas

Marbled

5

Aguascalientes

White

6

Zacatecas

Marbled

7

Zacatecas

Marbled

8

Zacatecas

Marbled

9

Zacatecas

Marbled

10

Zacatecas

Marbled

11

Zacatecas

Marbled

12

Zacatecas

Marbled

13

Zacatecas

Marbled

14

Zacatecas

Marbled

15

Zacatecas

Marbled

16

Zacatecas

Marbled

17

Aguascalientes

White

18

Zacatecas

Marbled

19

Guanajuato

Purple

20

Guanajuato

Purple

21

Guanajuato

Purple

22

Guanajuato

Purple

The plots of treated bulbs were planted in beds contiguous to those of their respective witnesses. The number of teeth planted in each useful plot was recorded. The emergence of seedlings (%) was estimated three weeks after planting. The height of plant (cm), diameter of neck (mm) and number of leaves were obtained in four plants of each variety in both modalities (heat treated and control). To compare the values obtained between the treated and untreated plants, the Student test (0.05%) was used (Olivares, 2013).

The emergence of garlic seedlings of heat-treated bulbs was significantly superior to their controls in 9 of the 22 genotypes, in only two of them the emergence of seedlings from control bulbs was greater than that of the heat-treated bulbs. However, 50% of the genotypes did not detect a difference in this variable between thermo-treated and control bulbs (Table 2). The range of emergency percentages resulted from 20.8 to 93.3 and from 5.6 to 89.6% in thermo-treated and control bulb teeth, respectively. The greatest differences in emergency percentage favorable to heat-treated teeth were 41.3, 35.6 and 31.2% in genotypes 11, 1 and 5, respectively. The teeth of the genotypes of the purple type showed, in general, a low percentage of emergence, although in the genotype 21 of this type of garlic, the percentage of emergence of control seedlings was significantly higher than that of heat-treated bulbs.

Table 2. Emergence of 24 genotypes of garlic seedlings from heat-treated bulbs and their controls.

Line

Condition

Emergency (%)

Line

Condition

Emergency (%)

1

Thermotreated

93.3*

2

Thermotreated

79.1*

Control

57.7

Control

66.5

3

Thermotreated

79.8*

4

Thermotreated

86.6*

Control

89.6

Control

61.9

5

Thermotreated

92.9*

6

Thermotreated

76.2 ns

Control

61.7

Control

64.5

7

Thermotreated

58.6 ns

8

Thermotreated

88.1*

Control

55.9

Control

60.5

9

Thermotreated

90.2 ns

10

Thermotreated

90.1 ns

Control

78.3

Control

59.9

11

Thermotreated

82.1*

12

Thermotreated

70 ns

Control

40.8

Control

79.2

13

Thermotreated

79.4*

14

Thermotreated

88.3 ns

Control

50

Control

82

15

Thermotreated

26.9*

16

Thermotreated

63.7 ns

Control

5.6

Control

73.1

17

Thermotreated

31.4 ns

18

Thermotreated

43.7*

Control

32.3

Control

14.1

19

Thermotreated

55.6 ns

20

Thermotreated

24.6 ns

Control

55.2

Control

48.1

21

Thermotreated

20.8

22

Thermotreated

38.8 ns

Control

51.7

Control

40.5

 

The height of the plants from heat-treated bulbs was significantly higher than that of their controls in 13 of the 22 genotypes of garlic, the difference in height favorable to plants originated from heat-treated bulbs, in terms of percentage, ranged between 16.8 and 37.5% (genotypes 16 and 3, both of the mottled type), in only one genotype, from Guanajuato, of the purple type, the opposite effect was observed; that is, the height of the control plants was higher than that of plants from heat-treated bulbs. In eight genotypes no differences were observed in the height of plants from heat-treated bulbs and their controls (Table 3).

Table 3. Height of plants of 24 garlic genotypes from heat-treated bulbs and their controls.

Variety

Condition

Height (cm)

NH1

Variety

Condition

Height (cm)

NH

1

Thermotreated

20.1*

4.8 ns

2

Thermotreated

19.9*

4.6 ns

Control

14.5

4.9

Control

14.9

4.8

3

Thermotreated

25.3*

4.3*

4

Thermotreated

19.7*

4.7*

Control

15.8

5.2

Control

14.3

5.6

5

Thermotreated

18.9*

5.2*

6

Thermotreated

18.4*

4.7 ns

Control

14.6

4.4

Control

14.2

5.4

7

Thermotreated

17.7 ns

4.5 ns

8

Thermotreated

20.1 ns

5.3 ns

Control

17.9

5.3

Control

18.4

5.6

9

Thermotreated

17.2 ns

4.6*

10

Thermotreated

18.2*

4.9 ns

Control

15.1

5.2

Control

15

5.5

11

Thermotreated

18.5*

5.3*

12

Thermotreated

16.4 ns

4.8 ns

Control

13.9

4.3

Control

12.8

4.6

13

Thermotreated

17.3*

4.7 ns

14

Thermotreated

17*

4.1*

Control

13.6

5

Control

12.6

3.6

15

Thermotreated

15.5 ns

4.2 ns

16

Thermotreated

26.2*

4.6 ns

Control

13.8

4.1

Control

21.8

4.8

17

Thermotreated

17.7*

4.6 ns

18

Thermotreated

22.8 ns

3.8 ns

Control

12.3

4.6

Control

22.8

3.8

19

Thermotreated

12*

5.3 ns

20

Thermotreated

28.6 ns

4*

Control

9

5.9

Control

29.8

6.2

21

Thermotreated

28.7 ns

4.2 ns

22

Thermotreated

25.5*

4.4 ns

Control

27.9

4.5

Control

32.4

3.9

1NH= number of leaves.

In seven of the 22 genotypes of garlic, significant differences were found in the average number of leaves between plants of heat-treated bulbs and their controls; however, in only three of them; genotypes the difference was favorable to heat-treated bulb plants (Table 3). No significant difference was detected in the neck diameter of plants from heat-treated and control bulbs belonging to 17 of the 22 garlic genotypes, only five genotypes (12, 15, 18, 21 and 22) exhibited a significant difference in this variable, although this difference was only favorable to heat-treated bulb plants of two genotypes, 12 and 15, both coming from Zacatecas and the variegated type; this difference represented an increase of 38.7 and 18.6% with respect to the control (Table 4).

Table 4. Diameter of the neck of plants belonging to 24 genotypes of garlic from heat-treated bulbs and their controls.

Variety

Condition

Diameter of neck (mm)

Variety

Condition

Diameter of neck (mm)

1

Thermotreated

9.1 ns

2

Thermotreated

8.5 ns

Control

8

Control

8.3

3

Thermotreated

8.5 ns

4

Thermotreated

8.1 ns

Control

8.9

Control

9.5

5

Thermotreated

7.9 ns

6

Thermotreated

8.8 ns

Control

8.5

Control

8.6

7

Thermotreated

8.9 NS

8

Thermotreated

9.8 ns

Control

9.4

Control

9.5

9

Thermotreated

7.4 ns

10

Thermotreated

9 ns

Control

7.9

Control

8.6

11

Thermotreated

7.4 NS

12

Thermotreated

8.6*

Control

7.6

Control

6.2

13

Thermotreated

9.3 ns

14

Thermotreated

8.4 ns

Control

8.1

Control

7.5

15

Thermotreated

10.2*

16

Thermotreated

8.4 ns

Control

8.3

Control

8.1

17

Thermotreated

7.2 ns

18

Thermotreated

5.5*

Control

7.3

Control

8

19

Thermotreated

7 ns

20

Thermotreated

9.2 ns

Control

7

Control

10.3

21

Thermotreated

7.6*

22

Thermotreated

5.5*

Control

9.8

Control

9.8

The complete elimination of diseases of viral origin in garlic plants is difficult because these pathogens accumulate in the bulbils (Pérez-Moreno et al., 2013), consequently, thermotherapy has been proposed as an intermediate step in the process of obtaining virus-free seedlings (Ucman et al., 1998).

In the emergency and height variables, 11 and eight genotypes were registered respectively, where their average values ​​were not significantly different from their respective controls; however, in 22 of 25 cases in which the comparison was significant for these variables, the plants from heat-treated bulbs outperformed the control plants.

On the other hand, it highlights that the heat treatment had less effect on the variables of number of leaves and diameter of the neck where 15 and 17 of the 22 garlic genotypes evaluated showed no significant difference between plants from heat-treated bulbs and their controls. In 7 out of 12 cases where the comparison was significant, the control plants outperformed the thermo-treated ones in the two mentioned variables.

The response of the genotypes was more consistent within the emergency variables and plant height where the genotypes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 11 and 13 appear as outstanding for both characteristics; however, genotypes 5 and 11 originated in heat-treated bulbs and were outstanding in emergence, height and number of leaves. These results are the product of an evaluation cycle and should be repeated before reaching definitive conclusions. It is recommended to include a greater number of genotypes of the white and purple types.

The results previously obtained in the reduction of ‘viral load’ showed little change in the viral incidence before and after heat treatment (53.5 and 45.1% respectively) (Velásquez-Valle et al., 2017), it is possible that the inconsistencies in terms of the reduction of 'viral load' and the effect on the emergence characteristics of plants and vegetative may also be related to the nature of the heat treatment, so a broader range of temperature and exposure periods should be explored as far as conditions permit of the bulbs.

Cited literature

Burba, J. L.; Müller J. J. V. y Casali V. W. D. 1983. Relaciones entre el índice visual de superación de dormición (IVD) en ajo (Allium sativum L.) con el tamaño y posición de bulbillos. Rev. Cienc. Agropec. 4:99-102.

Olivares, S. E. 2013. Programas estadísticos. Versión 1.4. Facultad de Agronomía. Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León.

Pérez-Moreno, L.; Navarro-León, M. J.; Ramírez-Malagón, R.; Mendoza-Celedón, B.; Núñez-Palenius H. G. y León-Galván, M. F. 2013. Detección de complejos virales en ajo por elisa y confirmados por RT-PCR. Interciencia. 38:364-369.

Perotto, M. C.; Cafrune, E. E. y Conci, V. C. 2010. The effect of additional viral infections on garlic plants initially infected with Allexiviruses. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 126:489-495.

Reveles-Hernández, M.; Velásquez-Valle, R. y Cid-Ríos, J. A. 2014. Barretero, variedad de ajo jaspeado para Zacatecas. Campo Experimental Zacatecas-Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP). Calera, Zacatecas, México. Folleto técnico núm. 61. 34 p.

Ucman, R.; Žel, J. and Ravnikar M. 1998. Thermoterapy in virus elimination from garlic: influences on shoot multiplication from meristems and bulb formation in vitro. Scientia Horticulturae 73:193-202.

Velásquez-Valle, R.; Chew-Madinaveitia, Y. I.; Amador-Ramírez, M. D. y Reveles-Hernández, M. 2010. Presencia de virus en el cultivo de ajo (Allium sativum L.) en Zacatecas, México. Rev. Mexicana de Fitopatología 28:135-143.

Velásquez-Valle, R.; Reveles-Hernández, M.; Chew-Medinaveitia, Y. I. y Reveles-Torres, L. R. 2017. Efecto del tratamiento térmico sobre la presencia de virus en bulbos de ajo (Allium sativum L.). Rev. FCA Uncuyo. 49:157-165.